Report this comment
  • "
    wilddog wrote:
    noddy57 wrote:
    whether you like it or not Burnley have not got the backbone to gamble on a possible survival package for the simple reason they are not in the same league as Blackburn Rovers and apart from a fleeting association with the premiership it will be back down to earth with a bump and then the inevitable will happen,,the guys at the top will jump ship with their ill gotten gains, after all its all about the money football is secondary.
    Your right, they aint in the same league! Burnley are in the prem and rovers aint!
    That,s a good observation,well done, l will be back on this medium at the end of the new season to remind you of your short stay in the big boys league and how it all fell apart, but having said that hats off to your manager he has done an exceptional job and l fully expect Gary bowyer to emulate it next season.COYB."
  • This field is mandatory
  • This field is mandatory
  • Please note we will not accept reports with HTML tags or URLs in them.

  • Enter the above word in the box below

Clarets co-chairman stunned by Championship debts

John Banaszkiewicz (left) celebrates Burnley’s promotion with Brendan Flood, Sean Dyche, Barry Kilby and Mike Garlick

John Banaszkiewicz (left) celebrates Burnley’s promotion with Brendan Flood, Sean Dyche, Barry Kilby and Mike Garlick

First published in Sport This Is Lancashire: Photograph of the Author by , Burnley FC reporter

CLARETS co-chairman John Banaszkiewicz described the Championship’s £1billion debt as “scary”, but added that it served to highlight the value of Burnley’s promotion even more.

A club-by-club guide to Championship finances from 2012/13 figures, printed in The Guardian, has revealed the mounting costs of trying to be competitive, with combined debts of the 24 clubs reaching a 10-figure sum.

Burnley, who posted a pre-tax loss of £7.6m for and net debt of £12.2m for that year, were mid-table in the rankings with a turnover of £15.3million and wage bill of £15.4m – marking them 13th highest in the league in both categories just 12 months before a Premier League place was secured.

Bolton Wanderers topped the spending scale with a turnover of £35m and wage bill of £37.4m both highest in the division, accounting for a staggering pre-tax loss of £50.6m and net debt of £163.8m.

Leicester City, who went up as champions last season, spent significantly more than Burnley on wages (£26.1m), with a turnover of £19.6m.

Ambitious Brighton, who this year missed out on promotion after losing their play-off semi-final with Derby County, had a turnover of £23.4m, with a 90 per cent proportion of that.

In comparison to their peers, Banaszkiewicz believes Burnley’s promotion has taken on even greater significance given their lack of financial clout.

Under Sean Dyche, Burnley have spent just £450,000 up front on player trading, with Ashley Barnes bought from Brighton in January.

“It makes it an even bigger achievement,” said Banaszkiewicz.

“The figures are a year old but it’s quite a good summary and puts things into perspective.

“A one billion pound debt is scary. For us it shows the structure of the club. If we’ve not got lots of money we’re not going to spend it.

“But it also highlights the value of promotion.”

Burnley’s losses have ultimately been offset by the sales of Jay Rodriguez, to Southampton for £7m and Charlie Austin to QPR for £4m in subsequent summers.

After making a concerted attempt to fall in line with the Financial Fair Play ruling they were on course to break even this financial year, even before celebrating promotion.

FFP rules state that Championship clubs can make a maximum loss of £3m for the current 2013-14 campaign. That figure rises to £8m if a club’s owner is willing to convert the additional £5m into shares in the club.

Anything above £3m or £8m will result in a transfer embargo which would come into force on January 1, 2015. Championship clubs that fail to comply with FFP but are promoted to the Premier League this season will be required to pay a ‘Fair Play Tax’ penalty, which scales from one per cent on the first £100,000 overspent to 100 per cent on anything above £10m.

Comments (26)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree