Delighted Varney so pleased to be a Rover

This Is Lancashire: Luke Varney Luke Varney

NEW Blackburn Rovers striker Luke Varney has vowed to repay Gary Bowyer after rescuing him from his Leeds United turmoil.

The 31-year-old was set to join Rovers in the final week of the January transfer window only for new Leeds owner Massimo Cellino to block the deal.

But Rovers boss Bowyer managed to resurrect the deal once the window for loan signings reopened on Saturday morning.

“I’m delighted to finally be here,” said Varney, who made his Rovers debut in the 0-0 draw at Middlesbrough just hours after his loan switch from Leeds was rubber stamped.

“I’ve had a lot of conversations with the club and the manager and I’m happy to get it over the line after a week of turmoil at Leeds.

“Once it was made aware that I might not get a new contract at Leeds they stopped playing me so I understood I would have to move on and I was delighted when I heard of the interest from Blackburn.

“I would have come as soon as I could but obviously the turmoil at Leeds stopped me.

“I’m just really pleased to be here now.”

“I can put all of what’s happened behind me and use that, not anger, but there’s a lot inside that I need to get out and I’m hoping to do that on the pitch for Blackburn.

“The gaffer has given me a great chance and I’m hoping to repay that faith soon.”

Varney will remain on loan at Rovers until May 11 but he is expected to sign a permanent deal once his contract from Leeds runs out in the summer.

Such was Varney’s desperation to join Rovers he asked not to play in Leeds’ home clash with Ipswich Town on January 28 in fear of sustaining an injury and jeopardising a move that was seemingly dead in the water after Cellino’s intervention.

“It’s been well documented that I’ve been trying to get out of Leeds for a while,” said Varney, who made just one appearance in his last two months at the Elland Road.

“I lost my motivation at Leeds and I’m a very positive person so for me to do that shows something had gone wrong.”

Reinvigorated Varney, who counts Crewe Alexandra, Blackpool and Portsmouth among his former clubs, is now fired up to help Rovers into the Championship play-offs.

He already feels at home at Ewood Park having worked with Bowyer’s assistant manager Terry McPhillips at Crewe and goalkeeper coach John Keeley and strength and conditioning coach Chris Neville at Portsmouth.

“I know some of the staff and that can only help,” said Varney, who can also play out wide as well as up front.

“I’ve felt wanted from the second I walked into the building and that’s really important.

“Hopefully I can pay them back and put some good performances in.”

Comments (49)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

12:20pm Mon 10 Feb 14

makaveli96 says...

Your signing for the CHAMPIONS of 95 son!

Good move!
Your signing for the CHAMPIONS of 95 son! Good move! makaveli96

12:35pm Mon 10 Feb 14

Steven Seagull says...

The arrogance of this childish big pay day seeking journeyman no mark means he will fit in rather nicely at no dad FC.

Sulking and refusing to play for a team because you don't get your own way is an utter disgrace. There are players on the periphery of any team chomping at the bit to break into the first team and this guy's attitude just plain stinks.
He's clearly going to be a bench warmer so let's see how long it takes for his bottom lip to stick out when he's not getting regular game time.

We'll done, you may well have just found yourself a club that befits your personality.
The arrogance of this childish big pay day seeking journeyman no mark means he will fit in rather nicely at no dad FC. Sulking and refusing to play for a team because you don't get your own way is an utter disgrace. There are players on the periphery of any team chomping at the bit to break into the first team and this guy's attitude just plain stinks. He's clearly going to be a bench warmer so let's see how long it takes for his bottom lip to stick out when he's not getting regular game time. We'll done, you may well have just found yourself a club that befits your personality. Steven Seagull

12:42pm Mon 10 Feb 14

Harwoodstblue says...

It's been too easy for opposing defenders at times. Hope this lad can get amongst them, upset a few defenders and make space for Rhodes. Not suggesting he should go straight in instead of Gestede but a good sub to bring on when needed. Another string to Bowyers bow.
It's been too easy for opposing defenders at times. Hope this lad can get amongst them, upset a few defenders and make space for Rhodes. Not suggesting he should go straight in instead of Gestede but a good sub to bring on when needed. Another string to Bowyers bow. Harwoodstblue

12:45pm Mon 10 Feb 14

Harwoodstblue says...

" Once it was made aware that I might not get a new contract at Leeds they stopped playing me "

Not arrogance, just common sense to get out to be able to play football.

Sounds something similar to what happened to Salgado
" Once it was made aware that I might not get a new contract at Leeds they stopped playing me " Not arrogance, just common sense to get out to be able to play football. Sounds something similar to what happened to Salgado Harwoodstblue

1:03pm Mon 10 Feb 14

Iiii1111 says...

Wait while he's not getting in the team, toys will be flung out the pram....thought GB was trying to rid the club of these types!
Wait while he's not getting in the team, toys will be flung out the pram....thought GB was trying to rid the club of these types! Iiii1111

1:06pm Mon 10 Feb 14

azza234 says...

Varney wants to play football and he felt his time at leeds was coming to end whats wrong with that most players go through a stage like that.
Varney wants to play football and he felt his time at leeds was coming to end whats wrong with that most players go through a stage like that. azza234

1:19pm Mon 10 Feb 14

look.up.blackburn says...

Just another non-scoring, no-mark journeyman looking to ride the Ewood cash cow. Give it 3 or 4 games when he's hardly had a look in and Best will have a new b!tching partner. Why do you clowns keep doing it to yourselves?

I'd like to go a day without having reason to laugh at you, I really would.
Just another non-scoring, no-mark journeyman looking to ride the Ewood cash cow. Give it 3 or 4 games when he's hardly had a look in and Best will have a new b!tching partner. Why do you clowns keep doing it to yourselves? I'd like to go a day without having reason to laugh at you, I really would. look.up.blackburn

1:25pm Mon 10 Feb 14

Steven Seagull says...

look.up.blackburn wrote:
Just another non-scoring, no-mark journeyman looking to ride the Ewood cash cow. Give it 3 or 4 games when he's hardly had a look in and Best will have a new b!tching partner. Why do you clowns keep doing it to yourselves?

I'd like to go a day without having reason to laugh at you, I really would.
That's never gonna happen.
[quote][p][bold]look.up.blackburn[/bold] wrote: Just another non-scoring, no-mark journeyman looking to ride the Ewood cash cow. Give it 3 or 4 games when he's hardly had a look in and Best will have a new b!tching partner. Why do you clowns keep doing it to yourselves? I'd like to go a day without having reason to laugh at you, I really would.[/p][/quote]That's never gonna happen. Steven Seagull

1:49pm Mon 10 Feb 14

Blackburn_End says...

Steven Seagull wrote:
look.up.blackburn wrote:
Just another non-scoring, no-mark journeyman looking to ride the Ewood cash cow. Give it 3 or 4 games when he's hardly had a look in and Best will have a new b!tching partner. Why do you clowns keep doing it to yourselves?

I'd like to go a day without having reason to laugh at you, I really would.
That's never gonna happen.
What are you clowns going to do when you get pumped at Ewood next month?

Online Bingo?... Dating websites?... Ebay?...Child ****?
[quote][p][bold]Steven Seagull[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]look.up.blackburn[/bold] wrote: Just another non-scoring, no-mark journeyman looking to ride the Ewood cash cow. Give it 3 or 4 games when he's hardly had a look in and Best will have a new b!tching partner. Why do you clowns keep doing it to yourselves? I'd like to go a day without having reason to laugh at you, I really would.[/p][/quote]That's never gonna happen.[/p][/quote]What are you clowns going to do when you get pumped at Ewood next month? Online Bingo?... Dating websites?... Ebay?...Child ****? Blackburn_End

2:08pm Mon 10 Feb 14

adcr says...

Minus points - rarely scores (his goal stats are more like a goalscoring midfielder than a forward) , Leeds aren't fussed about him leaving, and he is now past his best years.

Plus points - Bowyer rates him and Neil Warnock rated him, so maybe he brings other qualities that we currently lack.

I think we have possibly bought him for his size, as he looks quite strong. Rhodes isn't the strongest player, so he may have been bought to complement Rhodes. Someone who can possibly hold the ball up well.

I have got to say he doesn't inspire me, but I will obviously give him a chance.
Minus points - rarely scores (his goal stats are more like a goalscoring midfielder than a forward) , Leeds aren't fussed about him leaving, and he is now past his best years. Plus points - Bowyer rates him and Neil Warnock rated him, so maybe he brings other qualities that we currently lack. I think we have possibly bought him for his size, as he looks quite strong. Rhodes isn't the strongest player, so he may have been bought to complement Rhodes. Someone who can possibly hold the ball up well. I have got to say he doesn't inspire me, but I will obviously give him a chance. adcr

2:22pm Mon 10 Feb 14

look.up.blackburn says...

Blackburn_End wrote:
Steven Seagull wrote:
look.up.blackburn wrote:
Just another non-scoring, no-mark journeyman looking to ride the Ewood cash cow. Give it 3 or 4 games when he's hardly had a look in and Best will have a new b!tching partner. Why do you clowns keep doing it to yourselves?

I'd like to go a day without having reason to laugh at you, I really would.
That's never gonna happen.
What are you clowns going to do when you get pumped at Ewood next month?

Online Bingo?... Dating websites?... Ebay?...Child ****?
Blackburn_BellEnd,

Do you really see that happening? I mean really?

The only thing you'll be pumping is your fist in the run up the game, as usual, spouting all manner of nonsense about Blackburn still being a decent side. Truth be told, you lot are very, very weak. You have recently lost both your captain and your most creative player, you have taken a number of spankings recently which shows that your twitchy defence cannot stand up to attacking football, and not only this your goals have also dried up.

You have to play Reading (away), Brighton (home), and Bolton (away) before we take over Ewood, by which point I can see you in the bottom half looking at a 20 point gap and the shame of bending over to give Burnley another vital 3 points in our challenge for automatic promotion.
[quote][p][bold]Blackburn_End[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Steven Seagull[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]look.up.blackburn[/bold] wrote: Just another non-scoring, no-mark journeyman looking to ride the Ewood cash cow. Give it 3 or 4 games when he's hardly had a look in and Best will have a new b!tching partner. Why do you clowns keep doing it to yourselves? I'd like to go a day without having reason to laugh at you, I really would.[/p][/quote]That's never gonna happen.[/p][/quote]What are you clowns going to do when you get pumped at Ewood next month? Online Bingo?... Dating websites?... Ebay?...Child ****?[/p][/quote]Blackburn_BellEnd, Do you really see that happening? I mean really? The only thing you'll be pumping is your fist in the run up the game, as usual, spouting all manner of nonsense about Blackburn still being a decent side. Truth be told, you lot are very, very weak. You have recently lost both your captain and your most creative player, you have taken a number of spankings recently which shows that your twitchy defence cannot stand up to attacking football, and not only this your goals have also dried up. You have to play Reading (away), Brighton (home), and Bolton (away) before we take over Ewood, by which point I can see you in the bottom half looking at a 20 point gap and the shame of bending over to give Burnley another vital 3 points in our challenge for automatic promotion. look.up.blackburn

2:35pm Mon 10 Feb 14

A Rover 45 years and over says...

As long as he doesn't replace Gestede because he has done nothing wrong for me, he has provided the power and strength along with footballing ability and has made much more of a positive contribution than Rhodes we have missed this type of player all season. Would be in the team every week and should not be sacrificed every when making substitutions. To play him on the wing on Saturday was absolute rubbish and GB should get a grip. Rubbish tactics rubbish game I am afraid.
As long as he doesn't replace Gestede because he has done nothing wrong for me, he has provided the power and strength along with footballing ability and has made much more of a positive contribution than Rhodes we have missed this type of player all season. Would be in the team every week and should not be sacrificed every when making substitutions. To play him on the wing on Saturday was absolute rubbish and GB should get a grip. Rubbish tactics rubbish game I am afraid. A Rover 45 years and over

2:40pm Mon 10 Feb 14

bburnrover says...

I personally hope its just a short tenure at Ewood as we need a better standard of player than this guyis if we wish to achieve anything.The fact is that his record speaks volumes of how much a journeyman he is and I worry about GB's ability in reading how good a player is if he thinks this guy is suitable to get us into and through the play offs.
I personally hope its just a short tenure at Ewood as we need a better standard of player than this guyis if we wish to achieve anything.The fact is that his record speaks volumes of how much a journeyman he is and I worry about GB's ability in reading how good a player is if he thinks this guy is suitable to get us into and through the play offs. bburnrover

2:44pm Mon 10 Feb 14

Stretch_22 says...

What happens when Burnley don't win next month?
I mean the amount of crap you trolls post on here on a daily basis means you must be overwhelming favourites to win? Better not let yourselves down
As for the spankings, 5-0 against Man City, and 4-1 against a decent Forest side (plus referee), is the only 2 I can think of at best.
Of course I forget the 1-1 spankings we get from Burnley twice a season...
What happens when Burnley don't win next month? I mean the amount of crap you trolls post on here on a daily basis means you must be overwhelming favourites to win? Better not let yourselves down As for the spankings, 5-0 against Man City, and 4-1 against a decent Forest side (plus referee), is the only 2 I can think of at best. Of course I forget the 1-1 spankings we get from Burnley twice a season... Stretch_22

2:50pm Mon 10 Feb 14

more bans than ray - brfc lxxv says...

look.up.blackburn wrote:
Blackburn_End wrote:
Steven Seagull wrote:
look.up.blackburn wrote:
Just another non-scoring, no-mark journeyman looking to ride the Ewood cash cow. Give it 3 or 4 games when he's hardly had a look in and Best will have a new b!tching partner. Why do you clowns keep doing it to yourselves?

I'd like to go a day without having reason to laugh at you, I really would.
That's never gonna happen.
What are you clowns going to do when you get pumped at Ewood next month?

Online Bingo?... Dating websites?... Ebay?...Child ****?
Blackburn_BellEnd,

Do you really see that happening? I mean really?

The only thing you'll be pumping is your fist in the run up the game, as usual, spouting all manner of nonsense about Blackburn still being a decent side. Truth be told, you lot are very, very weak. You have recently lost both your captain and your most creative player, you have taken a number of spankings recently which shows that your twitchy defence cannot stand up to attacking football, and not only this your goals have also dried up.

You have to play Reading (away), Brighton (home), and Bolton (away) before we take over Ewood, by which point I can see you in the bottom half looking at a 20 point gap and the shame of bending over to give Burnley another vital 3 points in our challenge for automatic promotion.
I'm with you on this one, I can see you smashing us 9 or 10 nil easy.

I'm not going either because I'm scared of you dingles hurting me when you take Ewood over again and start dishing out batterings to toilets and bus windows and stuff. 3,500 dingles in the Darwen End and 72,000 locked out with you dressed as a chicken (probably the norm based on your cowardly keyboard warrior skills)

Who do we play after Burncelona? It's just that you seem to know our fixture list better than me and it saves me googling it.

Thanks in advance big boy
[quote][p][bold]look.up.blackburn[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Blackburn_End[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Steven Seagull[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]look.up.blackburn[/bold] wrote: Just another non-scoring, no-mark journeyman looking to ride the Ewood cash cow. Give it 3 or 4 games when he's hardly had a look in and Best will have a new b!tching partner. Why do you clowns keep doing it to yourselves? I'd like to go a day without having reason to laugh at you, I really would.[/p][/quote]That's never gonna happen.[/p][/quote]What are you clowns going to do when you get pumped at Ewood next month? Online Bingo?... Dating websites?... Ebay?...Child ****?[/p][/quote]Blackburn_BellEnd, Do you really see that happening? I mean really? The only thing you'll be pumping is your fist in the run up the game, as usual, spouting all manner of nonsense about Blackburn still being a decent side. Truth be told, you lot are very, very weak. You have recently lost both your captain and your most creative player, you have taken a number of spankings recently which shows that your twitchy defence cannot stand up to attacking football, and not only this your goals have also dried up. You have to play Reading (away), Brighton (home), and Bolton (away) before we take over Ewood, by which point I can see you in the bottom half looking at a 20 point gap and the shame of bending over to give Burnley another vital 3 points in our challenge for automatic promotion.[/p][/quote]I'm with you on this one, I can see you smashing us 9 or 10 nil easy. I'm not going either because I'm scared of you dingles hurting me when you take Ewood over again and start dishing out batterings to toilets and bus windows and stuff. 3,500 dingles in the Darwen End and 72,000 locked out with you dressed as a chicken (probably the norm based on your cowardly keyboard warrior skills) Who do we play after Burncelona? It's just that you seem to know our fixture list better than me and it saves me googling it. Thanks in advance big boy more bans than ray - brfc lxxv

2:54pm Mon 10 Feb 14

Stretch_22 says...

more bans than ray - brfc lxxv wrote:
look.up.blackburn wrote:
Blackburn_End wrote:
Steven Seagull wrote:
look.up.blackburn wrote:
Just another non-scoring, no-mark journeyman looking to ride the Ewood cash cow. Give it 3 or 4 games when he's hardly had a look in and Best will have a new b!tching partner. Why do you clowns keep doing it to yourselves?

I'd like to go a day without having reason to laugh at you, I really would.
That's never gonna happen.
What are you clowns going to do when you get pumped at Ewood next month?

Online Bingo?... Dating websites?... Ebay?...Child ****?
Blackburn_BellEnd,

Do you really see that happening? I mean really?

The only thing you'll be pumping is your fist in the run up the game, as usual, spouting all manner of nonsense about Blackburn still being a decent side. Truth be told, you lot are very, very weak. You have recently lost both your captain and your most creative player, you have taken a number of spankings recently which shows that your twitchy defence cannot stand up to attacking football, and not only this your goals have also dried up.

You have to play Reading (away), Brighton (home), and Bolton (away) before we take over Ewood, by which point I can see you in the bottom half looking at a 20 point gap and the shame of bending over to give Burnley another vital 3 points in our challenge for automatic promotion.
I'm with you on this one, I can see you smashing us 9 or 10 nil easy.

I'm not going either because I'm scared of you dingles hurting me when you take Ewood over again and start dishing out batterings to toilets and bus windows and stuff. 3,500 dingles in the Darwen End and 72,000 locked out with you dressed as a chicken (probably the norm based on your cowardly keyboard warrior skills)

Who do we play after Burncelona? It's just that you seem to know our fixture list better than me and it saves me googling it.

Thanks in advance big boy
Best comment ever! Haha
[quote][p][bold]more bans than ray - brfc lxxv[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]look.up.blackburn[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Blackburn_End[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Steven Seagull[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]look.up.blackburn[/bold] wrote: Just another non-scoring, no-mark journeyman looking to ride the Ewood cash cow. Give it 3 or 4 games when he's hardly had a look in and Best will have a new b!tching partner. Why do you clowns keep doing it to yourselves? I'd like to go a day without having reason to laugh at you, I really would.[/p][/quote]That's never gonna happen.[/p][/quote]What are you clowns going to do when you get pumped at Ewood next month? Online Bingo?... Dating websites?... Ebay?...Child ****?[/p][/quote]Blackburn_BellEnd, Do you really see that happening? I mean really? The only thing you'll be pumping is your fist in the run up the game, as usual, spouting all manner of nonsense about Blackburn still being a decent side. Truth be told, you lot are very, very weak. You have recently lost both your captain and your most creative player, you have taken a number of spankings recently which shows that your twitchy defence cannot stand up to attacking football, and not only this your goals have also dried up. You have to play Reading (away), Brighton (home), and Bolton (away) before we take over Ewood, by which point I can see you in the bottom half looking at a 20 point gap and the shame of bending over to give Burnley another vital 3 points in our challenge for automatic promotion.[/p][/quote]I'm with you on this one, I can see you smashing us 9 or 10 nil easy. I'm not going either because I'm scared of you dingles hurting me when you take Ewood over again and start dishing out batterings to toilets and bus windows and stuff. 3,500 dingles in the Darwen End and 72,000 locked out with you dressed as a chicken (probably the norm based on your cowardly keyboard warrior skills) Who do we play after Burncelona? It's just that you seem to know our fixture list better than me and it saves me googling it. Thanks in advance big boy[/p][/quote]Best comment ever! Haha Stretch_22

3:02pm Mon 10 Feb 14

dangerous dave says...

bburnrover wrote:
I personally hope its just a short tenure at Ewood as we need a better standard of player than this guyis if we wish to achieve anything.The fact is that his record speaks volumes of how much a journeyman he is and I worry about GB's ability in reading how good a player is if he thinks this guy is suitable to get us into and through the play offs.
youv'e hit the nail right on the head - we have loads of bench warmers/second rate players who couldnt get a contract elsewhere - like you I feel GB has'nt got the ability/credibility to attract the right players to Ewood to give us any hope of getting out of the Championship but as usual there will be a lot of posters who would'nt see the truth in this statement if it smacked them in the face!!
OUT WITH THE COWBOYS AND INDIANS
[quote][p][bold]bburnrover[/bold] wrote: I personally hope its just a short tenure at Ewood as we need a better standard of player than this guyis if we wish to achieve anything.The fact is that his record speaks volumes of how much a journeyman he is and I worry about GB's ability in reading how good a player is if he thinks this guy is suitable to get us into and through the play offs.[/p][/quote]youv'e hit the nail right on the head - we have loads of bench warmers/second rate players who couldnt get a contract elsewhere - like you I feel GB has'nt got the ability/credibility to attract the right players to Ewood to give us any hope of getting out of the Championship but as usual there will be a lot of posters who would'nt see the truth in this statement if it smacked them in the face!! OUT WITH THE COWBOYS AND INDIANS dangerous dave

3:22pm Mon 10 Feb 14

more bans than ray - brfc lxxv says...

dangerous dave wrote:
bburnrover wrote:
I personally hope its just a short tenure at Ewood as we need a better standard of player than this guyis if we wish to achieve anything.The fact is that his record speaks volumes of how much a journeyman he is and I worry about GB's ability in reading how good a player is if he thinks this guy is suitable to get us into and through the play offs.
youv'e hit the nail right on the head - we have loads of bench warmers/second rate players who couldnt get a contract elsewhere - like you I feel GB has'nt got the ability/credibility to attract the right players to Ewood to give us any hope of getting out of the Championship but as usual there will be a lot of posters who would'nt see the truth in this statement if it smacked them in the face!!
OUT WITH THE COWBOYS AND INDIANS
So what's your masterplan Dave?

We're all ears
[quote][p][bold]dangerous dave[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]bburnrover[/bold] wrote: I personally hope its just a short tenure at Ewood as we need a better standard of player than this guyis if we wish to achieve anything.The fact is that his record speaks volumes of how much a journeyman he is and I worry about GB's ability in reading how good a player is if he thinks this guy is suitable to get us into and through the play offs.[/p][/quote]youv'e hit the nail right on the head - we have loads of bench warmers/second rate players who couldnt get a contract elsewhere - like you I feel GB has'nt got the ability/credibility to attract the right players to Ewood to give us any hope of getting out of the Championship but as usual there will be a lot of posters who would'nt see the truth in this statement if it smacked them in the face!! OUT WITH THE COWBOYS AND INDIANS[/p][/quote]So what's your masterplan Dave? We're all ears more bans than ray - brfc lxxv

3:26pm Mon 10 Feb 14

Is Eckersley playing? says...

It would be interesting to see this players comments when he joined his previous clubs. Almost the same gush probably. Even the most optimistic Rovers fan - and they are becoming increasingly thin on the ground these days - would admit a move from Elland Road to Ewood is a retrograde step. The guy is on his way down - fast!
It would be interesting to see this players comments when he joined his previous clubs. Almost the same gush probably. Even the most optimistic Rovers fan - and they are becoming increasingly thin on the ground these days - would admit a move from Elland Road to Ewood is a retrograde step. The guy is on his way down - fast! Is Eckersley playing?

3:35pm Mon 10 Feb 14

look.up.blackburn says...

Stretch_22 wrote:
more bans than ray - brfc lxxv wrote:
look.up.blackburn wrote:
Blackburn_End wrote:
Steven Seagull wrote:
look.up.blackburn wrote:
Just another non-scoring, no-mark journeyman looking to ride the Ewood cash cow. Give it 3 or 4 games when he's hardly had a look in and Best will have a new b!tching partner. Why do you clowns keep doing it to yourselves?

I'd like to go a day without having reason to laugh at you, I really would.
That's never gonna happen.
What are you clowns going to do when you get pumped at Ewood next month?

Online Bingo?... Dating websites?... Ebay?...Child ****?
Blackburn_BellEnd,

Do you really see that happening? I mean really?

The only thing you'll be pumping is your fist in the run up the game, as usual, spouting all manner of nonsense about Blackburn still being a decent side. Truth be told, you lot are very, very weak. You have recently lost both your captain and your most creative player, you have taken a number of spankings recently which shows that your twitchy defence cannot stand up to attacking football, and not only this your goals have also dried up.

You have to play Reading (away), Brighton (home), and Bolton (away) before we take over Ewood, by which point I can see you in the bottom half looking at a 20 point gap and the shame of bending over to give Burnley another vital 3 points in our challenge for automatic promotion.
I'm with you on this one, I can see you smashing us 9 or 10 nil easy.

I'm not going either because I'm scared of you dingles hurting me when you take Ewood over again and start dishing out batterings to toilets and bus windows and stuff. 3,500 dingles in the Darwen End and 72,000 locked out with you dressed as a chicken (probably the norm based on your cowardly keyboard warrior skills)

Who do we play after Burncelona? It's just that you seem to know our fixture list better than me and it saves me googling it.

Thanks in advance big boy
Best comment ever! Haha
You can literally smell the panic wafting in from the Blackburn area.

Deep down you know your time is up and this is the year your comfort blanket is finally taken from you.

Blackburn Rovers could well provide the final piece in Burnley's promotion jigsaw. With an automatic promotion spot up for gabs we'll be going all out for the 3 points and your Mickey Mouse defence won't know how to deal with our attacking play. I expect there will be a lot of angry no-dads on the afternoon of the 9th March 2014.
[quote][p][bold]Stretch_22[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]more bans than ray - brfc lxxv[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]look.up.blackburn[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Blackburn_End[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Steven Seagull[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]look.up.blackburn[/bold] wrote: Just another non-scoring, no-mark journeyman looking to ride the Ewood cash cow. Give it 3 or 4 games when he's hardly had a look in and Best will have a new b!tching partner. Why do you clowns keep doing it to yourselves? I'd like to go a day without having reason to laugh at you, I really would.[/p][/quote]That's never gonna happen.[/p][/quote]What are you clowns going to do when you get pumped at Ewood next month? Online Bingo?... Dating websites?... Ebay?...Child ****?[/p][/quote]Blackburn_BellEnd, Do you really see that happening? I mean really? The only thing you'll be pumping is your fist in the run up the game, as usual, spouting all manner of nonsense about Blackburn still being a decent side. Truth be told, you lot are very, very weak. You have recently lost both your captain and your most creative player, you have taken a number of spankings recently which shows that your twitchy defence cannot stand up to attacking football, and not only this your goals have also dried up. You have to play Reading (away), Brighton (home), and Bolton (away) before we take over Ewood, by which point I can see you in the bottom half looking at a 20 point gap and the shame of bending over to give Burnley another vital 3 points in our challenge for automatic promotion.[/p][/quote]I'm with you on this one, I can see you smashing us 9 or 10 nil easy. I'm not going either because I'm scared of you dingles hurting me when you take Ewood over again and start dishing out batterings to toilets and bus windows and stuff. 3,500 dingles in the Darwen End and 72,000 locked out with you dressed as a chicken (probably the norm based on your cowardly keyboard warrior skills) Who do we play after Burncelona? It's just that you seem to know our fixture list better than me and it saves me googling it. Thanks in advance big boy[/p][/quote]Best comment ever! Haha[/p][/quote]You can literally smell the panic wafting in from the Blackburn area. Deep down you know your time is up and this is the year your comfort blanket is finally taken from you. Blackburn Rovers could well provide the final piece in Burnley's promotion jigsaw. With an automatic promotion spot up for gabs we'll be going all out for the 3 points and your Mickey Mouse defence won't know how to deal with our attacking play. I expect there will be a lot of angry no-dads on the afternoon of the 9th March 2014. look.up.blackburn

3:44pm Mon 10 Feb 14

We'll win the next one says...

Steven Seagull wrote:
The arrogance of this childish big pay day seeking journeyman no mark means he will fit in rather nicely at no dad FC. Sulking and refusing to play for a team because you don't get your own way is an utter disgrace. There are players on the periphery of any team chomping at the bit to break into the first team and this guy's attitude just plain stinks. He's clearly going to be a bench warmer so let's see how long it takes for his bottom lip to stick out when he's not getting regular game time. We'll done, you may well have just found yourself a club that befits your personality.
Why dont you find some where that befits you like a sewer , come to think of it you already have, you're from Burnleeey !
[quote][p][bold]Steven Seagull[/bold] wrote: The arrogance of this childish big pay day seeking journeyman no mark means he will fit in rather nicely at no dad FC. Sulking and refusing to play for a team because you don't get your own way is an utter disgrace. There are players on the periphery of any team chomping at the bit to break into the first team and this guy's attitude just plain stinks. He's clearly going to be a bench warmer so let's see how long it takes for his bottom lip to stick out when he's not getting regular game time. We'll done, you may well have just found yourself a club that befits your personality.[/p][/quote]Why dont you find some where that befits you like a sewer , come to think of it you already have, you're from Burnleeey ! We'll win the next one

3:54pm Mon 10 Feb 14

look.up.blackburn says...

No-dad reality check...

Burnley went 2nd in the Championship on 21 September 2013 after a 2-1 win at Leeds.

Following a 2-0 win at Doncaster on October 1st Burnley went to the top of the Championship. At that time Blackburn Rovers were 8th in the league. 10 games had been played. Burnley were 8 points ahead of Blackburn Rovers.

Fast forward to the present day. 29 games have now been played (Blackburn have played 30).

Burnley have amassed 33 points since October 1st.
Blackburn have amassed... 28 points.

Burnley are now 13 points and 19 goals better off than Blackburn Rovers.

Burnley are still in an automatic promotion position.
Blackburn have dropped to 9th place.


What happened to that big catch up? Why are we still so far ahead of you?
No-dad reality check... Burnley went 2nd in the Championship on 21 September 2013 after a 2-1 win at Leeds. Following a 2-0 win at Doncaster on October 1st Burnley went to the top of the Championship. At that time Blackburn Rovers were 8th in the league. 10 games had been played. Burnley were 8 points ahead of Blackburn Rovers. Fast forward to the present day. 29 games have now been played (Blackburn have played 30). Burnley have amassed 33 points since October 1st. Blackburn have amassed... 28 points. Burnley are now 13 points and 19 goals better off than Blackburn Rovers. Burnley are still in an automatic promotion position. Blackburn have dropped to 9th place. What happened to that big catch up? Why are we still so far ahead of you? look.up.blackburn

5:04pm Mon 10 Feb 14

earwego says...

look.up.blackburn wrote:
No-dad reality check...

Burnley went 2nd in the Championship on 21 September 2013 after a 2-1 win at Leeds.

Following a 2-0 win at Doncaster on October 1st Burnley went to the top of the Championship. At that time Blackburn Rovers were 8th in the league. 10 games had been played. Burnley were 8 points ahead of Blackburn Rovers.

Fast forward to the present day. 29 games have now been played (Blackburn have played 30).

Burnley have amassed 33 points since October 1st.
Blackburn have amassed... 28 points.

Burnley are now 13 points and 19 goals better off than Blackburn Rovers.

Burnley are still in an automatic promotion position.
Blackburn have dropped to 9th place.


What happened to that big catch up? Why are we still so far ahead of you?
I personally want you Dingles to get promoted (even though I don't think it will happen) I have got my abacus ready, just in case, to count the goals you lot will concede during your brief stay. Will be fun watching M.O.D. worth staying in for.
[quote][p][bold]look.up.blackburn[/bold] wrote: No-dad reality check... Burnley went 2nd in the Championship on 21 September 2013 after a 2-1 win at Leeds. Following a 2-0 win at Doncaster on October 1st Burnley went to the top of the Championship. At that time Blackburn Rovers were 8th in the league. 10 games had been played. Burnley were 8 points ahead of Blackburn Rovers. Fast forward to the present day. 29 games have now been played (Blackburn have played 30). Burnley have amassed 33 points since October 1st. Blackburn have amassed... 28 points. Burnley are now 13 points and 19 goals better off than Blackburn Rovers. Burnley are still in an automatic promotion position. Blackburn have dropped to 9th place. What happened to that big catch up? Why are we still so far ahead of you?[/p][/quote]I personally want you Dingles to get promoted (even though I don't think it will happen) I have got my abacus ready, just in case, to count the goals you lot will concede during your brief stay. Will be fun watching M.O.D. worth staying in for. earwego

5:15pm Mon 10 Feb 14

more bans than ray - brfc lxxv says...

look.up.blackburn wrote:
No-dad reality check...

Burnley went 2nd in the Championship on 21 September 2013 after a 2-1 win at Leeds.

Following a 2-0 win at Doncaster on October 1st Burnley went to the top of the Championship. At that time Blackburn Rovers were 8th in the league. 10 games had been played. Burnley were 8 points ahead of Blackburn Rovers.

Fast forward to the present day. 29 games have now been played (Blackburn have played 30).

Burnley have amassed 33 points since October 1st.
Blackburn have amassed... 28 points.

Burnley are now 13 points and 19 goals better off than Blackburn Rovers.

Burnley are still in an automatic promotion position.
Blackburn have dropped to 9th place.


What happened to that big catch up? Why are we still so far ahead of you?
Because everyone in Bonleh drives an F reg Sierra estate with hay in the back?
[quote][p][bold]look.up.blackburn[/bold] wrote: No-dad reality check... Burnley went 2nd in the Championship on 21 September 2013 after a 2-1 win at Leeds. Following a 2-0 win at Doncaster on October 1st Burnley went to the top of the Championship. At that time Blackburn Rovers were 8th in the league. 10 games had been played. Burnley were 8 points ahead of Blackburn Rovers. Fast forward to the present day. 29 games have now been played (Blackburn have played 30). Burnley have amassed 33 points since October 1st. Blackburn have amassed... 28 points. Burnley are now 13 points and 19 goals better off than Blackburn Rovers. Burnley are still in an automatic promotion position. Blackburn have dropped to 9th place. What happened to that big catch up? Why are we still so far ahead of you?[/p][/quote]Because everyone in Bonleh drives an F reg Sierra estate with hay in the back? more bans than ray - brfc lxxv

5:29pm Mon 10 Feb 14

Steven Seagull says...

earwego wrote:
look.up.blackburn wrote:
No-dad reality check...

Burnley went 2nd in the Championship on 21 September 2013 after a 2-1 win at Leeds.

Following a 2-0 win at Doncaster on October 1st Burnley went to the top of the Championship. At that time Blackburn Rovers were 8th in the league. 10 games had been played. Burnley were 8 points ahead of Blackburn Rovers.

Fast forward to the present day. 29 games have now been played (Blackburn have played 30).

Burnley have amassed 33 points since October 1st.
Blackburn have amassed... 28 points.

Burnley are now 13 points and 19 goals better off than Blackburn Rovers.

Burnley are still in an automatic promotion position.
Blackburn have dropped to 9th place.


What happened to that big catch up? Why are we still so far ahead of you?
I personally want you Dingles to get promoted (even though I don't think it will happen) I have got my abacus ready, just in case, to count the goals you lot will concede during your brief stay. Will be fun watching M.O.D. worth staying in for.
MOTD you mean? ( I can actually hear you saying in your chin dribbling Shadsworth twang "MATCH OF DAY").

Would that be the same programme you wish you still had on your sky plus?
[quote][p][bold]earwego[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]look.up.blackburn[/bold] wrote: No-dad reality check... Burnley went 2nd in the Championship on 21 September 2013 after a 2-1 win at Leeds. Following a 2-0 win at Doncaster on October 1st Burnley went to the top of the Championship. At that time Blackburn Rovers were 8th in the league. 10 games had been played. Burnley were 8 points ahead of Blackburn Rovers. Fast forward to the present day. 29 games have now been played (Blackburn have played 30). Burnley have amassed 33 points since October 1st. Blackburn have amassed... 28 points. Burnley are now 13 points and 19 goals better off than Blackburn Rovers. Burnley are still in an automatic promotion position. Blackburn have dropped to 9th place. What happened to that big catch up? Why are we still so far ahead of you?[/p][/quote]I personally want you Dingles to get promoted (even though I don't think it will happen) I have got my abacus ready, just in case, to count the goals you lot will concede during your brief stay. Will be fun watching M.O.D. worth staying in for.[/p][/quote]MOTD you mean? ( I can actually hear you saying in your chin dribbling Shadsworth twang "MATCH OF DAY"). Would that be the same programme you wish you still had on your sky plus? Steven Seagull

5:30pm Mon 10 Feb 14

Steven Seagull says...

more bans than ray - brfc lxxv wrote:
look.up.blackburn wrote:
No-dad reality check...

Burnley went 2nd in the Championship on 21 September 2013 after a 2-1 win at Leeds.

Following a 2-0 win at Doncaster on October 1st Burnley went to the top of the Championship. At that time Blackburn Rovers were 8th in the league. 10 games had been played. Burnley were 8 points ahead of Blackburn Rovers.

Fast forward to the present day. 29 games have now been played (Blackburn have played 30).

Burnley have amassed 33 points since October 1st.
Blackburn have amassed... 28 points.

Burnley are now 13 points and 19 goals better off than Blackburn Rovers.

Burnley are still in an automatic promotion position.
Blackburn have dropped to 9th place.


What happened to that big catch up? Why are we still so far ahead of you?
Because everyone in Bonleh drives an F reg Sierra estate with hay in the back?
Lol!!!
[quote][p][bold]more bans than ray - brfc lxxv[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]look.up.blackburn[/bold] wrote: No-dad reality check... Burnley went 2nd in the Championship on 21 September 2013 after a 2-1 win at Leeds. Following a 2-0 win at Doncaster on October 1st Burnley went to the top of the Championship. At that time Blackburn Rovers were 8th in the league. 10 games had been played. Burnley were 8 points ahead of Blackburn Rovers. Fast forward to the present day. 29 games have now been played (Blackburn have played 30). Burnley have amassed 33 points since October 1st. Blackburn have amassed... 28 points. Burnley are now 13 points and 19 goals better off than Blackburn Rovers. Burnley are still in an automatic promotion position. Blackburn have dropped to 9th place. What happened to that big catch up? Why are we still so far ahead of you?[/p][/quote]Because everyone in Bonleh drives an F reg Sierra estate with hay in the back?[/p][/quote]Lol!!! Steven Seagull

5:51pm Mon 10 Feb 14

owd nick says...

A Rover 45 years and over wrote:
As long as he doesn't replace Gestede because he has done nothing wrong for me, he has provided the power and strength along with footballing ability and has made much more of a positive contribution than Rhodes we have missed this type of player all season. Would be in the team every week and should not be sacrificed every when making substitutions. To play him on the wing on Saturday was absolute rubbish and GB should get a grip. Rubbish tactics rubbish game I am afraid.
He's been brought in as cover for Rhodes and Gestede and just for the Burnley numpties it's a loan signing until the end of the season, so big pay day signing it isn't.

Seen him play quite a few times over the years and I have always thought he's been a decent player, doesn't get a lot of goals but I have a friend who is a ST holder at Leeds and she says that he gets stuck in and gets lots of assists, just doesn't fit in with Marwood's style of play.

So it's quite simple for me, lets see how he goes, he's experienced at this level and GB is ruthless enough to clear him out like the rest if it isn't working.
[quote][p][bold]A Rover 45 years and over[/bold] wrote: As long as he doesn't replace Gestede because he has done nothing wrong for me, he has provided the power and strength along with footballing ability and has made much more of a positive contribution than Rhodes we have missed this type of player all season. Would be in the team every week and should not be sacrificed every when making substitutions. To play him on the wing on Saturday was absolute rubbish and GB should get a grip. Rubbish tactics rubbish game I am afraid.[/p][/quote]He's been brought in as cover for Rhodes and Gestede and just for the Burnley numpties it's a loan signing until the end of the season, so big pay day signing it isn't. Seen him play quite a few times over the years and I have always thought he's been a decent player, doesn't get a lot of goals but I have a friend who is a ST holder at Leeds and she says that he gets stuck in and gets lots of assists, just doesn't fit in with Marwood's style of play. So it's quite simple for me, lets see how he goes, he's experienced at this level and GB is ruthless enough to clear him out like the rest if it isn't working. owd nick

6:05pm Mon 10 Feb 14

earwego says...

Steven Seagull wrote:
earwego wrote:
look.up.blackburn wrote:
No-dad reality check...

Burnley went 2nd in the Championship on 21 September 2013 after a 2-1 win at Leeds.

Following a 2-0 win at Doncaster on October 1st Burnley went to the top of the Championship. At that time Blackburn Rovers were 8th in the league. 10 games had been played. Burnley were 8 points ahead of Blackburn Rovers.

Fast forward to the present day. 29 games have now been played (Blackburn have played 30).

Burnley have amassed 33 points since October 1st.
Blackburn have amassed... 28 points.

Burnley are now 13 points and 19 goals better off than Blackburn Rovers.

Burnley are still in an automatic promotion position.
Blackburn have dropped to 9th place.


What happened to that big catch up? Why are we still so far ahead of you?
I personally want you Dingles to get promoted (even though I don't think it will happen) I have got my abacus ready, just in case, to count the goals you lot will concede during your brief stay. Will be fun watching M.O.D. worth staying in for.
MOTD you mean? ( I can actually hear you saying in your chin dribbling Shadsworth twang "MATCH OF DAY").

Would that be the same programme you wish you still had on your sky plus?
Sky Plus? didn't realize you needed that to watch that. Thought I would write it so that you illiterate backward Dingles just might know what it is,don't know how to write Match o tu Day.
[quote][p][bold]Steven Seagull[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]earwego[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]look.up.blackburn[/bold] wrote: No-dad reality check... Burnley went 2nd in the Championship on 21 September 2013 after a 2-1 win at Leeds. Following a 2-0 win at Doncaster on October 1st Burnley went to the top of the Championship. At that time Blackburn Rovers were 8th in the league. 10 games had been played. Burnley were 8 points ahead of Blackburn Rovers. Fast forward to the present day. 29 games have now been played (Blackburn have played 30). Burnley have amassed 33 points since October 1st. Blackburn have amassed... 28 points. Burnley are now 13 points and 19 goals better off than Blackburn Rovers. Burnley are still in an automatic promotion position. Blackburn have dropped to 9th place. What happened to that big catch up? Why are we still so far ahead of you?[/p][/quote]I personally want you Dingles to get promoted (even though I don't think it will happen) I have got my abacus ready, just in case, to count the goals you lot will concede during your brief stay. Will be fun watching M.O.D. worth staying in for.[/p][/quote]MOTD you mean? ( I can actually hear you saying in your chin dribbling Shadsworth twang "MATCH OF DAY"). Would that be the same programme you wish you still had on your sky plus?[/p][/quote]Sky Plus? didn't realize you needed that to watch that. Thought I would write it so that you illiterate backward Dingles just might know what it is,don't know how to write Match o tu Day. earwego

6:59pm Mon 10 Feb 14

jim 2012 says...

more bans than ray - brfc lxxv wrote:
look.up.blackburn wrote:
No-dad reality check...

Burnley went 2nd in the Championship on 21 September 2013 after a 2-1 win at Leeds.

Following a 2-0 win at Doncaster on October 1st Burnley went to the top of the Championship. At that time Blackburn Rovers were 8th in the league. 10 games had been played. Burnley were 8 points ahead of Blackburn Rovers.

Fast forward to the present day. 29 games have now been played (Blackburn have played 30).

Burnley have amassed 33 points since October 1st.
Blackburn have amassed... 28 points.

Burnley are now 13 points and 19 goals better off than Blackburn Rovers.

Burnley are still in an automatic promotion position.
Blackburn have dropped to 9th place.


What happened to that big catch up? Why are we still so far ahead of you?
Because everyone in Bonleh drives an F reg Sierra estate with hay in the back?
Blackburn are 4 points off the play offs burnley are second on goal difference
rovers do not need to chase burnley Q P R are more than capable of doing that
this fixation with rover's is ridiculous and childish bluster
the idea that burnley will get automatic promotion is a pipe dream
your manager know that pity some burnley fans don't
the best you will do is what rovers what to do finish your season in the playoff's
[quote][p][bold]more bans than ray - brfc lxxv[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]look.up.blackburn[/bold] wrote: No-dad reality check... Burnley went 2nd in the Championship on 21 September 2013 after a 2-1 win at Leeds. Following a 2-0 win at Doncaster on October 1st Burnley went to the top of the Championship. At that time Blackburn Rovers were 8th in the league. 10 games had been played. Burnley were 8 points ahead of Blackburn Rovers. Fast forward to the present day. 29 games have now been played (Blackburn have played 30). Burnley have amassed 33 points since October 1st. Blackburn have amassed... 28 points. Burnley are now 13 points and 19 goals better off than Blackburn Rovers. Burnley are still in an automatic promotion position. Blackburn have dropped to 9th place. What happened to that big catch up? Why are we still so far ahead of you?[/p][/quote]Because everyone in Bonleh drives an F reg Sierra estate with hay in the back?[/p][/quote]Blackburn are 4 points off the play offs burnley are second on goal difference rovers do not need to chase burnley Q P R are more than capable of doing that this fixation with rover's is ridiculous and childish bluster the idea that burnley will get automatic promotion is a pipe dream your manager know that pity some burnley fans don't the best you will do is what rovers what to do finish your season in the playoff's jim 2012

7:10pm Mon 10 Feb 14

Leedsladd says...

I'm a Leeds fan. It makes me laugh what Varney is saying here. He has hardly been a first team regular since we signed him and too right he wasn't getting another contract. He was not good enough for us. Poor player and an average championship forward at best. I'm pleased he has left and I would have driven him to Blackburn myself. His goal scoring record is very poor so don't expect a flood of goals. At least you got Jordan Rhodes!
The one thing he is good at is heading, one of best at this we had. It's just rest of his game that let's him down. He does occaisionally have a really good game but on the whole your welcome to him.
I'm a Leeds fan. It makes me laugh what Varney is saying here. He has hardly been a first team regular since we signed him and too right he wasn't getting another contract. He was not good enough for us. Poor player and an average championship forward at best. I'm pleased he has left and I would have driven him to Blackburn myself. His goal scoring record is very poor so don't expect a flood of goals. At least you got Jordan Rhodes! The one thing he is good at is heading, one of best at this we had. It's just rest of his game that let's him down. He does occaisionally have a really good game but on the whole your welcome to him. Leedsladd

7:21pm Mon 10 Feb 14

Angry From Accrington says...

Harwoodstblue wrote:
It's been too easy for opposing defenders at times. Hope this lad can get amongst them, upset a few defenders and make space for Rhodes. Not suggesting he should go straight in instead of Gestede but a good sub to bring on when needed. Another string to Bowyers bow.
How about playing him alongside Gestede since it looks as though Rhodes may have lost his motivation.
An interesting admission from Varney in a week when some of us were arguing as to whether players sometimes go out and underperformed deliberately.
[quote][p][bold]Harwoodstblue[/bold] wrote: It's been too easy for opposing defenders at times. Hope this lad can get amongst them, upset a few defenders and make space for Rhodes. Not suggesting he should go straight in instead of Gestede but a good sub to bring on when needed. Another string to Bowyers bow.[/p][/quote]How about playing him alongside Gestede since it looks as though Rhodes may have lost his motivation. An interesting admission from Varney in a week when some of us were arguing as to whether players sometimes go out and underperformed deliberately. Angry From Accrington

7:46pm Mon 10 Feb 14

earwego says...

Angry From Accrington wrote:
Harwoodstblue wrote:
It's been too easy for opposing defenders at times. Hope this lad can get amongst them, upset a few defenders and make space for Rhodes. Not suggesting he should go straight in instead of Gestede but a good sub to bring on when needed. Another string to Bowyers bow.
How about playing him alongside Gestede since it looks as though Rhodes may have lost his motivation.
An interesting admission from Varney in a week when some of us were arguing as to whether players sometimes go out and underperformed deliberately.
It might be that Rhodes is carrying an injury and that could be the reason G.B. brought in a striker first when we were all expecting a replacement for Dann. Just a thought.
[quote][p][bold]Angry From Accrington[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Harwoodstblue[/bold] wrote: It's been too easy for opposing defenders at times. Hope this lad can get amongst them, upset a few defenders and make space for Rhodes. Not suggesting he should go straight in instead of Gestede but a good sub to bring on when needed. Another string to Bowyers bow.[/p][/quote]How about playing him alongside Gestede since it looks as though Rhodes may have lost his motivation. An interesting admission from Varney in a week when some of us were arguing as to whether players sometimes go out and underperformed deliberately.[/p][/quote]It might be that Rhodes is carrying an injury and that could be the reason G.B. brought in a striker first when we were all expecting a replacement for Dann. Just a thought. earwego

8:03pm Mon 10 Feb 14

look.up.blackburn. says...

earwego wrote:
Angry From Accrington wrote:
Harwoodstblue wrote:
It's been too easy for opposing defenders at times. Hope this lad can get amongst them, upset a few defenders and make space for Rhodes. Not suggesting he should go straight in instead of Gestede but a good sub to bring on when needed. Another string to Bowyers bow.
How about playing him alongside Gestede since it looks as though Rhodes may have lost his motivation.
An interesting admission from Varney in a week when some of us were arguing as to whether players sometimes go out and underperformed deliberately.
It might be that Rhodes is carrying an injury and that could be the reason G.B. brought in a striker first when we were all expecting a replacement for Dann. Just a thought.
Or perhaps he just wants out and his motivation is gone. He could almost touch the money on offer from the likes of Harry Redknapp until Blackburn selfishly and ridiculously priced him out of a move, but as you know in this game the player always gets his way in the end.

Rhodes will stroll to the end of his final season at Blackburn while you frantically scramble to secure the signing of non-scoring Leeds reject Varney.

If that's not a grim outlook I don't know what is. Speaks volumes when our friend from Leeds is glad to see the back of him. Another panic buy from bib and cones Bowyer.
[quote][p][bold]earwego[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Angry From Accrington[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Harwoodstblue[/bold] wrote: It's been too easy for opposing defenders at times. Hope this lad can get amongst them, upset a few defenders and make space for Rhodes. Not suggesting he should go straight in instead of Gestede but a good sub to bring on when needed. Another string to Bowyers bow.[/p][/quote]How about playing him alongside Gestede since it looks as though Rhodes may have lost his motivation. An interesting admission from Varney in a week when some of us were arguing as to whether players sometimes go out and underperformed deliberately.[/p][/quote]It might be that Rhodes is carrying an injury and that could be the reason G.B. brought in a striker first when we were all expecting a replacement for Dann. Just a thought.[/p][/quote]Or perhaps he just wants out and his motivation is gone. He could almost touch the money on offer from the likes of Harry Redknapp until Blackburn selfishly and ridiculously priced him out of a move, but as you know in this game the player always gets his way in the end. Rhodes will stroll to the end of his final season at Blackburn while you frantically scramble to secure the signing of non-scoring Leeds reject Varney. If that's not a grim outlook I don't know what is. Speaks volumes when our friend from Leeds is glad to see the back of him. Another panic buy from bib and cones Bowyer. look.up.blackburn.

8:22pm Mon 10 Feb 14

more bans than ray - brfc lxxv says...

look.up.blackburn. wrote:
earwego wrote:
Angry From Accrington wrote:
Harwoodstblue wrote:
It's been too easy for opposing defenders at times. Hope this lad can get amongst them, upset a few defenders and make space for Rhodes. Not suggesting he should go straight in instead of Gestede but a good sub to bring on when needed. Another string to Bowyers bow.
How about playing him alongside Gestede since it looks as though Rhodes may have lost his motivation.
An interesting admission from Varney in a week when some of us were arguing as to whether players sometimes go out and underperformed deliberately.
It might be that Rhodes is carrying an injury and that could be the reason G.B. brought in a striker first when we were all expecting a replacement for Dann. Just a thought.
Or perhaps he just wants out and his motivation is gone. He could almost touch the money on offer from the likes of Harry Redknapp until Blackburn selfishly and ridiculously priced him out of a move, but as you know in this game the player always gets his way in the end.

Rhodes will stroll to the end of his final season at Blackburn while you frantically scramble to secure the signing of non-scoring Leeds reject Varney.

If that's not a grim outlook I don't know what is. Speaks volumes when our friend from Leeds is glad to see the back of him. Another panic buy from bib and cones Bowyer.
Our friend from Leeds? I think if you're gonna create another account to feed your addiction, you need to at least make it believable you bumbling undershot hill pig.
[quote][p][bold]look.up.blackburn.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]earwego[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Angry From Accrington[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Harwoodstblue[/bold] wrote: It's been too easy for opposing defenders at times. Hope this lad can get amongst them, upset a few defenders and make space for Rhodes. Not suggesting he should go straight in instead of Gestede but a good sub to bring on when needed. Another string to Bowyers bow.[/p][/quote]How about playing him alongside Gestede since it looks as though Rhodes may have lost his motivation. An interesting admission from Varney in a week when some of us were arguing as to whether players sometimes go out and underperformed deliberately.[/p][/quote]It might be that Rhodes is carrying an injury and that could be the reason G.B. brought in a striker first when we were all expecting a replacement for Dann. Just a thought.[/p][/quote]Or perhaps he just wants out and his motivation is gone. He could almost touch the money on offer from the likes of Harry Redknapp until Blackburn selfishly and ridiculously priced him out of a move, but as you know in this game the player always gets his way in the end. Rhodes will stroll to the end of his final season at Blackburn while you frantically scramble to secure the signing of non-scoring Leeds reject Varney. If that's not a grim outlook I don't know what is. Speaks volumes when our friend from Leeds is glad to see the back of him. Another panic buy from bib and cones Bowyer.[/p][/quote]Our friend from Leeds? I think if you're gonna create another account to feed your addiction, you need to at least make it believable you bumbling undershot hill pig. more bans than ray - brfc lxxv

8:26pm Mon 10 Feb 14

Dukes says...

Time to prove everyone, you can pull the blackburn shirt Luke Varney. Its strange signing but we will give him a chance and judge him from there.
Time to prove everyone, you can pull the blackburn shirt Luke Varney. Its strange signing but we will give him a chance and judge him from there. Dukes

8:33pm Mon 10 Feb 14

digitusjonfred says...

Give the boy a chance.. GO FOR IT LUKE !!!!!!!!!
Give the boy a chance.. GO FOR IT LUKE !!!!!!!!! digitusjonfred

8:51pm Mon 10 Feb 14

earwego says...

look.up.blackburn. wrote:
earwego wrote:
Angry From Accrington wrote:
Harwoodstblue wrote:
It's been too easy for opposing defenders at times. Hope this lad can get amongst them, upset a few defenders and make space for Rhodes. Not suggesting he should go straight in instead of Gestede but a good sub to bring on when needed. Another string to Bowyers bow.
How about playing him alongside Gestede since it looks as though Rhodes may have lost his motivation.
An interesting admission from Varney in a week when some of us were arguing as to whether players sometimes go out and underperformed deliberately.
It might be that Rhodes is carrying an injury and that could be the reason G.B. brought in a striker first when we were all expecting a replacement for Dann. Just a thought.
Or perhaps he just wants out and his motivation is gone. He could almost touch the money on offer from the likes of Harry Redknapp until Blackburn selfishly and ridiculously priced him out of a move, but as you know in this game the player always gets his way in the end.

Rhodes will stroll to the end of his final season at Blackburn while you frantically scramble to secure the signing of non-scoring Leeds reject Varney.

If that's not a grim outlook I don't know what is. Speaks volumes when our friend from Leeds is glad to see the back of him. Another panic buy from bib and cones Bowyer.
And you believe Ings will stay at your 19th century club when the big boys come calling. Money talks and he will be gone whatever happens this season. So I would worry more about who will be leaving your dump rather who stays at our stadium. And at least Varney offers an option on the playing field,what options do your influx of directors offer your lot on the field,what position will they play on the field,perhaps a 5th goalkeeper to keep the trend going.
[quote][p][bold]look.up.blackburn.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]earwego[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Angry From Accrington[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Harwoodstblue[/bold] wrote: It's been too easy for opposing defenders at times. Hope this lad can get amongst them, upset a few defenders and make space for Rhodes. Not suggesting he should go straight in instead of Gestede but a good sub to bring on when needed. Another string to Bowyers bow.[/p][/quote]How about playing him alongside Gestede since it looks as though Rhodes may have lost his motivation. An interesting admission from Varney in a week when some of us were arguing as to whether players sometimes go out and underperformed deliberately.[/p][/quote]It might be that Rhodes is carrying an injury and that could be the reason G.B. brought in a striker first when we were all expecting a replacement for Dann. Just a thought.[/p][/quote]Or perhaps he just wants out and his motivation is gone. He could almost touch the money on offer from the likes of Harry Redknapp until Blackburn selfishly and ridiculously priced him out of a move, but as you know in this game the player always gets his way in the end. Rhodes will stroll to the end of his final season at Blackburn while you frantically scramble to secure the signing of non-scoring Leeds reject Varney. If that's not a grim outlook I don't know what is. Speaks volumes when our friend from Leeds is glad to see the back of him. Another panic buy from bib and cones Bowyer.[/p][/quote]And you believe Ings will stay at your 19th century club when the big boys come calling. Money talks and he will be gone whatever happens this season. So I would worry more about who will be leaving your dump rather who stays at our stadium. And at least Varney offers an option on the playing field,what options do your influx of directors offer your lot on the field,what position will they play on the field,perhaps a 5th goalkeeper to keep the trend going. earwego

10:00pm Mon 10 Feb 14

look.up.blackburn. says...

earwego wrote:
look.up.blackburn. wrote:
earwego wrote:
Angry From Accrington wrote:
Harwoodstblue wrote:
It's been too easy for opposing defenders at times. Hope this lad can get amongst them, upset a few defenders and make space for Rhodes. Not suggesting he should go straight in instead of Gestede but a good sub to bring on when needed. Another string to Bowyers bow.
How about playing him alongside Gestede since it looks as though Rhodes may have lost his motivation.
An interesting admission from Varney in a week when some of us were arguing as to whether players sometimes go out and underperformed deliberately.
It might be that Rhodes is carrying an injury and that could be the reason G.B. brought in a striker first when we were all expecting a replacement for Dann. Just a thought.
Or perhaps he just wants out and his motivation is gone. He could almost touch the money on offer from the likes of Harry Redknapp until Blackburn selfishly and ridiculously priced him out of a move, but as you know in this game the player always gets his way in the end.

Rhodes will stroll to the end of his final season at Blackburn while you frantically scramble to secure the signing of non-scoring Leeds reject Varney.

If that's not a grim outlook I don't know what is. Speaks volumes when our friend from Leeds is glad to see the back of him. Another panic buy from bib and cones Bowyer.
And you believe Ings will stay at your 19th century club when the big boys come calling. Money talks and he will be gone whatever happens this season. So I would worry more about who will be leaving your dump rather who stays at our stadium. And at least Varney offers an option on the playing field,what options do your influx of directors offer your lot on the field,what position will they play on the field,perhaps a 5th goalkeeper to keep the trend going.
13 points Mungo. Explain that one.
[quote][p][bold]earwego[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]look.up.blackburn.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]earwego[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Angry From Accrington[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Harwoodstblue[/bold] wrote: It's been too easy for opposing defenders at times. Hope this lad can get amongst them, upset a few defenders and make space for Rhodes. Not suggesting he should go straight in instead of Gestede but a good sub to bring on when needed. Another string to Bowyers bow.[/p][/quote]How about playing him alongside Gestede since it looks as though Rhodes may have lost his motivation. An interesting admission from Varney in a week when some of us were arguing as to whether players sometimes go out and underperformed deliberately.[/p][/quote]It might be that Rhodes is carrying an injury and that could be the reason G.B. brought in a striker first when we were all expecting a replacement for Dann. Just a thought.[/p][/quote]Or perhaps he just wants out and his motivation is gone. He could almost touch the money on offer from the likes of Harry Redknapp until Blackburn selfishly and ridiculously priced him out of a move, but as you know in this game the player always gets his way in the end. Rhodes will stroll to the end of his final season at Blackburn while you frantically scramble to secure the signing of non-scoring Leeds reject Varney. If that's not a grim outlook I don't know what is. Speaks volumes when our friend from Leeds is glad to see the back of him. Another panic buy from bib and cones Bowyer.[/p][/quote]And you believe Ings will stay at your 19th century club when the big boys come calling. Money talks and he will be gone whatever happens this season. So I would worry more about who will be leaving your dump rather who stays at our stadium. And at least Varney offers an option on the playing field,what options do your influx of directors offer your lot on the field,what position will they play on the field,perhaps a 5th goalkeeper to keep the trend going.[/p][/quote]13 points Mungo. Explain that one. look.up.blackburn.

10:37pm Mon 10 Feb 14

Wild Rover says...

Baldric, explain Flood and KILBY gathering round the smell of promotion
13 points, rah rah , means nowt in the long run
What happens to the money IF you get promoted?
New stadium, new players?
Or just another dispensation and more disappearing prize money
Straight back down......
You have avoided these comments in several of my posts and dodged answering them
Again why is Flood, a recent bankrupt, back on the Burnley board?
Explain that one Baldric?
Baldric, explain Flood and KILBY gathering round the smell of promotion 13 points, rah rah , means nowt in the long run What happens to the money IF you get promoted? New stadium, new players? Or just another dispensation and more disappearing prize money Straight back down...... You have avoided these comments in several of my posts and dodged answering them Again why is Flood, a recent bankrupt, back on the Burnley board? Explain that one Baldric? Wild Rover

10:43pm Mon 10 Feb 14

earwego says...

look.up.blackburn. wrote:
earwego wrote:
look.up.blackburn. wrote:
earwego wrote:
Angry From Accrington wrote:
Harwoodstblue wrote:
It's been too easy for opposing defenders at times. Hope this lad can get amongst them, upset a few defenders and make space for Rhodes. Not suggesting he should go straight in instead of Gestede but a good sub to bring on when needed. Another string to Bowyers bow.
How about playing him alongside Gestede since it looks as though Rhodes may have lost his motivation.
An interesting admission from Varney in a week when some of us were arguing as to whether players sometimes go out and underperformed deliberately.
It might be that Rhodes is carrying an injury and that could be the reason G.B. brought in a striker first when we were all expecting a replacement for Dann. Just a thought.
Or perhaps he just wants out and his motivation is gone. He could almost touch the money on offer from the likes of Harry Redknapp until Blackburn selfishly and ridiculously priced him out of a move, but as you know in this game the player always gets his way in the end.

Rhodes will stroll to the end of his final season at Blackburn while you frantically scramble to secure the signing of non-scoring Leeds reject Varney.

If that's not a grim outlook I don't know what is. Speaks volumes when our friend from Leeds is glad to see the back of him. Another panic buy from bib and cones Bowyer.
And you believe Ings will stay at your 19th century club when the big boys come calling. Money talks and he will be gone whatever happens this season. So I would worry more about who will be leaving your dump rather who stays at our stadium. And at least Varney offers an option on the playing field,what options do your influx of directors offer your lot on the field,what position will they play on the field,perhaps a 5th goalkeeper to keep the trend going.
13 points Mungo. Explain that one.
"13 points Mungo. Explain that one." OK let me try. I guess you mean 13 is an accumulation of points gained for,in this case football, A certain number of points are gained for a "win" or a "draw". A "win" when one team gets more goals than the other. A "draw" when both teams finish equally, but none for a loss. The more points you get means you may get a prize if you come top. In your case you don't get the prize because you are not top. Anything you don't understand please let us all know so we can enlighten you.We all know how hard it is being a Dingle with very little intelligence. Don't worry there are many like you in Dingleland,you are not alone.I hope this explain the very difficult term,"13 points". Have a nice day.
[quote][p][bold]look.up.blackburn.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]earwego[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]look.up.blackburn.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]earwego[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Angry From Accrington[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Harwoodstblue[/bold] wrote: It's been too easy for opposing defenders at times. Hope this lad can get amongst them, upset a few defenders and make space for Rhodes. Not suggesting he should go straight in instead of Gestede but a good sub to bring on when needed. Another string to Bowyers bow.[/p][/quote]How about playing him alongside Gestede since it looks as though Rhodes may have lost his motivation. An interesting admission from Varney in a week when some of us were arguing as to whether players sometimes go out and underperformed deliberately.[/p][/quote]It might be that Rhodes is carrying an injury and that could be the reason G.B. brought in a striker first when we were all expecting a replacement for Dann. Just a thought.[/p][/quote]Or perhaps he just wants out and his motivation is gone. He could almost touch the money on offer from the likes of Harry Redknapp until Blackburn selfishly and ridiculously priced him out of a move, but as you know in this game the player always gets his way in the end. Rhodes will stroll to the end of his final season at Blackburn while you frantically scramble to secure the signing of non-scoring Leeds reject Varney. If that's not a grim outlook I don't know what is. Speaks volumes when our friend from Leeds is glad to see the back of him. Another panic buy from bib and cones Bowyer.[/p][/quote]And you believe Ings will stay at your 19th century club when the big boys come calling. Money talks and he will be gone whatever happens this season. So I would worry more about who will be leaving your dump rather who stays at our stadium. And at least Varney offers an option on the playing field,what options do your influx of directors offer your lot on the field,what position will they play on the field,perhaps a 5th goalkeeper to keep the trend going.[/p][/quote]13 points Mungo. Explain that one.[/p][/quote]"13 points Mungo. Explain that one." OK let me try. I guess you mean 13 is an accumulation of points gained for,in this case football, A certain number of points are gained for a "win" or a "draw". A "win" when one team gets more goals than the other. A "draw" when both teams finish equally, but none for a loss. The more points you get means you may get a prize if you come top. In your case you don't get the prize because you are not top. Anything you don't understand please let us all know so we can enlighten you.We all know how hard it is being a Dingle with very little intelligence. Don't worry there are many like you in Dingleland,you are not alone.I hope this explain the very difficult term,"13 points". Have a nice day. earwego

10:56pm Mon 10 Feb 14

look.up.blackburn. says...

earwego wrote:
look.up.blackburn. wrote:
earwego wrote:
look.up.blackburn. wrote:
earwego wrote:
Angry From Accrington wrote:
Harwoodstblue wrote:
It's been too easy for opposing defenders at times. Hope this lad can get amongst them, upset a few defenders and make space for Rhodes. Not suggesting he should go straight in instead of Gestede but a good sub to bring on when needed. Another string to Bowyers bow.
How about playing him alongside Gestede since it looks as though Rhodes may have lost his motivation.
An interesting admission from Varney in a week when some of us were arguing as to whether players sometimes go out and underperformed deliberately.
It might be that Rhodes is carrying an injury and that could be the reason G.B. brought in a striker first when we were all expecting a replacement for Dann. Just a thought.
Or perhaps he just wants out and his motivation is gone. He could almost touch the money on offer from the likes of Harry Redknapp until Blackburn selfishly and ridiculously priced him out of a move, but as you know in this game the player always gets his way in the end.

Rhodes will stroll to the end of his final season at Blackburn while you frantically scramble to secure the signing of non-scoring Leeds reject Varney.

If that's not a grim outlook I don't know what is. Speaks volumes when our friend from Leeds is glad to see the back of him. Another panic buy from bib and cones Bowyer.
And you believe Ings will stay at your 19th century club when the big boys come calling. Money talks and he will be gone whatever happens this season. So I would worry more about who will be leaving your dump rather who stays at our stadium. And at least Varney offers an option on the playing field,what options do your influx of directors offer your lot on the field,what position will they play on the field,perhaps a 5th goalkeeper to keep the trend going.
13 points Mungo. Explain that one.
"13 points Mungo. Explain that one." OK let me try. I guess you mean 13 is an accumulation of points gained for,in this case football, A certain number of points are gained for a "win" or a "draw". A "win" when one team gets more goals than the other. A "draw" when both teams finish equally, but none for a loss. The more points you get means you may get a prize if you come top. In your case you don't get the prize because you are not top. Anything you don't understand please let us all know so we can enlighten you.We all know how hard it is being a Dingle with very little intelligence. Don't worry there are many like you in Dingleland,you are not alone.I hope this explain the very difficult term,"13 points". Have a nice day.
13 is the number of points we are above you morons. We were 13 points above you last October, we are 13 points above you now. Strange but true.

Here's another fact.... Derby 1 - 0 QPR

Which means Burnley FC are 2nd in the league.

2nd is an automatic promotion spot, that means the team in 2nd place goes into the Premier League. So you are in fact wrong when you say you don't get a prize if you're not top.

3rd to 6th place are play-off positions.

Blackburn are 9th.
[quote][p][bold]earwego[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]look.up.blackburn.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]earwego[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]look.up.blackburn.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]earwego[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Angry From Accrington[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Harwoodstblue[/bold] wrote: It's been too easy for opposing defenders at times. Hope this lad can get amongst them, upset a few defenders and make space for Rhodes. Not suggesting he should go straight in instead of Gestede but a good sub to bring on when needed. Another string to Bowyers bow.[/p][/quote]How about playing him alongside Gestede since it looks as though Rhodes may have lost his motivation. An interesting admission from Varney in a week when some of us were arguing as to whether players sometimes go out and underperformed deliberately.[/p][/quote]It might be that Rhodes is carrying an injury and that could be the reason G.B. brought in a striker first when we were all expecting a replacement for Dann. Just a thought.[/p][/quote]Or perhaps he just wants out and his motivation is gone. He could almost touch the money on offer from the likes of Harry Redknapp until Blackburn selfishly and ridiculously priced him out of a move, but as you know in this game the player always gets his way in the end. Rhodes will stroll to the end of his final season at Blackburn while you frantically scramble to secure the signing of non-scoring Leeds reject Varney. If that's not a grim outlook I don't know what is. Speaks volumes when our friend from Leeds is glad to see the back of him. Another panic buy from bib and cones Bowyer.[/p][/quote]And you believe Ings will stay at your 19th century club when the big boys come calling. Money talks and he will be gone whatever happens this season. So I would worry more about who will be leaving your dump rather who stays at our stadium. And at least Varney offers an option on the playing field,what options do your influx of directors offer your lot on the field,what position will they play on the field,perhaps a 5th goalkeeper to keep the trend going.[/p][/quote]13 points Mungo. Explain that one.[/p][/quote]"13 points Mungo. Explain that one." OK let me try. I guess you mean 13 is an accumulation of points gained for,in this case football, A certain number of points are gained for a "win" or a "draw". A "win" when one team gets more goals than the other. A "draw" when both teams finish equally, but none for a loss. The more points you get means you may get a prize if you come top. In your case you don't get the prize because you are not top. Anything you don't understand please let us all know so we can enlighten you.We all know how hard it is being a Dingle with very little intelligence. Don't worry there are many like you in Dingleland,you are not alone.I hope this explain the very difficult term,"13 points". Have a nice day.[/p][/quote]13 is the number of points we are above you morons. We were 13 points above you last October, we are 13 points above you now. Strange but true. Here's another fact.... Derby 1 - 0 QPR Which means Burnley FC are 2nd in the league. 2nd is an automatic promotion spot, that means the team in 2nd place goes into the Premier League. So you are in fact wrong when you say you don't get a prize if you're not top. 3rd to 6th place are play-off positions. Blackburn are 9th. look.up.blackburn.

11:03pm Mon 10 Feb 14

earwego says...

look.up.blackburn. wrote:
earwego wrote:
look.up.blackburn. wrote:
earwego wrote:
look.up.blackburn. wrote:
earwego wrote:
Angry From Accrington wrote:
Harwoodstblue wrote:
It's been too easy for opposing defenders at times. Hope this lad can get amongst them, upset a few defenders and make space for Rhodes. Not suggesting he should go straight in instead of Gestede but a good sub to bring on when needed. Another string to Bowyers bow.
How about playing him alongside Gestede since it looks as though Rhodes may have lost his motivation.
An interesting admission from Varney in a week when some of us were arguing as to whether players sometimes go out and underperformed deliberately.
It might be that Rhodes is carrying an injury and that could be the reason G.B. brought in a striker first when we were all expecting a replacement for Dann. Just a thought.
Or perhaps he just wants out and his motivation is gone. He could almost touch the money on offer from the likes of Harry Redknapp until Blackburn selfishly and ridiculously priced him out of a move, but as you know in this game the player always gets his way in the end.

Rhodes will stroll to the end of his final season at Blackburn while you frantically scramble to secure the signing of non-scoring Leeds reject Varney.

If that's not a grim outlook I don't know what is. Speaks volumes when our friend from Leeds is glad to see the back of him. Another panic buy from bib and cones Bowyer.
And you believe Ings will stay at your 19th century club when the big boys come calling. Money talks and he will be gone whatever happens this season. So I would worry more about who will be leaving your dump rather who stays at our stadium. And at least Varney offers an option on the playing field,what options do your influx of directors offer your lot on the field,what position will they play on the field,perhaps a 5th goalkeeper to keep the trend going.
13 points Mungo. Explain that one.
"13 points Mungo. Explain that one." OK let me try. I guess you mean 13 is an accumulation of points gained for,in this case football, A certain number of points are gained for a "win" or a "draw". A "win" when one team gets more goals than the other. A "draw" when both teams finish equally, but none for a loss. The more points you get means you may get a prize if you come top. In your case you don't get the prize because you are not top. Anything you don't understand please let us all know so we can enlighten you.We all know how hard it is being a Dingle with very little intelligence. Don't worry there are many like you in Dingleland,you are not alone.I hope this explain the very difficult term,"13 points". Have a nice day.
13 is the number of points we are above you morons. We were 13 points above you last October, we are 13 points above you now. Strange but true.

Here's another fact.... Derby 1 - 0 QPR

Which means Burnley FC are 2nd in the league.

2nd is an automatic promotion spot, that means the team in 2nd place goes into the Premier League. So you are in fact wrong when you say you don't get a prize if you're not top.

3rd to 6th place are play-off positions.

Blackburn are 9th.
That's not what you asked. You asked to explain 13 points. By the way a "Mungo" is an oil field in the Central North Sea. Why are you calling me and others,"an oil field"
Seems a really strange way to communicate with some body. Could that have something to do with your lack of knowledge and poor intellect. Or is that you are just a miserable old Dingle. Told you before,plenty like you in Dingleland. You are not alone.
[quote][p][bold]look.up.blackburn.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]earwego[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]look.up.blackburn.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]earwego[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]look.up.blackburn.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]earwego[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Angry From Accrington[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Harwoodstblue[/bold] wrote: It's been too easy for opposing defenders at times. Hope this lad can get amongst them, upset a few defenders and make space for Rhodes. Not suggesting he should go straight in instead of Gestede but a good sub to bring on when needed. Another string to Bowyers bow.[/p][/quote]How about playing him alongside Gestede since it looks as though Rhodes may have lost his motivation. An interesting admission from Varney in a week when some of us were arguing as to whether players sometimes go out and underperformed deliberately.[/p][/quote]It might be that Rhodes is carrying an injury and that could be the reason G.B. brought in a striker first when we were all expecting a replacement for Dann. Just a thought.[/p][/quote]Or perhaps he just wants out and his motivation is gone. He could almost touch the money on offer from the likes of Harry Redknapp until Blackburn selfishly and ridiculously priced him out of a move, but as you know in this game the player always gets his way in the end. Rhodes will stroll to the end of his final season at Blackburn while you frantically scramble to secure the signing of non-scoring Leeds reject Varney. If that's not a grim outlook I don't know what is. Speaks volumes when our friend from Leeds is glad to see the back of him. Another panic buy from bib and cones Bowyer.[/p][/quote]And you believe Ings will stay at your 19th century club when the big boys come calling. Money talks and he will be gone whatever happens this season. So I would worry more about who will be leaving your dump rather who stays at our stadium. And at least Varney offers an option on the playing field,what options do your influx of directors offer your lot on the field,what position will they play on the field,perhaps a 5th goalkeeper to keep the trend going.[/p][/quote]13 points Mungo. Explain that one.[/p][/quote]"13 points Mungo. Explain that one." OK let me try. I guess you mean 13 is an accumulation of points gained for,in this case football, A certain number of points are gained for a "win" or a "draw". A "win" when one team gets more goals than the other. A "draw" when both teams finish equally, but none for a loss. The more points you get means you may get a prize if you come top. In your case you don't get the prize because you are not top. Anything you don't understand please let us all know so we can enlighten you.We all know how hard it is being a Dingle with very little intelligence. Don't worry there are many like you in Dingleland,you are not alone.I hope this explain the very difficult term,"13 points". Have a nice day.[/p][/quote]13 is the number of points we are above you morons. We were 13 points above you last October, we are 13 points above you now. Strange but true. Here's another fact.... Derby 1 - 0 QPR Which means Burnley FC are 2nd in the league. 2nd is an automatic promotion spot, that means the team in 2nd place goes into the Premier League. So you are in fact wrong when you say you don't get a prize if you're not top. 3rd to 6th place are play-off positions. Blackburn are 9th.[/p][/quote]That's not what you asked. You asked to explain 13 points. By the way a "Mungo" is an oil field in the Central North Sea. Why are you calling me and others,"an oil field" Seems a really strange way to communicate with some body. Could that have something to do with your lack of knowledge and poor intellect. Or is that you are just a miserable old Dingle. Told you before,plenty like you in Dingleland. You are not alone. earwego

11:51pm Mon 10 Feb 14

2014 and a stadium with wood seats? says...

look.up.blackburn wrote:
Blackburn_End wrote:
Steven Seagull wrote:
look.up.blackburn wrote:
Just another non-scoring, no-mark journeyman looking to ride the Ewood cash cow. Give it 3 or 4 games when he's hardly had a look in and Best will have a new b!tching partner. Why do you clowns keep doing it to yourselves?

I'd like to go a day without having reason to laugh at you, I really would.
That's never gonna happen.
What are you clowns going to do when you get pumped at Ewood next month?

Online Bingo?... Dating websites?... Ebay?...Child ****?
Blackburn_BellEnd,

Do you really see that happening? I mean really?

The only thing you'll be pumping is your fist in the run up the game, as usual, spouting all manner of nonsense about Blackburn still being a decent side. Truth be told, you lot are very, very weak. You have recently lost both your captain and your most creative player, you have taken a number of spankings recently which shows that your twitchy defence cannot stand up to attacking football, and not only this your goals have also dried up.

You have to play Reading (away), Brighton (home), and Bolton (away) before we take over Ewood, by which point I can see you in the bottom half looking at a 20 point gap and the shame of bending over to give Burnley another vital 3 points in our challenge for automatic promotion.
We take over ewood ?.....you don't even go to home games you schizophrenic..... how can you tie your colours to bfc when you don't even
Go to any matches... you are less than a plastic fan you school gate dweller
[quote][p][bold]look.up.blackburn[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Blackburn_End[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Steven Seagull[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]look.up.blackburn[/bold] wrote: Just another non-scoring, no-mark journeyman looking to ride the Ewood cash cow. Give it 3 or 4 games when he's hardly had a look in and Best will have a new b!tching partner. Why do you clowns keep doing it to yourselves? I'd like to go a day without having reason to laugh at you, I really would.[/p][/quote]That's never gonna happen.[/p][/quote]What are you clowns going to do when you get pumped at Ewood next month? Online Bingo?... Dating websites?... Ebay?...Child ****?[/p][/quote]Blackburn_BellEnd, Do you really see that happening? I mean really? The only thing you'll be pumping is your fist in the run up the game, as usual, spouting all manner of nonsense about Blackburn still being a decent side. Truth be told, you lot are very, very weak. You have recently lost both your captain and your most creative player, you have taken a number of spankings recently which shows that your twitchy defence cannot stand up to attacking football, and not only this your goals have also dried up. You have to play Reading (away), Brighton (home), and Bolton (away) before we take over Ewood, by which point I can see you in the bottom half looking at a 20 point gap and the shame of bending over to give Burnley another vital 3 points in our challenge for automatic promotion.[/p][/quote]We take over ewood ?.....you don't even go to home games you schizophrenic..... how can you tie your colours to bfc when you don't even Go to any matches... you are less than a plastic fan you school gate dweller 2014 and a stadium with wood seats?

11:19am Tue 11 Feb 14

MattNewcastle says...

A Rover 45 years and over wrote:
As long as he doesn't replace Gestede because he has done nothing wrong for me, he has provided the power and strength along with footballing ability and has made much more of a positive contribution than Rhodes we have missed this type of player all season. Would be in the team every week and should not be sacrificed every when making substitutions. To play him on the wing on Saturday was absolute rubbish and GB should get a grip. Rubbish tactics rubbish game I am afraid.
Totally agree
[quote][p][bold]A Rover 45 years and over[/bold] wrote: As long as he doesn't replace Gestede because he has done nothing wrong for me, he has provided the power and strength along with footballing ability and has made much more of a positive contribution than Rhodes we have missed this type of player all season. Would be in the team every week and should not be sacrificed every when making substitutions. To play him on the wing on Saturday was absolute rubbish and GB should get a grip. Rubbish tactics rubbish game I am afraid.[/p][/quote]Totally agree MattNewcastle

11:19am Tue 11 Feb 14

junction10 says...

look.up.blackburn wrote:
No-dad reality check... Burnley went 2nd in the Championship on 21 September 2013 after a 2-1 win at Leeds. Following a 2-0 win at Doncaster on October 1st Burnley went to the top of the Championship. At that time Blackburn Rovers were 8th in the league. 10 games had been played. Burnley were 8 points ahead of Blackburn Rovers. Fast forward to the present day. 29 games have now been played (Blackburn have played 30). Burnley have amassed 33 points since October 1st. Blackburn have amassed... 28 points. Burnley are now 13 points and 19 goals better off than Blackburn Rovers. Burnley are still in an automatic promotion position. Blackburn have dropped to 9th place. What happened to that big catch up? Why are we still so far ahead of you?
Loving it. I can almost taste the disappointment and jealousy oozing from Rovers fans when they see Burnley's wins and see us sitting pretty in the Automatic spots as we have pretty much all season.

Most of us feel so little about Blackburn now that getting a draw at Ewood will not cause upset "Because we haven't beaten Blackburn in (34/5??) years" it will be a case of missing out on 2 points in our promotion chase, a la Brighton and Sheff Wed results. Honestly you lot are small fry now, I've lost all interest and just enjoy watching the gap between us widen.

Oh, and to finish, please save all your "Bonleh", "inbred", "your stadium is a s'*thole" jibes and take a look at the past few weeks worth of news on a local and national scale. Sex with horses, sex with sisters, benefits capital, "ghost town" like nightlife, and the fact your economic growth is years behind the rest of Lancashire means we have nothing to be envious of you for, so please stop trying to make us.
[quote][p][bold]look.up.blackburn[/bold] wrote: No-dad reality check... Burnley went 2nd in the Championship on 21 September 2013 after a 2-1 win at Leeds. Following a 2-0 win at Doncaster on October 1st Burnley went to the top of the Championship. At that time Blackburn Rovers were 8th in the league. 10 games had been played. Burnley were 8 points ahead of Blackburn Rovers. Fast forward to the present day. 29 games have now been played (Blackburn have played 30). Burnley have amassed 33 points since October 1st. Blackburn have amassed... 28 points. Burnley are now 13 points and 19 goals better off than Blackburn Rovers. Burnley are still in an automatic promotion position. Blackburn have dropped to 9th place. What happened to that big catch up? Why are we still so far ahead of you?[/p][/quote]Loving it. I can almost taste the disappointment and jealousy oozing from Rovers fans when they see Burnley's wins and see us sitting pretty in the Automatic spots as we have pretty much all season. Most of us feel so little about Blackburn now that getting a draw at Ewood will not cause upset "Because we haven't beaten Blackburn in (34/5??) years" it will be a case of missing out on 2 points in our promotion chase, a la Brighton and Sheff Wed results. Honestly you lot are small fry now, I've lost all interest and just enjoy watching the gap between us widen. Oh, and to finish, please save all your "Bonleh", "inbred", "your stadium is a s'*thole" jibes and take a look at the past few weeks worth of news on a local and national scale. Sex with horses, sex with sisters, benefits capital, "ghost town" like nightlife, and the fact your economic growth is years behind the rest of Lancashire means we have nothing to be envious of you for, so please stop trying to make us. junction10

1:12pm Tue 11 Feb 14

Wild Rover says...

junction10 wrote:
look.up.blackburn wrote:
No-dad reality check... Burnley went 2nd in the Championship on 21 September 2013 after a 2-1 win at Leeds. Following a 2-0 win at Doncaster on October 1st Burnley went to the top of the Championship. At that time Blackburn Rovers were 8th in the league. 10 games had been played. Burnley were 8 points ahead of Blackburn Rovers. Fast forward to the present day. 29 games have now been played (Blackburn have played 30). Burnley have amassed 33 points since October 1st. Blackburn have amassed... 28 points. Burnley are now 13 points and 19 goals better off than Blackburn Rovers. Burnley are still in an automatic promotion position. Blackburn have dropped to 9th place. What happened to that big catch up? Why are we still so far ahead of you?
Loving it. I can almost taste the disappointment and jealousy oozing from Rovers fans when they see Burnley's wins and see us sitting pretty in the Automatic spots as we have pretty much all season.

Most of us feel so little about Blackburn now that getting a draw at Ewood will not cause upset "Because we haven't beaten Blackburn in (34/5??) years" it will be a case of missing out on 2 points in our promotion chase, a la Brighton and Sheff Wed results. Honestly you lot are small fry now, I've lost all interest and just enjoy watching the gap between us widen.

Oh, and to finish, please save all your "Bonleh", "inbred", "your stadium is a s'*thole" jibes and take a look at the past few weeks worth of news on a local and national scale. Sex with horses, sex with sisters, benefits capital, "ghost town" like nightlife, and the fact your economic growth is years behind the rest of Lancashire means we have nothing to be envious of you for, so please stop trying to make us.
Really, " most of us feel so little about Blacburn....
That we spend every wakeful minute on here posting ABOUT
Blackburn, yes very not bothered, not!
By the way Baldric ( zWluv, etc etc) define most of us?
Us is you, you invent accounts daily to make it look like there is an US, but it is just you, little Billy no mates. Trolling 24/7, how sad and very lonely
And I am still awaiting an answer from you regarding Flood, Kilby and the use of any possible ? prize money
Oh and your so called stadium is a sh 1t hole, you are all inbred, I mean. Warburtons are building a new bakery in Burnley as the heard you were all into bread...
Burnley a club with no ambition ( see transfer activity) and no hope for the future ( see Kilby/ Flood)
Doing ok at the moment but as Meatloaf said, All revved up with Nowhere to go..
Bye for now
[quote][p][bold]junction10[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]look.up.blackburn[/bold] wrote: No-dad reality check... Burnley went 2nd in the Championship on 21 September 2013 after a 2-1 win at Leeds. Following a 2-0 win at Doncaster on October 1st Burnley went to the top of the Championship. At that time Blackburn Rovers were 8th in the league. 10 games had been played. Burnley were 8 points ahead of Blackburn Rovers. Fast forward to the present day. 29 games have now been played (Blackburn have played 30). Burnley have amassed 33 points since October 1st. Blackburn have amassed... 28 points. Burnley are now 13 points and 19 goals better off than Blackburn Rovers. Burnley are still in an automatic promotion position. Blackburn have dropped to 9th place. What happened to that big catch up? Why are we still so far ahead of you?[/p][/quote]Loving it. I can almost taste the disappointment and jealousy oozing from Rovers fans when they see Burnley's wins and see us sitting pretty in the Automatic spots as we have pretty much all season. Most of us feel so little about Blackburn now that getting a draw at Ewood will not cause upset "Because we haven't beaten Blackburn in (34/5??) years" it will be a case of missing out on 2 points in our promotion chase, a la Brighton and Sheff Wed results. Honestly you lot are small fry now, I've lost all interest and just enjoy watching the gap between us widen. Oh, and to finish, please save all your "Bonleh", "inbred", "your stadium is a s'*thole" jibes and take a look at the past few weeks worth of news on a local and national scale. Sex with horses, sex with sisters, benefits capital, "ghost town" like nightlife, and the fact your economic growth is years behind the rest of Lancashire means we have nothing to be envious of you for, so please stop trying to make us.[/p][/quote]Really, " most of us feel so little about Blacburn.... That we spend every wakeful minute on here posting ABOUT Blackburn, yes very not bothered, not! By the way Baldric ( zWluv, etc etc) define most of us? Us is you, you invent accounts daily to make it look like there is an US, but it is just you, little Billy no mates. Trolling 24/7, how sad and very lonely And I am still awaiting an answer from you regarding Flood, Kilby and the use of any possible ? prize money Oh and your so called stadium is a sh 1t hole, you are all inbred, I mean. Warburtons are building a new bakery in Burnley as the heard you were all into bread... Burnley a club with no ambition ( see transfer activity) and no hope for the future ( see Kilby/ Flood) Doing ok at the moment but as Meatloaf said, All revved up with Nowhere to go.. Bye for now Wild Rover

1:32pm Tue 11 Feb 14

look.up.blackburn says...

Wild Rover wrote:
junction10 wrote:
look.up.blackburn wrote:
No-dad reality check... Burnley went 2nd in the Championship on 21 September 2013 after a 2-1 win at Leeds. Following a 2-0 win at Doncaster on October 1st Burnley went to the top of the Championship. At that time Blackburn Rovers were 8th in the league. 10 games had been played. Burnley were 8 points ahead of Blackburn Rovers. Fast forward to the present day. 29 games have now been played (Blackburn have played 30). Burnley have amassed 33 points since October 1st. Blackburn have amassed... 28 points. Burnley are now 13 points and 19 goals better off than Blackburn Rovers. Burnley are still in an automatic promotion position. Blackburn have dropped to 9th place. What happened to that big catch up? Why are we still so far ahead of you?
Loving it. I can almost taste the disappointment and jealousy oozing from Rovers fans when they see Burnley's wins and see us sitting pretty in the Automatic spots as we have pretty much all season.

Most of us feel so little about Blackburn now that getting a draw at Ewood will not cause upset "Because we haven't beaten Blackburn in (34/5??) years" it will be a case of missing out on 2 points in our promotion chase, a la Brighton and Sheff Wed results. Honestly you lot are small fry now, I've lost all interest and just enjoy watching the gap between us widen.

Oh, and to finish, please save all your "Bonleh", "inbred", "your stadium is a s'*thole" jibes and take a look at the past few weeks worth of news on a local and national scale. Sex with horses, sex with sisters, benefits capital, "ghost town" like nightlife, and the fact your economic growth is years behind the rest of Lancashire means we have nothing to be envious of you for, so please stop trying to make us.
Really, " most of us feel so little about Blacburn....
That we spend every wakeful minute on here posting ABOUT
Blackburn, yes very not bothered, not!
By the way Baldric ( zWluv, etc etc) define most of us?
Us is you, you invent accounts daily to make it look like there is an US, but it is just you, little Billy no mates. Trolling 24/7, how sad and very lonely
And I am still awaiting an answer from you regarding Flood, Kilby and the use of any possible ? prize money
Oh and your so called stadium is a sh 1t hole, you are all inbred, I mean. Warburtons are building a new bakery in Burnley as the heard you were all into bread...
Burnley a club with no ambition ( see transfer activity) and no hope for the future ( see Kilby/ Flood)
Doing ok at the moment but as Meatloaf said, All revved up with Nowhere to go..
Bye for now
Burnley FC "No ambition and no hope for the future." Spoken like a true no-dad. Your jealousy is becoming comical. Please give it a rest.

13 points, 19 goals, and a game in hand on you clowns. If we have no hope for the future, then what of Blackburn Rovers.....

Blackburn Rovers recent history:

2009/2010 Premier League 10th
2010/2011 Premier League 15th
2011/2012 Premier League 19th (RELEGATED)
2012/2013 Championship 17th (survival on last day of season)
2013/2014 ?

Anyone else notice a pattern here? And all the while the financial situation worsens and the squad weakens.

A bib and cones man as manager who's previous experience includes being under 12's coach, the sale of your captain for a quarter of what you paid for him, letting your most creative player leave when what you need the most is someone to unlock defences, debts spiralling out of control, a transfer embargo on the horizon, and your star player biding his time until he can escape your cesspit of a football club in the summer.

I would say it is you with no ambition and no hope for the future.
[quote][p][bold]Wild Rover[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]junction10[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]look.up.blackburn[/bold] wrote: No-dad reality check... Burnley went 2nd in the Championship on 21 September 2013 after a 2-1 win at Leeds. Following a 2-0 win at Doncaster on October 1st Burnley went to the top of the Championship. At that time Blackburn Rovers were 8th in the league. 10 games had been played. Burnley were 8 points ahead of Blackburn Rovers. Fast forward to the present day. 29 games have now been played (Blackburn have played 30). Burnley have amassed 33 points since October 1st. Blackburn have amassed... 28 points. Burnley are now 13 points and 19 goals better off than Blackburn Rovers. Burnley are still in an automatic promotion position. Blackburn have dropped to 9th place. What happened to that big catch up? Why are we still so far ahead of you?[/p][/quote]Loving it. I can almost taste the disappointment and jealousy oozing from Rovers fans when they see Burnley's wins and see us sitting pretty in the Automatic spots as we have pretty much all season. Most of us feel so little about Blackburn now that getting a draw at Ewood will not cause upset "Because we haven't beaten Blackburn in (34/5??) years" it will be a case of missing out on 2 points in our promotion chase, a la Brighton and Sheff Wed results. Honestly you lot are small fry now, I've lost all interest and just enjoy watching the gap between us widen. Oh, and to finish, please save all your "Bonleh", "inbred", "your stadium is a s'*thole" jibes and take a look at the past few weeks worth of news on a local and national scale. Sex with horses, sex with sisters, benefits capital, "ghost town" like nightlife, and the fact your economic growth is years behind the rest of Lancashire means we have nothing to be envious of you for, so please stop trying to make us.[/p][/quote]Really, " most of us feel so little about Blacburn.... That we spend every wakeful minute on here posting ABOUT Blackburn, yes very not bothered, not! By the way Baldric ( zWluv, etc etc) define most of us? Us is you, you invent accounts daily to make it look like there is an US, but it is just you, little Billy no mates. Trolling 24/7, how sad and very lonely And I am still awaiting an answer from you regarding Flood, Kilby and the use of any possible ? prize money Oh and your so called stadium is a sh 1t hole, you are all inbred, I mean. Warburtons are building a new bakery in Burnley as the heard you were all into bread... Burnley a club with no ambition ( see transfer activity) and no hope for the future ( see Kilby/ Flood) Doing ok at the moment but as Meatloaf said, All revved up with Nowhere to go.. Bye for now[/p][/quote]Burnley FC "No ambition and no hope for the future." Spoken like a true no-dad. Your jealousy is becoming comical. Please give it a rest. 13 points, 19 goals, and a game in hand on you clowns. If we have no hope for the future, then what of Blackburn Rovers..... Blackburn Rovers recent history: 2009/2010 Premier League 10th 2010/2011 Premier League 15th 2011/2012 Premier League 19th (RELEGATED) 2012/2013 Championship 17th (survival on last day of season) 2013/2014 ? Anyone else notice a pattern here? And all the while the financial situation worsens and the squad weakens. A bib and cones man as manager who's previous experience includes being under 12's coach, the sale of your captain for a quarter of what you paid for him, letting your most creative player leave when what you need the most is someone to unlock defences, debts spiralling out of control, a transfer embargo on the horizon, and your star player biding his time until he can escape your cesspit of a football club in the summer. I would say it is you with no ambition and no hope for the future. look.up.blackburn

4:15pm Tue 11 Feb 14

Wild Rover says...

And once again our Troll swerves the real issue by trotting out a list of problems. Past and present but mostly past now
And once again our Troll swerves the real issue by trotting out a list of problems. Past and present but mostly past now Wild Rover

8:17am Wed 12 Feb 14

junction10 says...

Wild Rover wrote:
And once again our Troll swerves the real issue by trotting out a list of problems. Past and present but mostly past now
That was my very first post on here as I really can't be bothered with the usual tittle tattle on here, so where you've conjoured up this 24/7 troll idea is beyond me. And besides, it's hardly trolling more statement of facts. The truth really is the majority don't care anymore, you're so far out of sight we've got other priorities.
[quote][p][bold]Wild Rover[/bold] wrote: And once again our Troll swerves the real issue by trotting out a list of problems. Past and present but mostly past now[/p][/quote]That was my very first post on here as I really can't be bothered with the usual tittle tattle on here, so where you've conjoured up this 24/7 troll idea is beyond me. And besides, it's hardly trolling more statement of facts. The truth really is the majority don't care anymore, you're so far out of sight we've got other priorities. junction10

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree