2:50pm Saturday 13th March 2010 in
A ROMAN Pavlyuchenko brace gave Tottenham a 3-1 win over Blackburn Rovers at White Hart Lane this afternoon.
The striker struck twice in the second half, to add to Jermain Defoe's first half effort, sandwiched between Chris Samba's header.
Rovers face an anxious wait over the fitness of Paul Robinson as well after he was carried off in the first half with a calf injury and replaced by Jason Brown.
Roman Pavlyuchenko doubled Tottenham's lead on 55 minutes, after the visitors had started the half the brighter of the two sides.
The striker's shot from 18 yards went under substitute keeper Jason Brown and into the back of the net to effectively seal the win for the hosts.
Gareth Bale thought he had won his side a penalty on 67, after tumbling under Michel Salgado's challenge, although replays indicate there was no contact.
Chris Samba's towering header on 80 minutes though gave the visitors hope as he powered home Morten Gamst Pedersen's looping corner from the right.
That hope was killed just five minutes later though as Pavlyuchenko grabbed his second of the game, tapping home Bale's lower cross from close range.
Nikola Kalinic then had a brilliant volleyed goal disallowed for handball, even though it was him that had been shoved by Dawson.
Jermain Defoe had prodded home from close range after Niko Kranjcar's left wing corner was flicked on by Vedran Corluka on 45 minutes to give Spurs the half time lead.
Rovers could count themselves unfortunate to have behind though with David Dunn denied a blatant penalty and Samba almost heading them ahead.
Comments(74)
ewoodpark
says...
3:08pm Sat 13 Mar 10
glp
says...
3:27pm Sat 13 Mar 10
Alex_Hill
says...
3:40pm Sat 13 Mar 10
Morst wrote:Very poor indeed!?!?
Very poor indeed.
.
Andy Gray - Blackburn are just hoping for scraps - you can see why their srikers don't score many goals.
.
Hoodle - Spurs never got out of 3rd gear and won with comfort. Though Kalinic could become a real player.
.
I agree with both comments - Kalinic needs support and to form a partnership with a second striker and we could be a real threat to teams (and entertain!). So sad to see us play like this.
.
Salgado's legs have gone at this level
- end of debate.
.
31st........
jack01
says...
3:40pm Sat 13 Mar 10
moggy669
says...
3:42pm Sat 13 Mar 10
Greek Rover
says...
3:47pm Sat 13 Mar 10
ewoodpark
says...
3:57pm Sat 13 Mar 10
jack01 wrote:jack01, yes im having a moan, i pay my money and so have the right, but tell me this did we look like scoring with one up front?, the answer is no apart from a couple of half chances that didnt even trouble the stopper then we had nowt, but as soon as BFS put two up front the game opened up for us, but BFS cant see that, our defence is not up to scratch so the midfielders have having to drop back leaving one player up front against two of three defenders and what do we do?, hoof it up to a lone striker, sorry mate BFS is to blame, and i'll have a moan when i feel i need to.
Here we go, the moaners appear as soon as they spot an opportunity. Bet you've been waiting to have a good go at allardyce for weeks now but haven't had the chance. And as for Hoddle & Gray's comments, when have they ever been kind to rovers? They're the glory glory tottenham hotspur brigade, don't pay any attention to what them idiots say.
bertiebee1
says...
4:01pm Sat 13 Mar 10
glp wrote:glp, i would'nt say that, our defence are far worse than yours. Our defenders, i wont names names like to set the opposition up to score goals, when there was'nt really any threat from the opposition.
Our defence is pants, none of them know how to mark the opposition
ewoodpark
says...
4:09pm Sat 13 Mar 10
bertiebee1 wrote:nice of you to say bertie, see you on the 28th, you'll know who we are, we're the team with one up front lol
glp wrote: Our defence is pants, none of them know how to mark the oppositionglp, i would'nt say that, our defence are far worse than yours. Our defenders, i wont names names like to set the opposition up to score goals, when there was'nt really any threat from the opposition. I really thought Rovers were going to get something at Spurs today seems like it went a bit pear shaped alot like our season. See you on the 28th. UTC
ewoodpark
says...
4:21pm Sat 13 Mar 10
Celtic Rover
says...
4:31pm Sat 13 Mar 10
Morst
says...
5:04pm Sat 13 Mar 10
eddie the eagle
says...
5:20pm Sat 13 Mar 10
kevin e
says...
5:27pm Sat 13 Mar 10
miqaayil
says...
5:29pm Sat 13 Mar 10
Jonny Bovril
says...
5:34pm Sat 13 Mar 10
ewoodpark
says...
5:42pm Sat 13 Mar 10
kevin e wrote:kevin, spurs 3 points, rovers 0 points enough said, if like a couple of seasons ago when we played spurs of the park but lost one nil, then i didnt moan because we gave a god account of ourselves, today we didnt, i dont blame the players although our defence were left wanting, i blame BFS for waiting until we were 2-0 down before making the change, he should have made the change at half time we were only 1-0 down but didnt look like scoring, he should have thought lets give niko someone to play off.
Some shocking defending today but the overall performance was not as bad as the moaners would make out. . We started well and, had we converted the obvious penalty which we were denied, we may have gone on to get something from fourth-placed Spurs. . As it happens we lost Robinson and gave away a couple of very poor goals and had a cracking goal from Niko disallowed by a shockingly bad referee. . Spurs shoud have had a penalty as well so we could rightfully claim that a point would have been fair. . A big improvement on the sort of performances we were putting in against the top sides earlier in the season.
bertiebee1
says...
6:42pm Sat 13 Mar 10
ewoodpark wrote:Well mate the way our defence have defended this season (or not as the case maybe) you won't need anyone up front lol. Roll on the 28th . UTC
bertiebee1 wrote:nice of you to say bertie, see you on the 28th, you'll know who we are, we're the team with one up front lolglp wrote: Our defence is pants, none of them know how to mark the oppositionglp, i would'nt say that, our defence are far worse than yours. Our defenders, i wont names names like to set the opposition up to score goals, when there was'nt really any threat from the opposition. I really thought Rovers were going to get something at Spurs today seems like it went a bit pear shaped alot like our season. See you on the 28th. UTC
AnimalReid
says...
6:43pm Sat 13 Mar 10
jack01
says...
6:51pm Sat 13 Mar 10
AnimalReid wrote:Well said. It's just a pity that some rovers supporters seem to thrive off having a go at allardyce. If only we lost more games at home, that would really give people something to moan and groan about. Burnley are doing well playing good football aren't they?
Sam, this is a disgrace. We've not played for, well, ages so thats your fault. The weathers not been great today - what are you doing, this is clearly down to bad tactics. As for Spurs, we always win there. Yes I clearly remember when Souness and Hughes were manager we ALWAYS won at Spurs by at least 4 goals. This is your fault - you are inept. Now Robinsons injured - that would never have happened if you'd played two up front. If things get much worse, soon I'll be out of a job, I might lose the house and then I'll be on the booze and it'll all be your fault - if only you'd played two up front. ... You moaners are like a broken record. Lets do the 'I've forgotton how crap Paul Ince was' rap!! Sams the man.
blueandwhitey79
says...
7:04pm Sat 13 Mar 10
blueandwhitey79
says...
7:06pm Sat 13 Mar 10
ewoodpark wrote:one up fornt works against lesser opposition but against top 6 sides you wont get a sniff, chelsea in carling cup earlier this season we played 4-3-3 and that worked... why we never use it since?
jack01 wrote: Here we go, the moaners appear as soon as they spot an opportunity. Bet you've been waiting to have a good go at allardyce for weeks now but haven't had the chance. And as for Hoddle & Gray's comments, when have they ever been kind to rovers? They're the glory glory tottenham hotspur brigade, don't pay any attention to what them idiots say.jack01, yes im having a moan, i pay my money and so have the right, but tell me this did we look like scoring with one up front?, the answer is no apart from a couple of half chances that didnt even trouble the stopper then we had nowt, but as soon as BFS put two up front the game opened up for us, but BFS cant see that, our defence is not up to scratch so the midfielders have having to drop back leaving one player up front against two of three defenders and what do we do?, hoof it up to a lone striker, sorry mate BFS is to blame, and i'll have a moan when i feel i need to.
barnsleyrover
says...
7:20pm Sat 13 Mar 10
Maestro5
says...
7:26pm Sat 13 Mar 10
Blackburn Yoof
says...
7:46pm Sat 13 Mar 10
cantbeleiveyourallsostupid
says...
8:31pm Sat 13 Mar 10
Jonny Bovril
says...
8:44pm Sat 13 Mar 10
AnimalReid wrote:Sarcasm is breaking out !
Sam, this is a disgrace. We've not played for, well, ages so thats your fault. The weathers not been great today - what are you doing, this is clearly down to bad tactics.
As for Spurs, we always win there. Yes I clearly remember when Souness and Hughes were manager we ALWAYS won at Spurs by at least 4 goals. This is your fault - you are inept.
Now Robinsons injured - that would never have happened if you'd played two up front.
If things get much worse, soon I'll be out of a job, I might lose the house and then I'll be on the booze and it'll all be your fault - if only you'd played two up front.
...
You moaners are like a broken record. Lets do the 'I've forgotton how crap Paul Ince was' rap!!
Sams the man.
jack01
says...
8:55pm Sat 13 Mar 10
eddie the eagle
says...
10:06pm Sat 13 Mar 10
kool4katz
says...
10:10pm Sat 13 Mar 10
True Blue in Leicester
says...
11:19pm Sat 13 Mar 10
cantbeleiveyourallsoGood post, I agree with most of your match summary. We were to some extent our own worst enemies today. Once more giving away soft goals (1 & 2). But I suppose that's Sam's fault he got rid of our wonderful defensive coach (remember him) and he does no defending at all in the stands. Shame on him, being let down by some of his players.
stupid wrote:
This is what I saw:
Decent opening period, passed the ball and worked spurs around, the 5 man midfield definately stopped the likes of Modric and Palacious geting a grip of the game. Spurs best play came from long and crossfield balls. Needed to consolidate a good start, Olssen should have taken his chance... and we ultimately ruined a good half by switching off in added time
+
Second half started decently, bit of pressure... Then the mistake of a cold unused keeper (who was otherwise fantastic) put us in a bit of a mire. Do you throw everyone up at this point? considering we have a semi-fit Dunn and 34 year old left back and 35 minutes still to play? especially considering we have only two substitutes left because of the said injury?.... Big Keith comes into play (mainly because he can play several positions and has legs) and we try and soldier on looking for a goal.
+
To sum the rest of the game up - some dodgy refereeing decisions, some hopeless defending, and some definate inexperience showing in certain parts. The tactics managed to stop spurs midfield for 55 inutes, and I beleive all in all we had a decent game today.
+
Again an improvement on the away performances of earlier in the season.
+
As for the debate... I beleive there is no debate. You either like Sam or you dont. If you dont, you dress up hatred in some twisted opinion. You cut your nose off to spite your own face when you "vote with your feet" as one of you would coin. If you like Sam, you forgive him for his Bolton days, his ocassional daft interviews and remember that the guy has managed at this level for at least a decade, He isnt as stupid as a simple 4-4-2 debate
+
(please forgive spelling,rambling and any other grrrrrammatical errors!It's been a long day)
+
elma
says...
11:21pm Sat 13 Mar 10
Roverthere
says...
4:18am Sun 14 Mar 10
J.C - Rishton
says...
5:10am Sun 14 Mar 10
Forever Blue
says...
7:44am Sun 14 Mar 10
bed and breakfast man_!
says...
9:03am Sun 14 Mar 10
J.C - Rishton wrote:You pretty much sum it up in your comments......
I actually consider myself a neutral in the BFS debate - on the plus side he has stabalised things after the shambles of the PI era and has started to bring in some younger (good) players. On the negative side, some of his signings have been uttterly shocking (esp Salgardo on £40K a week and on a 2 yr deal ?? when it clear that at prem level, his legs have gone, and he put JW in a difficult position by saying he "HAD" to sign this player, after we had balanced our books for the year). He also failed to bring in a striker in Jan when 1, it was obv Benni was gonna leave & 2, he could have sent Di Santo home 1st Jan (hasnt done it at Prem level) and tried to sign someone on loan from 1st Jan to dirrectly replace him instead of waiting until 4pm on 1st Feb to sign Dindane on loan only for the deal to fall though over 1 clause because of the time factor - big mistake. Also, this persistance in 4-5-1 away from home simply dosent work. Yesterday was a perfect example WHY it dosent work. We started well but didnt score (fair enough) but as the oppo gets on top you get pushed back and back, that front man gets far too isolated, and infact you effectively play for periods with 9 outfielders, with spells where you don't get to push out and re-organise and in the prem there are too many good offensive players who punish you once you get too deep and/or lose your shape. Once we've conceed 1,2,3 we then change things for last 20 mins, do ok, sometimes score, sometimes conceed cos we now leave too much space at the back. End of game - LOSE. I beleive in our players - I just wish BFS would as well. Yes we may well have lost yesterday if we'd have played 442 but I think over the course of the away season so far we would have amassed more than 6 away points if we'd have more faith in our team and played 442 in every away game (bear in mind the only away win of the season, BFS was away and we played the entire 2nd half with Diouff and Di Santo upfront and Dunny in the hole). No doubt I'll get slagged off for seemingly slagging off BFS but I'm trying to be fair handed - he's done some really good things for the club but in other areas he has not done very well, mainly AWAY TACTICS.
local chap
says...
9:04am Sun 14 Mar 10
hasslem hasslem
says...
9:11am Sun 14 Mar 10
cantbeleiveyourallsostupid
says...
9:36am Sun 14 Mar 10
blueandwhitey79
says...
9:38am Sun 14 Mar 10
hasslem hasslem wrote:watched MOTD this morning loved Jensens bull attack on the wolves strikers arse... WTF?? haha.... not relevant to the post but you reminded me of it by mentioning the beast
I am not going to go on about pro-Sam this or anti-Sam that. . Just that for those of you who think Brown should be in the team ahead of Robinson - I hope you were watching yesterday. Everyone can get the jitters, but he made enough mistakes yesterday to be offered a 3 year contract as replacemnet for Jensen at the Clampett's.
marghen
says...
9:38am Sun 14 Mar 10
marghen
says...
9:52am Sun 14 Mar 10
Maestro5 wrote:Hmm-had one too many!
why's everyone having a moan. no team in the bottom 10 has picked up more than 6 points away from home. look around and consider rovers lucky to have such great home form.
bertiebee1
says...
10:07am Sun 14 Mar 10
blueandwhitey79 wrote:BAW, ello chap dont you just love Jensen, lmao maybe you could have him in exchange for Robbo lol.
hasslem hasslem wrote: I am not going to go on about pro-Sam this or anti-Sam that. . Just that for those of you who think Brown should be in the team ahead of Robinson - I hope you were watching yesterday. Everyone can get the jitters, but he made enough mistakes yesterday to be offered a 3 year contract as replacemnet for Jensen at the Clampett's.watched MOTD this morning loved Jensens bull attack on the wolves strikers arse... WTF?? haha.... not relevant to the post but you reminded me of it by mentioning the beast
cantbeleiveyourallsostupid
says...
10:13am Sun 14 Mar 10
Morst
says...
10:26am Sun 14 Mar 10
cantbeleiveyourallsostupid
says...
10:30am Sun 14 Mar 10
marghen
says...
10:34am Sun 14 Mar 10
cantbeleiveyourallsostupid
says...
10:40am Sun 14 Mar 10
Morst
says...
10:42am Sun 14 Mar 10
cantbeleiveyourallsoBut I am just having debate - not throwing insults around just because of different opinions.
stupid wrote:
but morst...
you cut your own nose off to spite your own face. Your opinion is null and void because you relinquished your opinion when you gave your ST away.
+
Grow some balls, admit you are wrong.. and then I might give your sentiment more then 10 seconds browse
marghen
says...
10:44am Sun 14 Mar 10
marghen
says...
10:48am Sun 14 Mar 10
Miller11
says...
11:41am Sun 14 Mar 10
cantbeleiveyourallsostupid
says...
12:57pm Sun 14 Mar 10
J.C - Rishton
says...
1:00pm Sun 14 Mar 10
cantbeleiveyourallsostupid
says...
1:28pm Sun 14 Mar 10
blueandwhitey79
says...
2:31pm Sun 14 Mar 10
bertiebee1 wrote:haha knowing our luck he'll probably have a blinder against us that day.. just hope we go into that one positive and not nick a point sam style..
blueandwhitey79 wrote:BAW, ello chap dont you just love Jensen, lmao maybe you could have him in exchange for Robbo lol. I mean he has been a good shot stopper in the past but christ he has dropped some clangers recently. But what was he playing at? All that was missing was his horns lol. Remember the 2nd goal at your place this season . Flapping at the ball trying to claim a freekick lmao. A pensioner with a walking stick could have done better. Cant wait for the 28th lol. UTChasslem hasslem wrote: I am not going to go on about pro-Sam this or anti-Sam that. . Just that for those of you who think Brown should be in the team ahead of Robinson - I hope you were watching yesterday. Everyone can get the jitters, but he made enough mistakes yesterday to be offered a 3 year contract as replacemnet for Jensen at the Clampett's.watched MOTD this morning loved Jensens bull attack on the wolves strikers arse... WTF?? haha.... not relevant to the post but you reminded me of it by mentioning the beast
bed and breakfast man_!
says...
2:34pm Sun 14 Mar 10
J.C - Rishton
says...
3:24pm Sun 14 Mar 10
J.C - Rishton
says...
3:29pm Sun 14 Mar 10
tinybrfc
says...
3:32pm Sun 14 Mar 10
marghen
says...
5:10pm Sun 14 Mar 10
tinybrfc wrote:Not sure what point you're trying to make, apart from confirming like I stated that they are all young defenders -I think you need to check your other ‘facts’
Xabier Castillo-left back,signed a four year deal with Bilbao a month before Salgado joined us. Rafael 'Rafa' García García-Midfeild,pla ying for Rayo Vallecano in the Spanish second division. José Ángel Crespo-Only made six appearences this season on loan to Santander Chico-Central defender Felipe Mattioni -Good enough only to make one start while at AC Milan and could only get a one year contract at Mallorca due to consistent injury problems
marghen
says...
5:17pm Sun 14 Mar 10
hasslem hasslem
says...
5:21pm Sun 14 Mar 10
marghen wrote:your parents making a baby?
* spot the deliberate mistake -first one to get it…..
marghen
says...
5:28pm Sun 14 Mar 10
eddie the eagle
says...
5:31pm Sun 14 Mar 10
hasslem hasslem wrote:star!
marghen wrote: * spot the deliberate mistake -first one to get it…..your parents making a baby?
marghen
says...
5:35pm Sun 14 Mar 10
Morst
says...
6:50pm Sun 14 Mar 10
eddie the eagle wrote:Never set yourself up! (I should talk)
hasslem hasslem wrote:star!
marghen wrote: * spot the deliberate mistake -first one to get it…..your parents making a baby?
Mike Costa
says...
7:18pm Sun 14 Mar 10
cantbeleiveyourallsoMike Costa says:
stupid wrote:
Marge is an example of the type of fan I talked about in my earlier post... Someone who hates Sam, so he dresses up hatred as opinion. Take your crap elsewhere, or forge a proper opinion... instead of suggesting we take off our right back at half time when we already are down to 2 substitutes. Absolutely moronic suggestion. And Pray.... please tell me about these full backs with bags of pace we can afford!!! + I think that returning to these boards was a bad idea, as I am already Fuming!
marghen
says...
8:27pm Sun 14 Mar 10
Blackburn Yoof
says...
9:03pm Sun 14 Mar 10
miqaayil
says...
9:11pm Sun 14 Mar 10
hasslem hasslem
says...
9:50pm Sun 14 Mar 10
miqaayil wrote:we won't roll over for chelsea, sam will try to do his mate, taggart, a favour.
442 is not just numerical or paper formation like some guys here think ... the problem with our so called current 4411 is dunn drops too deep and when ball played to kalinic he is all alone. whenever another striker comes in we always pose danger .... when di santo came on we looked good ... they will make a good pair .. give them a start ... have andrews and nzonzi play in middle and have dunn operate right and MGP on left ... keep midfield compact .. use olsen in defence left with emerton on right, both are speedy ... u think its not playable ..i learnt a good lesson when i was ten ... the best defence is offence ... we already losing ... why not is all we ask ... stop blaming our squad and stop thinking we are a small club punching above, and just roll over like a poodle and give some bite is all we ask, i sincerely hope we don't just roll over for chelsea....
jeppo
says...
11:00am Mon 15 Mar 10
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Search jobs in and around Lancashire
Search Now »
Find the right person for you
Search Now »
Search houses, flats, and all properties
Search Now »
Search new & used cars in and around Lancashire
Search Now »
Morst says...
3:01pm Sat 13 Mar 10
.
Andy Gray - Blackburn are just hoping for scraps - you can see why their srikers don't score many goals.
.
Hoodle - Spurs never got out of 3rd gear and won with comfort. Though Kalinic could become a real player.
.
I agree with both comments - Kalinic needs support and to form a partnership with a second striker and we could be a real threat to teams (and entertain!). So sad to see us play like this.
.
Salgado's legs have gone at this level
- end of debate.
.
31st........