Clarets will adapt in top-flight, says boss Dyche

Sean Dyche

Sean Dyche

First published in Sport
Last updated
This Is Lancashire: Photograph of the Author by , Burnley FC reporter

BURNLEY boss Sean Dyche says he will be flexible in his thinking as he helps Burnley bed into the Premier League.

The Clarets had a winning formula last season in sticking with a rigid 4-4-2 formation, which was spearheaded by the potent strike partnership of Sam Vokes and top scorer Danny Ings.

But as Dyche assembles his squad for the top flight while also looking to tie existing players to new deals after securing Vokes and right back Kieran Trippier longer term, he is also looking at how his side might line up when they come up against the world’s elite players and teams.

But Dyche added he will not get bogged down by tactics.

“Although tactics are important I think people can get too carried away with it.

“At the same time you can’t be naive to it because there are some differences but they’re mainly detailed differences and it often comes down to individual players.

“We do know that we’re going into a division with arguably some of the best individual players in the world.

“We obviously understand that within the tactics it’s a two-good thing. The tactics have to be right but also dealing with the individuals within that make a big difference.”

Dyche added: “There are many different things that I’m pleased with what we’ve managed to achieve here, but I’m not naive enough to think you can just sit still because football waits for no-one.

“So we’ve got to make sure that we’re still looking for different things that can help us, not just players but us as a staff, the players we’re working with, improvements we can make at the training ground which will be ongoing, improvements at the ground, improvements on the sports science and the analysis side.

“We’re always looking for flexibility within that, but there’s a certain base of things that I think are important for how the team and the staff operate.

“So far so good, but we appreciate that players make the difference so we do need to align players as well.”

Comments (70)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

9:18am Mon 30 Jun 14

Dublin Claret says...

l think we'll do alright under our gaffer.
ln Sean we trust.
l think we'll do alright under our gaffer. ln Sean we trust. Dublin Claret
  • Score: 15

9:22am Mon 30 Jun 14

TurfMoorTom says...

“We do know that we’re going into a division with arguably some of the best individual players in the world." So it makes perfect sense to make your marquee signing a Bolton reserve player. This is not naive in any way shape or form.

"improvements we can make at the training ground". I suggest a pooper scooper.

There may be trouble head. Future tumoil beckons.
“We do know that we’re going into a division with arguably some of the best individual players in the world." So it makes perfect sense to make your marquee signing a Bolton reserve player. This is not naive in any way shape or form. "improvements we can make at the training ground". I suggest a pooper scooper. There may be trouble head. Future tumoil beckons. TurfMoorTom
  • Score: -16

9:32am Mon 30 Jun 14

claret777 says...

TurfMoorTom wrote:
“We do know that we’re going into a division with arguably some of the best individual players in the world." So it makes perfect sense to make your marquee signing a Bolton reserve player. This is not naive in any way shape or form.

"improvements we can make at the training ground". I suggest a pooper scooper.

There may be trouble head. Future tumoil beckons.
Mmm....What about Best...Murphy...the Portuguese'stars'...
and many many more....we are Premier League..Arfield..a cast off from Huddersfield. ..great spot from Dyche...Jones...turn
ed you down to join us...masterstroke. ..I could be here all day...but I've got work to do.
[quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote: “We do know that we’re going into a division with arguably some of the best individual players in the world." So it makes perfect sense to make your marquee signing a Bolton reserve player. This is not naive in any way shape or form. "improvements we can make at the training ground". I suggest a pooper scooper. There may be trouble head. Future tumoil beckons.[/p][/quote]Mmm....What about Best...Murphy...the Portuguese'stars'... and many many more....we are Premier League..Arfield..a cast off from Huddersfield. ..great spot from Dyche...Jones...turn ed you down to join us...masterstroke. ..I could be here all day...but I've got work to do. claret777
  • Score: 19

9:34am Mon 30 Jun 14

Rovertheedge says...

He needs to be flexible, tried to extend a players contract but he decides to drop a division, then Ings is looking at going, Baird won't sign, scraping the barrel for a Bolton player that looks like he's staying put, the disappointment continues.....

Oh dear looks like Douche has a lot to do- bet that WBA offer looks good now
He needs to be flexible, tried to extend a players contract but he decides to drop a division, then Ings is looking at going, Baird won't sign, scraping the barrel for a Bolton player that looks like he's staying put, the disappointment continues..... Oh dear looks like Douche has a lot to do- bet that WBA offer looks good now Rovertheedge
  • Score: -16

9:35am Mon 30 Jun 14

kfc yummy says...

TurfMoorTom wrote:
“We do know that we’re going into a division with arguably some of the best individual players in the world." So it makes perfect sense to make your marquee signing a Bolton reserve player. This is not naive in any way shape or form.

"improvements we can make at the training ground". I suggest a pooper scooper.

There may be trouble head. Future tumoil beckons.
You are one sad person,don't bother to troll.
[quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote: “We do know that we’re going into a division with arguably some of the best individual players in the world." So it makes perfect sense to make your marquee signing a Bolton reserve player. This is not naive in any way shape or form. "improvements we can make at the training ground". I suggest a pooper scooper. There may be trouble head. Future tumoil beckons.[/p][/quote]You are one sad person,don't bother to troll. kfc yummy
  • Score: 18

9:40am Mon 30 Jun 14

Chuck Norris' Roundhouse says...

TurfMoorTom wrote:
“We do know that we’re going into a division with arguably some of the best individual players in the world." So it makes perfect sense to make your marquee signing a Bolton reserve player. This is not naive in any way shape or form.

"improvements we can make at the training ground". I suggest a pooper scooper.

There may be trouble head. Future tumoil beckons.
Racist
[quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote: “We do know that we’re going into a division with arguably some of the best individual players in the world." So it makes perfect sense to make your marquee signing a Bolton reserve player. This is not naive in any way shape or form. "improvements we can make at the training ground". I suggest a pooper scooper. There may be trouble head. Future tumoil beckons.[/p][/quote]Racist Chuck Norris' Roundhouse
  • Score: 15

9:53am Mon 30 Jun 14

Chuck Norris' Roundhouse says...

Rovertheedge wrote:
He needs to be flexible, tried to extend a players contract but he decides to drop a division, then Ings is looking at going, Baird won't sign, scraping the barrel for a Bolton player that looks like he's staying put, the disappointment continues.....

Oh dear looks like Douche has a lot to do- bet that WBA offer looks good now
Hmmm where to start with this pile of shoite...

Stanislas started less than 10 games last season (Although he still managed to score against your set of jokers), and was offered first team football, which he couldn't get at Burnley.

Baird wants to stay down south as he has a young family.

Sordell is only 23 and was an England Under 21 international worth three and a half million two seasons ago.

What WBA offer?

Congratulations on signing Chris Brown, my PNE supporting mate says, and I quote, "An absolute useless lump"

Focus on Car-crash BRFC, stop obsessing about your Premier League bigger and better neighbours.

Second Division Rubbish.
[quote][p][bold]Rovertheedge[/bold] wrote: He needs to be flexible, tried to extend a players contract but he decides to drop a division, then Ings is looking at going, Baird won't sign, scraping the barrel for a Bolton player that looks like he's staying put, the disappointment continues..... Oh dear looks like Douche has a lot to do- bet that WBA offer looks good now[/p][/quote]Hmmm where to start with this pile of shoite... Stanislas started less than 10 games last season (Although he still managed to score against your set of jokers), and was offered first team football, which he couldn't get at Burnley. Baird wants to stay down south as he has a young family. Sordell is only 23 and was an England Under 21 international worth three and a half million two seasons ago. What WBA offer? Congratulations on signing Chris Brown, my PNE supporting mate says, and I quote, "An absolute useless lump" Focus on Car-crash BRFC, stop obsessing about your Premier League bigger and better neighbours. Second Division Rubbish. Chuck Norris' Roundhouse
  • Score: 21

9:59am Mon 30 Jun 14

Rovertheedge says...

Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
Rovertheedge wrote:
He needs to be flexible, tried to extend a players contract but he decides to drop a division, then Ings is looking at going, Baird won't sign, scraping the barrel for a Bolton player that looks like he's staying put, the disappointment continues.....

Oh dear looks like Douche has a lot to do- bet that WBA offer looks good now
Hmmm where to start with this pile of shoite...

Stanislas started less than 10 games last season (Although he still managed to score against your set of jokers), and was offered first team football, which he couldn't get at Burnley.

Baird wants to stay down south as he has a young family.

Sordell is only 23 and was an England Under 21 international worth three and a half million two seasons ago.

What WBA offer?

Congratulations on signing Chris Brown, my PNE supporting mate says, and I quote, "An absolute useless lump"

Focus on Car-crash BRFC, stop obsessing about your Premier League bigger and better neighbours.

Second Division Rubbish.
Chris Brown is a cover player (and not on 10k a week before you spout cr*p). You still offered a contract to that player so douche must have wanted him to stay- but he thought, now's my chance to get out of Burnley and jumped.

Douche spoke to WBA and turned it down
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Rovertheedge[/bold] wrote: He needs to be flexible, tried to extend a players contract but he decides to drop a division, then Ings is looking at going, Baird won't sign, scraping the barrel for a Bolton player that looks like he's staying put, the disappointment continues..... Oh dear looks like Douche has a lot to do- bet that WBA offer looks good now[/p][/quote]Hmmm where to start with this pile of shoite... Stanislas started less than 10 games last season (Although he still managed to score against your set of jokers), and was offered first team football, which he couldn't get at Burnley. Baird wants to stay down south as he has a young family. Sordell is only 23 and was an England Under 21 international worth three and a half million two seasons ago. What WBA offer? Congratulations on signing Chris Brown, my PNE supporting mate says, and I quote, "An absolute useless lump" Focus on Car-crash BRFC, stop obsessing about your Premier League bigger and better neighbours. Second Division Rubbish.[/p][/quote]Chris Brown is a cover player (and not on 10k a week before you spout cr*p). You still offered a contract to that player so douche must have wanted him to stay- but he thought, now's my chance to get out of Burnley and jumped. Douche spoke to WBA and turned it down Rovertheedge
  • Score: -15

10:06am Mon 30 Jun 14

Chuck Norris' Roundhouse says...

Rovertheedge wrote:
Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
Rovertheedge wrote:
He needs to be flexible, tried to extend a players contract but he decides to drop a division, then Ings is looking at going, Baird won't sign, scraping the barrel for a Bolton player that looks like he's staying put, the disappointment continues.....

Oh dear looks like Douche has a lot to do- bet that WBA offer looks good now
Hmmm where to start with this pile of shoite...

Stanislas started less than 10 games last season (Although he still managed to score against your set of jokers), and was offered first team football, which he couldn't get at Burnley.

Baird wants to stay down south as he has a young family.

Sordell is only 23 and was an England Under 21 international worth three and a half million two seasons ago.

What WBA offer?

Congratulations on signing Chris Brown, my PNE supporting mate says, and I quote, "An absolute useless lump"

Focus on Car-crash BRFC, stop obsessing about your Premier League bigger and better neighbours.

Second Division Rubbish.
Chris Brown is a cover player (and not on 10k a week before you spout cr*p). You still offered a contract to that player so douche must have wanted him to stay- but he thought, now's my chance to get out of Burnley and jumped.

Douche spoke to WBA and turned it down
Can you prove that Dyche spoke to WBA or did you just make that up in your Burnley-obsessed tiny mind? Thought so

Read what I put about Stanislas - we offered him ONE YEAR deal, he couldn't get a game in the Championship with us so realised that instead of sitting on the bench (at best) so he signed a THREE YEAR deal with Bourrnemouth with a guarantee of first team involvement.

Maybe the likes of Best, Etuhu, etc should take a leaf out of Junior's book instead of sitting there and bleeding your pathetic club dry for millions - he is a proper player who left for footballing, not financial reasons.
[quote][p][bold]Rovertheedge[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Rovertheedge[/bold] wrote: He needs to be flexible, tried to extend a players contract but he decides to drop a division, then Ings is looking at going, Baird won't sign, scraping the barrel for a Bolton player that looks like he's staying put, the disappointment continues..... Oh dear looks like Douche has a lot to do- bet that WBA offer looks good now[/p][/quote]Hmmm where to start with this pile of shoite... Stanislas started less than 10 games last season (Although he still managed to score against your set of jokers), and was offered first team football, which he couldn't get at Burnley. Baird wants to stay down south as he has a young family. Sordell is only 23 and was an England Under 21 international worth three and a half million two seasons ago. What WBA offer? Congratulations on signing Chris Brown, my PNE supporting mate says, and I quote, "An absolute useless lump" Focus on Car-crash BRFC, stop obsessing about your Premier League bigger and better neighbours. Second Division Rubbish.[/p][/quote]Chris Brown is a cover player (and not on 10k a week before you spout cr*p). You still offered a contract to that player so douche must have wanted him to stay- but he thought, now's my chance to get out of Burnley and jumped. Douche spoke to WBA and turned it down[/p][/quote]Can you prove that Dyche spoke to WBA or did you just make that up in your Burnley-obsessed tiny mind? Thought so Read what I put about Stanislas - we offered him ONE YEAR deal, he couldn't get a game in the Championship with us so realised that instead of sitting on the bench (at best) so he signed a THREE YEAR deal with Bourrnemouth with a guarantee of first team involvement. Maybe the likes of Best, Etuhu, etc should take a leaf out of Junior's book instead of sitting there and bleeding your pathetic club dry for millions - he is a proper player who left for footballing, not financial reasons. Chuck Norris' Roundhouse
  • Score: 13

10:13am Mon 30 Jun 14

Rovertheedge says...

Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
Rovertheedge wrote:
Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
Rovertheedge wrote:
He needs to be flexible, tried to extend a players contract but he decides to drop a division, then Ings is looking at going, Baird won't sign, scraping the barrel for a Bolton player that looks like he's staying put, the disappointment continues.....

Oh dear looks like Douche has a lot to do- bet that WBA offer looks good now
Hmmm where to start with this pile of shoite...

Stanislas started less than 10 games last season (Although he still managed to score against your set of jokers), and was offered first team football, which he couldn't get at Burnley.

Baird wants to stay down south as he has a young family.

Sordell is only 23 and was an England Under 21 international worth three and a half million two seasons ago.

What WBA offer?

Congratulations on signing Chris Brown, my PNE supporting mate says, and I quote, "An absolute useless lump"

Focus on Car-crash BRFC, stop obsessing about your Premier League bigger and better neighbours.

Second Division Rubbish.
Chris Brown is a cover player (and not on 10k a week before you spout cr*p). You still offered a contract to that player so douche must have wanted him to stay- but he thought, now's my chance to get out of Burnley and jumped.

Douche spoke to WBA and turned it down
Can you prove that Dyche spoke to WBA or did you just make that up in your Burnley-obsessed tiny mind? Thought so

Read what I put about Stanislas - we offered him ONE YEAR deal, he couldn't get a game in the Championship with us so realised that instead of sitting on the bench (at best) so he signed a THREE YEAR deal with Bourrnemouth with a guarantee of first team involvement.

Maybe the likes of Best, Etuhu, etc should take a leaf out of Junior's book instead of sitting there and bleeding your pathetic club dry for millions - he is a proper player who left for footballing, not financial reasons.
Turned down premiership football to get out of the club though! Says it all. Ings won't sign he's waiting for a better offer Douche is trying all areas but all are not for coming.

Sad times, promotion and so much promise, but its looking bleak already.

And you say he left for football reasons not financial! Rubbish because you say he has signed for 3 years and rejected 1, so therefore its about getting money for 3 years!!!!!!!!!!

cretin
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Rovertheedge[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Rovertheedge[/bold] wrote: He needs to be flexible, tried to extend a players contract but he decides to drop a division, then Ings is looking at going, Baird won't sign, scraping the barrel for a Bolton player that looks like he's staying put, the disappointment continues..... Oh dear looks like Douche has a lot to do- bet that WBA offer looks good now[/p][/quote]Hmmm where to start with this pile of shoite... Stanislas started less than 10 games last season (Although he still managed to score against your set of jokers), and was offered first team football, which he couldn't get at Burnley. Baird wants to stay down south as he has a young family. Sordell is only 23 and was an England Under 21 international worth three and a half million two seasons ago. What WBA offer? Congratulations on signing Chris Brown, my PNE supporting mate says, and I quote, "An absolute useless lump" Focus on Car-crash BRFC, stop obsessing about your Premier League bigger and better neighbours. Second Division Rubbish.[/p][/quote]Chris Brown is a cover player (and not on 10k a week before you spout cr*p). You still offered a contract to that player so douche must have wanted him to stay- but he thought, now's my chance to get out of Burnley and jumped. Douche spoke to WBA and turned it down[/p][/quote]Can you prove that Dyche spoke to WBA or did you just make that up in your Burnley-obsessed tiny mind? Thought so Read what I put about Stanislas - we offered him ONE YEAR deal, he couldn't get a game in the Championship with us so realised that instead of sitting on the bench (at best) so he signed a THREE YEAR deal with Bourrnemouth with a guarantee of first team involvement. Maybe the likes of Best, Etuhu, etc should take a leaf out of Junior's book instead of sitting there and bleeding your pathetic club dry for millions - he is a proper player who left for footballing, not financial reasons.[/p][/quote]Turned down premiership football to get out of the club though! Says it all. Ings won't sign he's waiting for a better offer Douche is trying all areas but all are not for coming. Sad times, promotion and so much promise, but its looking bleak already. And you say he left for football reasons not financial! Rubbish because you say he has signed for 3 years and rejected 1, so therefore its about getting money for 3 years!!!!!!!!!! cretin Rovertheedge
  • Score: -9

10:13am Mon 30 Jun 14

tall in the saddle says...

Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
Rovertheedge wrote:
Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
Rovertheedge wrote:
He needs to be flexible, tried to extend a players contract but he decides to drop a division, then Ings is looking at going, Baird won't sign, scraping the barrel for a Bolton player that looks like he's staying put, the disappointment continues.....

Oh dear looks like Douche has a lot to do- bet that WBA offer looks good now
Hmmm where to start with this pile of shoite...

Stanislas started less than 10 games last season (Although he still managed to score against your set of jokers), and was offered first team football, which he couldn't get at Burnley.

Baird wants to stay down south as he has a young family.

Sordell is only 23 and was an England Under 21 international worth three and a half million two seasons ago.

What WBA offer?

Congratulations on signing Chris Brown, my PNE supporting mate says, and I quote, "An absolute useless lump"

Focus on Car-crash BRFC, stop obsessing about your Premier League bigger and better neighbours.

Second Division Rubbish.
Chris Brown is a cover player (and not on 10k a week before you spout cr*p). You still offered a contract to that player so douche must have wanted him to stay- but he thought, now's my chance to get out of Burnley and jumped.

Douche spoke to WBA and turned it down
Can you prove that Dyche spoke to WBA or did you just make that up in your Burnley-obsessed tiny mind? Thought so

Read what I put about Stanislas - we offered him ONE YEAR deal, he couldn't get a game in the Championship with us so realised that instead of sitting on the bench (at best) so he signed a THREE YEAR deal with Bourrnemouth with a guarantee of first team involvement.

Maybe the likes of Best, Etuhu, etc should take a leaf out of Junior's book instead of sitting there and bleeding your pathetic club dry for millions - he is a proper player who left for footballing, not financial reasons.
Why would Best, Etuhu etc go anywhere? Who else will pay them £30 – £40k / per week except Blackburn? They are getting good money for nothing. Different case with Junior, he wanted security for 3 years
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Rovertheedge[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Rovertheedge[/bold] wrote: He needs to be flexible, tried to extend a players contract but he decides to drop a division, then Ings is looking at going, Baird won't sign, scraping the barrel for a Bolton player that looks like he's staying put, the disappointment continues..... Oh dear looks like Douche has a lot to do- bet that WBA offer looks good now[/p][/quote]Hmmm where to start with this pile of shoite... Stanislas started less than 10 games last season (Although he still managed to score against your set of jokers), and was offered first team football, which he couldn't get at Burnley. Baird wants to stay down south as he has a young family. Sordell is only 23 and was an England Under 21 international worth three and a half million two seasons ago. What WBA offer? Congratulations on signing Chris Brown, my PNE supporting mate says, and I quote, "An absolute useless lump" Focus on Car-crash BRFC, stop obsessing about your Premier League bigger and better neighbours. Second Division Rubbish.[/p][/quote]Chris Brown is a cover player (and not on 10k a week before you spout cr*p). You still offered a contract to that player so douche must have wanted him to stay- but he thought, now's my chance to get out of Burnley and jumped. Douche spoke to WBA and turned it down[/p][/quote]Can you prove that Dyche spoke to WBA or did you just make that up in your Burnley-obsessed tiny mind? Thought so Read what I put about Stanislas - we offered him ONE YEAR deal, he couldn't get a game in the Championship with us so realised that instead of sitting on the bench (at best) so he signed a THREE YEAR deal with Bourrnemouth with a guarantee of first team involvement. Maybe the likes of Best, Etuhu, etc should take a leaf out of Junior's book instead of sitting there and bleeding your pathetic club dry for millions - he is a proper player who left for footballing, not financial reasons.[/p][/quote]Why would Best, Etuhu etc go anywhere? Who else will pay them £30 – £40k / per week except Blackburn? They are getting good money for nothing. Different case with Junior, he wanted security for 3 years tall in the saddle
  • Score: 4

10:22am Mon 30 Jun 14

Chuck Norris' Roundhouse says...

Rovertheedge wrote:
Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
Rovertheedge wrote:
Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
Rovertheedge wrote:
He needs to be flexible, tried to extend a players contract but he decides to drop a division, then Ings is looking at going, Baird won't sign, scraping the barrel for a Bolton player that looks like he's staying put, the disappointment continues.....

Oh dear looks like Douche has a lot to do- bet that WBA offer looks good now
Hmmm where to start with this pile of shoite...

Stanislas started less than 10 games last season (Although he still managed to score against your set of jokers), and was offered first team football, which he couldn't get at Burnley.

Baird wants to stay down south as he has a young family.

Sordell is only 23 and was an England Under 21 international worth three and a half million two seasons ago.

What WBA offer?

Congratulations on signing Chris Brown, my PNE supporting mate says, and I quote, "An absolute useless lump"

Focus on Car-crash BRFC, stop obsessing about your Premier League bigger and better neighbours.

Second Division Rubbish.
Chris Brown is a cover player (and not on 10k a week before you spout cr*p). You still offered a contract to that player so douche must have wanted him to stay- but he thought, now's my chance to get out of Burnley and jumped.

Douche spoke to WBA and turned it down
Can you prove that Dyche spoke to WBA or did you just make that up in your Burnley-obsessed tiny mind? Thought so

Read what I put about Stanislas - we offered him ONE YEAR deal, he couldn't get a game in the Championship with us so realised that instead of sitting on the bench (at best) so he signed a THREE YEAR deal with Bourrnemouth with a guarantee of first team involvement.

Maybe the likes of Best, Etuhu, etc should take a leaf out of Junior's book instead of sitting there and bleeding your pathetic club dry for millions - he is a proper player who left for footballing, not financial reasons.
Turned down premiership football to get out of the club though! Says it all. Ings won't sign he's waiting for a better offer Douche is trying all areas but all are not for coming.

Sad times, promotion and so much promise, but its looking bleak already.

And you say he left for football reasons not financial! Rubbish because you say he has signed for 3 years and rejected 1, so therefore its about getting money for 3 years!!!!!!!!!!

cretin
Are you so simple?

Have you got a few marbles rolling around in your massive neanderthal cranium?

I know you must find it difficult to comprehend a footballer wanting to play football instead of sitting on their fat arse collecting a paycheck, but honestly, at most proper football clubs that happens - except at Trampburn obviously where players would rather sit and earn their fat wages and train with the kids.

If it was about the money, then surely he would have signed for a Premier League club for more dosh? Have you not just undermined your whole argument you **** dunce!

As for the Ings comment, can you prove that he is waiting for a better offer, or like the Dyche comment you are basically reading football rumours website and posting it as fact - your life must be so unfulfilled supporting that shower of rubbish from BolEwood, that you are just making any old rubbish up..
[quote][p][bold]Rovertheedge[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Rovertheedge[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Rovertheedge[/bold] wrote: He needs to be flexible, tried to extend a players contract but he decides to drop a division, then Ings is looking at going, Baird won't sign, scraping the barrel for a Bolton player that looks like he's staying put, the disappointment continues..... Oh dear looks like Douche has a lot to do- bet that WBA offer looks good now[/p][/quote]Hmmm where to start with this pile of shoite... Stanislas started less than 10 games last season (Although he still managed to score against your set of jokers), and was offered first team football, which he couldn't get at Burnley. Baird wants to stay down south as he has a young family. Sordell is only 23 and was an England Under 21 international worth three and a half million two seasons ago. What WBA offer? Congratulations on signing Chris Brown, my PNE supporting mate says, and I quote, "An absolute useless lump" Focus on Car-crash BRFC, stop obsessing about your Premier League bigger and better neighbours. Second Division Rubbish.[/p][/quote]Chris Brown is a cover player (and not on 10k a week before you spout cr*p). You still offered a contract to that player so douche must have wanted him to stay- but he thought, now's my chance to get out of Burnley and jumped. Douche spoke to WBA and turned it down[/p][/quote]Can you prove that Dyche spoke to WBA or did you just make that up in your Burnley-obsessed tiny mind? Thought so Read what I put about Stanislas - we offered him ONE YEAR deal, he couldn't get a game in the Championship with us so realised that instead of sitting on the bench (at best) so he signed a THREE YEAR deal with Bourrnemouth with a guarantee of first team involvement. Maybe the likes of Best, Etuhu, etc should take a leaf out of Junior's book instead of sitting there and bleeding your pathetic club dry for millions - he is a proper player who left for footballing, not financial reasons.[/p][/quote]Turned down premiership football to get out of the club though! Says it all. Ings won't sign he's waiting for a better offer Douche is trying all areas but all are not for coming. Sad times, promotion and so much promise, but its looking bleak already. And you say he left for football reasons not financial! Rubbish because you say he has signed for 3 years and rejected 1, so therefore its about getting money for 3 years!!!!!!!!!! cretin[/p][/quote]Are you so simple? Have you got a few marbles rolling around in your massive neanderthal cranium? I know you must find it difficult to comprehend a footballer wanting to play football instead of sitting on their fat arse collecting a paycheck, but honestly, at most proper football clubs that happens - except at Trampburn obviously where players would rather sit and earn their fat wages and train with the kids. If it was about the money, then surely he would have signed for a Premier League club for more dosh? Have you not just undermined your whole argument you **** dunce! As for the Ings comment, can you prove that he is waiting for a better offer, or like the Dyche comment you are basically reading football rumours website and posting it as fact - your life must be so unfulfilled supporting that shower of rubbish from BolEwood, that you are just making any old rubbish up.. Chuck Norris' Roundhouse
  • Score: 11

10:25am Mon 30 Jun 14

TurfMoorTom says...

Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
Rovertheedge wrote:
Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
Rovertheedge wrote:
He needs to be flexible, tried to extend a players contract but he decides to drop a division, then Ings is looking at going, Baird won't sign, scraping the barrel for a Bolton player that looks like he's staying put, the disappointment continues.....

Oh dear looks like Douche has a lot to do- bet that WBA offer looks good now
Hmmm where to start with this pile of shoite...

Stanislas started less than 10 games last season (Although he still managed to score against your set of jokers), and was offered first team football, which he couldn't get at Burnley.

Baird wants to stay down south as he has a young family.

Sordell is only 23 and was an England Under 21 international worth three and a half million two seasons ago.

What WBA offer?

Congratulations on signing Chris Brown, my PNE supporting mate says, and I quote, "An absolute useless lump"

Focus on Car-crash BRFC, stop obsessing about your Premier League bigger and better neighbours.

Second Division Rubbish.
Chris Brown is a cover player (and not on 10k a week before you spout cr*p). You still offered a contract to that player so douche must have wanted him to stay- but he thought, now's my chance to get out of Burnley and jumped.

Douche spoke to WBA and turned it down
Can you prove that Dyche spoke to WBA or did you just make that up in your Burnley-obsessed tiny mind? Thought so

Read what I put about Stanislas - we offered him ONE YEAR deal, he couldn't get a game in the Championship with us so realised that instead of sitting on the bench (at best) so he signed a THREE YEAR deal with Bourrnemouth with a guarantee of first team involvement.

Maybe the likes of Best, Etuhu, etc should take a leaf out of Junior's book instead of sitting there and bleeding your pathetic club dry for millions - he is a proper player who left for footballing, not financial reasons.
But I thought all the Premier League contracts currently being negotiated at Turdmorgue are for one season only? Can't think why.
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Rovertheedge[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Rovertheedge[/bold] wrote: He needs to be flexible, tried to extend a players contract but he decides to drop a division, then Ings is looking at going, Baird won't sign, scraping the barrel for a Bolton player that looks like he's staying put, the disappointment continues..... Oh dear looks like Douche has a lot to do- bet that WBA offer looks good now[/p][/quote]Hmmm where to start with this pile of shoite... Stanislas started less than 10 games last season (Although he still managed to score against your set of jokers), and was offered first team football, which he couldn't get at Burnley. Baird wants to stay down south as he has a young family. Sordell is only 23 and was an England Under 21 international worth three and a half million two seasons ago. What WBA offer? Congratulations on signing Chris Brown, my PNE supporting mate says, and I quote, "An absolute useless lump" Focus on Car-crash BRFC, stop obsessing about your Premier League bigger and better neighbours. Second Division Rubbish.[/p][/quote]Chris Brown is a cover player (and not on 10k a week before you spout cr*p). You still offered a contract to that player so douche must have wanted him to stay- but he thought, now's my chance to get out of Burnley and jumped. Douche spoke to WBA and turned it down[/p][/quote]Can you prove that Dyche spoke to WBA or did you just make that up in your Burnley-obsessed tiny mind? Thought so Read what I put about Stanislas - we offered him ONE YEAR deal, he couldn't get a game in the Championship with us so realised that instead of sitting on the bench (at best) so he signed a THREE YEAR deal with Bourrnemouth with a guarantee of first team involvement. Maybe the likes of Best, Etuhu, etc should take a leaf out of Junior's book instead of sitting there and bleeding your pathetic club dry for millions - he is a proper player who left for footballing, not financial reasons.[/p][/quote]But I thought all the Premier League contracts currently being negotiated at Turdmorgue are for one season only? Can't think why. TurfMoorTom
  • Score: -10

10:26am Mon 30 Jun 14

Chuck Norris' Roundhouse says...

TurfMoorTom wrote:
Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
Rovertheedge wrote:
Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
Rovertheedge wrote:
He needs to be flexible, tried to extend a players contract but he decides to drop a division, then Ings is looking at going, Baird won't sign, scraping the barrel for a Bolton player that looks like he's staying put, the disappointment continues.....

Oh dear looks like Douche has a lot to do- bet that WBA offer looks good now
Hmmm where to start with this pile of shoite...

Stanislas started less than 10 games last season (Although he still managed to score against your set of jokers), and was offered first team football, which he couldn't get at Burnley.

Baird wants to stay down south as he has a young family.

Sordell is only 23 and was an England Under 21 international worth three and a half million two seasons ago.

What WBA offer?

Congratulations on signing Chris Brown, my PNE supporting mate says, and I quote, "An absolute useless lump"

Focus on Car-crash BRFC, stop obsessing about your Premier League bigger and better neighbours.

Second Division Rubbish.
Chris Brown is a cover player (and not on 10k a week before you spout cr*p). You still offered a contract to that player so douche must have wanted him to stay- but he thought, now's my chance to get out of Burnley and jumped.

Douche spoke to WBA and turned it down
Can you prove that Dyche spoke to WBA or did you just make that up in your Burnley-obsessed tiny mind? Thought so

Read what I put about Stanislas - we offered him ONE YEAR deal, he couldn't get a game in the Championship with us so realised that instead of sitting on the bench (at best) so he signed a THREE YEAR deal with Bourrnemouth with a guarantee of first team involvement.

Maybe the likes of Best, Etuhu, etc should take a leaf out of Junior's book instead of sitting there and bleeding your pathetic club dry for millions - he is a proper player who left for footballing, not financial reasons.
But I thought all the Premier League contracts currently being negotiated at Turdmorgue are for one season only? Can't think why.
Racist
[quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Rovertheedge[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Rovertheedge[/bold] wrote: He needs to be flexible, tried to extend a players contract but he decides to drop a division, then Ings is looking at going, Baird won't sign, scraping the barrel for a Bolton player that looks like he's staying put, the disappointment continues..... Oh dear looks like Douche has a lot to do- bet that WBA offer looks good now[/p][/quote]Hmmm where to start with this pile of shoite... Stanislas started less than 10 games last season (Although he still managed to score against your set of jokers), and was offered first team football, which he couldn't get at Burnley. Baird wants to stay down south as he has a young family. Sordell is only 23 and was an England Under 21 international worth three and a half million two seasons ago. What WBA offer? Congratulations on signing Chris Brown, my PNE supporting mate says, and I quote, "An absolute useless lump" Focus on Car-crash BRFC, stop obsessing about your Premier League bigger and better neighbours. Second Division Rubbish.[/p][/quote]Chris Brown is a cover player (and not on 10k a week before you spout cr*p). You still offered a contract to that player so douche must have wanted him to stay- but he thought, now's my chance to get out of Burnley and jumped. Douche spoke to WBA and turned it down[/p][/quote]Can you prove that Dyche spoke to WBA or did you just make that up in your Burnley-obsessed tiny mind? Thought so Read what I put about Stanislas - we offered him ONE YEAR deal, he couldn't get a game in the Championship with us so realised that instead of sitting on the bench (at best) so he signed a THREE YEAR deal with Bourrnemouth with a guarantee of first team involvement. Maybe the likes of Best, Etuhu, etc should take a leaf out of Junior's book instead of sitting there and bleeding your pathetic club dry for millions - he is a proper player who left for footballing, not financial reasons.[/p][/quote]But I thought all the Premier League contracts currently being negotiated at Turdmorgue are for one season only? Can't think why.[/p][/quote]Racist Chuck Norris' Roundhouse
  • Score: 13

10:29am Mon 30 Jun 14

Rob_H2O says...

Ban racisits
Ban racisits Rob_H2O
  • Score: 11

10:30am Mon 30 Jun 14

AnotherPounding4Burnley says...

The players we have will have to adapt because the ones we are signing are watered down versions of the ones that are now leaving. Unless we sign some genuine quality, we are going down..
A new tactic by the management and staff would be to build a prayer room and also one for quiet reflection with warm pastel coloured walls and lots of victory videos from last season, because this year the victory tape will be very short.
The players we have will have to adapt because the ones we are signing are watered down versions of the ones that are now leaving. Unless we sign some genuine quality, we are going down.. A new tactic by the management and staff would be to build a prayer room and also one for quiet reflection with warm pastel coloured walls and lots of victory videos from last season, because this year the victory tape will be very short. AnotherPounding4Burnley
  • Score: -12

10:30am Mon 30 Jun 14

Rovertheedge says...

Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
Rovertheedge wrote:
Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
Rovertheedge wrote:
Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
Rovertheedge wrote:
He needs to be flexible, tried to extend a players contract but he decides to drop a division, then Ings is looking at going, Baird won't sign, scraping the barrel for a Bolton player that looks like he's staying put, the disappointment continues.....

Oh dear looks like Douche has a lot to do- bet that WBA offer looks good now
Hmmm where to start with this pile of shoite...

Stanislas started less than 10 games last season (Although he still managed to score against your set of jokers), and was offered first team football, which he couldn't get at Burnley.

Baird wants to stay down south as he has a young family.

Sordell is only 23 and was an England Under 21 international worth three and a half million two seasons ago.

What WBA offer?

Congratulations on signing Chris Brown, my PNE supporting mate says, and I quote, "An absolute useless lump"

Focus on Car-crash BRFC, stop obsessing about your Premier League bigger and better neighbours.

Second Division Rubbish.
Chris Brown is a cover player (and not on 10k a week before you spout cr*p). You still offered a contract to that player so douche must have wanted him to stay- but he thought, now's my chance to get out of Burnley and jumped.

Douche spoke to WBA and turned it down
Can you prove that Dyche spoke to WBA or did you just make that up in your Burnley-obsessed tiny mind? Thought so

Read what I put about Stanislas - we offered him ONE YEAR deal, he couldn't get a game in the Championship with us so realised that instead of sitting on the bench (at best) so he signed a THREE YEAR deal with Bourrnemouth with a guarantee of first team involvement.

Maybe the likes of Best, Etuhu, etc should take a leaf out of Junior's book instead of sitting there and bleeding your pathetic club dry for millions - he is a proper player who left for footballing, not financial reasons.
Turned down premiership football to get out of the club though! Says it all. Ings won't sign he's waiting for a better offer Douche is trying all areas but all are not for coming.

Sad times, promotion and so much promise, but its looking bleak already.

And you say he left for football reasons not financial! Rubbish because you say he has signed for 3 years and rejected 1, so therefore its about getting money for 3 years!!!!!!!!!!

cretin
Are you so simple?

Have you got a few marbles rolling around in your massive neanderthal cranium?

I know you must find it difficult to comprehend a footballer wanting to play football instead of sitting on their fat arse collecting a paycheck, but honestly, at most proper football clubs that happens - except at Trampburn obviously where players would rather sit and earn their fat wages and train with the kids.

If it was about the money, then surely he would have signed for a Premier League club for more dosh? Have you not just undermined your whole argument you **** dunce!

As for the Ings comment, can you prove that he is waiting for a better offer, or like the Dyche comment you are basically reading football rumours website and posting it as fact - your life must be so unfulfilled supporting that shower of rubbish from BolEwood, that you are just making any old rubbish up..
No need for racism chucky boy.

I have not undermined my argument, you have on yours though.

Chuck- the player is leaving for football reasons not for money.
Chuck- the player got a 3 year deal instead on 1......this means he earn more!

If he stayed with you, he would not be getting premiership wages, lets be honest here, he may get a slight increase that's all.

Anyway Ings has never once sais he's committed to the club and hopes to help with survival etc, he obviously has no respect or loyalty for the club.

Its all going to crumble soon chucky boy.

Enjoy your day and lock your doors, there are nasty people lurking the streets of Burnley!
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Rovertheedge[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Rovertheedge[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Rovertheedge[/bold] wrote: He needs to be flexible, tried to extend a players contract but he decides to drop a division, then Ings is looking at going, Baird won't sign, scraping the barrel for a Bolton player that looks like he's staying put, the disappointment continues..... Oh dear looks like Douche has a lot to do- bet that WBA offer looks good now[/p][/quote]Hmmm where to start with this pile of shoite... Stanislas started less than 10 games last season (Although he still managed to score against your set of jokers), and was offered first team football, which he couldn't get at Burnley. Baird wants to stay down south as he has a young family. Sordell is only 23 and was an England Under 21 international worth three and a half million two seasons ago. What WBA offer? Congratulations on signing Chris Brown, my PNE supporting mate says, and I quote, "An absolute useless lump" Focus on Car-crash BRFC, stop obsessing about your Premier League bigger and better neighbours. Second Division Rubbish.[/p][/quote]Chris Brown is a cover player (and not on 10k a week before you spout cr*p). You still offered a contract to that player so douche must have wanted him to stay- but he thought, now's my chance to get out of Burnley and jumped. Douche spoke to WBA and turned it down[/p][/quote]Can you prove that Dyche spoke to WBA or did you just make that up in your Burnley-obsessed tiny mind? Thought so Read what I put about Stanislas - we offered him ONE YEAR deal, he couldn't get a game in the Championship with us so realised that instead of sitting on the bench (at best) so he signed a THREE YEAR deal with Bourrnemouth with a guarantee of first team involvement. Maybe the likes of Best, Etuhu, etc should take a leaf out of Junior's book instead of sitting there and bleeding your pathetic club dry for millions - he is a proper player who left for footballing, not financial reasons.[/p][/quote]Turned down premiership football to get out of the club though! Says it all. Ings won't sign he's waiting for a better offer Douche is trying all areas but all are not for coming. Sad times, promotion and so much promise, but its looking bleak already. And you say he left for football reasons not financial! Rubbish because you say he has signed for 3 years and rejected 1, so therefore its about getting money for 3 years!!!!!!!!!! cretin[/p][/quote]Are you so simple? Have you got a few marbles rolling around in your massive neanderthal cranium? I know you must find it difficult to comprehend a footballer wanting to play football instead of sitting on their fat arse collecting a paycheck, but honestly, at most proper football clubs that happens - except at Trampburn obviously where players would rather sit and earn their fat wages and train with the kids. If it was about the money, then surely he would have signed for a Premier League club for more dosh? Have you not just undermined your whole argument you **** dunce! As for the Ings comment, can you prove that he is waiting for a better offer, or like the Dyche comment you are basically reading football rumours website and posting it as fact - your life must be so unfulfilled supporting that shower of rubbish from BolEwood, that you are just making any old rubbish up..[/p][/quote]No need for racism chucky boy. I have not undermined my argument, you have on yours though. Chuck- the player is leaving for football reasons not for money. Chuck- the player got a 3 year deal instead on 1......this means he earn more! If he stayed with you, he would not be getting premiership wages, lets be honest here, he may get a slight increase that's all. Anyway Ings has never once sais he's committed to the club and hopes to help with survival etc, he obviously has no respect or loyalty for the club. Its all going to crumble soon chucky boy. Enjoy your day and lock your doors, there are nasty people lurking the streets of Burnley! Rovertheedge
  • Score: -10

10:31am Mon 30 Jun 14

Chuck Norris' Roundhouse says...

AnotherPounding4Burn
ley
wrote:
The players we have will have to adapt because the ones we are signing are watered down versions of the ones that are now leaving. Unless we sign some genuine quality, we are going down..
A new tactic by the management and staff would be to build a prayer room and also one for quiet reflection with warm pastel coloured walls and lots of victory videos from last season, because this year the victory tape will be very short.
Videos? In the modern world we call them DVD's, but in Blackburn it is still 1985.
[quote][p][bold]AnotherPounding4Burn ley[/bold] wrote: The players we have will have to adapt because the ones we are signing are watered down versions of the ones that are now leaving. Unless we sign some genuine quality, we are going down.. A new tactic by the management and staff would be to build a prayer room and also one for quiet reflection with warm pastel coloured walls and lots of victory videos from last season, because this year the victory tape will be very short.[/p][/quote]Videos? In the modern world we call them DVD's, but in Blackburn it is still 1985. Chuck Norris' Roundhouse
  • Score: 11

10:31am Mon 30 Jun 14

tall in the saddle says...

Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
TurfMoorTom wrote:
Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
Rovertheedge wrote:
Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
Rovertheedge wrote:
He needs to be flexible, tried to extend a players contract but he decides to drop a division, then Ings is looking at going, Baird won't sign, scraping the barrel for a Bolton player that looks like he's staying put, the disappointment continues.....

Oh dear looks like Douche has a lot to do- bet that WBA offer looks good now
Hmmm where to start with this pile of shoite...

Stanislas started less than 10 games last season (Although he still managed to score against your set of jokers), and was offered first team football, which he couldn't get at Burnley.

Baird wants to stay down south as he has a young family.

Sordell is only 23 and was an England Under 21 international worth three and a half million two seasons ago.

What WBA offer?

Congratulations on signing Chris Brown, my PNE supporting mate says, and I quote, "An absolute useless lump"

Focus on Car-crash BRFC, stop obsessing about your Premier League bigger and better neighbours.

Second Division Rubbish.
Chris Brown is a cover player (and not on 10k a week before you spout cr*p). You still offered a contract to that player so douche must have wanted him to stay- but he thought, now's my chance to get out of Burnley and jumped.

Douche spoke to WBA and turned it down
Can you prove that Dyche spoke to WBA or did you just make that up in your Burnley-obsessed tiny mind? Thought so

Read what I put about Stanislas - we offered him ONE YEAR deal, he couldn't get a game in the Championship with us so realised that instead of sitting on the bench (at best) so he signed a THREE YEAR deal with Bourrnemouth with a guarantee of first team involvement.

Maybe the likes of Best, Etuhu, etc should take a leaf out of Junior's book instead of sitting there and bleeding your pathetic club dry for millions - he is a proper player who left for footballing, not financial reasons.
But I thought all the Premier League contracts currently being negotiated at Turdmorgue are for one season only? Can't think why.
Racist
And craven coward whose comments should never be considered.
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Rovertheedge[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Rovertheedge[/bold] wrote: He needs to be flexible, tried to extend a players contract but he decides to drop a division, then Ings is looking at going, Baird won't sign, scraping the barrel for a Bolton player that looks like he's staying put, the disappointment continues..... Oh dear looks like Douche has a lot to do- bet that WBA offer looks good now[/p][/quote]Hmmm where to start with this pile of shoite... Stanislas started less than 10 games last season (Although he still managed to score against your set of jokers), and was offered first team football, which he couldn't get at Burnley. Baird wants to stay down south as he has a young family. Sordell is only 23 and was an England Under 21 international worth three and a half million two seasons ago. What WBA offer? Congratulations on signing Chris Brown, my PNE supporting mate says, and I quote, "An absolute useless lump" Focus on Car-crash BRFC, stop obsessing about your Premier League bigger and better neighbours. Second Division Rubbish.[/p][/quote]Chris Brown is a cover player (and not on 10k a week before you spout cr*p). You still offered a contract to that player so douche must have wanted him to stay- but he thought, now's my chance to get out of Burnley and jumped. Douche spoke to WBA and turned it down[/p][/quote]Can you prove that Dyche spoke to WBA or did you just make that up in your Burnley-obsessed tiny mind? Thought so Read what I put about Stanislas - we offered him ONE YEAR deal, he couldn't get a game in the Championship with us so realised that instead of sitting on the bench (at best) so he signed a THREE YEAR deal with Bourrnemouth with a guarantee of first team involvement. Maybe the likes of Best, Etuhu, etc should take a leaf out of Junior's book instead of sitting there and bleeding your pathetic club dry for millions - he is a proper player who left for footballing, not financial reasons.[/p][/quote]But I thought all the Premier League contracts currently being negotiated at Turdmorgue are for one season only? Can't think why.[/p][/quote]Racist[/p][/quote]And craven coward whose comments should never be considered. tall in the saddle
  • Score: 3

10:32am Mon 30 Jun 14

Rovertheedge says...

TurfMoorTom wrote:
Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
Rovertheedge wrote:
Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
Rovertheedge wrote:
He needs to be flexible, tried to extend a players contract but he decides to drop a division, then Ings is looking at going, Baird won't sign, scraping the barrel for a Bolton player that looks like he's staying put, the disappointment continues.....

Oh dear looks like Douche has a lot to do- bet that WBA offer looks good now
Hmmm where to start with this pile of shoite...

Stanislas started less than 10 games last season (Although he still managed to score against your set of jokers), and was offered first team football, which he couldn't get at Burnley.

Baird wants to stay down south as he has a young family.

Sordell is only 23 and was an England Under 21 international worth three and a half million two seasons ago.

What WBA offer?

Congratulations on signing Chris Brown, my PNE supporting mate says, and I quote, "An absolute useless lump"

Focus on Car-crash BRFC, stop obsessing about your Premier League bigger and better neighbours.

Second Division Rubbish.
Chris Brown is a cover player (and not on 10k a week before you spout cr*p). You still offered a contract to that player so douche must have wanted him to stay- but he thought, now's my chance to get out of Burnley and jumped.

Douche spoke to WBA and turned it down
Can you prove that Dyche spoke to WBA or did you just make that up in your Burnley-obsessed tiny mind? Thought so

Read what I put about Stanislas - we offered him ONE YEAR deal, he couldn't get a game in the Championship with us so realised that instead of sitting on the bench (at best) so he signed a THREE YEAR deal with Bourrnemouth with a guarantee of first team involvement.

Maybe the likes of Best, Etuhu, etc should take a leaf out of Junior's book instead of sitting there and bleeding your pathetic club dry for millions - he is a proper player who left for footballing, not financial reasons.
But I thought all the Premier League contracts currently being negotiated at Turdmorgue are for one season only? Can't think why.
excellent point well made. Maybe the players are waiting for 3 year deals at championship clubs
[quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Rovertheedge[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Rovertheedge[/bold] wrote: He needs to be flexible, tried to extend a players contract but he decides to drop a division, then Ings is looking at going, Baird won't sign, scraping the barrel for a Bolton player that looks like he's staying put, the disappointment continues..... Oh dear looks like Douche has a lot to do- bet that WBA offer looks good now[/p][/quote]Hmmm where to start with this pile of shoite... Stanislas started less than 10 games last season (Although he still managed to score against your set of jokers), and was offered first team football, which he couldn't get at Burnley. Baird wants to stay down south as he has a young family. Sordell is only 23 and was an England Under 21 international worth three and a half million two seasons ago. What WBA offer? Congratulations on signing Chris Brown, my PNE supporting mate says, and I quote, "An absolute useless lump" Focus on Car-crash BRFC, stop obsessing about your Premier League bigger and better neighbours. Second Division Rubbish.[/p][/quote]Chris Brown is a cover player (and not on 10k a week before you spout cr*p). You still offered a contract to that player so douche must have wanted him to stay- but he thought, now's my chance to get out of Burnley and jumped. Douche spoke to WBA and turned it down[/p][/quote]Can you prove that Dyche spoke to WBA or did you just make that up in your Burnley-obsessed tiny mind? Thought so Read what I put about Stanislas - we offered him ONE YEAR deal, he couldn't get a game in the Championship with us so realised that instead of sitting on the bench (at best) so he signed a THREE YEAR deal with Bourrnemouth with a guarantee of first team involvement. Maybe the likes of Best, Etuhu, etc should take a leaf out of Junior's book instead of sitting there and bleeding your pathetic club dry for millions - he is a proper player who left for footballing, not financial reasons.[/p][/quote]But I thought all the Premier League contracts currently being negotiated at Turdmorgue are for one season only? Can't think why.[/p][/quote]excellent point well made. Maybe the players are waiting for 3 year deals at championship clubs Rovertheedge
  • Score: -11

10:33am Mon 30 Jun 14

AnotherPounding4Burnley says...

Ban hatred stirrers, liars and rodders toilet frequenters.
Ban hatred stirrers, liars and rodders toilet frequenters. AnotherPounding4Burnley
  • Score: -10

10:41am Mon 30 Jun 14

jim 2012 says...

We obviously understand that within the tactics it’s a two-good thing. The tactics have to be right but also dealing with the individuals within that make a big difference.”
can anyone tell me what the above statement means ?
We obviously understand that within the tactics it’s a two-good thing. The tactics have to be right but also dealing with the individuals within that make a big difference.” can anyone tell me what the above statement means ? jim 2012
  • Score: -1

10:42am Mon 30 Jun 14

Chuck Norris' Roundhouse says...

Rovertheedge wrote:
Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
Rovertheedge wrote:
Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
Rovertheedge wrote:
Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
Rovertheedge wrote:
He needs to be flexible, tried to extend a players contract but he decides to drop a division, then Ings is looking at going, Baird won't sign, scraping the barrel for a Bolton player that looks like he's staying put, the disappointment continues.....

Oh dear looks like Douche has a lot to do- bet that WBA offer looks good now
Hmmm where to start with this pile of shoite...

Stanislas started less than 10 games last season (Although he still managed to score against your set of jokers), and was offered first team football, which he couldn't get at Burnley.

Baird wants to stay down south as he has a young family.

Sordell is only 23 and was an England Under 21 international worth three and a half million two seasons ago.

What WBA offer?

Congratulations on signing Chris Brown, my PNE supporting mate says, and I quote, "An absolute useless lump"

Focus on Car-crash BRFC, stop obsessing about your Premier League bigger and better neighbours.

Second Division Rubbish.
Chris Brown is a cover player (and not on 10k a week before you spout cr*p). You still offered a contract to that player so douche must have wanted him to stay- but he thought, now's my chance to get out of Burnley and jumped.

Douche spoke to WBA and turned it down
Can you prove that Dyche spoke to WBA or did you just make that up in your Burnley-obsessed tiny mind? Thought so

Read what I put about Stanislas - we offered him ONE YEAR deal, he couldn't get a game in the Championship with us so realised that instead of sitting on the bench (at best) so he signed a THREE YEAR deal with Bourrnemouth with a guarantee of first team involvement.

Maybe the likes of Best, Etuhu, etc should take a leaf out of Junior's book instead of sitting there and bleeding your pathetic club dry for millions - he is a proper player who left for footballing, not financial reasons.
Turned down premiership football to get out of the club though! Says it all. Ings won't sign he's waiting for a better offer Douche is trying all areas but all are not for coming.

Sad times, promotion and so much promise, but its looking bleak already.

And you say he left for football reasons not financial! Rubbish because you say he has signed for 3 years and rejected 1, so therefore its about getting money for 3 years!!!!!!!!!!

cretin
Are you so simple?

Have you got a few marbles rolling around in your massive neanderthal cranium?

I know you must find it difficult to comprehend a footballer wanting to play football instead of sitting on their fat arse collecting a paycheck, but honestly, at most proper football clubs that happens - except at Trampburn obviously where players would rather sit and earn their fat wages and train with the kids.

If it was about the money, then surely he would have signed for a Premier League club for more dosh? Have you not just undermined your whole argument you **** dunce!

As for the Ings comment, can you prove that he is waiting for a better offer, or like the Dyche comment you are basically reading football rumours website and posting it as fact - your life must be so unfulfilled supporting that shower of rubbish from BolEwood, that you are just making any old rubbish up..
No need for racism chucky boy.

I have not undermined my argument, you have on yours though.

Chuck- the player is leaving for football reasons not for money.
Chuck- the player got a 3 year deal instead on 1......this means he earn more!

If he stayed with you, he would not be getting premiership wages, lets be honest here, he may get a slight increase that's all.

Anyway Ings has never once sais he's committed to the club and hopes to help with survival etc, he obviously has no respect or loyalty for the club.

Its all going to crumble soon chucky boy.

Enjoy your day and lock your doors, there are nasty people lurking the streets of Burnley!
Aww your so persistent aren't you, like a stray, mangy dog trying to shag my leg.

Stanislas left because he wanted regular minutes on the pitch, not a place on the bench, dress it up how you like, but that my deluded friend is FACT.

Yes he WOULD have got Premier LEAGUE (Not Premiership you backwards numpty) wages at Burnley, after all, we are a Premier League club you know.

Ahh, I see, because Ings hasn't come out and said he is staying, then that means he isn't - great logic. If he goes, he goes, we will buy a replacement for him, now can you think of a Championship striker that has been banging the goals in for a poor poor side and has basically carried them on his shoulders for the last three years? Someone who would love a move to a Premier League club as he has been dropped from his international side.........? Could it happen... It would be worth it to see your reactions on here lol.
[quote][p][bold]Rovertheedge[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Rovertheedge[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Rovertheedge[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Rovertheedge[/bold] wrote: He needs to be flexible, tried to extend a players contract but he decides to drop a division, then Ings is looking at going, Baird won't sign, scraping the barrel for a Bolton player that looks like he's staying put, the disappointment continues..... Oh dear looks like Douche has a lot to do- bet that WBA offer looks good now[/p][/quote]Hmmm where to start with this pile of shoite... Stanislas started less than 10 games last season (Although he still managed to score against your set of jokers), and was offered first team football, which he couldn't get at Burnley. Baird wants to stay down south as he has a young family. Sordell is only 23 and was an England Under 21 international worth three and a half million two seasons ago. What WBA offer? Congratulations on signing Chris Brown, my PNE supporting mate says, and I quote, "An absolute useless lump" Focus on Car-crash BRFC, stop obsessing about your Premier League bigger and better neighbours. Second Division Rubbish.[/p][/quote]Chris Brown is a cover player (and not on 10k a week before you spout cr*p). You still offered a contract to that player so douche must have wanted him to stay- but he thought, now's my chance to get out of Burnley and jumped. Douche spoke to WBA and turned it down[/p][/quote]Can you prove that Dyche spoke to WBA or did you just make that up in your Burnley-obsessed tiny mind? Thought so Read what I put about Stanislas - we offered him ONE YEAR deal, he couldn't get a game in the Championship with us so realised that instead of sitting on the bench (at best) so he signed a THREE YEAR deal with Bourrnemouth with a guarantee of first team involvement. Maybe the likes of Best, Etuhu, etc should take a leaf out of Junior's book instead of sitting there and bleeding your pathetic club dry for millions - he is a proper player who left for footballing, not financial reasons.[/p][/quote]Turned down premiership football to get out of the club though! Says it all. Ings won't sign he's waiting for a better offer Douche is trying all areas but all are not for coming. Sad times, promotion and so much promise, but its looking bleak already. And you say he left for football reasons not financial! Rubbish because you say he has signed for 3 years and rejected 1, so therefore its about getting money for 3 years!!!!!!!!!! cretin[/p][/quote]Are you so simple? Have you got a few marbles rolling around in your massive neanderthal cranium? I know you must find it difficult to comprehend a footballer wanting to play football instead of sitting on their fat arse collecting a paycheck, but honestly, at most proper football clubs that happens - except at Trampburn obviously where players would rather sit and earn their fat wages and train with the kids. If it was about the money, then surely he would have signed for a Premier League club for more dosh? Have you not just undermined your whole argument you **** dunce! As for the Ings comment, can you prove that he is waiting for a better offer, or like the Dyche comment you are basically reading football rumours website and posting it as fact - your life must be so unfulfilled supporting that shower of rubbish from BolEwood, that you are just making any old rubbish up..[/p][/quote]No need for racism chucky boy. I have not undermined my argument, you have on yours though. Chuck- the player is leaving for football reasons not for money. Chuck- the player got a 3 year deal instead on 1......this means he earn more! If he stayed with you, he would not be getting premiership wages, lets be honest here, he may get a slight increase that's all. Anyway Ings has never once sais he's committed to the club and hopes to help with survival etc, he obviously has no respect or loyalty for the club. Its all going to crumble soon chucky boy. Enjoy your day and lock your doors, there are nasty people lurking the streets of Burnley![/p][/quote]Aww your so persistent aren't you, like a stray, mangy dog trying to shag my leg. Stanislas left because he wanted regular minutes on the pitch, not a place on the bench, dress it up how you like, but that my deluded friend is FACT. Yes he WOULD have got Premier LEAGUE (Not Premiership you backwards numpty) wages at Burnley, after all, we are a Premier League club you know. Ahh, I see, because Ings hasn't come out and said he is staying, then that means he isn't - great logic. If he goes, he goes, we will buy a replacement for him, now can you think of a Championship striker that has been banging the goals in for a poor poor side and has basically carried them on his shoulders for the last three years? Someone who would love a move to a Premier League club as he has been dropped from his international side.........? Could it happen... It would be worth it to see your reactions on here lol. Chuck Norris' Roundhouse
  • Score: 9

10:54am Mon 30 Jun 14

TurfMoorTom says...

Rob_H2O wrote:
Ban racisits
Good call - does he play for Croatia? Fallen on deaf ears anyway as Bumley won't know as they didn't have the ambition to send a scout to the World Cup. Still when you've got £120m supposedly in your back pocket, why go to Brazil when you can go to Bolton instead and still not be able to attract the player.
[quote][p][bold]Rob_H2O[/bold] wrote: Ban racisits[/p][/quote]Good call - does he play for Croatia? Fallen on deaf ears anyway as Bumley won't know as they didn't have the ambition to send a scout to the World Cup. Still when you've got £120m supposedly in your back pocket, why go to Brazil when you can go to Bolton instead and still not be able to attract the player. TurfMoorTom
  • Score: -11

10:56am Mon 30 Jun 14

Chuck Norris' Roundhouse says...

jim 2012 wrote:
We obviously understand that within the tactics it’s a two-good thing. The tactics have to be right but also dealing with the individuals within that make a big difference.”
can anyone tell me what the above statement means ?
It is a Premier League statement for Premier League supporters - don't bother your Chumpionship befuddled head about it.
[quote][p][bold]jim 2012[/bold] wrote: We obviously understand that within the tactics it’s a two-good thing. The tactics have to be right but also dealing with the individuals within that make a big difference.” can anyone tell me what the above statement means ?[/p][/quote]It is a Premier League statement for Premier League supporters - don't bother your Chumpionship befuddled head about it. Chuck Norris' Roundhouse
  • Score: 12

11:18am Mon 30 Jun 14

Chuck Norris' Roundhouse says...

TurfMoorTom wrote:
Rob_H2O wrote:
Ban racisits
Good call - does he play for Croatia? Fallen on deaf ears anyway as Bumley won't know as they didn't have the ambition to send a scout to the World Cup. Still when you've got £120m supposedly in your back pocket, why go to Brazil when you can go to Bolton instead and still not be able to attract the player.
Racist
[quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Rob_H2O[/bold] wrote: Ban racisits[/p][/quote]Good call - does he play for Croatia? Fallen on deaf ears anyway as Bumley won't know as they didn't have the ambition to send a scout to the World Cup. Still when you've got £120m supposedly in your back pocket, why go to Brazil when you can go to Bolton instead and still not be able to attract the player.[/p][/quote]Racist Chuck Norris' Roundhouse
  • Score: 9

11:18am Mon 30 Jun 14

tall in the saddle says...

Press reports today say that Ronald Koeman is to sign two players for Southampton from the Dutch league. One is an Italian striker, to replace Lambert. No mention of Ings at all.
Press reports today say that Ronald Koeman is to sign two players for Southampton from the Dutch league. One is an Italian striker, to replace Lambert. No mention of Ings at all. tall in the saddle
  • Score: 3

11:41am Mon 30 Jun 14

TurfMoorTom says...

Look, charitable as I am I’m going to help you out. Your Directors obviously aren’t confident, your inexperienced manager is stumbling around in the dark like he’s got the trots and can’t find the light switch, while your players would prefer to be lining up for Bournemouth. The good news is that through a run of good fortune you’re now at the top of your game though on a hiding to nothing in the Premier League with nowhere to go but down in a ball of flames. Seemingly wanting to pocket all the cash with no outlay or intention to compete, why don’t you go-for-broke and sell up rather than subject yourselves to the inevitable and drawn out sad demise. That would net you the £120m you crave more than any meaningful football trophy and as a gesture of goodwill for the loyal support over the past 4 lean decades keep you all in White Lightning for about a fortnight.
Look, charitable as I am I’m going to help you out. Your Directors obviously aren’t confident, your inexperienced manager is stumbling around in the dark like he’s got the trots and can’t find the light switch, while your players would prefer to be lining up for Bournemouth. The good news is that through a run of good fortune you’re now at the top of your game though on a hiding to nothing in the Premier League with nowhere to go but down in a ball of flames. Seemingly wanting to pocket all the cash with no outlay or intention to compete, why don’t you go-for-broke and sell up rather than subject yourselves to the inevitable and drawn out sad demise. That would net you the £120m you crave more than any meaningful football trophy and as a gesture of goodwill for the loyal support over the past 4 lean decades keep you all in White Lightning for about a fortnight. TurfMoorTom
  • Score: -9

11:57am Mon 30 Jun 14

jim 2012 says...

Rovertheedge wrote:
Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
Rovertheedge wrote:
He needs to be flexible, tried to extend a players contract but he decides to drop a division, then Ings is looking at going, Baird won't sign, scraping the barrel for a Bolton player that looks like he's staying put, the disappointment continues.....

Oh dear looks like Douche has a lot to do- bet that WBA offer looks good now
Hmmm where to start with this pile of shoite...

Stanislas started less than 10 games last season (Although he still managed to score against your set of jokers), and was offered first team football, which he couldn't get at Burnley.

Baird wants to stay down south as he has a young family.

Sordell is only 23 and was an England Under 21 international worth three and a half million two seasons ago.

What WBA offer?

Congratulations on signing Chris Brown, my PNE supporting mate says, and I quote, "An absolute useless lump"

Focus on Car-crash BRFC, stop obsessing about your Premier League bigger and better neighbours.

Second Division Rubbish.
Chris Brown is a cover player (and not on 10k a week before you spout cr*p). You still offered a contract to that player so douche must have wanted him to stay- but he thought, now's my chance to get out of Burnley and jumped.

Douche spoke to WBA and turned it down
my mate said I was going to win the lotto this week but gess what he was wrong what An absolute useless lump" he is
[quote][p][bold]Rovertheedge[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Rovertheedge[/bold] wrote: He needs to be flexible, tried to extend a players contract but he decides to drop a division, then Ings is looking at going, Baird won't sign, scraping the barrel for a Bolton player that looks like he's staying put, the disappointment continues..... Oh dear looks like Douche has a lot to do- bet that WBA offer looks good now[/p][/quote]Hmmm where to start with this pile of shoite... Stanislas started less than 10 games last season (Although he still managed to score against your set of jokers), and was offered first team football, which he couldn't get at Burnley. Baird wants to stay down south as he has a young family. Sordell is only 23 and was an England Under 21 international worth three and a half million two seasons ago. What WBA offer? Congratulations on signing Chris Brown, my PNE supporting mate says, and I quote, "An absolute useless lump" Focus on Car-crash BRFC, stop obsessing about your Premier League bigger and better neighbours. Second Division Rubbish.[/p][/quote]Chris Brown is a cover player (and not on 10k a week before you spout cr*p). You still offered a contract to that player so douche must have wanted him to stay- but he thought, now's my chance to get out of Burnley and jumped. Douche spoke to WBA and turned it down[/p][/quote]my mate said I was going to win the lotto this week but gess what he was wrong what An absolute useless lump" he is jim 2012
  • Score: 7

12:10pm Mon 30 Jun 14

jim 2012 says...

Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
jim 2012 wrote:
We obviously understand that within the tactics it’s a two-good thing. The tactics have to be right but also dealing with the individuals within that make a big difference.”
can anyone tell me what the above statement means ?
It is a Premier League statement for Premier League supporters - don't bother your Chumpionship befuddled head about it.
i know is a statement but can anyone tell me what the above statement means ?
and what the hell is a Premier League statement for Premier League supporters ?
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]jim 2012[/bold] wrote: We obviously understand that within the tactics it’s a two-good thing. The tactics have to be right but also dealing with the individuals within that make a big difference.” can anyone tell me what the above statement means ?[/p][/quote]It is a Premier League statement for Premier League supporters - don't bother your Chumpionship befuddled head about it.[/p][/quote]i know is a statement but can anyone tell me what the above statement means ? and what the hell is a Premier League statement for Premier League supporters ? jim 2012
  • Score: -3

12:19pm Mon 30 Jun 14

Rob_H2O says...

AnotherPounding4Burn
ley
wrote:
Ban hatred stirrers, liars and rodders toilet frequenters.
Banning yourself as the archetypal hatred stirrer and liar is a cool idea. Well done. As for toilet frequenting at the Rodders, for me, its usual from pint 4 onwards to urinate. You may well wish to use it as a safe haven to talk to yourselves in 15 different accents so you don't get confused.

The invitation for you to visit me at the Rodders remains open. Just pop a message in the comment column of the lead article on the Burnley comment board with suggested time and I will be there. You will be provided with a warm welcome and assistance to return home.

It'll be a first for the pub; an Egyptian driver of very big vehicles, who is huge, lives in Darwen, is a Rovers fan and a Burnley fan simultaneously (the latter being steeped in lies), is a recidivist that manifests itself in lies, oneupmanship, obfuscation, narcism, misogyny, fanaticism, racism and self-loathing.

Most impressively, it'll be the first international film star we'll have ever met. Gollum Smeagul. Can you arrange for your face to be pixilated when you arrive? We'll ensure you'll be unrecognisable when you leave. We'll even put fish on the menu for you.
[quote][p][bold]AnotherPounding4Burn ley[/bold] wrote: Ban hatred stirrers, liars and rodders toilet frequenters.[/p][/quote]Banning yourself as the archetypal hatred stirrer and liar is a cool idea. Well done. As for toilet frequenting at the Rodders, for me, its usual from pint 4 onwards to urinate. You may well wish to use it as a safe haven to talk to yourselves in 15 different accents so you don't get confused. The invitation for you to visit me at the Rodders remains open. Just pop a message in the comment column of the lead article on the Burnley comment board with suggested time and I will be there. You will be provided with a warm welcome and assistance to return home. It'll be a first for the pub; an Egyptian driver of very big vehicles, who is huge, lives in Darwen, is a Rovers fan and a Burnley fan simultaneously (the latter being steeped in lies), is a recidivist that manifests itself in lies, oneupmanship, obfuscation, narcism, misogyny, fanaticism, racism and self-loathing. Most impressively, it'll be the first international film star we'll have ever met. Gollum Smeagul. Can you arrange for your face to be pixilated when you arrive? We'll ensure you'll be unrecognisable when you leave. We'll even put fish on the menu for you. Rob_H2O
  • Score: -6

12:24pm Mon 30 Jun 14

Rob_H2O says...

jim 2012 wrote:
Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
jim 2012 wrote:
We obviously understand that within the tactics it’s a two-good thing. The tactics have to be right but also dealing with the individuals within that make a big difference.”
can anyone tell me what the above statement means ?
It is a Premier League statement for Premier League supporters - don't bother your Chumpionship befuddled head about it.
i know is a statement but can anyone tell me what the above statement means ?
and what the hell is a Premier League statement for Premier League supporters ?
It means something in two parts. Thats part one ...... then, part two. Got it?

A Premier League statement is a statement that relates to the Premier League. Premier League Supporters relates to those people who support a Premier League Club.

Hello. Hello. Any body in?
[quote][p][bold]jim 2012[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]jim 2012[/bold] wrote: We obviously understand that within the tactics it’s a two-good thing. The tactics have to be right but also dealing with the individuals within that make a big difference.” can anyone tell me what the above statement means ?[/p][/quote]It is a Premier League statement for Premier League supporters - don't bother your Chumpionship befuddled head about it.[/p][/quote]i know is a statement but can anyone tell me what the above statement means ? and what the hell is a Premier League statement for Premier League supporters ?[/p][/quote]It means something in two parts. Thats part one ...... then, part two. Got it? A Premier League statement is a statement that relates to the Premier League. Premier League Supporters relates to those people who support a Premier League Club. Hello. Hello. Any body in? Rob_H2O
  • Score: 1

12:39pm Mon 30 Jun 14

Rovertheedge says...

jwid wrote:
Rovertheedge wrote:
He needs to be flexible, tried to extend a players contract but he decides to drop a division, then Ings is looking at going, Baird won't sign, scraping the barrel for a Bolton player that looks like he's staying put, the disappointment continues.....

Oh dear looks like Douche has a lot to do- bet that WBA offer looks good now
Here's why you clowns are completely Donald Ducked..

£11.2m yet to pay out for Jordan Rhodes
£3.65m yet to pay out for Dickson Etuhu
£3.12m yet to pay out for Leon Best
£1.3m yet to pay out for DJ Campbell

That's a total of £19.3m owed under contract to just the four players above, and comes on the back of the £4.92m paid out on David Goodwillie in his 3 magnificent seasons with your laughingstock of a club.

Now if this isn't a financial mess I don't know what is.

Not to mention transfer fee's, agents fee's, bonuses.. i.e., Rhodes was bought for £8m, Best for £3m, Goodwillie for £2.8m, etc.

And considering the fact that your club is already over £60million in debt, the future is looking decidedly grim to say the least.
Ings wants out and Stan left for Bournemouth!

What's all that about?
[quote][p][bold]jwid[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Rovertheedge[/bold] wrote: He needs to be flexible, tried to extend a players contract but he decides to drop a division, then Ings is looking at going, Baird won't sign, scraping the barrel for a Bolton player that looks like he's staying put, the disappointment continues..... Oh dear looks like Douche has a lot to do- bet that WBA offer looks good now[/p][/quote]Here's why you clowns are completely Donald Ducked.. £11.2m yet to pay out for Jordan Rhodes £3.65m yet to pay out for Dickson Etuhu £3.12m yet to pay out for Leon Best £1.3m yet to pay out for DJ Campbell That's a total of £19.3m owed under contract to just the four players above, and comes on the back of the £4.92m paid out on David Goodwillie in his 3 magnificent seasons with your laughingstock of a club. Now if this isn't a financial mess I don't know what is. Not to mention transfer fee's, agents fee's, bonuses.. i.e., Rhodes was bought for £8m, Best for £3m, Goodwillie for £2.8m, etc. And considering the fact that your club is already over £60million in debt, the future is looking decidedly grim to say the least.[/p][/quote]Ings wants out and Stan left for Bournemouth! What's all that about? Rovertheedge
  • Score: -9

12:55pm Mon 30 Jun 14

jwid says...

Danny Ings is under contract and wants to stay. If a big enough offer comes in and we decide to sell him then we take Rhodes off you, simple.

Sean Dyche, Kieran Trippier, Sam Vokes and Michael Kightly have all signed new contracts, but I notice you haven't commented on those?

Stanislas wouldn't have got many games in in the Premier League, if any, and chose to reject a one year offer as a backup player sitting on the bench in favour of a 3 year contract as a first team regular. He's a decent honest professional and wants to play football, good luck to him. And he scored a screamer against you clowns didn't he..

And so to the point which you appear to have skipped over..... the small matter of the £19.3m owed on FOUR players at Blackburn Rovers....

Really, what's that all about?
Danny Ings is under contract and wants to stay. If a big enough offer comes in and we decide to sell him then we take Rhodes off you, simple. Sean Dyche, Kieran Trippier, Sam Vokes and Michael Kightly have all signed new contracts, but I notice you haven't commented on those? Stanislas wouldn't have got many games in in the Premier League, if any, and chose to reject a one year offer as a backup player sitting on the bench in favour of a 3 year contract as a first team regular. He's a decent honest professional and wants to play football, good luck to him. And he scored a screamer against you clowns didn't he.. And so to the point which you appear to have skipped over..... the small matter of the £19.3m owed on FOUR players at Blackburn Rovers.... Really, what's that all about? jwid
  • Score: 0

12:58pm Mon 30 Jun 14

AnotherPounding4Burnley says...

Rob_H2O wrote:
AnotherPounding4Burn

ley
wrote:
Ban hatred stirrers, liars and rodders toilet frequenters.
Banning yourself as the archetypal hatred stirrer and liar is a cool idea. Well done. As for toilet frequenting at the Rodders, for me, its usual from pint 4 onwards to urinate. You may well wish to use it as a safe haven to talk to yourselves in 15 different accents so you don't get confused.

The invitation for you to visit me at the Rodders remains open. Just pop a message in the comment column of the lead article on the Burnley comment board with suggested time and I will be there. You will be provided with a warm welcome and assistance to return home.

It'll be a first for the pub; an Egyptian driver of very big vehicles, who is huge, lives in Darwen, is a Rovers fan and a Burnley fan simultaneously (the latter being steeped in lies), is a recidivist that manifests itself in lies, oneupmanship, obfuscation, narcism, misogyny, fanaticism, racism and self-loathing.

Most impressively, it'll be the first international film star we'll have ever met. Gollum Smeagul. Can you arrange for your face to be pixilated when you arrive? We'll ensure you'll be unrecognisable when you leave. We'll even put fish on the menu for you.
Sure what about Thursday 20:00 hrs, I will share a pint with you. We can catch up on all things Burnley. Maybe do a bit of floor mopping. Sounds good to me. Can you bring Crispy as well. That would be mega.
[quote][p][bold]Rob_H2O[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]AnotherPounding4Burn ley[/bold] wrote: Ban hatred stirrers, liars and rodders toilet frequenters.[/p][/quote]Banning yourself as the archetypal hatred stirrer and liar is a cool idea. Well done. As for toilet frequenting at the Rodders, for me, its usual from pint 4 onwards to urinate. You may well wish to use it as a safe haven to talk to yourselves in 15 different accents so you don't get confused. The invitation for you to visit me at the Rodders remains open. Just pop a message in the comment column of the lead article on the Burnley comment board with suggested time and I will be there. You will be provided with a warm welcome and assistance to return home. It'll be a first for the pub; an Egyptian driver of very big vehicles, who is huge, lives in Darwen, is a Rovers fan and a Burnley fan simultaneously (the latter being steeped in lies), is a recidivist that manifests itself in lies, oneupmanship, obfuscation, narcism, misogyny, fanaticism, racism and self-loathing. Most impressively, it'll be the first international film star we'll have ever met. Gollum Smeagul. Can you arrange for your face to be pixilated when you arrive? We'll ensure you'll be unrecognisable when you leave. We'll even put fish on the menu for you.[/p][/quote]Sure what about Thursday 20:00 hrs, I will share a pint with you. We can catch up on all things Burnley. Maybe do a bit of floor mopping. Sounds good to me. Can you bring Crispy as well. That would be mega. AnotherPounding4Burnley
  • Score: -10

1:09pm Mon 30 Jun 14

Rovertheedge says...

jwid wrote:
Danny Ings is under contract and wants to stay. If a big enough offer comes in and we decide to sell him then we take Rhodes off you, simple.

Sean Dyche, Kieran Trippier, Sam Vokes and Michael Kightly have all signed new contracts, but I notice you haven't commented on those?

Stanislas wouldn't have got many games in in the Premier League, if any, and chose to reject a one year offer as a backup player sitting on the bench in favour of a 3 year contract as a first team regular. He's a decent honest professional and wants to play football, good luck to him. And he scored a screamer against you clowns didn't he..

And so to the point which you appear to have skipped over..... the small matter of the £19.3m owed on FOUR players at Blackburn Rovers....

Really, what's that all about?
Well these players have no ambition at all lets be honest. Bigger clubs were looking at Trippier and he signed his contract (silly boy) Vokes does not matter, serious injury won't be the same player again, Knightly was on loan, & nobody else wanted him.

As for Rhodes behave he's not a dumb dingle

And when has Ings said he wants to stay?
[quote][p][bold]jwid[/bold] wrote: Danny Ings is under contract and wants to stay. If a big enough offer comes in and we decide to sell him then we take Rhodes off you, simple. Sean Dyche, Kieran Trippier, Sam Vokes and Michael Kightly have all signed new contracts, but I notice you haven't commented on those? Stanislas wouldn't have got many games in in the Premier League, if any, and chose to reject a one year offer as a backup player sitting on the bench in favour of a 3 year contract as a first team regular. He's a decent honest professional and wants to play football, good luck to him. And he scored a screamer against you clowns didn't he.. And so to the point which you appear to have skipped over..... the small matter of the £19.3m owed on FOUR players at Blackburn Rovers.... Really, what's that all about?[/p][/quote]Well these players have no ambition at all lets be honest. Bigger clubs were looking at Trippier and he signed his contract (silly boy) Vokes does not matter, serious injury won't be the same player again, Knightly was on loan, & nobody else wanted him. As for Rhodes behave he's not a dumb dingle And when has Ings said he wants to stay? Rovertheedge
  • Score: -7

1:13pm Mon 30 Jun 14

AnotherPounding4Burnley says...

Ground improvments are long overdue, but we only have 120
million and we need to spend that on the ground alone, never mind new players.
Ground improvments are long overdue, but we only have 120 million and we need to spend that on the ground alone, never mind new players. AnotherPounding4Burnley
  • Score: -8

1:16pm Mon 30 Jun 14

Rob_H2O says...

AnotherPounding4Burn
ley
wrote:
Rob_H2O wrote:
AnotherPounding4Burn


ley
wrote:
Ban hatred stirrers, liars and rodders toilet frequenters.
Banning yourself as the archetypal hatred stirrer and liar is a cool idea. Well done. As for toilet frequenting at the Rodders, for me, its usual from pint 4 onwards to urinate. You may well wish to use it as a safe haven to talk to yourselves in 15 different accents so you don't get confused.

The invitation for you to visit me at the Rodders remains open. Just pop a message in the comment column of the lead article on the Burnley comment board with suggested time and I will be there. You will be provided with a warm welcome and assistance to return home.

It'll be a first for the pub; an Egyptian driver of very big vehicles, who is huge, lives in Darwen, is a Rovers fan and a Burnley fan simultaneously (the latter being steeped in lies), is a recidivist that manifests itself in lies, oneupmanship, obfuscation, narcism, misogyny, fanaticism, racism and self-loathing.

Most impressively, it'll be the first international film star we'll have ever met. Gollum Smeagul. Can you arrange for your face to be pixilated when you arrive? We'll ensure you'll be unrecognisable when you leave. We'll even put fish on the menu for you.
Sure what about Thursday 20:00 hrs, I will share a pint with you. We can catch up on all things Burnley. Maybe do a bit of floor mopping. Sounds good to me. Can you bring Crispy as well. That would be mega.
You have a deal. Don't forget to bring your wallet.
[quote][p][bold]AnotherPounding4Burn ley[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Rob_H2O[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]AnotherPounding4Burn ley[/bold] wrote: Ban hatred stirrers, liars and rodders toilet frequenters.[/p][/quote]Banning yourself as the archetypal hatred stirrer and liar is a cool idea. Well done. As for toilet frequenting at the Rodders, for me, its usual from pint 4 onwards to urinate. You may well wish to use it as a safe haven to talk to yourselves in 15 different accents so you don't get confused. The invitation for you to visit me at the Rodders remains open. Just pop a message in the comment column of the lead article on the Burnley comment board with suggested time and I will be there. You will be provided with a warm welcome and assistance to return home. It'll be a first for the pub; an Egyptian driver of very big vehicles, who is huge, lives in Darwen, is a Rovers fan and a Burnley fan simultaneously (the latter being steeped in lies), is a recidivist that manifests itself in lies, oneupmanship, obfuscation, narcism, misogyny, fanaticism, racism and self-loathing. Most impressively, it'll be the first international film star we'll have ever met. Gollum Smeagul. Can you arrange for your face to be pixilated when you arrive? We'll ensure you'll be unrecognisable when you leave. We'll even put fish on the menu for you.[/p][/quote]Sure what about Thursday 20:00 hrs, I will share a pint with you. We can catch up on all things Burnley. Maybe do a bit of floor mopping. Sounds good to me. Can you bring Crispy as well. That would be mega.[/p][/quote]You have a deal. Don't forget to bring your wallet. Rob_H2O
  • Score: 1

1:26pm Mon 30 Jun 14

AnotherPounding4Burnley says...

Rob_H2O wrote:
AnotherPounding4Burn

ley
wrote:
Rob_H2O wrote:
AnotherPounding4Burn



ley
wrote:
Ban hatred stirrers, liars and rodders toilet frequenters.
Banning yourself as the archetypal hatred stirrer and liar is a cool idea. Well done. As for toilet frequenting at the Rodders, for me, its usual from pint 4 onwards to urinate. You may well wish to use it as a safe haven to talk to yourselves in 15 different accents so you don't get confused.

The invitation for you to visit me at the Rodders remains open. Just pop a message in the comment column of the lead article on the Burnley comment board with suggested time and I will be there. You will be provided with a warm welcome and assistance to return home.

It'll be a first for the pub; an Egyptian driver of very big vehicles, who is huge, lives in Darwen, is a Rovers fan and a Burnley fan simultaneously (the latter being steeped in lies), is a recidivist that manifests itself in lies, oneupmanship, obfuscation, narcism, misogyny, fanaticism, racism and self-loathing.

Most impressively, it'll be the first international film star we'll have ever met. Gollum Smeagul. Can you arrange for your face to be pixilated when you arrive? We'll ensure you'll be unrecognisable when you leave. We'll even put fish on the menu for you.
Sure what about Thursday 20:00 hrs, I will share a pint with you. We can catch up on all things Burnley. Maybe do a bit of floor mopping. Sounds good to me. Can you bring Crispy as well. That would be mega.
You have a deal. Don't forget to bring your wallet.
Mega, I'll wear a Burnley shirt, see if you can pick me out.
[quote][p][bold]Rob_H2O[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]AnotherPounding4Burn ley[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Rob_H2O[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]AnotherPounding4Burn ley[/bold] wrote: Ban hatred stirrers, liars and rodders toilet frequenters.[/p][/quote]Banning yourself as the archetypal hatred stirrer and liar is a cool idea. Well done. As for toilet frequenting at the Rodders, for me, its usual from pint 4 onwards to urinate. You may well wish to use it as a safe haven to talk to yourselves in 15 different accents so you don't get confused. The invitation for you to visit me at the Rodders remains open. Just pop a message in the comment column of the lead article on the Burnley comment board with suggested time and I will be there. You will be provided with a warm welcome and assistance to return home. It'll be a first for the pub; an Egyptian driver of very big vehicles, who is huge, lives in Darwen, is a Rovers fan and a Burnley fan simultaneously (the latter being steeped in lies), is a recidivist that manifests itself in lies, oneupmanship, obfuscation, narcism, misogyny, fanaticism, racism and self-loathing. Most impressively, it'll be the first international film star we'll have ever met. Gollum Smeagul. Can you arrange for your face to be pixilated when you arrive? We'll ensure you'll be unrecognisable when you leave. We'll even put fish on the menu for you.[/p][/quote]Sure what about Thursday 20:00 hrs, I will share a pint with you. We can catch up on all things Burnley. Maybe do a bit of floor mopping. Sounds good to me. Can you bring Crispy as well. That would be mega.[/p][/quote]You have a deal. Don't forget to bring your wallet.[/p][/quote]Mega, I'll wear a Burnley shirt, see if you can pick me out. AnotherPounding4Burnley
  • Score: -4

1:27pm Mon 30 Jun 14

TurfMoorTom says...

jwid wrote:
Danny Ings is under contract and wants to stay. If a big enough offer comes in and we decide to sell him then we take Rhodes off you, simple.

Sean Dyche, Kieran Trippier, Sam Vokes and Michael Kightly have all signed new contracts, but I notice you haven't commented on those?

Stanislas wouldn't have got many games in in the Premier League, if any, and chose to reject a one year offer as a backup player sitting on the bench in favour of a 3 year contract as a first team regular. He's a decent honest professional and wants to play football, good luck to him. And he scored a screamer against you clowns didn't he..

And so to the point which you appear to have skipped over..... the small matter of the £19.3m owed on FOUR players at Blackburn Rovers....

Really, what's that all about?
Is that not like £5m a season, the very same Venky's can throw in the pot if they so desire? Or alternatively what about the £32m still to come from parachute payments?

Here you go, figures recently independently assessed and cnfrmed by one of your 6-fingered brethren:

2013-14:
Championship TV £3m
Gates (avg 13000 @ £15) £4.5m
Sponsorships say £3m
Parachute payment 2 £16m
Venkys (potential) £5m
Total income = £31.5m

Season outgoings
Wages £24.25m (as verfied by our 6-fingered accuntant)
Running costs £3.5m

Net £3.75m PROFIT!!!!

2014-15:
Championship TV £3m
Gates (avg 13000 @ £15) £4.5m
Sponsorships say £3m
Parachute payment 3 £8m
Venkys (potential) £5m
Total income = £23.5m

Season outgoings
Wages £17.5m (with Best, Etuhu and Campbell gone, Dunn and Robbo's wages reduced, as verfied by our 6-fingered accuntant)
Running costs £3.5m

Net £2.5m PROFIT!!!!

As long as Venky's continue to put in £1.5-2m per season it's business as usual for the next couple of seasons at least by which time you'll be back in the gutter to which you belong.

Your problem seems to revolve around everything being based on money rather than consider that competitive sport is about winning competitions. This is possibly why you have still to win any major domestic honour this century and likely will not.
[quote][p][bold]jwid[/bold] wrote: Danny Ings is under contract and wants to stay. If a big enough offer comes in and we decide to sell him then we take Rhodes off you, simple. Sean Dyche, Kieran Trippier, Sam Vokes and Michael Kightly have all signed new contracts, but I notice you haven't commented on those? Stanislas wouldn't have got many games in in the Premier League, if any, and chose to reject a one year offer as a backup player sitting on the bench in favour of a 3 year contract as a first team regular. He's a decent honest professional and wants to play football, good luck to him. And he scored a screamer against you clowns didn't he.. And so to the point which you appear to have skipped over..... the small matter of the £19.3m owed on FOUR players at Blackburn Rovers.... Really, what's that all about?[/p][/quote]Is that not like £5m a season, the very same Venky's can throw in the pot if they so desire? Or alternatively what about the £32m still to come from parachute payments? Here you go, figures recently independently assessed and cnfrmed by one of your 6-fingered brethren: 2013-14: Championship TV £3m Gates (avg 13000 @ £15) £4.5m Sponsorships say £3m Parachute payment 2 £16m Venkys (potential) £5m Total income = £31.5m Season outgoings Wages £24.25m (as verfied by our 6-fingered accuntant) Running costs £3.5m Net £3.75m PROFIT!!!! 2014-15: Championship TV £3m Gates (avg 13000 @ £15) £4.5m Sponsorships say £3m Parachute payment 3 £8m Venkys (potential) £5m Total income = £23.5m Season outgoings Wages £17.5m (with Best, Etuhu and Campbell gone, Dunn and Robbo's wages reduced, as verfied by our 6-fingered accuntant) Running costs £3.5m Net £2.5m PROFIT!!!! As long as Venky's continue to put in £1.5-2m per season it's business as usual for the next couple of seasons at least by which time you'll be back in the gutter to which you belong. Your problem seems to revolve around everything being based on money rather than consider that competitive sport is about winning competitions. This is possibly why you have still to win any major domestic honour this century and likely will not. TurfMoorTom
  • Score: -9

1:54pm Mon 30 Jun 14

Rob_H2O says...

AnotherPounding4Burn
ley
wrote:
Rob_H2O wrote:
AnotherPounding4Burn


ley
wrote:
Rob_H2O wrote:
AnotherPounding4Burn




ley
wrote:
Ban hatred stirrers, liars and rodders toilet frequenters.
Banning yourself as the archetypal hatred stirrer and liar is a cool idea. Well done. As for toilet frequenting at the Rodders, for me, its usual from pint 4 onwards to urinate. You may well wish to use it as a safe haven to talk to yourselves in 15 different accents so you don't get confused.

The invitation for you to visit me at the Rodders remains open. Just pop a message in the comment column of the lead article on the Burnley comment board with suggested time and I will be there. You will be provided with a warm welcome and assistance to return home.

It'll be a first for the pub; an Egyptian driver of very big vehicles, who is huge, lives in Darwen, is a Rovers fan and a Burnley fan simultaneously (the latter being steeped in lies), is a recidivist that manifests itself in lies, oneupmanship, obfuscation, narcism, misogyny, fanaticism, racism and self-loathing.

Most impressively, it'll be the first international film star we'll have ever met. Gollum Smeagul. Can you arrange for your face to be pixilated when you arrive? We'll ensure you'll be unrecognisable when you leave. We'll even put fish on the menu for you.
Sure what about Thursday 20:00 hrs, I will share a pint with you. We can catch up on all things Burnley. Maybe do a bit of floor mopping. Sounds good to me. Can you bring Crispy as well. That would be mega.
You have a deal. Don't forget to bring your wallet.
Mega, I'll wear a Burnley shirt, see if you can pick me out.
Just walk like an Egyptian. With sincere apologies to the Bangles. And just shout chur (Chair) wur (Where) and Thur (There) to show you are from Darrin.
[quote][p][bold]AnotherPounding4Burn ley[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Rob_H2O[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]AnotherPounding4Burn ley[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Rob_H2O[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]AnotherPounding4Burn ley[/bold] wrote: Ban hatred stirrers, liars and rodders toilet frequenters.[/p][/quote]Banning yourself as the archetypal hatred stirrer and liar is a cool idea. Well done. As for toilet frequenting at the Rodders, for me, its usual from pint 4 onwards to urinate. You may well wish to use it as a safe haven to talk to yourselves in 15 different accents so you don't get confused. The invitation for you to visit me at the Rodders remains open. Just pop a message in the comment column of the lead article on the Burnley comment board with suggested time and I will be there. You will be provided with a warm welcome and assistance to return home. It'll be a first for the pub; an Egyptian driver of very big vehicles, who is huge, lives in Darwen, is a Rovers fan and a Burnley fan simultaneously (the latter being steeped in lies), is a recidivist that manifests itself in lies, oneupmanship, obfuscation, narcism, misogyny, fanaticism, racism and self-loathing. Most impressively, it'll be the first international film star we'll have ever met. Gollum Smeagul. Can you arrange for your face to be pixilated when you arrive? We'll ensure you'll be unrecognisable when you leave. We'll even put fish on the menu for you.[/p][/quote]Sure what about Thursday 20:00 hrs, I will share a pint with you. We can catch up on all things Burnley. Maybe do a bit of floor mopping. Sounds good to me. Can you bring Crispy as well. That would be mega.[/p][/quote]You have a deal. Don't forget to bring your wallet.[/p][/quote]Mega, I'll wear a Burnley shirt, see if you can pick me out.[/p][/quote]Just walk like an Egyptian. With sincere apologies to the Bangles. And just shout chur (Chair) wur (Where) and Thur (There) to show you are from Darrin. Rob_H2O
  • Score: 3

2:07pm Mon 30 Jun 14

houseclaret says...

Can the telegraph not do something about the idiot who is ruining our forum? He has so many names now we do not know who we are replying to and too many Clarets are getting sucked in with with copy/paste idiocy. I have looked at 2 stories today and given up on both due to the endless copies that make one post 10 minutes long. And nothing new is being said.
Maybe, due to the replies they are getting, they are being successful in their ambition to destroy the forum for any right-thinking Clarets (and the odd Rover).
Chuck, do you really have to repeat umpteen posts just to put the word "racist"?
If any Rover comments about the idiots of ours on Rovers forum please note I very rarely ever go there, but I don't condone that either. I only ever visit on a common story (eg. after a derby).
Let's get back to some semblance of sanity, please.
Can the telegraph not do something about the idiot who is ruining our forum? He has so many names now we do not know who we are replying to and too many Clarets are getting sucked in with with copy/paste idiocy. I have looked at 2 stories today and given up on both due to the endless copies that make one post 10 minutes long. And nothing new is being said. Maybe, due to the replies they are getting, they are being successful in their ambition to destroy the forum for any right-thinking Clarets (and the odd Rover). Chuck, do you really have to repeat umpteen posts just to put the word "racist"? If any Rover comments about the idiots of ours on Rovers forum please note I very rarely ever go there, but I don't condone that either. I only ever visit on a common story (eg. after a derby). Let's get back to some semblance of sanity, please. houseclaret
  • Score: 8

2:33pm Mon 30 Jun 14

Chuck Norris' Roundhouse says...

TurfMoorTom wrote:
jwid wrote:
Danny Ings is under contract and wants to stay. If a big enough offer comes in and we decide to sell him then we take Rhodes off you, simple.

Sean Dyche, Kieran Trippier, Sam Vokes and Michael Kightly have all signed new contracts, but I notice you haven't commented on those?

Stanislas wouldn't have got many games in in the Premier League, if any, and chose to reject a one year offer as a backup player sitting on the bench in favour of a 3 year contract as a first team regular. He's a decent honest professional and wants to play football, good luck to him. And he scored a screamer against you clowns didn't he..

And so to the point which you appear to have skipped over..... the small matter of the £19.3m owed on FOUR players at Blackburn Rovers....

Really, what's that all about?
Is that not like £5m a season, the very same Venky's can throw in the pot if they so desire? Or alternatively what about the £32m still to come from parachute payments?

Here you go, figures recently independently assessed and cnfrmed by one of your 6-fingered brethren:

2013-14:
Championship TV £3m
Gates (avg 13000 @ £15) £4.5m
Sponsorships say £3m
Parachute payment 2 £16m
Venkys (potential) £5m
Total income = £31.5m

Season outgoings
Wages £24.25m (as verfied by our 6-fingered accuntant)
Running costs £3.5m

Net £3.75m PROFIT!!!!

2014-15:
Championship TV £3m
Gates (avg 13000 @ £15) £4.5m
Sponsorships say £3m
Parachute payment 3 £8m
Venkys (potential) £5m
Total income = £23.5m

Season outgoings
Wages £17.5m (with Best, Etuhu and Campbell gone, Dunn and Robbo's wages reduced, as verfied by our 6-fingered accuntant)
Running costs £3.5m

Net £2.5m PROFIT!!!!

As long as Venky's continue to put in £1.5-2m per season it's business as usual for the next couple of seasons at least by which time you'll be back in the gutter to which you belong.

Your problem seems to revolve around everything being based on money rather than consider that competitive sport is about winning competitions. This is possibly why you have still to win any major domestic honour this century and likely will not.
I bet you anything you like that Blackburn DO NOT make a profit when the financial figures are released.
[quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]jwid[/bold] wrote: Danny Ings is under contract and wants to stay. If a big enough offer comes in and we decide to sell him then we take Rhodes off you, simple. Sean Dyche, Kieran Trippier, Sam Vokes and Michael Kightly have all signed new contracts, but I notice you haven't commented on those? Stanislas wouldn't have got many games in in the Premier League, if any, and chose to reject a one year offer as a backup player sitting on the bench in favour of a 3 year contract as a first team regular. He's a decent honest professional and wants to play football, good luck to him. And he scored a screamer against you clowns didn't he.. And so to the point which you appear to have skipped over..... the small matter of the £19.3m owed on FOUR players at Blackburn Rovers.... Really, what's that all about?[/p][/quote]Is that not like £5m a season, the very same Venky's can throw in the pot if they so desire? Or alternatively what about the £32m still to come from parachute payments? Here you go, figures recently independently assessed and cnfrmed by one of your 6-fingered brethren: 2013-14: Championship TV £3m Gates (avg 13000 @ £15) £4.5m Sponsorships say £3m Parachute payment 2 £16m Venkys (potential) £5m Total income = £31.5m Season outgoings Wages £24.25m (as verfied by our 6-fingered accuntant) Running costs £3.5m Net £3.75m PROFIT!!!! 2014-15: Championship TV £3m Gates (avg 13000 @ £15) £4.5m Sponsorships say £3m Parachute payment 3 £8m Venkys (potential) £5m Total income = £23.5m Season outgoings Wages £17.5m (with Best, Etuhu and Campbell gone, Dunn and Robbo's wages reduced, as verfied by our 6-fingered accuntant) Running costs £3.5m Net £2.5m PROFIT!!!! As long as Venky's continue to put in £1.5-2m per season it's business as usual for the next couple of seasons at least by which time you'll be back in the gutter to which you belong. Your problem seems to revolve around everything being based on money rather than consider that competitive sport is about winning competitions. This is possibly why you have still to win any major domestic honour this century and likely will not.[/p][/quote]I bet you anything you like that Blackburn DO NOT make a profit when the financial figures are released. Chuck Norris' Roundhouse
  • Score: 1

2:44pm Mon 30 Jun 14

TurfMoorTom says...

Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
TurfMoorTom wrote:
jwid wrote:
Danny Ings is under contract and wants to stay. If a big enough offer comes in and we decide to sell him then we take Rhodes off you, simple.

Sean Dyche, Kieran Trippier, Sam Vokes and Michael Kightly have all signed new contracts, but I notice you haven't commented on those?

Stanislas wouldn't have got many games in in the Premier League, if any, and chose to reject a one year offer as a backup player sitting on the bench in favour of a 3 year contract as a first team regular. He's a decent honest professional and wants to play football, good luck to him. And he scored a screamer against you clowns didn't he..

And so to the point which you appear to have skipped over..... the small matter of the £19.3m owed on FOUR players at Blackburn Rovers....

Really, what's that all about?
Is that not like £5m a season, the very same Venky's can throw in the pot if they so desire? Or alternatively what about the £32m still to come from parachute payments?

Here you go, figures recently independently assessed and cnfrmed by one of your 6-fingered brethren:

2013-14:
Championship TV £3m
Gates (avg 13000 @ £15) £4.5m
Sponsorships say £3m
Parachute payment 2 £16m
Venkys (potential) £5m
Total income = £31.5m

Season outgoings
Wages £24.25m (as verfied by our 6-fingered accuntant)
Running costs £3.5m

Net £3.75m PROFIT!!!!

2014-15:
Championship TV £3m
Gates (avg 13000 @ £15) £4.5m
Sponsorships say £3m
Parachute payment 3 £8m
Venkys (potential) £5m
Total income = £23.5m

Season outgoings
Wages £17.5m (with Best, Etuhu and Campbell gone, Dunn and Robbo's wages reduced, as verfied by our 6-fingered accuntant)
Running costs £3.5m

Net £2.5m PROFIT!!!!

As long as Venky's continue to put in £1.5-2m per season it's business as usual for the next couple of seasons at least by which time you'll be back in the gutter to which you belong.

Your problem seems to revolve around everything being based on money rather than consider that competitive sport is about winning competitions. This is possibly why you have still to win any major domestic honour this century and likely will not.
I bet you anything you like that Blackburn DO NOT make a profit when the financial figures are released.
For what it's worth I agree though I stuck those figures on a Rovers thread to wake up the resident moron to the fact that it wasn't as bad as he was making out.

Please stop quoting as the man above suggests and more importantly discussing Rovers. The real debate here is why Bumley are trying to assemble a rogues gallery of missfits for a shot at the bigtime, are not able to attract anyone and actually losing players with Premier League experience.
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]jwid[/bold] wrote: Danny Ings is under contract and wants to stay. If a big enough offer comes in and we decide to sell him then we take Rhodes off you, simple. Sean Dyche, Kieran Trippier, Sam Vokes and Michael Kightly have all signed new contracts, but I notice you haven't commented on those? Stanislas wouldn't have got many games in in the Premier League, if any, and chose to reject a one year offer as a backup player sitting on the bench in favour of a 3 year contract as a first team regular. He's a decent honest professional and wants to play football, good luck to him. And he scored a screamer against you clowns didn't he.. And so to the point which you appear to have skipped over..... the small matter of the £19.3m owed on FOUR players at Blackburn Rovers.... Really, what's that all about?[/p][/quote]Is that not like £5m a season, the very same Venky's can throw in the pot if they so desire? Or alternatively what about the £32m still to come from parachute payments? Here you go, figures recently independently assessed and cnfrmed by one of your 6-fingered brethren: 2013-14: Championship TV £3m Gates (avg 13000 @ £15) £4.5m Sponsorships say £3m Parachute payment 2 £16m Venkys (potential) £5m Total income = £31.5m Season outgoings Wages £24.25m (as verfied by our 6-fingered accuntant) Running costs £3.5m Net £3.75m PROFIT!!!! 2014-15: Championship TV £3m Gates (avg 13000 @ £15) £4.5m Sponsorships say £3m Parachute payment 3 £8m Venkys (potential) £5m Total income = £23.5m Season outgoings Wages £17.5m (with Best, Etuhu and Campbell gone, Dunn and Robbo's wages reduced, as verfied by our 6-fingered accuntant) Running costs £3.5m Net £2.5m PROFIT!!!! As long as Venky's continue to put in £1.5-2m per season it's business as usual for the next couple of seasons at least by which time you'll be back in the gutter to which you belong. Your problem seems to revolve around everything being based on money rather than consider that competitive sport is about winning competitions. This is possibly why you have still to win any major domestic honour this century and likely will not.[/p][/quote]I bet you anything you like that Blackburn DO NOT make a profit when the financial figures are released.[/p][/quote]For what it's worth I agree though I stuck those figures on a Rovers thread to wake up the resident moron to the fact that it wasn't as bad as he was making out. Please stop quoting as the man above suggests and more importantly discussing Rovers. The real debate here is why Bumley are trying to assemble a rogues gallery of missfits for a shot at the bigtime, are not able to attract anyone and actually losing players with Premier League experience. TurfMoorTom
  • Score: -10

3:47pm Mon 30 Jun 14

Chuck Norris' Roundhouse says...

TurfMoorTom wrote:
Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
TurfMoorTom wrote:
jwid wrote:
Danny Ings is under contract and wants to stay. If a big enough offer comes in and we decide to sell him then we take Rhodes off you, simple.

Sean Dyche, Kieran Trippier, Sam Vokes and Michael Kightly have all signed new contracts, but I notice you haven't commented on those?

Stanislas wouldn't have got many games in in the Premier League, if any, and chose to reject a one year offer as a backup player sitting on the bench in favour of a 3 year contract as a first team regular. He's a decent honest professional and wants to play football, good luck to him. And he scored a screamer against you clowns didn't he..

And so to the point which you appear to have skipped over..... the small matter of the £19.3m owed on FOUR players at Blackburn Rovers....

Really, what's that all about?
Is that not like £5m a season, the very same Venky's can throw in the pot if they so desire? Or alternatively what about the £32m still to come from parachute payments?

Here you go, figures recently independently assessed and cnfrmed by one of your 6-fingered brethren:

2013-14:
Championship TV £3m
Gates (avg 13000 @ £15) £4.5m
Sponsorships say £3m
Parachute payment 2 £16m
Venkys (potential) £5m
Total income = £31.5m

Season outgoings
Wages £24.25m (as verfied by our 6-fingered accuntant)
Running costs £3.5m

Net £3.75m PROFIT!!!!

2014-15:
Championship TV £3m
Gates (avg 13000 @ £15) £4.5m
Sponsorships say £3m
Parachute payment 3 £8m
Venkys (potential) £5m
Total income = £23.5m

Season outgoings
Wages £17.5m (with Best, Etuhu and Campbell gone, Dunn and Robbo's wages reduced, as verfied by our 6-fingered accuntant)
Running costs £3.5m

Net £2.5m PROFIT!!!!

As long as Venky's continue to put in £1.5-2m per season it's business as usual for the next couple of seasons at least by which time you'll be back in the gutter to which you belong.

Your problem seems to revolve around everything being based on money rather than consider that competitive sport is about winning competitions. This is possibly why you have still to win any major domestic honour this century and likely will not.
I bet you anything you like that Blackburn DO NOT make a profit when the financial figures are released.
For what it's worth I agree though I stuck those figures on a Rovers thread to wake up the resident moron to the fact that it wasn't as bad as he was making out.

Please stop quoting as the man above suggests and more importantly discussing Rovers. The real debate here is why Bumley are trying to assemble a rogues gallery of missfits for a shot at the bigtime, are not able to attract anyone and actually losing players with Premier League experience.
Why do you persist in doing this to yourself Tom? You have been outed as a racist with your disgraceful posts about Marvin Sordell, you tried to pass yourself off as a Burnley fan in your earlier posts until you mistakenly posted on the Rovers site logged into the wrong username (Epic fail), and the you set another one up as 'Anotherpounding 4Burnley and expect everyone to believe that you are in actual fact a Burnley fan, even despite the Burnley-critical username?

To Err once is human, twice is stupidity.
[quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]jwid[/bold] wrote: Danny Ings is under contract and wants to stay. If a big enough offer comes in and we decide to sell him then we take Rhodes off you, simple. Sean Dyche, Kieran Trippier, Sam Vokes and Michael Kightly have all signed new contracts, but I notice you haven't commented on those? Stanislas wouldn't have got many games in in the Premier League, if any, and chose to reject a one year offer as a backup player sitting on the bench in favour of a 3 year contract as a first team regular. He's a decent honest professional and wants to play football, good luck to him. And he scored a screamer against you clowns didn't he.. And so to the point which you appear to have skipped over..... the small matter of the £19.3m owed on FOUR players at Blackburn Rovers.... Really, what's that all about?[/p][/quote]Is that not like £5m a season, the very same Venky's can throw in the pot if they so desire? Or alternatively what about the £32m still to come from parachute payments? Here you go, figures recently independently assessed and cnfrmed by one of your 6-fingered brethren: 2013-14: Championship TV £3m Gates (avg 13000 @ £15) £4.5m Sponsorships say £3m Parachute payment 2 £16m Venkys (potential) £5m Total income = £31.5m Season outgoings Wages £24.25m (as verfied by our 6-fingered accuntant) Running costs £3.5m Net £3.75m PROFIT!!!! 2014-15: Championship TV £3m Gates (avg 13000 @ £15) £4.5m Sponsorships say £3m Parachute payment 3 £8m Venkys (potential) £5m Total income = £23.5m Season outgoings Wages £17.5m (with Best, Etuhu and Campbell gone, Dunn and Robbo's wages reduced, as verfied by our 6-fingered accuntant) Running costs £3.5m Net £2.5m PROFIT!!!! As long as Venky's continue to put in £1.5-2m per season it's business as usual for the next couple of seasons at least by which time you'll be back in the gutter to which you belong. Your problem seems to revolve around everything being based on money rather than consider that competitive sport is about winning competitions. This is possibly why you have still to win any major domestic honour this century and likely will not.[/p][/quote]I bet you anything you like that Blackburn DO NOT make a profit when the financial figures are released.[/p][/quote]For what it's worth I agree though I stuck those figures on a Rovers thread to wake up the resident moron to the fact that it wasn't as bad as he was making out. Please stop quoting as the man above suggests and more importantly discussing Rovers. The real debate here is why Bumley are trying to assemble a rogues gallery of missfits for a shot at the bigtime, are not able to attract anyone and actually losing players with Premier League experience.[/p][/quote]Why do you persist in doing this to yourself Tom? You have been outed as a racist with your disgraceful posts about Marvin Sordell, you tried to pass yourself off as a Burnley fan in your earlier posts until you mistakenly posted on the Rovers site logged into the wrong username (Epic fail), and the you set another one up as 'Anotherpounding 4Burnley and expect everyone to believe that you are in actual fact a Burnley fan, even despite the Burnley-critical username? To Err once is human, twice is stupidity. Chuck Norris' Roundhouse
  • Score: 7

4:16pm Mon 30 Jun 14

jwid . says...

jwid wrote:
Danny Ings is under contract and wants to stay. If a big enough offer comes in and we decide to sell him then we take Rhodes off you, simple.

Sean Dyche, Kieran Trippier, Sam Vokes and Michael Kightly have all signed new contracts, but I notice you haven't commented on those?

Stanislas wouldn't have got many games in in the Premier League, if any, and chose to reject a one year offer as a backup player sitting on the bench in favour of a 3 year contract as a first team regular. He's a decent honest professional and wants to play football, good luck to him. And he scored a screamer against you clowns didn't he..

And so to the point which you appear to have skipped over..... the small matter of the £19.3m owed on FOUR players at Blackburn Rovers....

Really, what's that all about?
Then again I already know what its all about being a rovers expert.
I think I need to stop talking bull.
Simples
[quote][p][bold]jwid[/bold] wrote: Danny Ings is under contract and wants to stay. If a big enough offer comes in and we decide to sell him then we take Rhodes off you, simple. Sean Dyche, Kieran Trippier, Sam Vokes and Michael Kightly have all signed new contracts, but I notice you haven't commented on those? Stanislas wouldn't have got many games in in the Premier League, if any, and chose to reject a one year offer as a backup player sitting on the bench in favour of a 3 year contract as a first team regular. He's a decent honest professional and wants to play football, good luck to him. And he scored a screamer against you clowns didn't he.. And so to the point which you appear to have skipped over..... the small matter of the £19.3m owed on FOUR players at Blackburn Rovers.... Really, what's that all about?[/p][/quote]Then again I already know what its all about being a rovers expert. I think I need to stop talking bull. Simples jwid .
  • Score: -5

4:59pm Mon 30 Jun 14

AnotherPounding4Burnley says...

Rob_H2O wrote:
AnotherPounding4Burn

ley
wrote:
Rob_H2O wrote:
AnotherPounding4Burn



ley
wrote:
Rob_H2O wrote:
AnotherPounding4Burn





ley
wrote:
Ban hatred stirrers, liars and rodders toilet frequenters.
Banning yourself as the archetypal hatred stirrer and liar is a cool idea. Well done. As for toilet frequenting at the Rodders, for me, its usual from pint 4 onwards to urinate. You may well wish to use it as a safe haven to talk to yourselves in 15 different accents so you don't get confused.

The invitation for you to visit me at the Rodders remains open. Just pop a message in the comment column of the lead article on the Burnley comment board with suggested time and I will be there. You will be provided with a warm welcome and assistance to return home.

It'll be a first for the pub; an Egyptian driver of very big vehicles, who is huge, lives in Darwen, is a Rovers fan and a Burnley fan simultaneously (the latter being steeped in lies), is a recidivist that manifests itself in lies, oneupmanship, obfuscation, narcism, misogyny, fanaticism, racism and self-loathing.

Most impressively, it'll be the first international film star we'll have ever met. Gollum Smeagul. Can you arrange for your face to be pixilated when you arrive? We'll ensure you'll be unrecognisable when you leave. We'll even put fish on the menu for you.
Sure what about Thursday 20:00 hrs, I will share a pint with you. We can catch up on all things Burnley. Maybe do a bit of floor mopping. Sounds good to me. Can you bring Crispy as well. That would be mega.
You have a deal. Don't forget to bring your wallet.
Mega, I'll wear a Burnley shirt, see if you can pick me out.
Just walk like an Egyptian. With sincere apologies to the Bangles. And just shout chur (Chair) wur (Where) and Thur (There) to show you are from Darrin.
What about "is a gate" will that do tha nose.
[quote][p][bold]Rob_H2O[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]AnotherPounding4Burn ley[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Rob_H2O[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]AnotherPounding4Burn ley[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Rob_H2O[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]AnotherPounding4Burn ley[/bold] wrote: Ban hatred stirrers, liars and rodders toilet frequenters.[/p][/quote]Banning yourself as the archetypal hatred stirrer and liar is a cool idea. Well done. As for toilet frequenting at the Rodders, for me, its usual from pint 4 onwards to urinate. You may well wish to use it as a safe haven to talk to yourselves in 15 different accents so you don't get confused. The invitation for you to visit me at the Rodders remains open. Just pop a message in the comment column of the lead article on the Burnley comment board with suggested time and I will be there. You will be provided with a warm welcome and assistance to return home. It'll be a first for the pub; an Egyptian driver of very big vehicles, who is huge, lives in Darwen, is a Rovers fan and a Burnley fan simultaneously (the latter being steeped in lies), is a recidivist that manifests itself in lies, oneupmanship, obfuscation, narcism, misogyny, fanaticism, racism and self-loathing. Most impressively, it'll be the first international film star we'll have ever met. Gollum Smeagul. Can you arrange for your face to be pixilated when you arrive? We'll ensure you'll be unrecognisable when you leave. We'll even put fish on the menu for you.[/p][/quote]Sure what about Thursday 20:00 hrs, I will share a pint with you. We can catch up on all things Burnley. Maybe do a bit of floor mopping. Sounds good to me. Can you bring Crispy as well. That would be mega.[/p][/quote]You have a deal. Don't forget to bring your wallet.[/p][/quote]Mega, I'll wear a Burnley shirt, see if you can pick me out.[/p][/quote]Just walk like an Egyptian. With sincere apologies to the Bangles. And just shout chur (Chair) wur (Where) and Thur (There) to show you are from Darrin.[/p][/quote]What about "is a gate" will that do tha nose. AnotherPounding4Burnley
  • Score: -4

5:20pm Mon 30 Jun 14

u owe u owe says...

Don't know why the thread has gone from 'clarets will adapt in top flight' to no dads fiscal policies. But have to ask TOM what's the interest they are paying to the Bank of India and the finance company they've borrowed from? Do no dads get free gas and electricity? Does the taxman waiver his cut of the income? What of the other expenses such as transport for away matches, ground maintenance etc?
Don't know why the thread has gone from 'clarets will adapt in top flight' to no dads fiscal policies. But have to ask TOM what's the interest they are paying to the Bank of India and the finance company they've borrowed from? Do no dads get free gas and electricity? Does the taxman waiver his cut of the income? What of the other expenses such as transport for away matches, ground maintenance etc? u owe u owe
  • Score: 1

5:49pm Mon 30 Jun 14

TurfMoorTom says...

Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
TurfMoorTom wrote:
Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
TurfMoorTom wrote:
jwid wrote:
Danny Ings is under contract and wants to stay. If a big enough offer comes in and we decide to sell him then we take Rhodes off you, simple.

Sean Dyche, Kieran Trippier, Sam Vokes and Michael Kightly have all signed new contracts, but I notice you haven't commented on those?

Stanislas wouldn't have got many games in in the Premier League, if any, and chose to reject a one year offer as a backup player sitting on the bench in favour of a 3 year contract as a first team regular. He's a decent honest professional and wants to play football, good luck to him. And he scored a screamer against you clowns didn't he..

And so to the point which you appear to have skipped over..... the small matter of the £19.3m owed on FOUR players at Blackburn Rovers....

Really, what's that all about?
Is that not like £5m a season, the very same Venky's can throw in the pot if they so desire? Or alternatively what about the £32m still to come from parachute payments?

Here you go, figures recently independently assessed and cnfrmed by one of your 6-fingered brethren:

2013-14:
Championship TV £3m
Gates (avg 13000 @ £15) £4.5m
Sponsorships say £3m
Parachute payment 2 £16m
Venkys (potential) £5m
Total income = £31.5m

Season outgoings
Wages £24.25m (as verfied by our 6-fingered accuntant)
Running costs £3.5m

Net £3.75m PROFIT!!!!

2014-15:
Championship TV £3m
Gates (avg 13000 @ £15) £4.5m
Sponsorships say £3m
Parachute payment 3 £8m
Venkys (potential) £5m
Total income = £23.5m

Season outgoings
Wages £17.5m (with Best, Etuhu and Campbell gone, Dunn and Robbo's wages reduced, as verfied by our 6-fingered accuntant)
Running costs £3.5m

Net £2.5m PROFIT!!!!

As long as Venky's continue to put in £1.5-2m per season it's business as usual for the next couple of seasons at least by which time you'll be back in the gutter to which you belong.

Your problem seems to revolve around everything being based on money rather than consider that competitive sport is about winning competitions. This is possibly why you have still to win any major domestic honour this century and likely will not.
I bet you anything you like that Blackburn DO NOT make a profit when the financial figures are released.
For what it's worth I agree though I stuck those figures on a Rovers thread to wake up the resident moron to the fact that it wasn't as bad as he was making out.

Please stop quoting as the man above suggests and more importantly discussing Rovers. The real debate here is why Bumley are trying to assemble a rogues gallery of missfits for a shot at the bigtime, are not able to attract anyone and actually losing players with Premier League experience.
Why do you persist in doing this to yourself Tom? You have been outed as a racist with your disgraceful posts about Marvin Sordell, you tried to pass yourself off as a Burnley fan in your earlier posts until you mistakenly posted on the Rovers site logged into the wrong username (Epic fail), and the you set another one up as 'Anotherpounding 4Burnley and expect everyone to believe that you are in actual fact a Burnley fan, even despite the Burnley-critical username?

To Err once is human, twice is stupidity.
Twice is stupidity - and yet you bright spark manage to be erroneous three times in quick succession there. Captain Dunderhead.
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]jwid[/bold] wrote: Danny Ings is under contract and wants to stay. If a big enough offer comes in and we decide to sell him then we take Rhodes off you, simple. Sean Dyche, Kieran Trippier, Sam Vokes and Michael Kightly have all signed new contracts, but I notice you haven't commented on those? Stanislas wouldn't have got many games in in the Premier League, if any, and chose to reject a one year offer as a backup player sitting on the bench in favour of a 3 year contract as a first team regular. He's a decent honest professional and wants to play football, good luck to him. And he scored a screamer against you clowns didn't he.. And so to the point which you appear to have skipped over..... the small matter of the £19.3m owed on FOUR players at Blackburn Rovers.... Really, what's that all about?[/p][/quote]Is that not like £5m a season, the very same Venky's can throw in the pot if they so desire? Or alternatively what about the £32m still to come from parachute payments? Here you go, figures recently independently assessed and cnfrmed by one of your 6-fingered brethren: 2013-14: Championship TV £3m Gates (avg 13000 @ £15) £4.5m Sponsorships say £3m Parachute payment 2 £16m Venkys (potential) £5m Total income = £31.5m Season outgoings Wages £24.25m (as verfied by our 6-fingered accuntant) Running costs £3.5m Net £3.75m PROFIT!!!! 2014-15: Championship TV £3m Gates (avg 13000 @ £15) £4.5m Sponsorships say £3m Parachute payment 3 £8m Venkys (potential) £5m Total income = £23.5m Season outgoings Wages £17.5m (with Best, Etuhu and Campbell gone, Dunn and Robbo's wages reduced, as verfied by our 6-fingered accuntant) Running costs £3.5m Net £2.5m PROFIT!!!! As long as Venky's continue to put in £1.5-2m per season it's business as usual for the next couple of seasons at least by which time you'll be back in the gutter to which you belong. Your problem seems to revolve around everything being based on money rather than consider that competitive sport is about winning competitions. This is possibly why you have still to win any major domestic honour this century and likely will not.[/p][/quote]I bet you anything you like that Blackburn DO NOT make a profit when the financial figures are released.[/p][/quote]For what it's worth I agree though I stuck those figures on a Rovers thread to wake up the resident moron to the fact that it wasn't as bad as he was making out. Please stop quoting as the man above suggests and more importantly discussing Rovers. The real debate here is why Bumley are trying to assemble a rogues gallery of missfits for a shot at the bigtime, are not able to attract anyone and actually losing players with Premier League experience.[/p][/quote]Why do you persist in doing this to yourself Tom? You have been outed as a racist with your disgraceful posts about Marvin Sordell, you tried to pass yourself off as a Burnley fan in your earlier posts until you mistakenly posted on the Rovers site logged into the wrong username (Epic fail), and the you set another one up as 'Anotherpounding 4Burnley and expect everyone to believe that you are in actual fact a Burnley fan, even despite the Burnley-critical username? To Err once is human, twice is stupidity.[/p][/quote]Twice is stupidity - and yet you bright spark manage to be erroneous three times in quick succession there. Captain Dunderhead. TurfMoorTom
  • Score: -18

5:57pm Mon 30 Jun 14

Claretcert says...

Tea break Gollum. Time to take stock of another day talking to andarguing with your selves. More multiple IDs, same banal boring brain numbingly dull drivel. Another spoil another paste, another numb, cringing display of how attention seeking losers live. One day there's just going to be silence and a stain as you end your miserable existence. Not too late my old mate. Help is a phone call away. Don't be miserable Gollum, you will meet somone eventually, not everyone hates you as much as you hate yourself, they might now but you can change - honest
Tea break Gollum. Time to take stock of another day talking to andarguing with your selves. More multiple IDs, same banal boring brain numbingly dull drivel. Another spoil another paste, another numb, cringing display of how attention seeking losers live. One day there's just going to be silence and a stain as you end your miserable existence. Not too late my old mate. Help is a phone call away. Don't be miserable Gollum, you will meet somone eventually, not everyone hates you as much as you hate yourself, they might now but you can change - honest Claretcert
  • Score: 7

6:15pm Mon 30 Jun 14

Rob_H2O says...

Claretcert wrote:
Tea break Gollum. Time to take stock of another day talking to andarguing with your selves. More multiple IDs, same banal boring brain numbingly dull drivel. Another spoil another paste, another numb, cringing display of how attention seeking losers live. One day there's just going to be silence and a stain as you end your miserable existence. Not too late my old mate. Help is a phone call away. Don't be miserable Gollum, you will meet somone eventually, not everyone hates you as much as you hate yourself, they might now but you can change - honest
You are far to kind Claretcert
[quote][p][bold]Claretcert[/bold] wrote: Tea break Gollum. Time to take stock of another day talking to andarguing with your selves. More multiple IDs, same banal boring brain numbingly dull drivel. Another spoil another paste, another numb, cringing display of how attention seeking losers live. One day there's just going to be silence and a stain as you end your miserable existence. Not too late my old mate. Help is a phone call away. Don't be miserable Gollum, you will meet somone eventually, not everyone hates you as much as you hate yourself, they might now but you can change - honest[/p][/quote]You are far to kind Claretcert Rob_H2O
  • Score: 1

6:40pm Mon 30 Jun 14

Claretcert says...

Rob_H2O wrote:
Claretcert wrote:
Tea break Gollum. Time to take stock of another day talking to andarguing with your selves. More multiple IDs, same banal boring brain numbingly dull drivel. Another spoil another paste, another numb, cringing display of how attention seeking losers live. One day there's just going to be silence and a stain as you end your miserable existence. Not too late my old mate. Help is a phone call away. Don't be miserable Gollum, you will meet somone eventually, not everyone hates you as much as you hate yourself, they might now but you can change - honest
You are far to kind Claretcert
Well if he did deteriorate any more if that's possible, he's such a Burnley obsessed loon there's only one place he''ll choose to end his miserable existence and the thought of him painted claret and blue, stood with an erection, screaming no nay never before torching himself outside the park view is unbearable, plus it'd make my burger stink.
[quote][p][bold]Rob_H2O[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Claretcert[/bold] wrote: Tea break Gollum. Time to take stock of another day talking to andarguing with your selves. More multiple IDs, same banal boring brain numbingly dull drivel. Another spoil another paste, another numb, cringing display of how attention seeking losers live. One day there's just going to be silence and a stain as you end your miserable existence. Not too late my old mate. Help is a phone call away. Don't be miserable Gollum, you will meet somone eventually, not everyone hates you as much as you hate yourself, they might now but you can change - honest[/p][/quote]You are far to kind Claretcert[/p][/quote]Well if he did deteriorate any more if that's possible, he's such a Burnley obsessed loon there's only one place he''ll choose to end his miserable existence and the thought of him painted claret and blue, stood with an erection, screaming no nay never before torching himself outside the park view is unbearable, plus it'd make my burger stink. Claretcert
  • Score: 9

7:00pm Mon 30 Jun 14

jim 2012 says...

Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
jim 2012 wrote:
We obviously understand that within the tactics it’s a two-good thing. The tactics have to be right but also dealing with the individuals within that make a big difference.”
can anyone tell me what the above statement means ?
It is a Premier League statement for Premier League supporters - don't bother your Chumpionship befuddled head about it.
no its not its more gobbledygook from the chief dingle
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]jim 2012[/bold] wrote: We obviously understand that within the tactics it’s a two-good thing. The tactics have to be right but also dealing with the individuals within that make a big difference.” can anyone tell me what the above statement means ?[/p][/quote]It is a Premier League statement for Premier League supporters - don't bother your Chumpionship befuddled head about it.[/p][/quote]no its not its more gobbledygook from the chief dingle jim 2012
  • Score: -7

7:06pm Mon 30 Jun 14

TurfMoorTom says...

u owe u owe wrote:
Don't know why the thread has gone from 'clarets will adapt in top flight' to no dads fiscal policies. But have to ask TOM what's the interest they are paying to the Bank of India and the finance company they've borrowed from? Do no dads get free gas and electricity? Does the taxman waiver his cut of the income? What of the other expenses such as transport for away matches, ground maintenance etc?
Refer to the £3.5m 'Running costs'. Now will you drop it about Rovers on this page and lets get back to the serious conundrum of why Bumley are losing Premier League experienced players and only interested in signing Championship reserves yet fail? It's like going to a Michelin 3 star restaurant with a free menu then ordering beans on toast and spilling the lot down your shirt. What a bunch of numpties.
[quote][p][bold]u owe u owe[/bold] wrote: Don't know why the thread has gone from 'clarets will adapt in top flight' to no dads fiscal policies. But have to ask TOM what's the interest they are paying to the Bank of India and the finance company they've borrowed from? Do no dads get free gas and electricity? Does the taxman waiver his cut of the income? What of the other expenses such as transport for away matches, ground maintenance etc?[/p][/quote]Refer to the £3.5m 'Running costs'. Now will you drop it about Rovers on this page and lets get back to the serious conundrum of why Bumley are losing Premier League experienced players and only interested in signing Championship reserves yet fail? It's like going to a Michelin 3 star restaurant with a free menu then ordering beans on toast and spilling the lot down your shirt. What a bunch of numpties. TurfMoorTom
  • Score: -13

7:44pm Mon 30 Jun 14

u owe u owe says...

Tommy boy there is no running profit simples! And who was it who posted income/outgoings proclaiming profit? Now please answer the questions posed! Or is it you can't?
Tommy boy there is no running profit simples! And who was it who posted income/outgoings proclaiming profit? Now please answer the questions posed! Or is it you can't? u owe u owe
  • Score: 4

7:46pm Mon 30 Jun 14

Rob_H2O says...

TurfMoorTom wrote:
u owe u owe wrote:
Don't know why the thread has gone from 'clarets will adapt in top flight' to no dads fiscal policies. But have to ask TOM what's the interest they are paying to the Bank of India and the finance company they've borrowed from? Do no dads get free gas and electricity? Does the taxman waiver his cut of the income? What of the other expenses such as transport for away matches, ground maintenance etc?
Refer to the £3.5m 'Running costs'. Now will you drop it about Rovers on this page and lets get back to the serious conundrum of why Bumley are losing Premier League experienced players and only interested in signing Championship reserves yet fail? It's like going to a Michelin 3 star restaurant with a free menu then ordering beans on toast and spilling the lot down your shirt. What a bunch of numpties.
No it isn't.
[quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]u owe u owe[/bold] wrote: Don't know why the thread has gone from 'clarets will adapt in top flight' to no dads fiscal policies. But have to ask TOM what's the interest they are paying to the Bank of India and the finance company they've borrowed from? Do no dads get free gas and electricity? Does the taxman waiver his cut of the income? What of the other expenses such as transport for away matches, ground maintenance etc?[/p][/quote]Refer to the £3.5m 'Running costs'. Now will you drop it about Rovers on this page and lets get back to the serious conundrum of why Bumley are losing Premier League experienced players and only interested in signing Championship reserves yet fail? It's like going to a Michelin 3 star restaurant with a free menu then ordering beans on toast and spilling the lot down your shirt. What a bunch of numpties.[/p][/quote]No it isn't. Rob_H2O
  • Score: 6

7:48pm Mon 30 Jun 14

Rob_H2O says...

jim 2012 wrote:
Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
jim 2012 wrote:
We obviously understand that within the tactics it’s a two-good thing. The tactics have to be right but also dealing with the individuals within that make a big difference.”
can anyone tell me what the above statement means ?
It is a Premier League statement for Premier League supporters - don't bother your Chumpionship befuddled head about it.
no its not its more gobbledygook from the chief dingle
Successful chief dingle. Who are you? What have you ever done other than carp and hate Burnley?
[quote][p][bold]jim 2012[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]jim 2012[/bold] wrote: We obviously understand that within the tactics it’s a two-good thing. The tactics have to be right but also dealing with the individuals within that make a big difference.” can anyone tell me what the above statement means ?[/p][/quote]It is a Premier League statement for Premier League supporters - don't bother your Chumpionship befuddled head about it.[/p][/quote]no its not its more gobbledygook from the chief dingle[/p][/quote]Successful chief dingle. Who are you? What have you ever done other than carp and hate Burnley? Rob_H2O
  • Score: 6

8:01pm Mon 30 Jun 14

TurfMoorTom says...

u owe u owe wrote:
Tommy boy there is no running profit simples! And who was it who posted income/outgoings proclaiming profit? Now please answer the questions posed! Or is it you can't?
I didn't suggest there was profit or that it was likely, just that it was possible. Now will you finally drop it about Rovers on this page and lets get back to the serious conundrum of why Bumley are losing Premier League experienced players and only interested in signing Championship reserves yet fail? It's like being offered a free five star holiday in the Maldives but going to Skegness instead then missing the bus. What a bunch of numpties.
[quote][p][bold]u owe u owe[/bold] wrote: Tommy boy there is no running profit simples! And who was it who posted income/outgoings proclaiming profit? Now please answer the questions posed! Or is it you can't?[/p][/quote]I didn't suggest there was profit or that it was likely, just that it was possible. Now will you finally drop it about Rovers on this page and lets get back to the serious conundrum of why Bumley are losing Premier League experienced players and only interested in signing Championship reserves yet fail? It's like being offered a free five star holiday in the Maldives but going to Skegness instead then missing the bus. What a bunch of numpties. TurfMoorTom
  • Score: -9

8:24pm Mon 30 Jun 14

jim 2012 says...

Rob_H2O wrote:
jim 2012 wrote:
Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
jim 2012 wrote:
We obviously understand that within the tactics it’s a two-good thing. The tactics have to be right but also dealing with the individuals within that make a big difference.”
can anyone tell me what the above statement means ?
It is a Premier League statement for Premier League supporters - don't bother your Chumpionship befuddled head about it.
i know is a statement but can anyone tell me what the above statement means ?
and what the hell is a Premier League statement for Premier League supporters ?
It means something in two parts. Thats part one ...... then, part two. Got it?

A Premier League statement is a statement that relates to the Premier League. Premier League Supporters relates to those people who support a Premier League Club.

Hello. Hello. Any body in?
you just made that up
OK I will tell you what I think
its dingle speak
[quote][p][bold]Rob_H2O[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]jim 2012[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]jim 2012[/bold] wrote: We obviously understand that within the tactics it’s a two-good thing. The tactics have to be right but also dealing with the individuals within that make a big difference.” can anyone tell me what the above statement means ?[/p][/quote]It is a Premier League statement for Premier League supporters - don't bother your Chumpionship befuddled head about it.[/p][/quote]i know is a statement but can anyone tell me what the above statement means ? and what the hell is a Premier League statement for Premier League supporters ?[/p][/quote]It means something in two parts. Thats part one ...... then, part two. Got it? A Premier League statement is a statement that relates to the Premier League. Premier League Supporters relates to those people who support a Premier League Club. Hello. Hello. Any body in?[/p][/quote]you just made that up OK I will tell you what I think its dingle speak jim 2012
  • Score: -9

8:41pm Mon 30 Jun 14

jim 2012 says...

Rob_H2O wrote:
jim 2012 wrote:
Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
jim 2012 wrote:
We obviously understand that within the tactics it’s a two-good thing. The tactics have to be right but also dealing with the individuals within that make a big difference.”
can anyone tell me what the above statement means ?
It is a Premier League statement for Premier League supporters - don't bother your Chumpionship befuddled head about it.
no its not its more gobbledygook from the chief dingle
Successful chief dingle. Who are you? What have you ever done other than carp and hate Burnley?
Successful not in the premier league
[quote][p][bold]Rob_H2O[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]jim 2012[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]jim 2012[/bold] wrote: We obviously understand that within the tactics it’s a two-good thing. The tactics have to be right but also dealing with the individuals within that make a big difference.” can anyone tell me what the above statement means ?[/p][/quote]It is a Premier League statement for Premier League supporters - don't bother your Chumpionship befuddled head about it.[/p][/quote]no its not its more gobbledygook from the chief dingle[/p][/quote]Successful chief dingle. Who are you? What have you ever done other than carp and hate Burnley?[/p][/quote]Successful not in the premier league jim 2012
  • Score: -10

9:03pm Mon 30 Jun 14

u owe u owe says...

Tommy announcement of signs are imminent, why concern yourself on matters you don't understand. Rumours are just that rumours, the club has shown its recruitment process works. Doesn't matter where they come from, we've already been told they won't recruit the usual suspects, I realise it conflicts with your understanding and your brain hurts, but the proof will be at the end of the season, with no debts and a very healthy bank balance. And a mid table finish,
Tommy announcement of signs are imminent, why concern yourself on matters you don't understand. Rumours are just that rumours, the club has shown its recruitment process works. Doesn't matter where they come from, we've already been told they won't recruit the usual suspects, I realise it conflicts with your understanding and your brain hurts, but the proof will be at the end of the season, with no debts and a very healthy bank balance. And a mid table finish, u owe u owe
  • Score: 5

10:33pm Mon 30 Jun 14

Claretcert says...

We have a well managed, debt free club that is the template all FL clubs now aspire to. A fan of say Barnet can look at us and think maybe. We see the bloated falling to the wayside, fake clubs. Like Rovers.
We have a well managed, debt free club that is the template all FL clubs now aspire to. A fan of say Barnet can look at us and think maybe. We see the bloated falling to the wayside, fake clubs. Like Rovers. Claretcert
  • Score: 6

11:07pm Mon 30 Jun 14

Forever Blue says...

Claretcert wrote:
We have a well managed, debt free club that is the template all FL clubs now aspire to. A fan of say Barnet can look at us and think maybe. We see the bloated falling to the wayside, fake clubs. Like Rovers.
Blackburn Rovers always will always be the biggest club in east lancs you know it and so do all genuine clarets fans It hurts doesn’t it but you can say it.
[quote][p][bold]Claretcert[/bold] wrote: We have a well managed, debt free club that is the template all FL clubs now aspire to. A fan of say Barnet can look at us and think maybe. We see the bloated falling to the wayside, fake clubs. Like Rovers.[/p][/quote]Blackburn Rovers always will always be the biggest club in east lancs you know it and so do all genuine clarets fans It hurts doesn’t it but you can say it. Forever Blue
  • Score: -6

11:33pm Mon 30 Jun 14

TurfMoorTom says...

Claretcert wrote:
We have a well managed, debt free club that is the template all FL clubs now aspire to. A fan of say Barnet can look at us and think maybe. We see the bloated falling to the wayside, fake clubs. Like Rovers.
Why do you keep pushing this pioneer twaddle. You've done no more than Oldham, Barnsley, Sheff Utd, Swindon or Bradford. Where are they now and who speaks of their spectacular success? You'll fall harder, you'll fall further. Because you're a smaller club.

Now I say again, why are Bumley losing Premier League experienced players and only interested in signing Championship reserves, yet fail to get anyone? It's like you've fallen into a barrel of t!ts and come out sucking Rob_H2O's little tinkle. What a bunch of numpties.
[quote][p][bold]Claretcert[/bold] wrote: We have a well managed, debt free club that is the template all FL clubs now aspire to. A fan of say Barnet can look at us and think maybe. We see the bloated falling to the wayside, fake clubs. Like Rovers.[/p][/quote]Why do you keep pushing this pioneer twaddle. You've done no more than Oldham, Barnsley, Sheff Utd, Swindon or Bradford. Where are they now and who speaks of their spectacular success? You'll fall harder, you'll fall further. Because you're a smaller club. Now I say again, why are Bumley losing Premier League experienced players and only interested in signing Championship reserves, yet fail to get anyone? It's like you've fallen into a barrel of t!ts and come out sucking Rob_H2O's little tinkle. What a bunch of numpties. TurfMoorTom
  • Score: -9

11:53pm Mon 30 Jun 14

Rob_H2O says...

jim 2012 wrote:
Rob_H2O wrote:
jim 2012 wrote:
Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
jim 2012 wrote:
We obviously understand that within the tactics it’s a two-good thing. The tactics have to be right but also dealing with the individuals within that make a big difference.”
can anyone tell me what the above statement means ?
It is a Premier League statement for Premier League supporters - don't bother your Chumpionship befuddled head about it.
no its not its more gobbledygook from the chief dingle
Successful chief dingle. Who are you? What have you ever done other than carp and hate Burnley?
Successful not in the premier league
Who are you? What have you ever done? Come on. Fess up. Have you lead a Championship club into the Premier League? Keyboard warrior.
[quote][p][bold]jim 2012[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Rob_H2O[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]jim 2012[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]jim 2012[/bold] wrote: We obviously understand that within the tactics it’s a two-good thing. The tactics have to be right but also dealing with the individuals within that make a big difference.” can anyone tell me what the above statement means ?[/p][/quote]It is a Premier League statement for Premier League supporters - don't bother your Chumpionship befuddled head about it.[/p][/quote]no its not its more gobbledygook from the chief dingle[/p][/quote]Successful chief dingle. Who are you? What have you ever done other than carp and hate Burnley?[/p][/quote]Successful not in the premier league[/p][/quote]Who are you? What have you ever done? Come on. Fess up. Have you lead a Championship club into the Premier League? Keyboard warrior. Rob_H2O
  • Score: 5

12:21am Tue 1 Jul 14

Claretcert says...

Whoa there - this is bedsit Barry, the Gollum, the Blackburn stalker in chief. Today for example, he got up and posted garbage all day. Using his many IDs he talked nonsense to himself. Legend he is.
Whoa there - this is bedsit Barry, the Gollum, the Blackburn stalker in chief. Today for example, he got up and posted garbage all day. Using his many IDs he talked nonsense to himself. Legend he is. Claretcert
  • Score: 9

8:34am Tue 1 Jul 14

mjp 53 says...

TurfMoorTom wrote:
Claretcert wrote:
We have a well managed, debt free club that is the template all FL clubs now aspire to. A fan of say Barnet can look at us and think maybe. We see the bloated falling to the wayside, fake clubs. Like Rovers.
Why do you keep pushing this pioneer twaddle. You've done no more than Oldham, Barnsley, Sheff Utd, Swindon or Bradford. Where are they now and who speaks of their spectacular success? You'll fall harder, you'll fall further. Because you're a smaller club.

Now I say again, why are Bumley losing Premier League experienced players and only interested in signing Championship reserves, yet fail to get anyone? It's like you've fallen into a barrel of t!ts and come out sucking Rob_H2O's little tinkle. What a bunch of numpties.
Well if it isn't Fake T*ts Bubble Pop, MT Head, Another Pounding, Super Claret, Ted Maul, Turf Moor T*t or more commonly as he/she is known as Barry the Tranny frm Wilpshire.
The one big thing that gives the game away my dear cross dressing friend is your IP address is the same for every posting, so unless you have multiple people sharing your one and only friend, your computer then you have just been outed as a cross dressing, flute playing lunatic. It must be very qiet on the Rovers pages, not signd anyone of note I see, nobody that is going to get you out of the Championship, bought second division players for a second rate team. Times must be hard, friends even harder to come by, so much so you have invented new friends who you even talk to nnline, amazing. Stck to dressing up your dolls collection or even better stick to trying on your own dresses, this is a football forum not a fashion parade Barry !!!!!!
[quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Claretcert[/bold] wrote: We have a well managed, debt free club that is the template all FL clubs now aspire to. A fan of say Barnet can look at us and think maybe. We see the bloated falling to the wayside, fake clubs. Like Rovers.[/p][/quote]Why do you keep pushing this pioneer twaddle. You've done no more than Oldham, Barnsley, Sheff Utd, Swindon or Bradford. Where are they now and who speaks of their spectacular success? You'll fall harder, you'll fall further. Because you're a smaller club. Now I say again, why are Bumley losing Premier League experienced players and only interested in signing Championship reserves, yet fail to get anyone? It's like you've fallen into a barrel of t!ts and come out sucking Rob_H2O's little tinkle. What a bunch of numpties.[/p][/quote]Well if it isn't Fake T*ts Bubble Pop, MT Head, Another Pounding, Super Claret, Ted Maul, Turf Moor T*t or more commonly as he/she is known as Barry the Tranny frm Wilpshire. The one big thing that gives the game away my dear cross dressing friend is your IP address is the same for every posting, so unless you have multiple people sharing your one and only friend, your computer then you have just been outed as a cross dressing, flute playing lunatic. It must be very qiet on the Rovers pages, not signd anyone of note I see, nobody that is going to get you out of the Championship, bought second division players for a second rate team. Times must be hard, friends even harder to come by, so much so you have invented new friends who you even talk to nnline, amazing. Stck to dressing up your dolls collection or even better stick to trying on your own dresses, this is a football forum not a fashion parade Barry !!!!!! mjp 53
  • Score: 12

9:36am Tue 1 Jul 14

TurfMoorTom says...

mjp 53 wrote:
TurfMoorTom wrote:
Claretcert wrote:
We have a well managed, debt free club that is the template all FL clubs now aspire to. A fan of say Barnet can look at us and think maybe. We see the bloated falling to the wayside, fake clubs. Like Rovers.
Why do you keep pushing this pioneer twaddle. You've done no more than Oldham, Barnsley, Sheff Utd, Swindon or Bradford. Where are they now and who speaks of their spectacular success? You'll fall harder, you'll fall further. Because you're a smaller club.

Now I say again, why are Bumley losing Premier League experienced players and only interested in signing Championship reserves, yet fail to get anyone? It's like you've fallen into a barrel of t!ts and come out sucking Rob_H2O's little tinkle. What a bunch of numpties.
Well if it isn't Fake T*ts Bubble Pop, MT Head, Another Pounding, Super Claret, Ted Maul, Turf Moor T*t or more commonly as he/she is known as Barry the Tranny frm Wilpshire.
The one big thing that gives the game away my dear cross dressing friend is your IP address is the same for every posting, so unless you have multiple people sharing your one and only friend, your computer then you have just been outed as a cross dressing, flute playing lunatic. It must be very qiet on the Rovers pages, not signd anyone of note I see, nobody that is going to get you out of the Championship, bought second division players for a second rate team. Times must be hard, friends even harder to come by, so much so you have invented new friends who you even talk to nnline, amazing. Stck to dressing up your dolls collection or even better stick to trying on your own dresses, this is a football forum not a fashion parade Barry !!!!!!
All that shows is you haven't actually got access to IP addresses so I wouldn't go around shouting about your big thing as I'm sorry my friend but it looks like you haven't got a thing at all. Note we've just signed Varvey - admittedly not my first choice but he has Premier League experience. Anyone with that at Bumley is leaving.
[quote][p][bold]mjp 53[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Claretcert[/bold] wrote: We have a well managed, debt free club that is the template all FL clubs now aspire to. A fan of say Barnet can look at us and think maybe. We see the bloated falling to the wayside, fake clubs. Like Rovers.[/p][/quote]Why do you keep pushing this pioneer twaddle. You've done no more than Oldham, Barnsley, Sheff Utd, Swindon or Bradford. Where are they now and who speaks of their spectacular success? You'll fall harder, you'll fall further. Because you're a smaller club. Now I say again, why are Bumley losing Premier League experienced players and only interested in signing Championship reserves, yet fail to get anyone? It's like you've fallen into a barrel of t!ts and come out sucking Rob_H2O's little tinkle. What a bunch of numpties.[/p][/quote]Well if it isn't Fake T*ts Bubble Pop, MT Head, Another Pounding, Super Claret, Ted Maul, Turf Moor T*t or more commonly as he/she is known as Barry the Tranny frm Wilpshire. The one big thing that gives the game away my dear cross dressing friend is your IP address is the same for every posting, so unless you have multiple people sharing your one and only friend, your computer then you have just been outed as a cross dressing, flute playing lunatic. It must be very qiet on the Rovers pages, not signd anyone of note I see, nobody that is going to get you out of the Championship, bought second division players for a second rate team. Times must be hard, friends even harder to come by, so much so you have invented new friends who you even talk to nnline, amazing. Stck to dressing up your dolls collection or even better stick to trying on your own dresses, this is a football forum not a fashion parade Barry !!!!!![/p][/quote]All that shows is you haven't actually got access to IP addresses so I wouldn't go around shouting about your big thing as I'm sorry my friend but it looks like you haven't got a thing at all. Note we've just signed Varvey - admittedly not my first choice but he has Premier League experience. Anyone with that at Bumley is leaving. TurfMoorTom
  • Score: -8

10:19am Tue 1 Jul 14

Chuck Norris' Roundhouse says...

TurfMoorTom wrote:
mjp 53 wrote:
TurfMoorTom wrote:
Claretcert wrote:
We have a well managed, debt free club that is the template all FL clubs now aspire to. A fan of say Barnet can look at us and think maybe. We see the bloated falling to the wayside, fake clubs. Like Rovers.
Why do you keep pushing this pioneer twaddle. You've done no more than Oldham, Barnsley, Sheff Utd, Swindon or Bradford. Where are they now and who speaks of their spectacular success? You'll fall harder, you'll fall further. Because you're a smaller club.

Now I say again, why are Bumley losing Premier League experienced players and only interested in signing Championship reserves, yet fail to get anyone? It's like you've fallen into a barrel of t!ts and come out sucking Rob_H2O's little tinkle. What a bunch of numpties.
Well if it isn't Fake T*ts Bubble Pop, MT Head, Another Pounding, Super Claret, Ted Maul, Turf Moor T*t or more commonly as he/she is known as Barry the Tranny frm Wilpshire.
The one big thing that gives the game away my dear cross dressing friend is your IP address is the same for every posting, so unless you have multiple people sharing your one and only friend, your computer then you have just been outed as a cross dressing, flute playing lunatic. It must be very qiet on the Rovers pages, not signd anyone of note I see, nobody that is going to get you out of the Championship, bought second division players for a second rate team. Times must be hard, friends even harder to come by, so much so you have invented new friends who you even talk to nnline, amazing. Stck to dressing up your dolls collection or even better stick to trying on your own dresses, this is a football forum not a fashion parade Barry !!!!!!
All that shows is you haven't actually got access to IP addresses so I wouldn't go around shouting about your big thing as I'm sorry my friend but it looks like you haven't got a thing at all. Note we've just signed Varvey - admittedly not my first choice but he has Premier League experience. Anyone with that at Bumley is leaving.
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha *wipes eyes*

Have you honestly just used your stellar signing of Luke VarNey as an example of your ambition?

Absolute comedy gold Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha Cheers Tom, you have made my morning.
[quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]mjp 53[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Claretcert[/bold] wrote: We have a well managed, debt free club that is the template all FL clubs now aspire to. A fan of say Barnet can look at us and think maybe. We see the bloated falling to the wayside, fake clubs. Like Rovers.[/p][/quote]Why do you keep pushing this pioneer twaddle. You've done no more than Oldham, Barnsley, Sheff Utd, Swindon or Bradford. Where are they now and who speaks of their spectacular success? You'll fall harder, you'll fall further. Because you're a smaller club. Now I say again, why are Bumley losing Premier League experienced players and only interested in signing Championship reserves, yet fail to get anyone? It's like you've fallen into a barrel of t!ts and come out sucking Rob_H2O's little tinkle. What a bunch of numpties.[/p][/quote]Well if it isn't Fake T*ts Bubble Pop, MT Head, Another Pounding, Super Claret, Ted Maul, Turf Moor T*t or more commonly as he/she is known as Barry the Tranny frm Wilpshire. The one big thing that gives the game away my dear cross dressing friend is your IP address is the same for every posting, so unless you have multiple people sharing your one and only friend, your computer then you have just been outed as a cross dressing, flute playing lunatic. It must be very qiet on the Rovers pages, not signd anyone of note I see, nobody that is going to get you out of the Championship, bought second division players for a second rate team. Times must be hard, friends even harder to come by, so much so you have invented new friends who you even talk to nnline, amazing. Stck to dressing up your dolls collection or even better stick to trying on your own dresses, this is a football forum not a fashion parade Barry !!!!!![/p][/quote]All that shows is you haven't actually got access to IP addresses so I wouldn't go around shouting about your big thing as I'm sorry my friend but it looks like you haven't got a thing at all. Note we've just signed Varvey - admittedly not my first choice but he has Premier League experience. Anyone with that at Bumley is leaving.[/p][/quote]Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha *wipes eyes* Have you honestly just used your stellar signing of Luke VarNey as an example of your ambition? Absolute comedy gold Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha Cheers Tom, you have made my morning. Chuck Norris' Roundhouse
  • Score: 9

12:21pm Tue 1 Jul 14

mjp 53 says...

TurfMoorTom wrote:
mjp 53 wrote:
TurfMoorTom wrote:
Claretcert wrote:
We have a well managed, debt free club that is the template all FL clubs now aspire to. A fan of say Barnet can look at us and think maybe. We see the bloated falling to the wayside, fake clubs. Like Rovers.
Why do you keep pushing this pioneer twaddle. You've done no more than Oldham, Barnsley, Sheff Utd, Swindon or Bradford. Where are they now and who speaks of their spectacular success? You'll fall harder, you'll fall further. Because you're a smaller club.

Now I say again, why are Bumley losing Premier League experienced players and only interested in signing Championship reserves, yet fail to get anyone? It's like you've fallen into a barrel of t!ts and come out sucking Rob_H2O's little tinkle. What a bunch of numpties.
Well if it isn't Fake T*ts Bubble Pop, MT Head, Another Pounding, Super Claret, Ted Maul, Turf Moor T*t or more commonly as he/she is known as Barry the Tranny frm Wilpshire.
The one big thing that gives the game away my dear cross dressing friend is your IP address is the same for every posting, so unless you have multiple people sharing your one and only friend, your computer then you have just been outed as a cross dressing, flute playing lunatic. It must be very qiet on the Rovers pages, not signd anyone of note I see, nobody that is going to get you out of the Championship, bought second division players for a second rate team. Times must be hard, friends even harder to come by, so much so you have invented new friends who you even talk to nnline, amazing. Stck to dressing up your dolls collection or even better stick to trying on your own dresses, this is a football forum not a fashion parade Barry !!!!!!
All that shows is you haven't actually got access to IP addresses so I wouldn't go around shouting about your big thing as I'm sorry my friend but it looks like you haven't got a thing at all. Note we've just signed Varvey - admittedly not my first choice but he has Premier League experience. Anyone with that at Bumley is leaving.
You have not got a clue what I have Barry. What I don't have is the massive selection of dresses in your wardrobe that you do. Do me a favour you plonker Luke Varney is a championship player who was let go by Leeds because he is not very good> Nobody else wanted him, a bit like Chris Brown. You wait and see but my guess is that they are about to offload Gestede and Rhodes to balance the books and reduce the overly massive wage bill and you will be left with the biggest 2 numptys in the Championship. Oh happy days PMSL, Luke Varney or is that Reg Varney, comedy Gold. On the buses my friend, on the buses.!!!!!
[quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]mjp 53[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Claretcert[/bold] wrote: We have a well managed, debt free club that is the template all FL clubs now aspire to. A fan of say Barnet can look at us and think maybe. We see the bloated falling to the wayside, fake clubs. Like Rovers.[/p][/quote]Why do you keep pushing this pioneer twaddle. You've done no more than Oldham, Barnsley, Sheff Utd, Swindon or Bradford. Where are they now and who speaks of their spectacular success? You'll fall harder, you'll fall further. Because you're a smaller club. Now I say again, why are Bumley losing Premier League experienced players and only interested in signing Championship reserves, yet fail to get anyone? It's like you've fallen into a barrel of t!ts and come out sucking Rob_H2O's little tinkle. What a bunch of numpties.[/p][/quote]Well if it isn't Fake T*ts Bubble Pop, MT Head, Another Pounding, Super Claret, Ted Maul, Turf Moor T*t or more commonly as he/she is known as Barry the Tranny frm Wilpshire. The one big thing that gives the game away my dear cross dressing friend is your IP address is the same for every posting, so unless you have multiple people sharing your one and only friend, your computer then you have just been outed as a cross dressing, flute playing lunatic. It must be very qiet on the Rovers pages, not signd anyone of note I see, nobody that is going to get you out of the Championship, bought second division players for a second rate team. Times must be hard, friends even harder to come by, so much so you have invented new friends who you even talk to nnline, amazing. Stck to dressing up your dolls collection or even better stick to trying on your own dresses, this is a football forum not a fashion parade Barry !!!!!![/p][/quote]All that shows is you haven't actually got access to IP addresses so I wouldn't go around shouting about your big thing as I'm sorry my friend but it looks like you haven't got a thing at all. Note we've just signed Varvey - admittedly not my first choice but he has Premier League experience. Anyone with that at Bumley is leaving.[/p][/quote]You have not got a clue what I have Barry. What I don't have is the massive selection of dresses in your wardrobe that you do. Do me a favour you plonker Luke Varney is a championship player who was let go by Leeds because he is not very good> Nobody else wanted him, a bit like Chris Brown. You wait and see but my guess is that they are about to offload Gestede and Rhodes to balance the books and reduce the overly massive wage bill and you will be left with the biggest 2 numptys in the Championship. Oh happy days PMSL, Luke Varney or is that Reg Varney, comedy Gold. On the buses my friend, on the buses.!!!!! mjp 53
  • Score: 3

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree