FULL-TIME: Southampton 2, Burnley 0 (From This Is Lancashire)

Oh no! We lost and Blackburn won. Victory for the value takers. It's bad news for society as a whole.

Roll on next weekend when all returns to normal.

Jimmy Jambone wrote:
Oh no! We lost and Blackburn won. Victory for the value takers. It's bad news for society as a whole. Roll on next weekend when all returns to normal.

Value-takers? Are you unwell you jibbering fool?

Anyway, sanity is restored on Planet Football. Rovers nonchalantly destroy an expensively assembled QPR, while Bumley come a cropper to a half-decent championship side. T'was ever thus!

We'll never be mastered...

Up T'Rovers

Where's Gaydari? Unusually quiet for a gobsh*te!

Blackburn Yoof wrote:

Jimmy Jambone wrote: Oh no! We lost and Blackburn won. Victory for the value takers. It's bad news for society as a whole. Roll on next weekend when all returns to normal.

Value-takers? Are you unwell you jibbering fool? Anyway, sanity is restored on Planet Football. Rovers nonchalantly destroy an expensively assembled QPR, while Bumley come a cropper to a half-decent championship side. T'was ever thus! We'll never be mastered... Up T'Rovers

Oh look another deluded fool from Bollywood who cant get the facts right. Expensively assembled Q.P.R side?? Funny after looking at the relative sides today you must only be summising that the transfer fees for cetain players in the Q.R.R starting line up was as printed in the media, think you will actually find that the majority of those fees were undisclosed as are a nimber for that of the Rovers side. But there again if you take the relative match day palyers in to account i think you find Rovers team (inc subs) actually cost more than Q.P.R's. So before you make sweeping claims get your facts straight you BINT!! Rovers cost 19.5 mill compared to Q.P.R at 11.95 mill sorry to Pee on your chips. NOT!!!!! UTC!!!

Hey designer, were you one of the British spies in Allo Allo?
*
I am summising that yarr nimber is ooop!

designer wrote:

Blackburn Yoof wrote:

Jimmy Jambone wrote: Oh no! We lost and Blackburn won. Victory for the value takers. It's bad news for society as a whole. Roll on next weekend when all returns to normal.

Value-takers? Are you unwell you jibbering fool? Anyway, sanity is restored on Planet Football. Rovers nonchalantly destroy an expensively assembled QPR, while Bumley come a cropper to a half-decent championship side. T'was ever thus! We'll never be mastered... Up T'Rovers

Oh look another deluded fool from Bollywood who cant get the facts right. Expensively assembled Q.P.R side?? Funny after looking at the relative sides today you must only be summising that the transfer fees for cetain players in the Q.R.R starting line up was as printed in the media, think you will actually find that the majority of those fees were undisclosed as are a nimber for that of the Rovers side. But there again if you take the relative match day palyers in to account i think you find Rovers team (inc subs) actually cost more than Q.P.R's. So before you make sweeping claims get your facts straight you BINT!! Rovers cost 19.5 mill compared to Q.P.R at 11.95 mill sorry to Pee on your chips. NOT!!!!! UTC!!!

We have a Dingle that actually thinks he can count oh oh oh don't think so !!
Once a bitter Dingle always a bitter Dingle .

burner wrote:
LT, instead of "for legal reasons", please explain why there is censorship.

its been explained about 100000000 times..

Just back from yet another away game watching the mighty clarets. And its just not fare to show off to Inbredburn fans that us clarets can afford to attend away games, Even when venkys are trying their best to help our inbred scroat friends out

nontetleydrinker wrote:
Just back from yet another away game watching the mighty clarets. And its just not fare to show off to Inbredburn fans that us clarets can afford to attend away games, Even when venkys are trying their best to help our inbred scroat friends out

Fibber, Liar , you never went why because soon as you say mighty Dingles we all know you are are a day dreamer !

nontetleydrinker wrote:
Just back from yet another away game watching the mighty clarets. And its just not fare to show off to Inbredburn fans that us clarets can afford to attend away games, Even when venkys are trying their best to help our inbred scroat friends out

That's right, some Clarets can afford to go to the odd away game from time to time if they save up their cheated benefits rather than blowing it all on spending the weekend getting wasted in dirty boozers in Burnley town centre. However, considering only about 10,000 can be bothered to turn up at Turf Moor for a supposed 'promotion push' I doubt many could bring themselves to travel down to Southampton.

Better off saving up for a couple of years then have a day out at Old Trafford. Then you'd be a 'real' United supporter and you'd get to watch the top flight football that has eluded an entire generation in Burnley. I know you're one of those that was stood in the pub at dinner time cheering on United.

jack01 wrote:

nontetleydrinker wrote:
Just back from yet another away game watching the mighty clarets. And its just not fare to show off to Inbredburn fans that us clarets can afford to attend away games, Even when venkys are trying their best to help our inbred scroat friends out

That's right, some Clarets can afford to go to the odd away game from time to time if they save up their cheated benefits rather than blowing it all on spending the weekend getting wasted in dirty boozers in Burnley town centre. However, considering only about 10,000 can be bothered to turn up at Turf Moor for a supposed 'promotion push' I doubt many could bring themselves to travel down to Southampton.

Better off saving up for a couple of years then have a day out at Old Trafford. Then you'd be a 'real' United supporter and you'd get to watch the top flight football that has eluded an entire generation in Burnley. I know you're one of those that was stood in the pub at dinner time cheering on United.

Cheated benefits? Get back to washing windows, sorry I mean licking.

Forever Blue wrote:

Blackburn Yoof wrote: Where's Gaydari? Unusually quiet for a gobsh*te!

There no bigger gob*shte than this guy I haven't told you this he been at Elland Road today with his mate! shuuuuuu Dad and lad ticket cant make it up Once a Yorkshire man always a Yorkshire man

Gaydari, a closet Leeds fan? The man has no shame! The inbred Yarkshur freak!!

Robbie wrote:

burner wrote:
LT, instead of "for legal reasons", please explain why there is censorship.

its been explained about 100000000 times..

Not by LT it hasn't.

burner wrote:

Robbie wrote:

burner wrote:
LT, instead of "for legal reasons", please explain why there is censorship.

its been explained about 100000000 times..

Not by LT it hasn't.

kentro.anderson.venk
ys.will sue the lt if anyone puts something on here what they dont like(lets say the truth about the way the club is being run)at the shareholders meeting it was stated the venkeys will do as they please its their club not the fans club anymore

burner wrote:

Robbie wrote:

burner wrote: LT, instead of "for legal reasons", please explain why there is censorship.

its been explained about 100000000 times..

Not by LT it hasn't.

hmm yes it has.

Forever Blue wrote:

designer wrote:

Blackburn Yoof wrote:

Jimmy Jambone wrote: Oh no! We lost and Blackburn won. Victory for the value takers. It's bad news for society as a whole. Roll on next weekend when all returns to normal.

Value-takers? Are you unwell you jibbering fool? Anyway, sanity is restored on Planet Football. Rovers nonchalantly destroy an expensively assembled QPR, while Bumley come a cropper to a half-decent championship side. T'was ever thus! We'll never be mastered... Up T'Rovers

Oh look another deluded fool from Bollywood who cant get the facts right. Expensively assembled Q.P.R side?? Funny after looking at the relative sides today you must only be summising that the transfer fees for cetain players in the Q.R.R starting line up was as printed in the media, think you will actually find that the majority of those fees were undisclosed as are a nimber for that of the Rovers side. But there again if you take the relative match day palyers in to account i think you find Rovers team (inc subs) actually cost more than Q.P.R's. So before you make sweeping claims get your facts straight you BINT!! Rovers cost 19.5 mill compared to Q.P.R at 11.95 mill sorry to Pee on your chips. NOT!!!!! UTC!!!

We have a Dingle that actually thinks he can count oh oh oh don't think so !! Once a bitter Dingle always a bitter Dingle .

Bitter what do i have to be bitter at?? As for counting well you may have that problem in your neck of the woods but not round here. Look at the teams inc subs from yesterday & then look up there relevant transfer figures as quoted by each of the clubs & you do the maths!!!!!! Oh i forgot you cant can you cause you have a problem counting past 1. There agian you have to post on here cause you havent got a forum have you at weekends cause of all the vile libel you post on your own pages LMAO!!!! UTC

designer wrote:

Forever Blue wrote:

designer wrote:

Blackburn Yoof wrote:

Jimmy Jambone wrote: Oh no! We lost and Blackburn won. Victory for the value takers. It's bad news for society as a whole. Roll on next weekend when all returns to normal.

Value-takers? Are you unwell you jibbering fool? Anyway, sanity is restored on Planet Football. Rovers nonchalantly destroy an expensively assembled QPR, while Bumley come a cropper to a half-decent championship side. T'was ever thus! We'll never be mastered... Up T'Rovers

Oh look another deluded fool from Bollywood who cant get the facts right. Expensively assembled Q.P.R side?? Funny after looking at the relative sides today you must only be summising that the transfer fees for cetain players in the Q.R.R starting line up was as printed in the media, think you will actually find that the majority of those fees were undisclosed as are a nimber for that of the Rovers side. But there again if you take the relative match day palyers in to account i think you find Rovers team (inc subs) actually cost more than Q.P.R's. So before you make sweeping claims get your facts straight you BINT!! Rovers cost 19.5 mill compared to Q.P.R at 11.95 mill sorry to Pee on your chips. NOT!!!!! UTC!!!

We have a Dingle that actually thinks he can count oh oh oh don't think so !! Once a bitter Dingle always a bitter Dingle .

Bitter what do i have to be bitter at?? As for counting well you may have that problem in your neck of the woods but not round here. Look at the teams inc subs from yesterday & then look up there relevant transfer figures as quoted by each of the clubs & you do the maths!!!!!! Oh i forgot you cant can you cause you have a problem counting past 1. There agian you have to post on here cause you havent got a forum have you at weekends cause of all the vile libel you post on your own pages LMAO!!!! UTC

Vile libeL? Actually it is the truth and you know how some individuals dont like to hear the truth. Another truth is that some Burnley fans post more comments under the Blackburn Rovers news articles than they do under their own club's news. Obviously the former is interesting and relevant and the latter is just plain boring.

... the Rovers win
.
and Burnley lose
.
Oh Rovers
.
You got me singing the Blues!!!

So how come all the inbred comments from inbredburn fans that call clarets fans comments remain, But when clarets give it back they are deleted ? blackburn evening rag by any chance

Us clarets love venky chicken.

nontetleydrinker wrote:
So how come all the inbred comments from inbredburn fans that call clarets fans comments remain, But when clarets give it back they are deleted ? blackburn evening rag by any chance

Us clarets love venky chicken.

It's just more taking. That's what Blackburn do. If there is value anywhere in the world that they haven't created, they will take it and then claim entitlement to it.

That's why rather than fighting the Venkys fight themselves, they keep asking the LET to do it for them.

And then, baffled, they wonder why ex players like Shearer have no attachment or loyalty to them. Although they indignantly claim they should.

Jimmy Jambone wrote:

nontetleydrinker wrote: So how come all the inbred comments from inbredburn fans that call clarets fans comments remain, But when clarets give it back they are deleted ? blackburn evening rag by any chance Us clarets love venky chicken.

It's just more taking. That's what Blackburn do. If there is value anywhere in the world that they haven't created, they will take it and then claim entitlement to it. That's why rather than fighting the Venkys fight themselves, they keep asking the LET to do it for them. And then, baffled, they wonder why ex players like Shearer have no attachment or loyalty to them. Although they indignantly claim they should.

Jambone & Nontetley - 2 cheeks of the same a*se. Go to sleep ladies, you've got a big game against Barnsley this week.

Keith Hill's Barnsley army...

For legal reasons I suggest all Rovers fans stop buying the Telegraph,until such time that Telegraph explain closing their comments column at week-ends FOR LEGAL REASONS!!!