Darwen deprived area ‘is missing out on vital funds’
7:00pm Wednesday 29th August 2012 in News
ONE of Blackburn with Darwen’s most deprived areas is missing out on vital funding to battle poverty because of a “political game”, according to ward councillors.
Liberal Democrat Roy Davies hit out at the Labour-controlled borough council for “giving money to every other ward but mine”.
But Labour members have hit back, saying they the Darwen area is getting help, and the council has had no control over some major grants to other areas.
Coun Davies said: “Sudell is missing out. I have the most deprived ward in the borough, but I’m not getting any resources to do anything about it this poverty.
“I’ve got empty houses and people out of work, but every other ward seems to get something.
“Shadsworth is no worse than Sudell, but recently they’ve got a £1million lottery grant that was applied for by the council, because of their deprivation problems.
“I’ve got £5,850 for Sudell. What can I do with that sort of money?”
When asked why he thought the Sudell ward might be missing out, Coun Davies said: “Well, Sudell has two Liberal Democrat councillors and one Labour. You can make your own mind up.”
Fellow Sudell Councillor Paul Browne agreed. He said: “It’s political. All the money is going to the Labour areas.
“We have to get grants from voluntary bodies. It’s peanuts in comparison.”
Labour Councillor Eileen Entwistle, who also represents the Sudell ward, said: “The £1million for Shadsworth was nothing to do with the council, it was given by the Lottery without an application, and a lot of work has gone on there to consult and set up a committee.”
She said: “Sudell has always had problems, but money has been and continued to be invested. We’ve had Sure Start, Olive Lane park and the Adi Zone put in recently.
“You have got to prioritise money, and sometimes some areas will need more than others, but that isn’t political.”
Comments(10)
Reality50
says...
10:48pm Wed 29 Aug 12
english rose 1
says...
12:33am Thu 30 Aug 12
fireonthemountain wrote:Very occasionally Coun Davies & Browne say something sensible - unfortunately these comments are not in this category !
1 - to quote from the above article .
Labour Councillor Eileen Entwistle, who also represents the Sudell ward, said: “The £1million for Shadsworth was nothing to do with the council, it was given by the Lottery without an application, and a lot of work has gone on there to consult and set up a committee.”
I see - so one day the Lottery people decided "Let's give Shad a million quid , not that they've asked for it " .
Bit far-fetched don't you think ?
What isn't far-fetched is that the first thing Labour do is set up a committee . Oooh , we can claim expenses .
2 - I have to agree with Paul and Roy .
Yes I do vote Liberal - locally - as I regard them as the best for our community - though not in General Elections as I regard Clegg (and Cable) as halfwits .
Where exactly are the boundaries , by the way ? - I notice that Nancy St. and Bank St. houses have been done up beautifully , but up in Sudell - nothing .
Yes it's political .
3 - Anyone any news on The Highfield ? (Glad it's gone by the way ) .
* The money in Shad was indeed lottery money & nothing to do with the Council - who did not apply for it. The £1m is over 10 years - hardly a mega amount. And Councillors CANNOT claim any expenses for sitting on any Committee connected to this funding.
* Both Sudell & Ewood wards have recently received extra funding for various schemes based on deprivation index
* Sudell ward IS NOT the most deprived ward in the Borough. It is the 7th most deprived - it is, however, the most deprived within Darwen.
* Quite rightly, Sudell Ward has a great Sure Start Centre & Community Centre - no other ward in Darwen has these, apart from a Childrens Centre in Earcroft Ward.
* Sudell Ward has the best & biggest play area in Darwen (Olive Ln)
* Nancy St & Bank St etc are in Sunnyhurst Ward and the houses in that area have had about £12k each spent on them. Coun Davies & Browne were AGAINST the HMR scheme that enabled these houses to be done up. When money was available for housing they didn't want it in their ward !
* Coun Davies also campaigned against Darwen Academy at Sudell Rd and all the benefits that it has brought. Indeed Coun Davies gave evidence at the public enquiry that helped to waste nearly £1m of taxpayers money - money that could have been spent in Sudell Ward.
* Both nationally & locally Coun Browne & Davies both support deals with the Tories. The Government has taken away £millions from deprived areas like Sudell.
* Given the above facts how anyone can think that these 2 councillors are good for Sudell is rather baffling !
Last I heard about the Highfield is that some private hire firms want it as a taxi base.
In reply to Reality50 most Blackburn Councillors are NOT muslim - I'm not sure how many of the Darwen Councillors are christian ?
english rose 1
says...
12:35am Thu 30 Aug 12
fireonthemountain wrote:Very occasionally Coun Davies & Browne say something sensible - unfortunately these comments are not in this category !
1 - to quote from the above article .
Labour Councillor Eileen Entwistle, who also represents the Sudell ward, said: “The £1million for Shadsworth was nothing to do with the council, it was given by the Lottery without an application, and a lot of work has gone on there to consult and set up a committee.”
I see - so one day the Lottery people decided "Let's give Shad a million quid , not that they've asked for it " .
Bit far-fetched don't you think ?
What isn't far-fetched is that the first thing Labour do is set up a committee . Oooh , we can claim expenses .
2 - I have to agree with Paul and Roy .
Yes I do vote Liberal - locally - as I regard them as the best for our community - though not in General Elections as I regard Clegg (and Cable) as halfwits .
Where exactly are the boundaries , by the way ? - I notice that Nancy St. and Bank St. houses have been done up beautifully , but up in Sudell - nothing .
Yes it's political .
3 - Anyone any news on The Highfield ? (Glad it's gone by the way ) .
* The money in Shad was indeed lottery money & nothing to do with the Council - who did not apply for it. The £1m is over 10 years - hardly a mega amount. And Councillors CANNOT claim any expenses for sitting on any Committee connected to this funding.
* Both Sudell & Ewood wards have recently received extra funding for various schemes based on deprivation index
* Sudell ward IS NOT the most deprived ward in the Borough. It is the 7th most deprived - it is, however, the most deprived within Darwen.
* Quite rightly, Sudell Ward has a great Sure Start Centre & Community Centre - no other ward in Darwen has these, apart from a Childrens Centre in Earcroft Ward.
* Sudell Ward has the best & biggest play area in Darwen (Olive Ln)
* Nancy St & Bank St etc are in Sunnyhurst Ward and the houses in that area have had about £12k each spent on them. Coun Davies & Browne were AGAINST the HMR scheme that enabled these houses to be done up. When money was available for housing they didn't want it in their ward !
* Coun Davies also campaigned against Darwen Academy at Sudell Rd and all the benefits that it has brought. Indeed Coun Davies gave evidence at the public enquiry that helped to waste nearly £1m of taxpayers money - money that could have been spent in Sudell Ward.
* Both nationally & locally Coun Browne & Davies both support deals with the Tories. The Government has taken away £millions from deprived areas like Sudell.
* Given the above facts how anyone can think that these 2 councillors are good for Sudell is rather baffling !
Last I heard about the Highfield is that some private hire firms want it as a taxi base.
In reply to Reality50 most Blackburn Councillors are NOT muslim - I'm not sure how many of the Darwen Councillors are christian ?
Oh - the Sudell ward boundaries are Argyle St - Sudell Rd (east of railway line) up to Roman Rd.
Excluded again
says...
6:33am Thu 30 Aug 12
For some reason, the town centre is in Sunnyhurst ward, not Sudell ward. But it would have been daft to have put these buildings in Sudell ward not in the Town Centre.
Reality50
says...
10:21am Thu 30 Aug 12
district01
says...
12:13pm Thu 30 Aug 12
english rose 1 wrote:Politicians look after who they think provide them with their votes. They are ‘bought’ by those voters to help look after their own particular affairs. The voting population remains low because of the low trust in politicians as a whole just as much as the weather during that particular voting day. Not an ideal situation!
fireonthemountain wrote:Very occasionally Coun Davies & Browne say something sensible - unfortunately these comments are not in this category !
1 - to quote from the above article .
Labour Councillor Eileen Entwistle, who also represents the Sudell ward, said: “The £1million for Shadsworth was nothing to do with the council, it was given by the Lottery without an application, and a lot of work has gone on there to consult and set up a committee.”
I see - so one day the Lottery people decided "Let's give Shad a million quid , not that they've asked for it " .
Bit far-fetched don't you think ?
What isn't far-fetched is that the first thing Labour do is set up a committee . Oooh , we can claim expenses .
2 - I have to agree with Paul and Roy .
Yes I do vote Liberal - locally - as I regard them as the best for our community - though not in General Elections as I regard Clegg (and Cable) as halfwits .
Where exactly are the boundaries , by the way ? - I notice that Nancy St. and Bank St. houses have been done up beautifully , but up in Sudell - nothing .
Yes it's political .
3 - Anyone any news on The Highfield ? (Glad it's gone by the way ) .
* The money in Shad was indeed lottery money & nothing to do with the Council - who did not apply for it. The £1m is over 10 years - hardly a mega amount. And Councillors CANNOT claim any expenses for sitting on any Committee connected to this funding.
* Both Sudell & Ewood wards have recently received extra funding for various schemes based on deprivation index
* Sudell ward IS NOT the most deprived ward in the Borough. It is the 7th most deprived - it is, however, the most deprived within Darwen.
* Quite rightly, Sudell Ward has a great Sure Start Centre & Community Centre - no other ward in Darwen has these, apart from a Childrens Centre in Earcroft Ward.
* Sudell Ward has the best & biggest play area in Darwen (Olive Ln)
* Nancy St & Bank St etc are in Sunnyhurst Ward and the houses in that area have had about £12k each spent on them. Coun Davies & Browne were AGAINST the HMR scheme that enabled these houses to be done up. When money was available for housing they didn't want it in their ward !
* Coun Davies also campaigned against Darwen Academy at Sudell Rd and all the benefits that it has brought. Indeed Coun Davies gave evidence at the public enquiry that helped to waste nearly £1m of taxpayers money - money that could have been spent in Sudell Ward.
* Both nationally & locally Coun Browne & Davies both support deals with the Tories. The Government has taken away £millions from deprived areas like Sudell.
* Given the above facts how anyone can think that these 2 councillors are good for Sudell is rather baffling !
Last I heard about the Highfield is that some private hire firms want it as a taxi base.
In reply to Reality50 most Blackburn Councillors are NOT muslim - I'm not sure how many of the Darwen Councillors are christian ?
Oh - the Sudell ward boundaries are Argyle St - Sudell Rd (east of railway line) up to Roman Rd.
It’s all down to statistics as ‘english rose 1’ knows only too well. We don’t know who vote or for what reason nor how knowledgeable they are about why they vote. The majority vote because that is how they have always voted which is why Blackburn remains an old Labour voting area and for no other reason. Anyone would be voted into power under that badge for no other reason as can be seen within the Blackburn political structure from the top down. Those who vote get what they vote for and those who don‘t can’t complain. But nobody knows who voted or why they did so. A political mystery?
district01
says...
7:45pm Thu 30 Aug 12
fireonthemountain
says...
10:17pm Thu 30 Aug 12
My thanks for your reply .
You have certainly brought up something(s) of which I was unaware .
Specifically -
That the million for Shad is over 10 years .
Councillors cannot claim expenses for attending said meetings .
I look forward to your links to these "facts" .
Now -
What was it again ?
Voted against £12,000 per house being spent in a different ward ?
Sounds good to me .
Voted against The Academy ?
Ah - was that the building that destroyed a perfectly happy community ?
Smashed a row of shops - and associated employment ?
Flattened a small business park , again adding to unemployment ?
Made traffic , parking much worse ?
Made walking up Sudell at night an utterly no-go area ?
I'll take it you are a Liebour voter .
Says it all really .
P.S. - what does "&" mean ?
happycyclist
says...
12:36am Fri 31 Aug 12
district01 wrote:Well said.
PS - Roy Davis would be the one to get my vote within that area. The others get it because of old party loyalty. He and his party have to earn it, and they do!

fireonthemountain says...
8:57pm Wed 29 Aug 12
Labour Councillor Eileen Entwistle, who also represents the Sudell ward, said: “The £1million for Shadsworth was nothing to do with the council, it was given by the Lottery without an application, and a lot of work has gone on there to consult and set up a committee.”
I see - so one day the Lottery people decided "Let's give Shad a million quid , not that they've asked for it " .
Bit far-fetched don't you think ?
What isn't far-fetched is that the first thing Labour do is set up a committee . Oooh , we can claim expenses .
2 - I have to agree with Paul and Roy .
Yes I do vote Liberal - locally - as I regard them as the best for our community - though not in General Elections as I regard Clegg (and Cable) as halfwits .
Where exactly are the boundaries , by the way ? - I notice that Nancy St. and Bank St. houses have been done up beautifully , but up in Sudell - nothing .
Yes it's political .
3 - Anyone any news on The Highfield ? (Glad it's gone by the way ) .