Blackburn council plans redundancies to meet government spending targets

BLACKBURN council has admitted for the first time that it will have to make staff compulsorily redundant to make the spending cuts demanded by the government.

The borough’s finance boss Andy Kay confirmed that its Labour leaders were ready to force staff to leave jobs as he was accused of saving money for a rainy day.

Tory leader Michael Lee said that the authority’s underspend of £6.27 million in 2011/12 - four per cent of a total approved budget of £154.85 million - looked like cutting vital services to put money in the bank for future government council grant cuts.

He highlighted grass cutting and street cleaning as two areas where cutbacks seemed to being made unnecessarily quickly.

At the council’s ruling cabinet meeting, he said he had managed to prevent a proposed end to grass cutting on Grasmere Avenue, where the average age of residents was over 70, but had been told by officers that no promise could be made to continue the services on verges in the future.

Coun Lee also questioned why £2.8 million set aside for redundancy payments by the council but not used had not been made available to spend on vital services.

Executive member for resources Coun Kay said he was being prudent in making sure there was money left in the kitty for the remaining 12 months of a two year budgeting process.

On the £2.8 million, he told Coun Lee: “I have no doubt that we will have to make compulsory redundancies and will have to pay out this money.”

He said the council needed to keep its reserves topped up to deal with the effect of government cutbacks in the grant to Blackburn-with-Darwen expected to come in at between £8 million and £27 million next year.

Coun Kay added: “This saving is not going to solve the problem but it puts us in good stead for the future.”

After the meeting Coun Kay said: “I cannot say how many compulsory redundancies there will be because it depends on how much the government cuts our budget. Council staff are the only realisable assets we have to cut our annual spending. Even selling property is just a one-off payment.”

Comments(17)

jack daniels says...
9:42am Sat 14 Jul 12

Cue unwelcome comments from selfish people who know no better, about people about to have their world turned upside down

Jack Herer says...
10:08am Sat 14 Jul 12

jack daniels wrote:
Cue unwelcome comments from selfish people who know no better, about people about to have their world turned upside down
No it's a crying shame.

It's why Labour are a total and utter disgrace. Giving people dreams, but it was based on debt so stupid that it makes a credit card addict look sensible, and so these jobs were completely unsustainable.

It's a tragedy which never needed to happen, but it came about from the likes of Tony Blair and Gordon Brown and Peter Mandelson, and their young acolytes of the time like Ed Miliband and Ed Balls of course. All of them shamelessly creating jobs on unsustainable debt, all to win votes.

And it's real people who pay the price, not them at all. While Ed Miliband and Ed Balls, themselves architects of this tragedy, are made the new leaders,normal people at home worry about a letter through the door which would wreck their lives.

It's rotten isn't it.

2 for 5p says...
10:18am Sat 14 Jul 12

What kind of baffons are running that council last year they under spend £6m
The whole government spending cuts is just a con to squeeze the working people. It costs a lot of money to make people redundant, and then we are Tod that in 2 years we will be out of recession so cutting now doesn't work.

happycyclist says...
10:58am Sat 14 Jul 12

Jack Herer wrote:
jack daniels wrote:
Cue unwelcome comments from selfish people who know no better, about people about to have their world turned upside down
No it's a crying shame.

It's why Labour are a total and utter disgrace. Giving people dreams, but it was based on debt so stupid that it makes a credit card addict look sensible, and so these jobs were completely unsustainable.

It's a tragedy which never needed to happen, but it came about from the likes of Tony Blair and Gordon Brown and Peter Mandelson, and their young acolytes of the time like Ed Miliband and Ed Balls of course. All of them shamelessly creating jobs on unsustainable debt, all to win votes.

And it's real people who pay the price, not them at all. While Ed Miliband and Ed Balls, themselves architects of this tragedy, are made the new leaders,normal people at home worry about a letter through the door which would wreck their lives.

It's rotten isn't it.
Well said, Jack.

A Darener says...
11:54am Sat 14 Jul 12

As none of the essential work seems to be getting done e.g. Drain cleaning, grass cutting etc. why do we need all the heads of departments on huge salaries. They must be sat in their offices doing nothing. Because nothing is getting done. Get rid of them, amalgamate departments with one head instead of several. In other words get rid of the chiefs but keep the Indians.

prince of darkness says...
12:25pm Sat 14 Jul 12

A Darener wrote:
As none of the essential work seems to be getting done e.g. Drain cleaning, grass cutting etc. why do we need all the heads of departments on huge salaries. They must be sat in their offices doing nothing. Because nothing is getting done. Get rid of them, amalgamate departments with one head instead of several. In other words get rid of the chiefs but keep the Indians.
Agree sure could make saving ere first. No doubt the additional influx agreed by Jack Straw will cause overspending next year. The politicians should hang their heads in shame. People who have real dreams shatered due to these vote catchers. Hope all remember come the elections but doubt it.

RUinsane says...
12:45pm Sat 14 Jul 12

This ones real easy, anyone earning over 50 grand should be made redundant. That should have em running for cover. Guess which services would be affected........? NONE

Michael@ClitheroeSince58 says...
12:52pm Sat 14 Jul 12

RUinsane wrote:
This ones real easy, anyone earning over 50 grand should be made redundant. That should have em running for cover. Guess which services would be affected........? NONE
How true!

district01 says...
2:31pm Sat 14 Jul 12

New Labour have always been hiding behind the old Labour banner knowing full well that the old historical loyalty votes will see them through. New Labour are not Labour but Jack Straw who has made a fine living from having a safe Labour seat here in Blackburn was still prepared to share Tony Blair‘s bed plus his war as well. Now both are extremely wealthy all due to the many loyal votes of old Labour folk who still seem blinkered as to what the New Labour gathering brought upon us all.

But welcome home Tony is now the New Labour cry!

Re the headline: Blackburn council plans redundancies to meet government spending targets. But judging by their past knowledge of our finances how do we know what they say to be true?

totcoms says...
5:03pm Sat 14 Jul 12

try getting shut of the dead wood from the council that are still wasting money year after year. yes it still goes on by old school council workers and also the capita super staff. let hope the coucil pay these people out.

l m h jones says...
6:41pm Sat 14 Jul 12

so which tory voter on this site is up for "big society" and cutting grass instead of whinging about it?

merlinrabbit says...
6:58pm Sat 14 Jul 12

They made compulsory redundancies last year. My son was one of them. Bad employer.

Michael@ClitheroeSince58 says...
9:22pm Sat 14 Jul 12

l m h jones wrote:
so which tory voter on this site is up for "big society" and cutting grass instead of whinging about it?
I think you will find that even Tory Voters are sick to the back teeth with the garbage management we have these days. cull all the 50k+ brigade bring the power back to the people.

english rose 1 says...
2:18am Sun 15 Jul 12

Jack Herer wrote:
jack daniels wrote:
Cue unwelcome comments from selfish people who know no better, about people about to have their world turned upside down
No it's a crying shame.

It's why Labour are a total and utter disgrace. Giving people dreams, but it was based on debt so stupid that it makes a credit card addict look sensible, and so these jobs were completely unsustainable.

It's a tragedy which never needed to happen, but it came about from the likes of Tony Blair and Gordon Brown and Peter Mandelson, and their young acolytes of the time like Ed Miliband and Ed Balls of course. All of them shamelessly creating jobs on unsustainable debt, all to win votes.

And it's real people who pay the price, not them at all. While Ed Miliband and Ed Balls, themselves architects of this tragedy, are made the new leaders,normal people at home worry about a letter through the door which would wreck their lives.

It's rotten isn't it.
Errrrr,,,,,,,,,no Jack Herer...debt wasn't that bad under Labour........averag
e for the EU + the loans taken out (after the banking collapse) were at the lowest ever rates. Compare debt as a % under Labour and with your heroine Thatcher.
*
Ironic isn't it that Cameron & Osborne are pleading with the banks to lend business money...yet lending under Labour was sooo terrible !!
*
You can't have it both ways !
*
Presumably you totally disagree with folk getting mortgages ????

district01 says...
12:10pm Sun 15 Jul 12

english rose 1 wrote:
Jack Herer wrote:
jack daniels wrote:
Cue unwelcome comments from selfish people who know no better, about people about to have their world turned upside down
No it's a crying shame.

It's why Labour are a total and utter disgrace. Giving people dreams, but it was based on debt so stupid that it makes a credit card addict look sensible, and so these jobs were completely unsustainable.

It's a tragedy which never needed to happen, but it came about from the likes of Tony Blair and Gordon Brown and Peter Mandelson, and their young acolytes of the time like Ed Miliband and Ed Balls of course. All of them shamelessly creating jobs on unsustainable debt, all to win votes.

And it's real people who pay the price, not them at all. While Ed Miliband and Ed Balls, themselves architects of this tragedy, are made the new leaders,normal people at home worry about a letter through the door which would wreck their lives.

It's rotten isn't it.
Errrrr,,,,,,,,,no Jack Herer...debt wasn't that bad under Labour........averag

e for the EU + the loans taken out (after the banking collapse) were at the lowest ever rates. Compare debt as a % under Labour and with your heroine Thatcher.
*
Ironic isn't it that Cameron & Osborne are pleading with the banks to lend business money...yet lending under Labour was sooo terrible !!
*
You can't have it both ways !
*
Presumably you totally disagree with folk getting mortgages ????
Political banner bearer - Bless . . .

A Darener says...
12:29pm Sun 15 Jul 12

There is nothing wrong with taking out a loan. The problem is having the ability to repay it. I was always lucky in that the loans I had I was always able to repay. Although my parents brought me up to believe neither lender nor borrower be. I realise that it is not always possible not to take out a loan. But never borrow more than you can comfortably repay. Unfortunately the Labour government thought differently. Their philosophy was....the next generation can repay all our borrowings. Well that generation is all of us now! The present Government has to do what ALL Tory governments have had to do, get us out of a mess created by a previous Labour Government.

skydiver1975 says...
2:31pm Tue 17 Jul 12

all i can say is there wouldnt need to be redundencies if the council didnt pay over inflated wages, i seen a part time cleaners job 20 hours a week with an annual salary of £13,500 now come on theres people doing a fukll days work and not coming out with that so what makes them so special??

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree