Heaton: Burnley can go up without more signings

Tom Heaton

Tom Heaton

First published in Sport
Last updated
This Is Lancashire: Photograph of the Author by , Burnley FC reporter

TOM Heaton believes the current Burnley squad is strong enough to sustain their promotion challenge, and insists there would not be cause for panic if no further January additions were made.

Sean Dyche made Ashley Barnes his first paid-for signing in over a year in charge this month, on a three-and-a-half-year deal from Brighton.

The Clarets boss remains in the market for more new faces to boost the squad going into the final 20 games of the season.

But although Burnley slipped out of the automatic promotion places after being held to a 1-1 draw by Sheffield Wednesday at the weekend, goalkeeper Heaton feels they are equipped enough to cope with the rigours of the run-in regardless of whether squad numbers increase or not.

“If the club and the staff feel it’s right to add a few players along the way then so be it, but we certainly won’t be looking at it that way, we’ll be just looking to continue what we’ve done so far.

“It may make things a bit easier perhaps with a few more bodies, but it’s something we probably won’t think about as players so much, just concentrate on trying to continue and improve on what we’ve done so far,” said Heaton, who is one of just 18 players to start for the Clarets this season.

Burnley have used the least number of players in total this season, with 22 turning out for the team in league and cup – four less than the next lowest, Ipswich, with 26. Millwall and Sheffield Wednesday have used the most, with 34.

But with both of those teams struggling, despite the depth of their squad, Heaton says those statistics give a good indication how fewer players can be more productive.

“You get that consistency of performance,” said the stopper.

“I think over the last few years, in my humble opinion, there’s almost too much rotation perhaps, a little bit too much resting and this that and the other.

“We’ve been a prime example in the Christmas period of getting some good results and some great performances and not using that many players. You sort of get that feel that if you switch your mindset to ‘this is what’s happening, strap up and get on with it’, that’s what you do. I think that’s how we’ve been and how we’ll continue to be.

“There are positives and negatives to both sides of it.”

Heaton accepted that the possibility of being struck by injuries was a concern, but not an over-riding one.

“There’s always the loan market I suppose these days,” he said.

“There’s no point telling you there’s not a physical aspect to a lot of games in a short space of time. The lads probably felt fatigued at times (over Christmas) but they managed to find that second wind.”

Comments (7)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

10:16am Thu 23 Jan 14

Champagne plus charlie says...

Absolutely.

We are in the top three on merit, and it doesn't matter how many players you have sat on the sidelines, it matters about the eleven on the pitch, and our first eleven is better than most at this level.

Ideally I would like a bit more midfield cover in case Marney or Jones pick up an injury or suspension, but other than that I think we are well equipped to mount a serious promotion challenge..

UTC
Absolutely. We are in the top three on merit, and it doesn't matter how many players you have sat on the sidelines, it matters about the eleven on the pitch, and our first eleven is better than most at this level. Ideally I would like a bit more midfield cover in case Marney or Jones pick up an injury or suspension, but other than that I think we are well equipped to mount a serious promotion challenge.. UTC Champagne plus charlie
  • Score: 13

1:37pm Thu 23 Jan 14

noddy57 says...

you cannot be serious,,well just carry on dreaming and in may we will all come back down to earth wont we ?,,ARTE ET LABORE, we are right behind you,,,,oh and dont forget you have yet to lose players through injurywhich every team has to endure,,
you cannot be serious,,well just carry on dreaming and in may we will all come back down to earth wont we ?,,ARTE ET LABORE, we are right behind you,,,,oh and dont forget you have yet to lose players through injurywhich every team has to endure,, noddy57
  • Score: -6

3:08pm Thu 23 Jan 14

kfc yummy says...

noddy57 wrote:
you cannot be serious,,well just carry on dreaming and in may we will all come back down to earth wont we ?,,ARTE ET LABORE, we are right behind you,,,,oh and dont forget you have yet to lose players through injurywhich every team has to endure,,
Right behind? don't you mean 14 points behind.
[quote][p][bold]noddy57[/bold] wrote: you cannot be serious,,well just carry on dreaming and in may we will all come back down to earth wont we ?,,ARTE ET LABORE, we are right behind you,,,,oh and dont forget you have yet to lose players through injurywhich every team has to endure,,[/p][/quote]Right behind? don't you mean 14 points behind. kfc yummy
  • Score: 4

3:09pm Thu 23 Jan 14

H2O Control says...

noddy57 wrote:
you cannot be serious,,well just carry on dreaming and in may we will all come back down to earth wont we ?,,ARTE ET LABORE, we are right behind you,,,,oh and dont forget you have yet to lose players through injurywhich every team has to endure,,
Apart from Wallace, Ings, Jones, Marney and Mee. Each of these have had spells out. Wallace effectively out since the start. That's 25% of the squad at some stage. Sometimes with 4 out at the same time.

So, apart from when we've had injuries we've had no injuries. Is that right you bloody rocket scientist.
[quote][p][bold]noddy57[/bold] wrote: you cannot be serious,,well just carry on dreaming and in may we will all come back down to earth wont we ?,,ARTE ET LABORE, we are right behind you,,,,oh and dont forget you have yet to lose players through injurywhich every team has to endure,,[/p][/quote]Apart from Wallace, Ings, Jones, Marney and Mee. Each of these have had spells out. Wallace effectively out since the start. That's 25% of the squad at some stage. Sometimes with 4 out at the same time. So, apart from when we've had injuries we've had no injuries. Is that right you bloody rocket scientist. H2O Control
  • Score: 5

5:21pm Thu 23 Jan 14

mjp 53 says...

noddy57 wrote:
you cannot be serious,,well just carry on dreaming and in may we will all come back down to earth wont we ?,,ARTE ET LABORE, we are right behind you,,,,oh and dont forget you have yet to lose players through injurywhich every team has to endure,,
14 points and a game more come Saturday, i think that crack you are smoking is giving you hallucinations not dreams. Dann off to Palace Rhodes off to QPR, then lets see where you will be then.
[quote][p][bold]noddy57[/bold] wrote: you cannot be serious,,well just carry on dreaming and in may we will all come back down to earth wont we ?,,ARTE ET LABORE, we are right behind you,,,,oh and dont forget you have yet to lose players through injurywhich every team has to endure,,[/p][/quote]14 points and a game more come Saturday, i think that crack you are smoking is giving you hallucinations not dreams. Dann off to Palace Rhodes off to QPR, then lets see where you will be then. mjp 53
  • Score: 2

9:28pm Thu 23 Jan 14

noddy57 says...

H2O Control wrote:
noddy57 wrote:
you cannot be serious,,well just carry on dreaming and in may we will all come back down to earth wont we ?,,ARTE ET LABORE, we are right behind you,,,,oh and dont forget you have yet to lose players through injurywhich every team has to endure,,
Apart from Wallace, Ings, Jones, Marney and Mee. Each of these have had spells out. Wallace effectively out since the start. That's 25% of the squad at some stage. Sometimes with 4 out at the same time.

So, apart from when we've had injuries we've had no injuries. Is that right you bloody rocket scientist.
you dont call them injuries ,,i,m talking proper injuries plonker,
[quote][p][bold]H2O Control[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]noddy57[/bold] wrote: you cannot be serious,,well just carry on dreaming and in may we will all come back down to earth wont we ?,,ARTE ET LABORE, we are right behind you,,,,oh and dont forget you have yet to lose players through injurywhich every team has to endure,,[/p][/quote]Apart from Wallace, Ings, Jones, Marney and Mee. Each of these have had spells out. Wallace effectively out since the start. That's 25% of the squad at some stage. Sometimes with 4 out at the same time. So, apart from when we've had injuries we've had no injuries. Is that right you bloody rocket scientist.[/p][/quote]you dont call them injuries ,,i,m talking proper injuries plonker, noddy57
  • Score: 0

2:49pm Fri 24 Jan 14

GeoRam says...

noddy57 wrote:
H2O Control wrote:
noddy57 wrote:
you cannot be serious,,well just carry on dreaming and in may we will all come back down to earth wont we ?,,ARTE ET LABORE, we are right behind you,,,,oh and dont forget you have yet to lose players through injurywhich every team has to endure,,
Apart from Wallace, Ings, Jones, Marney and Mee. Each of these have had spells out. Wallace effectively out since the start. That's 25% of the squad at some stage. Sometimes with 4 out at the same time.

So, apart from when we've had injuries we've had no injuries. Is that right you bloody rocket scientist.
you dont call them injuries ,,i,m talking proper injuries plonker,
Noddy, forgive me for asking, but when is an injury not an injury?

And could you please enlighten me as to what defines a 'proper' injury?
[quote][p][bold]noddy57[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]H2O Control[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]noddy57[/bold] wrote: you cannot be serious,,well just carry on dreaming and in may we will all come back down to earth wont we ?,,ARTE ET LABORE, we are right behind you,,,,oh and dont forget you have yet to lose players through injurywhich every team has to endure,,[/p][/quote]Apart from Wallace, Ings, Jones, Marney and Mee. Each of these have had spells out. Wallace effectively out since the start. That's 25% of the squad at some stage. Sometimes with 4 out at the same time. So, apart from when we've had injuries we've had no injuries. Is that right you bloody rocket scientist.[/p][/quote]you dont call them injuries ,,i,m talking proper injuries plonker,[/p][/quote]Noddy, forgive me for asking, but when is an injury not an injury? And could you please enlighten me as to what defines a 'proper' injury? GeoRam
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree