Loan duo will not feature at Millwall

DJ Campbell

DJ Campbell

First published in Sport
Last updated
This Is Lancashire: Photograph of the Author by , Blackburn Rovers reporter

DJ CAMPBELL and Liam Feeney will not be allowed to play against their parent clubs in tomorrow’s Championship clash between Millwall and Blackburn Rovers.

As part of the deals that took Campbell to the Lions from Rovers and Feeney to Ewood from Millwall it was stipulated that both players would be ineligible for the Den encounter.

Feeney signed for Rovers earlier this month but the winger has been restricted to just three appearances for Gary Bowyer’s side, two of them coming from the bench.

Striker Campbell has played nine games and scored two goals for the Lions since making the move from Ewood Park in January.

Both Feeney and Campbell are on loan deals that run until the end of the season.

Comments (9)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

9:25am Fri 28 Mar 14

yyy's1 says...

Bad move that, Rovers should let D J Campbell play, Millwall might put somebody in the team now who is not quite as useless.
Bad move that, Rovers should let D J Campbell play, Millwall might put somebody in the team now who is not quite as useless. yyy's1
  • Score: 5

10:11am Fri 28 Mar 14

Tatts says...

If Cairney is fit then we should play him in the centre alongside Evans and stick Dunny in right midfield.
If Cairney is fit then we should play him in the centre alongside Evans and stick Dunny in right midfield. Tatts
  • Score: 3

11:44am Fri 28 Mar 14

TurfMoorTom says...

I can't help wondering if part of the reason for Feeney being at Rovers is part of the payment for Campbell? I don't really see that he adds too much to the equation otherwise and can't see Rovers signing him permanently with Conway, King and Marshall in the ranks.
I can't help wondering if part of the reason for Feeney being at Rovers is part of the payment for Campbell? I don't really see that he adds too much to the equation otherwise and can't see Rovers signing him permanently with Conway, King and Marshall in the ranks. TurfMoorTom
  • Score: 6

11:47am Fri 28 Mar 14

Champagne plus charlie says...

TurfMoorTom wrote:
I can't help wondering if part of the reason for Feeney being at Rovers is part of the payment for Campbell? I don't really see that he adds too much to the equation otherwise and can't see Rovers signing him permanently with Conway, King and Marshall in the ranks.
Thought you were a Burnley fan?
[quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote: I can't help wondering if part of the reason for Feeney being at Rovers is part of the payment for Campbell? I don't really see that he adds too much to the equation otherwise and can't see Rovers signing him permanently with Conway, King and Marshall in the ranks.[/p][/quote]Thought you were a Burnley fan? Champagne plus charlie
  • Score: -2

12:15pm Fri 28 Mar 14

john byrom says...

yyy's1 wrote:
Bad move that, Rovers should let D J Campbell play, Millwall might put somebody in the team now who is not quite as useless.
As the rules say NO loan player can play against their parent club, Bit of a silly comment.
[quote][p][bold]yyy's1[/bold] wrote: Bad move that, Rovers should let D J Campbell play, Millwall might put somebody in the team now who is not quite as useless.[/p][/quote]As the rules say NO loan player can play against their parent club, Bit of a silly comment. john byrom
  • Score: -1

1:34pm Fri 28 Mar 14

yyy's1 says...

John Byrom says as the rules say no loan player can play against their parent club. Bit of a silly comment.
Football league rules section six. Temporary loan transfers. Rule 52.5 During the period of any loan transfer, a player shall not play against his parent club without prior written permission of the parent club. (which if given must be indicated on the appropriate temporary transfer form)
Perhaps not as silly as you thought John. A little bit of knowledge and all that.
John Byrom says as the rules say no loan player can play against their parent club. Bit of a silly comment. Football league rules section six. Temporary loan transfers. Rule 52.5 During the period of any loan transfer, a player shall not play against his parent club without prior written permission of the parent club. (which if given must be indicated on the appropriate temporary transfer form) Perhaps not as silly as you thought John. A little bit of knowledge and all that. yyy's1
  • Score: 3

2:04pm Fri 28 Mar 14

jimluftas says...

Champagne plus charlie wrote:
TurfMoorTom wrote:
I can't help wondering if part of the reason for Feeney being at Rovers is part of the payment for Campbell? I don't really see that he adds too much to the equation otherwise and can't see Rovers signing him permanently with Conway, King and Marshall in the ranks.
Thought you were a Burnley fan?
I thought you were?! This is a rovers story to melt.
[quote][p][bold]Champagne plus charlie[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote: I can't help wondering if part of the reason for Feeney being at Rovers is part of the payment for Campbell? I don't really see that he adds too much to the equation otherwise and can't see Rovers signing him permanently with Conway, King and Marshall in the ranks.[/p][/quote]Thought you were a Burnley fan?[/p][/quote]I thought you were?! This is a rovers story to melt. jimluftas
  • Score: 1

7:52pm Fri 28 Mar 14

TurfMoorTom says...

Champagne plus charlie wrote:
TurfMoorTom wrote:
I can't help wondering if part of the reason for Feeney being at Rovers is part of the payment for Campbell? I don't really see that he adds too much to the equation otherwise and can't see Rovers signing him permanently with Conway, King and Marshall in the ranks.
Thought you were a Burnley fan?
Whereas I know you're a nob jockey
[quote][p][bold]Champagne plus charlie[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote: I can't help wondering if part of the reason for Feeney being at Rovers is part of the payment for Campbell? I don't really see that he adds too much to the equation otherwise and can't see Rovers signing him permanently with Conway, King and Marshall in the ranks.[/p][/quote]Thought you were a Burnley fan?[/p][/quote]Whereas I know you're a nob jockey TurfMoorTom
  • Score: 2

8:23pm Fri 28 Mar 14

roverstid says...

Send em both back.

Does anyone else see the correlation between the team at the bottom of the league and our two most useless loan acquisitions from said team??
Send em both back. Does anyone else see the correlation between the team at the bottom of the league and our two most useless loan acquisitions from said team?? roverstid
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree