War hero Aaron wins battle for benefits

AN Afghan war hero has won his fight to have his disability benefits reinstated.

Aaron Moon lost a leg in a roadside bomb — but the Department of work and Pensions stopped his Disability Living Allowance (DLA), claiming he was not disabled enough.

Former Royal Marine Mr Moon suffered horrific injuries, including multiple broken bones, in February, 2009.

The 25-year-old, from Westhoughton, was just two weeks into his first combat tour when the Viking armoured vehicle he was driving hit an improvised explosive device (IED) as it was returning from a patrol in Lashkar Gah, Helmand Province.

He was blown through the door and suffered fractures to his shoulder, spine, pelvis, hip, heel and legs, a ruptured spleen, dislocated knees and a broken leg.

In November, 2010, his leg was amputated below the knee despite the efforts of medical staff to save it.

Since May, 2009, he had claimed £100 per week DLA — which is awarded to help a person with disability costs regardless of whether or not they are capable of work.

But in November, last year, the DWP ordered him to have a medical assessment.

Mr Moon claimed the nurse carrying out the assessment read out a list of his injuries, including the fact he had had his leg amputated, but still asked him to “move his toes” and “point his feet to the floor”, and “looked surprised” when he took off his leg to show him it was a prosthetic.

The veteran later received a letter saying his DLA had been withdrawn because he could “walk 200 metres pain-free”.

Mr Moon, of Madison Park, claimed when he phoned to complain, a DWP staff member told him a prosthetic leg “was just as good as having his own leg”.

He took the government to a tribunal and yesterday a panel reinstated the higher rate mobility component of his DLA, which will now be backdated to December last year.

But his lower rate care component was not reinstated.

He said: “I’m happy now. It was intensive, there were a lot of questions being asked about my injuries and how I got around.”

Mr Moon still suffers pain and infections in his leg and is due to undergo another operation.

He said: “It’s been a big distraction with my operation and everything but it’s over and done with now.

“I still feel annoyed about it, I shouldn’t have had to go through this.”

Mr Moon added he does not know how much money he will now receive but said he hopes his story inspires others.

He said: “Being in The Bolton News brought this to the public’s attention and I hope it encourages people who are in the same position.

“If they deserve it they should fight for it.”

He was represented at his tribunal by Mike Downes of the British Limbless Ex Service Men's Association, who submitted a dossier of medical evidence from senior doctors backing the former Marine’s case.

Mr Downes said: “I’m just pleased for Aaron that he can now put the last 12 months behind him.

“The care component was stopped but it’s the mobility aspect which was the most important because it opens the door to things like blue badges, which Aaron needs.”

A DWP spokesman added: "We owe the men and women who have served their country a huge debt of gratitude and cases like this show exactly why we need to reform the system.

“In future seriously injured members of the armed forces will automatically get the support they need and won't have to do a separate assessment.

"Everyone has the right to appeal a decision at an independent tribunal and often people provide additional information to go with their original claim which can have an effect on the outcome of their case."

Comments(5)

raggadaddy says...
10:31am Wed 17 Oct 12

The mobility part of DLA is £54.50 per week which can be used for getting about. If he receives a motability car, then the full weekly amount goes towards the cost of the car, which covers everything, except the petrol.

Probably the DWP stopped the whole lot because he was claiming the care component of DLA. They will have thought that he isn't entitled to it as he can get around on the prosthetic leg.

So really the story headline is misleading. He was received part of the DLA benefit back not the full amount.

Well done to him though. He thoroughly deserves it - and more!

Kevin Turvey says...
11:16am Wed 17 Oct 12

If he gets turned down for a job due to only having one leg then can he still claim discrimination?

rnorris says...
11:44am Wed 17 Oct 12

Well done lad. The country owes you much more than a few quid a week in benefits. Good luck for the future.

John Edwards says...
3:20pm Wed 17 Oct 12

His benefit should never have been stopped in the first place. Immigrants come here and bleed us dry of thousands, the same as our alcoholics and druggies do. This lad went out for Queen and country and was treated like something that you scrape off your shoe.

oftbewildered2 says...
7:41am Thu 18 Oct 12

Kevin Turvey wrote:
If he gets turned down for a job due to only having one leg then can he still claim discrimination?
during my working life I have worked with seven people with prosthetic limbs - six with both prosthetic legs and one with a prosthetic hand. It should be a tragedy if he got turned down for employment on that basis; he is far too young and employment can only be beneficial ot his well being, as well as benefitting the firm which employs him. I wish him well. Look to Douglas Bader - they were going to write him off but he proved them wrong

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree