New Burnley striker Jutkiewicz looking to make 'big contribution'

Lukas Jutkiewicz (centre) gets into the swing of training with Burnley in Austria alongside Danny Ings, Kieran Tripper and Dean Marney

Lukas Jutkiewicz (centre) gets into the swing of training with Burnley in Austria alongside Danny Ings, Kieran Tripper and Dean Marney

First published in Sport
Last updated
This Is Lancashire: Photograph of the Author by , Burnley FC reporter

NEW signing Lukas Jutkiewicz is out to make a “big contribution” to Burnley after completing his move from Middlesbrough to Turf Moor.

The Clarets won the race for the striker’s signature after being the first to meet Boro’s asking price last week.

The 25-year-old met with Burnley staff on Monday to hold talks and complete his medical before the squad set off for their pre-season tour of Austria.

MORE TOP STORIES:

And despite a late bid by Bolton Wanderers to snap up Dougie Freedman’s top target, which was also accepted by Middlesbrough, and strong interest from Wigan, Derby and Wolves, the pull of joining Burnley in the Premier League proved irresistible.

“I’m delighted the deal got concluded so I could join up with the lads out here in Austria,” said Jutkiewicz.

“I’m looking forward to the season ahead and hopefully making a big contribution to the team.”

The 6ft 1ins former Coventry striker put pen to paper on a three-year deal in time to fly out to Vienna and be introduced to his new team-mates ahead of the afternoon training session on day two of their week-long training camp.

Middlesbrough have made a profit on Jutkiewicz, who they bought from Coventry in January 2012 for £1.3m.

The initial fee is thought to be £1.5m with the potential to rise to £2.25m with incentives including appearances.

Burnley boss Sean Dyche has already added former Watford and Bolton striker Marvin Sordell to his attacking armoury and believes Jutkiewicz, who David Moyes signed for Everton in 2007, offers another dimension to their front line.

“He’s a physical presence who can hold the ball up very well and link play. We think there is goals in him and it is very similar to the Sam Vokes story where he’s always done well and we’re looking for him to build on what he’s done,” said Dyche.

“There is a nice demand now in that area of the pitch as all the players offer something different to the team so we’re happy with how that is developing.

“I still think there is development in Lukas, he’s 25 and has been around a little bit now and he finished last season very strongly.

“I feel there is even more to come and he’ll be hungry for that. He’ll be working with a good group who are all hungry to not only achieve things but to keep pushing themselves as individuals.

“That’s a big part of our mentality and he’ll fit into that very nicely.”

Jutkiewicz, who is commonly known as ‘The Juke’ by supporters, was wanted by Bolton after ending the season on loan at the Reebok Stadium from January, scoring seven goals in 20 games.

Comments (55)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

9:25am Wed 16 Jul 14

McClaret says...

First - sorry AP4B, don't get too upset by it - obviously must be busy in Staric today
First - sorry AP4B, don't get too upset by it - obviously must be busy in Staric today McClaret
  • Score: 5

9:39am Wed 16 Jul 14

Chuck Norris' Roundhouse says...

Bolton fans are genuinely gutted that they have missed out on The Juke.

Ings plays better with a big man up front and because Vokes is out for another six months it makes sense for us to get him now.
Bolton fans are genuinely gutted that they have missed out on The Juke. Ings plays better with a big man up front and because Vokes is out for another six months it makes sense for us to get him now. Chuck Norris' Roundhouse
  • Score: 6

10:07am Wed 16 Jul 14

AnotherPounding4Burnley says...

We have no option but to get the best out of this championship chump. Just hope tripper can pick out hos flat face in the six yard box.
We have no option but to get the best out of this championship chump. Just hope tripper can pick out hos flat face in the six yard box. AnotherPounding4Burnley
  • Score: -13

10:13am Wed 16 Jul 14

Scamp Kingsley says...

The Clarets have been linked with LJ several times in the last few years so I'm not surprised we've finally got him. Can't think of a better match for Voksey's position in the team. SD will get him to the next level. Welcome to the Turf Mr Duke, it's gonna be fun.
UTC.
The Clarets have been linked with LJ several times in the last few years so I'm not surprised we've finally got him. Can't think of a better match for Voksey's position in the team. SD will get him to the next level. Welcome to the Turf Mr Duke, it's gonna be fun. UTC. Scamp Kingsley
  • Score: 8

10:14am Wed 16 Jul 14

Rob_H2O says...

AnotherPounding4Burn
ley
wrote:
We have no option but to get the best out of this championship chump. Just hope tripper can pick out hos flat face in the six yard box.
A Burnley fan calling the clubs latest acquisition "a chump". I'm so glad a solid Claret like you plays his role in ensuring everyone gets fair chance before name calling and criticism starts.
[quote][p][bold]AnotherPounding4Burn ley[/bold] wrote: We have no option but to get the best out of this championship chump. Just hope tripper can pick out hos flat face in the six yard box.[/p][/quote]A Burnley fan calling the clubs latest acquisition "a chump". I'm so glad a solid Claret like you plays his role in ensuring everyone gets fair chance before name calling and criticism starts. Rob_H2O
  • Score: 12

10:18am Wed 16 Jul 14

Scamp Kingsley says...

AnotherPounding4Burn
ley
wrote:
We have no option but to get the best out of this championship chump. Just hope tripper can pick out hos flat face in the six yard box.
The only 'tripper' around here is you. Now scurry off smack rat.
[quote][p][bold]AnotherPounding4Burn ley[/bold] wrote: We have no option but to get the best out of this championship chump. Just hope tripper can pick out hos flat face in the six yard box.[/p][/quote]The only 'tripper' around here is you. Now scurry off smack rat. Scamp Kingsley
  • Score: 11

10:19am Wed 16 Jul 14

TurfMoorTom says...

Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
Bolton fans are genuinely gutted that they have missed out on The Juke.

Ings plays better with a big man up front and because Vokes is out for another six months it makes sense for us to get him now.
Yes but Bolton are in the Championship (and he wasn't particularly prolific even there). Why bother going for someone who's mid career and all his early career has done is demonstate he isn't up to the challenge of the Prem. You really expect too much of Shorn Douche.

If you pay peanuts, you get monkeys. And that's exactly what you've got.
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote: Bolton fans are genuinely gutted that they have missed out on The Juke. Ings plays better with a big man up front and because Vokes is out for another six months it makes sense for us to get him now.[/p][/quote]Yes but Bolton are in the Championship (and he wasn't particularly prolific even there). Why bother going for someone who's mid career and all his early career has done is demonstate he isn't up to the challenge of the Prem. You really expect too much of Shorn Douche. If you pay peanuts, you get monkeys. And that's exactly what you've got. TurfMoorTom
  • Score: -13

10:52am Wed 16 Jul 14

Scamp Kingsley says...

TurfMoorTom wrote:
Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
Bolton fans are genuinely gutted that they have missed out on The Juke.

Ings plays better with a big man up front and because Vokes is out for another six months it makes sense for us to get him now.
Yes but Bolton are in the Championship (and he wasn't particularly prolific even there). Why bother going for someone who's mid career and all his early career has done is demonstate he isn't up to the challenge of the Prem. You really expect too much of Shorn Douche.

If you pay peanuts, you get monkeys. And that's exactly what you've got.
SD's record of paying peanuts and unearthing gems:-
Dave Jones (a freebee from you ha, ha to replace dodgy knee McCann)
Michael Kightly (season loan from PL Stoke)
Tom Heaton (freebee with plenty of practice at relegated Bristol City)
Scott Airfield (swapped a non scoring striker for a free scoring mid fielder)
BTW 'The Duke' scored 7 in 16 matches plus 4 as sub. at a stuttering bolton. So your analysis TMT is just tearful, bitter and twisted wovers propaganda.
[quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote: Bolton fans are genuinely gutted that they have missed out on The Juke. Ings plays better with a big man up front and because Vokes is out for another six months it makes sense for us to get him now.[/p][/quote]Yes but Bolton are in the Championship (and he wasn't particularly prolific even there). Why bother going for someone who's mid career and all his early career has done is demonstate he isn't up to the challenge of the Prem. You really expect too much of Shorn Douche. If you pay peanuts, you get monkeys. And that's exactly what you've got.[/p][/quote]SD's record of paying peanuts and unearthing gems:- Dave Jones (a freebee from you ha, ha to replace dodgy knee McCann) Michael Kightly (season loan from PL Stoke) Tom Heaton (freebee with plenty of practice at relegated Bristol City) Scott Airfield (swapped a non scoring striker for a free scoring mid fielder) BTW 'The Duke' scored 7 in 16 matches plus 4 as sub. at a stuttering bolton. So your analysis TMT is just tearful, bitter and twisted wovers propaganda. Scamp Kingsley
  • Score: 12

11:04am Wed 16 Jul 14

claret mov says...

"If you pay peanuts, you get monkeys. And that's exactly what you've got."

lol our "monkey" cost 2.2 million your monkey come out of the bargain bin at 1st division doncaster for FREE..........WHO'S GOT THE MONKEY thicko
"If you pay peanuts, you get monkeys. And that's exactly what you've got." lol our "monkey" cost 2.2 million your monkey come out of the bargain bin at 1st division doncaster for FREE..........WHO'S GOT THE MONKEY thicko claret mov
  • Score: 3

11:06am Wed 16 Jul 14

Rob_H2O says...

TurfMoorTom wrote:
Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
Bolton fans are genuinely gutted that they have missed out on The Juke.

Ings plays better with a big man up front and because Vokes is out for another six months it makes sense for us to get him now.
Yes but Bolton are in the Championship (and he wasn't particularly prolific even there). Why bother going for someone who's mid career and all his early career has done is demonstate he isn't up to the challenge of the Prem. You really expect too much of Shorn Douche.

If you pay peanuts, you get monkeys. And that's exactly what you've got.
Hi AP4B, good to read the negation of the negative - still same end-result too and from an ID that used to be a solid Burnley fan before 7th May.

Anyway, its not what we expect of Sean Dyche in the context. Its what Sean Dyche expects of Sean Dyche. You see, its his selection not ours. We didn't force him into this. Neither did the Board. He was, after all, enabled to spend £6m on Troy Deeney. The problem was Watford's rejection of the offer, not the raising of the sum in the first place. So, the raising of the cash is not the issue.

Mr Dyche got Burnley promoted amassing 93 points and just five defeats in 46 games. He improved all the players immeasurably. The same principle applies here to. He has a track record. Your opinion is worthless. You have no track record running a football club. He has. You have recognised this in the past pointing out how this club and that club will poach him. Not withstanding the need for you to make up your mind, its important to put this matter into a context.

You're just a keyboard warrior with mixed IDs and swivelling opinions.
[quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote: Bolton fans are genuinely gutted that they have missed out on The Juke. Ings plays better with a big man up front and because Vokes is out for another six months it makes sense for us to get him now.[/p][/quote]Yes but Bolton are in the Championship (and he wasn't particularly prolific even there). Why bother going for someone who's mid career and all his early career has done is demonstate he isn't up to the challenge of the Prem. You really expect too much of Shorn Douche. If you pay peanuts, you get monkeys. And that's exactly what you've got.[/p][/quote]Hi AP4B, good to read the negation of the negative - still same end-result too and from an ID that used to be a solid Burnley fan before 7th May. Anyway, its not what we expect of Sean Dyche in the context. Its what Sean Dyche expects of Sean Dyche. You see, its his selection not ours. We didn't force him into this. Neither did the Board. He was, after all, enabled to spend £6m on Troy Deeney. The problem was Watford's rejection of the offer, not the raising of the sum in the first place. So, the raising of the cash is not the issue. Mr Dyche got Burnley promoted amassing 93 points and just five defeats in 46 games. He improved all the players immeasurably. The same principle applies here to. He has a track record. Your opinion is worthless. You have no track record running a football club. He has. You have recognised this in the past pointing out how this club and that club will poach him. Not withstanding the need for you to make up your mind, its important to put this matter into a context. You're just a keyboard warrior with mixed IDs and swivelling opinions. Rob_H2O
  • Score: 12

11:17am Wed 16 Jul 14

ChickinLickin says...

Scamp Kingsley wrote:
AnotherPounding4Burn

ley
wrote:
We have no option but to get the best out of this championship chump. Just hope tripper can pick out hos flat face in the six yard box.
The only 'tripper' around here is you. Now scurry off smack rat.
Smack Rat LOL just splurted my tea.

Brilliant

And how anyone from Rover can refer to our 'chumps'. Do they watch their own team. I am backing them for relegation this year. Good price.
[quote][p][bold]Scamp Kingsley[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]AnotherPounding4Burn ley[/bold] wrote: We have no option but to get the best out of this championship chump. Just hope tripper can pick out hos flat face in the six yard box.[/p][/quote]The only 'tripper' around here is you. Now scurry off smack rat.[/p][/quote]Smack Rat LOL just splurted my tea. Brilliant And how anyone from Rover can refer to our 'chumps'. Do they watch their own team. I am backing them for relegation this year. Good price. ChickinLickin
  • Score: 6

11:44am Wed 16 Jul 14

Claretcert says...

AnotherPounding4Burn
ley
wrote:
We have no option but to get the best out of this championship chump. Just hope tripper can pick out hos flat face in the six yard box.
This idiot is despised by Blackburn fans as much as he is pitied by our own, no doubt he'll move on to harassing Luton Town or elderly ladies waiting for their pension. Online bully, online stalker, outed as a complete fool, he was given gods abuse on the Rovers pages for his mutliple ID shifting postings of coplete nonsense. I think it's time to put this one to bed Gollum, you've got nothing to say, all you bring is more ridicule on yourself, every ID you own is known. Blackburn fans are rightly furious at your willingness to spoil every thread. It started as a joke, ended as a pitful, obsessive illness on your part. Go away now weird child, we're talking footie and that's not your specialist subject, have a nice life and all that,. try not to think too much about how stupid you've made yourself look. Nobody knows it's you, not the real you. The friendless, lonely disturbed one. Run along now.
[quote][p][bold]AnotherPounding4Burn ley[/bold] wrote: We have no option but to get the best out of this championship chump. Just hope tripper can pick out hos flat face in the six yard box.[/p][/quote]This idiot is despised by Blackburn fans as much as he is pitied by our own, no doubt he'll move on to harassing Luton Town or elderly ladies waiting for their pension. Online bully, online stalker, outed as a complete fool, he was given gods abuse on the Rovers pages for his mutliple ID shifting postings of coplete nonsense. I think it's time to put this one to bed Gollum, you've got nothing to say, all you bring is more ridicule on yourself, every ID you own is known. Blackburn fans are rightly furious at your willingness to spoil every thread. It started as a joke, ended as a pitful, obsessive illness on your part. Go away now weird child, we're talking footie and that's not your specialist subject, have a nice life and all that,. try not to think too much about how stupid you've made yourself look. Nobody knows it's you, not the real you. The friendless, lonely disturbed one. Run along now. Claretcert
  • Score: 4

11:46am Wed 16 Jul 14

McClaret says...

AnotherPounding4Burn
ley
wrote:
We have no option but to get the best out of this championship chump. Just hope tripper can pick out hos flat face in the six yard box.
Hello Staric
[quote][p][bold]AnotherPounding4Burn ley[/bold] wrote: We have no option but to get the best out of this championship chump. Just hope tripper can pick out hos flat face in the six yard box.[/p][/quote]Hello Staric McClaret
  • Score: 3

12:04pm Wed 16 Jul 14

Super CIaret says...

LOL @ the jealous retards from penniless Blackburn Rovers.

Enjoy the second division you desperate morons... We're in the premier league...

First up Jose Mourinho's Chelsea... Next home games Louis van Gaal's Manchester United.... How does that sound no-dad's... I can almost hear the sobbing from here. Always have been jealous and always will be jealous of the Clarets.

Good signing by Dyche who we can be sure will step right into the Sam Vokes role and provide a great strike partner to Danny Ings. Things are coming together nicely.
LOL @ the jealous retards from penniless Blackburn Rovers. Enjoy the second division you desperate morons... We're in the premier league... First up Jose Mourinho's Chelsea... Next home games Louis van Gaal's Manchester United.... How does that sound no-dad's... I can almost hear the sobbing from here. Always have been jealous and always will be jealous of the Clarets. Good signing by Dyche who we can be sure will step right into the Sam Vokes role and provide a great strike partner to Danny Ings. Things are coming together nicely. Super CIaret
  • Score: 3

12:17pm Wed 16 Jul 14

TurfMoorTom says...

Rob_H2O wrote:
TurfMoorTom wrote:
Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
Bolton fans are genuinely gutted that they have missed out on The Juke.

Ings plays better with a big man up front and because Vokes is out for another six months it makes sense for us to get him now.
Yes but Bolton are in the Championship (and he wasn't particularly prolific even there). Why bother going for someone who's mid career and all his early career has done is demonstate he isn't up to the challenge of the Prem. You really expect too much of Shorn Douche.

If you pay peanuts, you get monkeys. And that's exactly what you've got.
Hi AP4B, good to read the negation of the negative - still same end-result too and from an ID that used to be a solid Burnley fan before 7th May.

Anyway, its not what we expect of Sean Dyche in the context. Its what Sean Dyche expects of Sean Dyche. You see, its his selection not ours. We didn't force him into this. Neither did the Board. He was, after all, enabled to spend £6m on Troy Deeney. The problem was Watford's rejection of the offer, not the raising of the sum in the first place. So, the raising of the cash is not the issue.

Mr Dyche got Burnley promoted amassing 93 points and just five defeats in 46 games. He improved all the players immeasurably. The same principle applies here to. He has a track record. Your opinion is worthless. You have no track record running a football club. He has. You have recognised this in the past pointing out how this club and that club will poach him. Not withstanding the need for you to make up your mind, its important to put this matter into a context.

You're just a keyboard warrior with mixed IDs and swivelling opinions.
I'm not AP4B. Wow, 7th May now, just keep plucking dates from the air. Unfortunately for Shorn Douche, due to his failure to prepare his track record is going to head in the wrong direction and all his good work will soon be long forgotton. Best he can hope for is 17th place around Christmas time and then moving to one of the struggling but established Prem teams who have Directors with some belief and ambition. Unfortunately Bumley have been so starved of success, the mentality of the club is to look down rather than up. For that reason you will never achieve anything. Poor poor Dingles.
[quote][p][bold]Rob_H2O[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote: Bolton fans are genuinely gutted that they have missed out on The Juke. Ings plays better with a big man up front and because Vokes is out for another six months it makes sense for us to get him now.[/p][/quote]Yes but Bolton are in the Championship (and he wasn't particularly prolific even there). Why bother going for someone who's mid career and all his early career has done is demonstate he isn't up to the challenge of the Prem. You really expect too much of Shorn Douche. If you pay peanuts, you get monkeys. And that's exactly what you've got.[/p][/quote]Hi AP4B, good to read the negation of the negative - still same end-result too and from an ID that used to be a solid Burnley fan before 7th May. Anyway, its not what we expect of Sean Dyche in the context. Its what Sean Dyche expects of Sean Dyche. You see, its his selection not ours. We didn't force him into this. Neither did the Board. He was, after all, enabled to spend £6m on Troy Deeney. The problem was Watford's rejection of the offer, not the raising of the sum in the first place. So, the raising of the cash is not the issue. Mr Dyche got Burnley promoted amassing 93 points and just five defeats in 46 games. He improved all the players immeasurably. The same principle applies here to. He has a track record. Your opinion is worthless. You have no track record running a football club. He has. You have recognised this in the past pointing out how this club and that club will poach him. Not withstanding the need for you to make up your mind, its important to put this matter into a context. You're just a keyboard warrior with mixed IDs and swivelling opinions.[/p][/quote]I'm not AP4B. Wow, 7th May now, just keep plucking dates from the air. Unfortunately for Shorn Douche, due to his failure to prepare his track record is going to head in the wrong direction and all his good work will soon be long forgotton. Best he can hope for is 17th place around Christmas time and then moving to one of the struggling but established Prem teams who have Directors with some belief and ambition. Unfortunately Bumley have been so starved of success, the mentality of the club is to look down rather than up. For that reason you will never achieve anything. Poor poor Dingles. TurfMoorTom
  • Score: -9

12:20pm Wed 16 Jul 14

TurfMoorTom says...

Just as a matter of interest - do any of you muppets know any Blackpool fans? Ask them how they benefitted from their one season wonder. You have a natural place and you know it.
Just as a matter of interest - do any of you muppets know any Blackpool fans? Ask them how they benefitted from their one season wonder. You have a natural place and you know it. TurfMoorTom
  • Score: -6

12:33pm Wed 16 Jul 14

A Darener says...

LOL @ the jealous retards from penniless Blackburn Rovers."?????
Where do you get the idea BRFC are penniless? They've got more in their petty cash drawer than Burnley have in the directors pockets.
LOL @ the jealous retards from penniless Blackburn Rovers."????? Where do you get the idea BRFC are penniless? They've got more in their petty cash drawer than Burnley have in the directors pockets. A Darener
  • Score: -3

12:45pm Wed 16 Jul 14

Super CIaret says...

A Darener wrote:
LOL @ the jealous retards from penniless Blackburn Rovers."?????
Where do you get the idea BRFC are penniless? They've got more in their petty cash drawer than Burnley have in the directors pockets.
LOL.

Of course they have. That's why they have paid off your £60million debts.... Oh wait, no they haven't!

Stop kidding yourselves, Venkys have made a massive mistake and have learnt a painful lesson. They clearly regret ever being associated with Blackburn Rovers and will be looking to break all ties as soon as that final parachute payment is received ahead of next season. Then it's downhill all the way I'm afraid.
[quote][p][bold]A Darener[/bold] wrote: LOL @ the jealous retards from penniless Blackburn Rovers."????? Where do you get the idea BRFC are penniless? They've got more in their petty cash drawer than Burnley have in the directors pockets.[/p][/quote]LOL. Of course they have. That's why they have paid off your £60million debts.... Oh wait, no they haven't! Stop kidding yourselves, Venkys have made a massive mistake and have learnt a painful lesson. They clearly regret ever being associated with Blackburn Rovers and will be looking to break all ties as soon as that final parachute payment is received ahead of next season. Then it's downhill all the way I'm afraid. Super CIaret
  • Score: 5

12:57pm Wed 16 Jul 14

George Oghani's Ironing Board says...

Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
Bolton fans are genuinely gutted that they have missed out on The Juke.

Ings plays better with a big man up front and because Vokes is out for another six months it makes sense for us to get him now.
Spot on Chuckster you are brilliant as Ings does play better with a big man up top, sadly it wont be for the Dingles. Whoops nearly forgot you then Son, sorry here you go.

Sky+ MOTD,DAOF,cant wait. RTID
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote: Bolton fans are genuinely gutted that they have missed out on The Juke. Ings plays better with a big man up front and because Vokes is out for another six months it makes sense for us to get him now.[/p][/quote]Spot on Chuckster you are brilliant as Ings does play better with a big man up top, sadly it wont be for the Dingles. Whoops nearly forgot you then Son, sorry here you go. Sky+ MOTD,DAOF,cant wait. RTID George Oghani's Ironing Board
  • Score: -3

1:01pm Wed 16 Jul 14

Super CIaret says...

Blackburn Rovers 1 - 2 Burnley.

Burnley in the Premier League.

Look up!
Blackburn Rovers 1 - 2 Burnley. Burnley in the Premier League. Look up! Super CIaret
  • Score: 1

1:02pm Wed 16 Jul 14

vintageclaret says...

Just to change the subject a little but can I ask for sensible opinions to a sensible answer? Am I the only one who think Aguerro's foul on Schweinsteiger was far worse than Suarrez's bite?

Having watched it several times over you can see how Aguerro's fingers were curled backwards into a claw, to dig into Schweinsteiger's face. Half an inch higher he would have gouged out his eye.
Just to change the subject a little but can I ask for sensible opinions to a sensible answer? Am I the only one who think Aguerro's foul on Schweinsteiger was far worse than Suarrez's bite? Having watched it several times over you can see how Aguerro's fingers were curled backwards into a claw, to dig into Schweinsteiger's face. Half an inch higher he would have gouged out his eye. vintageclaret
  • Score: 0

1:03pm Wed 16 Jul 14

Dead Sun Rising says...

Eee theres nothing like a good well thought out discussion.
On here anyway.

Howdo darener.
Eee theres nothing like a good well thought out discussion. On here anyway. Howdo darener. Dead Sun Rising
  • Score: 1

1:05pm Wed 16 Jul 14

burnleyglentoran says...

Bolton are gutted that a player has chosen a bigger and better lancashire club

I remember a small Indian based club wanting David Jones last season. They've never got over the reality check that caused..their deluded little brains to pop!!!!

BRKFC - PRIDE OF THE PUNE

BURNLEY FC - A DIFFERENT CLASS IN A DIFFERENT LEAGUE
Bolton are gutted that a player has chosen a bigger and better lancashire club I remember a small Indian based club wanting David Jones last season. They've never got over the reality check that caused..their deluded little brains to pop!!!! BRKFC - PRIDE OF THE PUNE BURNLEY FC - A DIFFERENT CLASS IN A DIFFERENT LEAGUE burnleyglentoran
  • Score: 4

1:07pm Wed 16 Jul 14

hasslem hasslem says...

Claretcert wrote:
AnotherPounding4Burn

ley
wrote:
We have no option but to get the best out of this championship chump. Just hope tripper can pick out hos flat face in the six yard box.
This idiot is despised by Blackburn fans as much as he is pitied by our own, no doubt he'll move on to harassing Luton Town or elderly ladies waiting for their pension. Online bully, online stalker, outed as a complete fool, he was given gods abuse on the Rovers pages for his mutliple ID shifting postings of coplete nonsense. I think it's time to put this one to bed Gollum, you've got nothing to say, all you bring is more ridicule on yourself, every ID you own is known. Blackburn fans are rightly furious at your willingness to spoil every thread. It started as a joke, ended as a pitful, obsessive illness on your part. Go away now weird child, we're talking footie and that's not your specialist subject, have a nice life and all that,. try not to think too much about how stupid you've made yourself look. Nobody knows it's you, not the real you. The friendless, lonely disturbed one. Run along now.
you have your own despotic clownish idiot and it has posted in a post two below yours - despite being continually banned it resurfaces with an alternative sign-in.

it has ruined our pages - nobody minds a bit of banter - but this fool should never have been let out of its secure unit. all it wants is a good home - but its lack of potty training despite its advancing years is what prevents it from adoption. it is destined to live a sad and lonely life - come on burnley supporters do the decent thing and give it a burial at sea
[quote][p][bold]Claretcert[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]AnotherPounding4Burn ley[/bold] wrote: We have no option but to get the best out of this championship chump. Just hope tripper can pick out hos flat face in the six yard box.[/p][/quote]This idiot is despised by Blackburn fans as much as he is pitied by our own, no doubt he'll move on to harassing Luton Town or elderly ladies waiting for their pension. Online bully, online stalker, outed as a complete fool, he was given gods abuse on the Rovers pages for his mutliple ID shifting postings of coplete nonsense. I think it's time to put this one to bed Gollum, you've got nothing to say, all you bring is more ridicule on yourself, every ID you own is known. Blackburn fans are rightly furious at your willingness to spoil every thread. It started as a joke, ended as a pitful, obsessive illness on your part. Go away now weird child, we're talking footie and that's not your specialist subject, have a nice life and all that,. try not to think too much about how stupid you've made yourself look. Nobody knows it's you, not the real you. The friendless, lonely disturbed one. Run along now.[/p][/quote]you have your own despotic clownish idiot and it has posted in a post two below yours - despite being continually banned it resurfaces with an alternative sign-in. it has ruined our pages - nobody minds a bit of banter - but this fool should never have been let out of its secure unit. all it wants is a good home - but its lack of potty training despite its advancing years is what prevents it from adoption. it is destined to live a sad and lonely life - come on burnley supporters do the decent thing and give it a burial at sea hasslem hasslem
  • Score: -3

1:15pm Wed 16 Jul 14

hasslem hasslem says...

what's with the bras? kate moss has got more up top than most of them. our david dunn could give dolly parton a run for her money though
what's with the bras? kate moss has got more up top than most of them. our david dunn could give dolly parton a run for her money though hasslem hasslem
  • Score: -6

1:30pm Wed 16 Jul 14

Rob_H2O says...

TurfMoorTom wrote:
Rob_H2O wrote:
TurfMoorTom wrote:
Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
Bolton fans are genuinely gutted that they have missed out on The Juke.

Ings plays better with a big man up front and because Vokes is out for another six months it makes sense for us to get him now.
Yes but Bolton are in the Championship (and he wasn't particularly prolific even there). Why bother going for someone who's mid career and all his early career has done is demonstate he isn't up to the challenge of the Prem. You really expect too much of Shorn Douche.

If you pay peanuts, you get monkeys. And that's exactly what you've got.
Hi AP4B, good to read the negation of the negative - still same end-result too and from an ID that used to be a solid Burnley fan before 7th May.

Anyway, its not what we expect of Sean Dyche in the context. Its what Sean Dyche expects of Sean Dyche. You see, its his selection not ours. We didn't force him into this. Neither did the Board. He was, after all, enabled to spend £6m on Troy Deeney. The problem was Watford's rejection of the offer, not the raising of the sum in the first place. So, the raising of the cash is not the issue.

Mr Dyche got Burnley promoted amassing 93 points and just five defeats in 46 games. He improved all the players immeasurably. The same principle applies here to. He has a track record. Your opinion is worthless. You have no track record running a football club. He has. You have recognised this in the past pointing out how this club and that club will poach him. Not withstanding the need for you to make up your mind, its important to put this matter into a context.

You're just a keyboard warrior with mixed IDs and swivelling opinions.
I'm not AP4B. Wow, 7th May now, just keep plucking dates from the air. Unfortunately for Shorn Douche, due to his failure to prepare his track record is going to head in the wrong direction and all his good work will soon be long forgotton. Best he can hope for is 17th place around Christmas time and then moving to one of the struggling but established Prem teams who have Directors with some belief and ambition. Unfortunately Bumley have been so starved of success, the mentality of the club is to look down rather than up. For that reason you will never achieve anything. Poor poor Dingles.
Well AP4B, not withstanding that you've used the wrong name again (posting as a fatherless), and that the dates and associated entries are all available for viewing in the Lancashire Telegraph Archive, plucking date out the air is not necessary. Smashing stuff. Nailed you down as a pathological liar. Medical condition. You're not blame, dear boy. Self esteem issues apparently.

Back to business oh swivel-posting one. What" failure to prepare" is this you're prattling on about? Do you have a copy of the "must follow" blue print? Has he failed to match you fatherless tick-box requirements? You say "all his good work". How can that be? You keep posting that he was lucky and that he is unproven. Which entry do we believe? This one where he is "good" or the previous one where you say he isn't. Oh, dear. Swivel, swivel.

How could he move to a struggling prem team later in the season, when all they have to do is look back at his time with Burnley and say 'blimey, he failed to prepare properly at Burnley, we can't recruit a guy like that". So, come on swivelling one, which is it. A man who doesn't prepare or a man that does? Do make up your mind, there's a good boy.

You'll get the hang of this if you keep trying. Chin up.
[quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Rob_H2O[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote: Bolton fans are genuinely gutted that they have missed out on The Juke. Ings plays better with a big man up front and because Vokes is out for another six months it makes sense for us to get him now.[/p][/quote]Yes but Bolton are in the Championship (and he wasn't particularly prolific even there). Why bother going for someone who's mid career and all his early career has done is demonstate he isn't up to the challenge of the Prem. You really expect too much of Shorn Douche. If you pay peanuts, you get monkeys. And that's exactly what you've got.[/p][/quote]Hi AP4B, good to read the negation of the negative - still same end-result too and from an ID that used to be a solid Burnley fan before 7th May. Anyway, its not what we expect of Sean Dyche in the context. Its what Sean Dyche expects of Sean Dyche. You see, its his selection not ours. We didn't force him into this. Neither did the Board. He was, after all, enabled to spend £6m on Troy Deeney. The problem was Watford's rejection of the offer, not the raising of the sum in the first place. So, the raising of the cash is not the issue. Mr Dyche got Burnley promoted amassing 93 points and just five defeats in 46 games. He improved all the players immeasurably. The same principle applies here to. He has a track record. Your opinion is worthless. You have no track record running a football club. He has. You have recognised this in the past pointing out how this club and that club will poach him. Not withstanding the need for you to make up your mind, its important to put this matter into a context. You're just a keyboard warrior with mixed IDs and swivelling opinions.[/p][/quote]I'm not AP4B. Wow, 7th May now, just keep plucking dates from the air. Unfortunately for Shorn Douche, due to his failure to prepare his track record is going to head in the wrong direction and all his good work will soon be long forgotton. Best he can hope for is 17th place around Christmas time and then moving to one of the struggling but established Prem teams who have Directors with some belief and ambition. Unfortunately Bumley have been so starved of success, the mentality of the club is to look down rather than up. For that reason you will never achieve anything. Poor poor Dingles.[/p][/quote]Well AP4B, not withstanding that you've used the wrong name again (posting as a fatherless), and that the dates and associated entries are all available for viewing in the Lancashire Telegraph Archive, plucking date out the air is not necessary. Smashing stuff. Nailed you down as a pathological liar. Medical condition. You're not blame, dear boy. Self esteem issues apparently. Back to business oh swivel-posting one. What" failure to prepare" is this you're prattling on about? Do you have a copy of the "must follow" blue print? Has he failed to match you fatherless tick-box requirements? You say "all his good work". How can that be? You keep posting that he was lucky and that he is unproven. Which entry do we believe? This one where he is "good" or the previous one where you say he isn't. Oh, dear. Swivel, swivel. How could he move to a struggling prem team later in the season, when all they have to do is look back at his time with Burnley and say 'blimey, he failed to prepare properly at Burnley, we can't recruit a guy like that". So, come on swivelling one, which is it. A man who doesn't prepare or a man that does? Do make up your mind, there's a good boy. You'll get the hang of this if you keep trying. Chin up. Rob_H2O
  • Score: 0

1:31pm Wed 16 Jul 14

FCBurnley says...

Bras ? They look at lot better than the Ze Bras Rovers will be wearing every game. !!
Bras ? They look at lot better than the Ze Bras Rovers will be wearing every game. !! FCBurnley
  • Score: 1

1:34pm Wed 16 Jul 14

Rob_H2O says...

TurfMoorTom wrote:
Just as a matter of interest - do any of you muppets know any Blackpool fans? Ask them how they benefitted from their one season wonder. You have a natural place and you know it.
Twist or stick?
[quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote: Just as a matter of interest - do any of you muppets know any Blackpool fans? Ask them how they benefitted from their one season wonder. You have a natural place and you know it.[/p][/quote]Twist or stick? Rob_H2O
  • Score: 4

1:39pm Wed 16 Jul 14

u owe u owe says...

Its the latest in fitness monitors , must not have reached the Equid town. Still training 'carrot and stick' method.
Its the latest in fitness monitors , must not have reached the Equid town. Still training 'carrot and stick' method. u owe u owe
  • Score: 0

1:44pm Wed 16 Jul 14

AnotherPounding4BurnIey says...

Dead Sun Rising wrote:
Eee theres nothing like a good well thought out discussion.
On here anyway.

Howdo darener.
Trying to build a bridge with the other side Dead Pus Stinking?
Forget it and stick to stroking old ladies thighs. You know what I'm talking about.

Neigh
[quote][p][bold]Dead Sun Rising[/bold] wrote: Eee theres nothing like a good well thought out discussion. On here anyway. Howdo darener.[/p][/quote]Trying to build a bridge with the other side Dead Pus Stinking? Forget it and stick to stroking old ladies thighs. You know what I'm talking about. Neigh AnotherPounding4BurnIey
  • Score: -8

2:03pm Wed 16 Jul 14

AnotherPounding4Burnley says...

Tmt has nothing to do with me. We have nothing in common except our shared view that we at Burnley said we weren't going to make the same mistakes as last time, then sign a load of freebies and low rent journeyman. It just makes no sense at all. Relegation is looking more likely.
Tmt has nothing to do with me. We have nothing in common except our shared view that we at Burnley said we weren't going to make the same mistakes as last time, then sign a load of freebies and low rent journeyman. It just makes no sense at all. Relegation is looking more likely. AnotherPounding4Burnley
  • Score: -3

2:47pm Wed 16 Jul 14

Rob_H2O says...

AnotherPounding4Burn
ley
wrote:
Tmt has nothing to do with me. We have nothing in common except our shared view that we at Burnley said we weren't going to make the same mistakes as last time, then sign a load of freebies and low rent journeyman. It just makes no sense at all. Relegation is looking more likely.
Hi TMT. You say "a load of freebies". They aren't. My club has forked out £4.25m for 3 of the players. So your talking tosh. The others were contract switch players and you don't pay for those. Low rent journeymen? Not according to the managers who signed them previously (o they wouldn't have signed them) and not according to Dyche or, well err, he wouldn't have signed the either. Got to cut your coat etc and its what we do. Good club. Well run. You should try following us instead.
[quote][p][bold]AnotherPounding4Burn ley[/bold] wrote: Tmt has nothing to do with me. We have nothing in common except our shared view that we at Burnley said we weren't going to make the same mistakes as last time, then sign a load of freebies and low rent journeyman. It just makes no sense at all. Relegation is looking more likely.[/p][/quote]Hi TMT. You say "a load of freebies". They aren't. My club has forked out £4.25m for 3 of the players. So your talking tosh. The others were contract switch players and you don't pay for those. Low rent journeymen? Not according to the managers who signed them previously (o they wouldn't have signed them) and not according to Dyche or, well err, he wouldn't have signed the either. Got to cut your coat etc and its what we do. Good club. Well run. You should try following us instead. Rob_H2O
  • Score: 5

3:40pm Wed 16 Jul 14

Super CIaret says...

Embarrassing Tom. Really poor.
Embarrassing Tom. Really poor. Super CIaret
  • Score: -2

3:48pm Wed 16 Jul 14

McClaret says...

AnotherPounding4Burn
ley
wrote:
Tmt has nothing to do with me. We have nothing in common except our shared view that we at Burnley said we weren't going to make the same mistakes as last time, then sign a load of freebies and low rent journeyman. It just makes no sense at all. Relegation is looking more likely.
Tos*er - get back to Staric, suits you best
[quote][p][bold]AnotherPounding4Burn ley[/bold] wrote: Tmt has nothing to do with me. We have nothing in common except our shared view that we at Burnley said we weren't going to make the same mistakes as last time, then sign a load of freebies and low rent journeyman. It just makes no sense at all. Relegation is looking more likely.[/p][/quote]Tos*er - get back to Staric, suits you best McClaret
  • Score: 3

3:53pm Wed 16 Jul 14

Claretcert says...

A Darener wrote:
LOL @ the jealous retards from penniless Blackburn Rovers."????? Where do you get the idea BRFC are penniless? They've got more in their petty cash drawer than Burnley have in the directors pockets.
Rovers would have a multi-million pound kitty if they hadn't spent many millions paying off players, millions to sacked managers and millions in legal costs. Added to the millions of reported losses, the millions in losses yet to report, do you ever wonder why people might think you're a know nothing tool? The petty cash? The distance between the balance sheets of our two clubs is massive. Financial basket case versus well run club.
[quote][p][bold]A Darener[/bold] wrote: LOL @ the jealous retards from penniless Blackburn Rovers."????? Where do you get the idea BRFC are penniless? They've got more in their petty cash drawer than Burnley have in the directors pockets.[/p][/quote]Rovers would have a multi-million pound kitty if they hadn't spent many millions paying off players, millions to sacked managers and millions in legal costs. Added to the millions of reported losses, the millions in losses yet to report, do you ever wonder why people might think you're a know nothing tool? The petty cash? The distance between the balance sheets of our two clubs is massive. Financial basket case versus well run club. Claretcert
  • Score: 1

3:56pm Wed 16 Jul 14

Frisson says...

The Burnley Premiere League Massacre Pt 1

http://youtu.be/tcZs
GLpOqXs

Sequel due this time next year
The Burnley Premiere League Massacre Pt 1 http://youtu.be/tcZs GLpOqXs Sequel due this time next year Frisson
  • Score: 0

4:08pm Wed 16 Jul 14

Rob_H2O says...

Frisson wrote:
The Burnley Premiere League Massacre Pt 1

http://youtu.be/tcZs

GLpOqXs

Sequel due this time next year
81 years and 65 years. Blackburn Rovers, always running out of someone else's money.

1995 led to Man City and Chelsea and the buckling of English Football. Rovers the midwives of FFP
[quote][p][bold]Frisson[/bold] wrote: The Burnley Premiere League Massacre Pt 1 http://youtu.be/tcZs GLpOqXs Sequel due this time next year[/p][/quote]81 years and 65 years. Blackburn Rovers, always running out of someone else's money. 1995 led to Man City and Chelsea and the buckling of English Football. Rovers the midwives of FFP Rob_H2O
  • Score: 3

5:12pm Wed 16 Jul 14

Claretcert says...

Rob_H2O wrote:
Frisson wrote:
The Burnley Premiere League Massacre Pt 1

http://youtu.be/tcZs


GLpOqXs

Sequel due this time next year
81 years and 65 years. Blackburn Rovers, always running out of someone else's money.

1995 led to Man City and Chelsea and the buckling of English Football. Rovers the midwives of FFP
Yes Rob but they're exempt from FFP. Jack Straw took it to the European court of human rights and due to the projected damage to the mental health of the residents of Blackburn would suffer in having to face reality they got a 15 year lead in period during which methadone would be gradually used to prevent the obvious psychological trauma dealing with reality causes them. It's called 'The swivel headed thick gets' allowance - Google it, was passed last year. A Blackburn fan at work told me.
[quote][p][bold]Rob_H2O[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Frisson[/bold] wrote: The Burnley Premiere League Massacre Pt 1 http://youtu.be/tcZs GLpOqXs Sequel due this time next year[/p][/quote]81 years and 65 years. Blackburn Rovers, always running out of someone else's money. 1995 led to Man City and Chelsea and the buckling of English Football. Rovers the midwives of FFP[/p][/quote]Yes Rob but they're exempt from FFP. Jack Straw took it to the European court of human rights and due to the projected damage to the mental health of the residents of Blackburn would suffer in having to face reality they got a 15 year lead in period during which methadone would be gradually used to prevent the obvious psychological trauma dealing with reality causes them. It's called 'The swivel headed thick gets' allowance - Google it, was passed last year. A Blackburn fan at work told me. Claretcert
  • Score: 1

5:16pm Wed 16 Jul 14

TurfMoorTom says...

Super CIaret wrote:
Embarrassing Tom. Really poor.
What are you talking about - how Blackpool benefitted from their one season wonder in the Prem and how they've since gone from strength to strength? This was your chance and you blew it by believing in being frugal while your Directors trouser all the proceeds and laugh at you as they try to hike ticket prices. A club of family values? What a joke.

You need to have a word with NobH2O - he's an embarrassment to you.
[quote][p][bold]Super CIaret[/bold] wrote: Embarrassing Tom. Really poor.[/p][/quote]What are you talking about - how Blackpool benefitted from their one season wonder in the Prem and how they've since gone from strength to strength? This was your chance and you blew it by believing in being frugal while your Directors trouser all the proceeds and laugh at you as they try to hike ticket prices. A club of family values? What a joke. You need to have a word with NobH2O - he's an embarrassment to you. TurfMoorTom
  • Score: -5

5:34pm Wed 16 Jul 14

TurfMoorTom says...

Rob_H2O wrote:
AnotherPounding4Burn

ley
wrote:
Tmt has nothing to do with me. We have nothing in common except our shared view that we at Burnley said we weren't going to make the same mistakes as last time, then sign a load of freebies and low rent journeyman. It just makes no sense at all. Relegation is looking more likely.
Hi TMT. You say "a load of freebies". They aren't. My club has forked out £4.25m for 3 of the players. So your talking tosh. The others were contract switch players and you don't pay for those. Low rent journeymen? Not according to the managers who signed them previously (o they wouldn't have signed them) and not according to Dyche or, well err, he wouldn't have signed the either. Got to cut your coat etc and its what we do. Good club. Well run. You should try following us instead.
Look one last time - I'm not AP4B.

It's YOU'RE not YOUR.

Past transactions are no argument against low rent journeymen you numpty. And in any case you only buy players whose values have depreciated so I hardly believe the respective managers thought they were much good or any prospect.

And why do you cut your coat and no your cloth?? Might be better to try and win a trophy.

Does Douche not have the ability to improve a £6m player and only low rent journeymen? Maybe you, your directors and even the ginger himself don't believe in his ability to develop players quite as much as you spout.

You're out of your depth as is your club.
[quote][p][bold]Rob_H2O[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]AnotherPounding4Burn ley[/bold] wrote: Tmt has nothing to do with me. We have nothing in common except our shared view that we at Burnley said we weren't going to make the same mistakes as last time, then sign a load of freebies and low rent journeyman. It just makes no sense at all. Relegation is looking more likely.[/p][/quote]Hi TMT. You say "a load of freebies". They aren't. My club has forked out £4.25m for 3 of the players. So your talking tosh. The others were contract switch players and you don't pay for those. Low rent journeymen? Not according to the managers who signed them previously (o they wouldn't have signed them) and not according to Dyche or, well err, he wouldn't have signed the either. Got to cut your coat etc and its what we do. Good club. Well run. You should try following us instead.[/p][/quote]Look one last time - I'm not AP4B. It's YOU'RE not YOUR. Past transactions are no argument against low rent journeymen you numpty. And in any case you only buy players whose values have depreciated so I hardly believe the respective managers thought they were much good or any prospect. And why do you cut your coat and no your cloth?? Might be better to try and win a trophy. Does Douche not have the ability to improve a £6m player and only low rent journeymen? Maybe you, your directors and even the ginger himself don't believe in his ability to develop players quite as much as you spout. You're out of your depth as is your club. TurfMoorTom
  • Score: -3

5:57pm Wed 16 Jul 14

eddyo says...

Typical dingles getting it @r5e about t1t again.
*
Bonleh have bought your joint chairman's spicy sausage nephew for £1 million and Boro have replaced him with Garcia for £2.5 million from Real Murcia. Doh.
Typical dingles getting it @r5e about t1t again. * Bonleh have bought your joint chairman's spicy sausage nephew for £1 million and Boro have replaced him with Garcia for £2.5 million from Real Murcia. Doh. eddyo
  • Score: -4

6:07pm Wed 16 Jul 14

Rob_H2O says...

TurfMoorTom wrote:
Rob_H2O wrote:
AnotherPounding4Burn


ley
wrote:
Tmt has nothing to do with me. We have nothing in common except our shared view that we at Burnley said we weren't going to make the same mistakes as last time, then sign a load of freebies and low rent journeyman. It just makes no sense at all. Relegation is looking more likely.
Hi TMT. You say "a load of freebies". They aren't. My club has forked out £4.25m for 3 of the players. So your talking tosh. The others were contract switch players and you don't pay for those. Low rent journeymen? Not according to the managers who signed them previously (o they wouldn't have signed them) and not according to Dyche or, well err, he wouldn't have signed the either. Got to cut your coat etc and its what we do. Good club. Well run. You should try following us instead.
Look one last time - I'm not AP4B.

It's YOU'RE not YOUR.

Past transactions are no argument against low rent journeymen you numpty. And in any case you only buy players whose values have depreciated so I hardly believe the respective managers thought they were much good or any prospect.

And why do you cut your coat and no your cloth?? Might be better to try and win a trophy.

Does Douche not have the ability to improve a £6m player and only low rent journeymen? Maybe you, your directors and even the ginger himself don't believe in his ability to develop players quite as much as you spout.

You're out of your depth as is your club.
Oooo. Whose getting tetchy. Self-esteem issues to the fore I see. One last time - you decide do you? AP4B. Well you don't actually. I think you're (is that better?) telling a great big whopping porkie.

To matters football.

Past transactions are a reliable guide in many cases. I would readily accept that players past 30 are often offloaded because of age and that does lead to in-line depreciation. Where a contract is terminated early, alarm bells ring in an especially shrill manner. Neither of the two over-30s my club has signed were termination cases. The write-dwon will have been bog standard, as will the matter of release. This does not make them soccer journey-men. You use these phrases to insult and deride because you are a Rovers fan (using a pro Burnley ID morphed in the past because of **** up.

We've spent £4,25m to date. WBA today rejected an improved bid for Dawson from us, reported by Sky to be £1.5m. That's a club committed hard to spending £5.75m. Add in the £5m bid for Deeney, the spending they are committing to is nearly £11m.

Remember, no money in yet. This is brave and adventurous from a club our size.

As to me being out of my depth, that is a cracking line normally spouted by a loser - a moniker I provided you with in the past. So apt, so apposite.

Fake Olympic.
[quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Rob_H2O[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]AnotherPounding4Burn ley[/bold] wrote: Tmt has nothing to do with me. We have nothing in common except our shared view that we at Burnley said we weren't going to make the same mistakes as last time, then sign a load of freebies and low rent journeyman. It just makes no sense at all. Relegation is looking more likely.[/p][/quote]Hi TMT. You say "a load of freebies". They aren't. My club has forked out £4.25m for 3 of the players. So your talking tosh. The others were contract switch players and you don't pay for those. Low rent journeymen? Not according to the managers who signed them previously (o they wouldn't have signed them) and not according to Dyche or, well err, he wouldn't have signed the either. Got to cut your coat etc and its what we do. Good club. Well run. You should try following us instead.[/p][/quote]Look one last time - I'm not AP4B. It's YOU'RE not YOUR. Past transactions are no argument against low rent journeymen you numpty. And in any case you only buy players whose values have depreciated so I hardly believe the respective managers thought they were much good or any prospect. And why do you cut your coat and no your cloth?? Might be better to try and win a trophy. Does Douche not have the ability to improve a £6m player and only low rent journeymen? Maybe you, your directors and even the ginger himself don't believe in his ability to develop players quite as much as you spout. You're out of your depth as is your club.[/p][/quote]Oooo. Whose getting tetchy. Self-esteem issues to the fore I see. One last time - you decide do you? AP4B. Well you don't actually. I think you're (is that better?) telling a great big whopping porkie. To matters football. Past transactions are a reliable guide in many cases. I would readily accept that players past 30 are often offloaded because of age and that does lead to in-line depreciation. Where a contract is terminated early, alarm bells ring in an especially shrill manner. Neither of the two over-30s my club has signed were termination cases. The write-dwon will have been bog standard, as will the matter of release. This does not make them soccer journey-men. You use these phrases to insult and deride because you are a Rovers fan (using a pro Burnley ID morphed in the past because of **** up. We've spent £4,25m to date. WBA today rejected an improved bid for Dawson from us, reported by Sky to be £1.5m. That's a club committed hard to spending £5.75m. Add in the £5m bid for Deeney, the spending they are committing to is nearly £11m. Remember, no money in yet. This is brave and adventurous from a club our size. As to me being out of my depth, that is a cracking line normally spouted by a loser - a moniker I provided you with in the past. So apt, so apposite. Fake Olympic. Rob_H2O
  • Score: 1

6:09pm Wed 16 Jul 14

Rob_H2O says...

TurfMoorTom wrote:
Super CIaret wrote:
Embarrassing Tom. Really poor.
What are you talking about - how Blackpool benefitted from their one season wonder in the Prem and how they've since gone from strength to strength? This was your chance and you blew it by believing in being frugal while your Directors trouser all the proceeds and laugh at you as they try to hike ticket prices. A club of family values? What a joke.

You need to have a word with NobH2O - he's an embarrassment to you.
Oooo a wrinkle. Dim boy.
[quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Super CIaret[/bold] wrote: Embarrassing Tom. Really poor.[/p][/quote]What are you talking about - how Blackpool benefitted from their one season wonder in the Prem and how they've since gone from strength to strength? This was your chance and you blew it by believing in being frugal while your Directors trouser all the proceeds and laugh at you as they try to hike ticket prices. A club of family values? What a joke. You need to have a word with NobH2O - he's an embarrassment to you.[/p][/quote]Oooo a wrinkle. Dim boy. Rob_H2O
  • Score: 2

6:47pm Wed 16 Jul 14

Dead Sun Rising says...

Rob_H2O wrote:
AnotherPounding4Burn

ley
wrote:
We have no option but to get the best out of this championship chump. Just hope tripper can pick out hos flat face in the six yard box.
A Burnley fan calling the clubs latest acquisition "a chump". I'm so glad a solid Claret like you plays his role in ensuring everyone gets fair chance before name calling and criticism starts.
He's not a claret rob. He's a bell end blue.
[quote][p][bold]Rob_H2O[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]AnotherPounding4Burn ley[/bold] wrote: We have no option but to get the best out of this championship chump. Just hope tripper can pick out hos flat face in the six yard box.[/p][/quote]A Burnley fan calling the clubs latest acquisition "a chump". I'm so glad a solid Claret like you plays his role in ensuring everyone gets fair chance before name calling and criticism starts.[/p][/quote]He's not a claret rob. He's a bell end blue. Dead Sun Rising
  • Score: 4

6:49pm Wed 16 Jul 14

Dead Sun Rising says...

TurfMoorTom wrote:
Just as a matter of interest - do any of you muppets know any Blackpool fans? Ask them how they benefitted from their one season wonder. You have a natural place and you know it.
We did have a year in the PL Tom, and now WE'RE THERE AGAIN!
[quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote: Just as a matter of interest - do any of you muppets know any Blackpool fans? Ask them how they benefitted from their one season wonder. You have a natural place and you know it.[/p][/quote]We did have a year in the PL Tom, and now WE'RE THERE AGAIN! Dead Sun Rising
  • Score: 3

6:49pm Wed 16 Jul 14

Dead Sun Rising says...

TurfMoorTom wrote:
Just as a matter of interest - do any of you muppets know any Blackpool fans? Ask them how they benefitted from their one season wonder. You have a natural place and you know it.
We did have a year in the PL Tom, and now WE'RE THERE AGAIN!
[quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote: Just as a matter of interest - do any of you muppets know any Blackpool fans? Ask them how they benefitted from their one season wonder. You have a natural place and you know it.[/p][/quote]We did have a year in the PL Tom, and now WE'RE THERE AGAIN! Dead Sun Rising
  • Score: 2

7:20pm Wed 16 Jul 14

TurfMoorTom says...

Rob_H2O wrote:
TurfMoorTom wrote:
Super CIaret wrote:
Embarrassing Tom. Really poor.
What are you talking about - how Blackpool benefitted from their one season wonder in the Prem and how they've since gone from strength to strength? This was your chance and you blew it by believing in being frugal while your Directors trouser all the proceeds and laugh at you as they try to hike ticket prices. A club of family values? What a joke.

You need to have a word with NobH2O - he's an embarrassment to you.
Oooo a wrinkle. Dim boy.
Like I said. An embarrassment.
[quote][p][bold]Rob_H2O[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Super CIaret[/bold] wrote: Embarrassing Tom. Really poor.[/p][/quote]What are you talking about - how Blackpool benefitted from their one season wonder in the Prem and how they've since gone from strength to strength? This was your chance and you blew it by believing in being frugal while your Directors trouser all the proceeds and laugh at you as they try to hike ticket prices. A club of family values? What a joke. You need to have a word with NobH2O - he's an embarrassment to you.[/p][/quote]Oooo a wrinkle. Dim boy.[/p][/quote]Like I said. An embarrassment. TurfMoorTom
  • Score: -4

7:38pm Wed 16 Jul 14

TurfMoorTom says...

Dead Sun Rising wrote:
TurfMoorTom wrote:
Just as a matter of interest - do any of you muppets know any Blackpool fans? Ask them how they benefitted from their one season wonder. You have a natural place and you know it.
We did have a year in the PL Tom, and now WE'RE THERE AGAIN!
And he learning from last time amounts to the square route of fark hall. The journey ends here.
[quote][p][bold]Dead Sun Rising[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote: Just as a matter of interest - do any of you muppets know any Blackpool fans? Ask them how they benefitted from their one season wonder. You have a natural place and you know it.[/p][/quote]We did have a year in the PL Tom, and now WE'RE THERE AGAIN![/p][/quote]And he learning from last time amounts to the square route of fark hall. The journey ends here. TurfMoorTom
  • Score: -2

8:06pm Wed 16 Jul 14

Claretcert says...

eddyo wrote:
Typical dingles getting it @r5e about t1t again.
*
Bonleh have bought your joint chairman's spicy sausage nephew for £1 million and Boro have replaced him with Garcia for £2.5 million from Real Murcia. Doh.
You know people in Blackburn should be charged 200 grand a kid as that's what it costs the taxpayers to eventually sort the retarded little gimps out. Expensive waste of my tax you are fool - now run along now. It'll take you 3 days to remember how to log on. Get some rest.
[quote][p][bold]eddyo[/bold] wrote: Typical dingles getting it @r5e about t1t again. * Bonleh have bought your joint chairman's spicy sausage nephew for £1 million and Boro have replaced him with Garcia for £2.5 million from Real Murcia. Doh.[/p][/quote]You know people in Blackburn should be charged 200 grand a kid as that's what it costs the taxpayers to eventually sort the retarded little gimps out. Expensive waste of my tax you are fool - now run along now. It'll take you 3 days to remember how to log on. Get some rest. Claretcert
  • Score: 1

8:06pm Wed 16 Jul 14

Super Claret . says...

Super CIaret wrote:
LOL @ the jealous retards from penniless Blackburn Rovers.

Enjoy the second division you desperate morons... We're in the premier league...

First up Jose Mourinho's Chelsea... Next home games Louis van Gaal's Manchester United.... How does that sound no-dad's... I can almost hear the sobbing from here. Always have been jealous and always will be jealous of the Clarets.

Good signing by Dyche who we can be sure will step right into the Sam Vokes role and provide a great strike partner to Danny Ings. Things are coming together nicely.
Im such a thick f@@k tho, I forget you beat all those teams to WIN the premier league.
The best I can hope for is to not lose by too many.
I apologise for my dimness
[quote][p][bold]Super CIaret[/bold] wrote: LOL @ the jealous retards from penniless Blackburn Rovers. Enjoy the second division you desperate morons... We're in the premier league... First up Jose Mourinho's Chelsea... Next home games Louis van Gaal's Manchester United.... How does that sound no-dad's... I can almost hear the sobbing from here. Always have been jealous and always will be jealous of the Clarets. Good signing by Dyche who we can be sure will step right into the Sam Vokes role and provide a great strike partner to Danny Ings. Things are coming together nicely.[/p][/quote]Im such a thick f@@k tho, I forget you beat all those teams to WIN the premier league. The best I can hope for is to not lose by too many. I apologise for my dimness Super Claret .
  • Score: -5

8:13pm Wed 16 Jul 14

Rob_H2O says...

TurfMoorTom wrote:
Rob_H2O wrote:
TurfMoorTom wrote:
Super CIaret wrote:
Embarrassing Tom. Really poor.
What are you talking about - how Blackpool benefitted from their one season wonder in the Prem and how they've since gone from strength to strength? This was your chance and you blew it by believing in being frugal while your Directors trouser all the proceeds and laugh at you as they try to hike ticket prices. A club of family values? What a joke.

You need to have a word with NobH2O - he's an embarrassment to you.
Oooo a wrinkle. Dim boy.
Like I said. An embarrassment.
I know you are. Shall we hold it against you or just sigh knowingly?
[quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Rob_H2O[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Super CIaret[/bold] wrote: Embarrassing Tom. Really poor.[/p][/quote]What are you talking about - how Blackpool benefitted from their one season wonder in the Prem and how they've since gone from strength to strength? This was your chance and you blew it by believing in being frugal while your Directors trouser all the proceeds and laugh at you as they try to hike ticket prices. A club of family values? What a joke. You need to have a word with NobH2O - he's an embarrassment to you.[/p][/quote]Oooo a wrinkle. Dim boy.[/p][/quote]Like I said. An embarrassment.[/p][/quote]I know you are. Shall we hold it against you or just sigh knowingly? Rob_H2O
  • Score: 4

10:48pm Wed 16 Jul 14

AnotherPounding4Burnley says...

Dead Sun Rising wrote:
Rob_H2O wrote:
AnotherPounding4Burn


ley
wrote:
We have no option but to get the best out of this championship chump. Just hope tripper can pick out hos flat face in the six yard box.
A Burnley fan calling the clubs latest acquisition "a chump". I'm so glad a solid Claret like you plays his role in ensuring everyone gets fair chance before name calling and criticism starts.
He's not a claret rob. He's a bell end blue.
Hi Bob, of course I'm a Claret, just one with a sense of reality, this team is going down. I said we would be okay if we signed some quality to go with our dogs of war, we signed more dogs of war. Time is running out.
[quote][p][bold]Dead Sun Rising[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Rob_H2O[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]AnotherPounding4Burn ley[/bold] wrote: We have no option but to get the best out of this championship chump. Just hope tripper can pick out hos flat face in the six yard box.[/p][/quote]A Burnley fan calling the clubs latest acquisition "a chump". I'm so glad a solid Claret like you plays his role in ensuring everyone gets fair chance before name calling and criticism starts.[/p][/quote]He's not a claret rob. He's a bell end blue.[/p][/quote]Hi Bob, of course I'm a Claret, just one with a sense of reality, this team is going down. I said we would be okay if we signed some quality to go with our dogs of war, we signed more dogs of war. Time is running out. AnotherPounding4Burnley
  • Score: -3

5:37am Thu 17 Jul 14

Rob_H2O says...

No, TTM is or was. You were a Rover and now say you're a Claret. You're one and the same and your a Rover.

The points you make are repetitive . They don't change board policy or the managerial focus, do they? The riposte(s) remain the same.

We have tried to spend a tad under £10m. We've had no money in. The players we have are the ones we can afford. The board will only trouser the money they are owed plus interest. The contracts all have detailed wage reductions if we go down. Thee will be a controlled exodus if that happens. We'll have the balance retained from £120m. We'll have the parachutes. If we stay up then the matter is very different.
No, TTM is or was. You were a Rover and now say you're a Claret. You're one and the same and your a Rover. The points you make are repetitive . They don't change board policy or the managerial focus, do they? The riposte(s) remain the same. We have tried to spend a tad under £10m. We've had no money in. The players we have are the ones we can afford. The board will only trouser the money they are owed plus interest. The contracts all have detailed wage reductions if we go down. Thee will be a controlled exodus if that happens. We'll have the balance retained from £120m. We'll have the parachutes. If we stay up then the matter is very different. Rob_H2O
  • Score: 4

8:30am Thu 17 Jul 14

Dead Sun Rising says...

TurfMoorTom wrote:
Dead Sun Rising wrote:
TurfMoorTom wrote:
Just as a matter of interest - do any of you muppets know any Blackpool fans? Ask them how they benefitted from their one season wonder. You have a natural place and you know it.
We did have a year in the PL Tom, and now WE'RE THERE AGAIN!
And he learning from last time amounts to the square route of fark hall. The journey ends here.
Steady on fella. Much bigger clubs have dropped out the PL and then continued to drop, we had some more lean times but the right appointment turned things around.

I am very happy, and will continue to be so, if we turn into a bit of a yo-yo club then great.

Blackpool appear to be on the wrong end of some serious mis-management and the chairman, well, doesn't seem concerned. Baffling.
[quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Dead Sun Rising[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote: Just as a matter of interest - do any of you muppets know any Blackpool fans? Ask them how they benefitted from their one season wonder. You have a natural place and you know it.[/p][/quote]We did have a year in the PL Tom, and now WE'RE THERE AGAIN![/p][/quote]And he learning from last time amounts to the square route of fark hall. The journey ends here.[/p][/quote]Steady on fella. Much bigger clubs have dropped out the PL and then continued to drop, we had some more lean times but the right appointment turned things around. I am very happy, and will continue to be so, if we turn into a bit of a yo-yo club then great. Blackpool appear to be on the wrong end of some serious mis-management and the chairman, well, doesn't seem concerned. Baffling. Dead Sun Rising
  • Score: 2

8:35am Thu 17 Jul 14

houseclaret says...

A Darener wrote:
LOL @ the jealous retards from penniless Blackburn Rovers."?????
Where do you get the idea BRFC are penniless? They've got more in their petty cash drawer than Burnley have in the directors pockets.
Now then Darener, I have respect for your opinions normally but this is a bit silly, your club are crippled with debt, ours isn't. Simples!
[quote][p][bold]A Darener[/bold] wrote: LOL @ the jealous retards from penniless Blackburn Rovers."????? Where do you get the idea BRFC are penniless? They've got more in their petty cash drawer than Burnley have in the directors pockets.[/p][/quote]Now then Darener, I have respect for your opinions normally but this is a bit silly, your club are crippled with debt, ours isn't. Simples! houseclaret
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree