News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Five-year equal pay dispute is set to end

A FIVE-year equal pay wrangle, which has cost more than half a million pounds in legal bills, is set to end.

Bury Council and the biggest town hall union, Unison, have reached an historic agreement, covering 943 claims from current and former council employees.

The women, who undertook jobs such as cleaning and cooking, were paid less than their male colleagues for doing work of equivalent value.

The council payout runs into millions of pounds, but no total figure has been disclosed.

Hailing the agreement, Unison branch secretary Steve Morton said: “Nearly 1,000 low paid women council workers are now a big step closer to the pay justice they deserve. It is the year 2012, more than 40 years after the Equal Pay Act, and women should have the right to expect fairness.”

Council leader, Cllr Mike Connolly said: “ I hope that these settlement offers will be accepted and that we can now move on and work together, as we always have, for the good of Bury and its people.”

The agreement finally draws a line under the prolonged equal pay saga which has cost Bury Council around £662,000 in legal costs. Bury was the first local authority targeted by Unison with mass litigation for equal pay in 2007.

In February last year, an Employment Appeals Tribunal upheld a 2009 decision that hundreds of mainly low-paid women employees were entitled to compensation for all the years they were paid less than male council workers doing comparable jobs. Bury Council had claimed the men were paid more because of a genuine material factor, rather than because of the workers’ sex.

But weeks after the Appeals Tribunal ruling, women had their hopes of an imminent pay-out dashed when the council announced it was lodging another appeal against the decision.

Cllr Connolly added: “A joint application with Unison will be made to the Court of Appeal to defer the appeal hearing scheduled for March, thus saving further legal costs.”

Commenting on the settlement, he added: “We have worked with the trade unions to reach an agreement that is fair to current and former employees and also good value for the Bury taxpayer, whose money we have a duty to safeguard.

“At this moment, I cannot disclose the amounts of money involved. There are still outstanding claims to be progressed with other claimants who are either not represented or represented by firms other than solicitors who represent the Unison claimants.”

The council has already settled 672 claims and a further 138, not represented by Unison, are still outstanding.

Unison regional manager Steve Stott said: “We are pleased that the council has at last accepted its responsibility to treat its women workers fairly. Most of the women’s claims were first lodged in 2007 and for nearly five years the council has been wasting precious public money trying to defend the indefensible.”

Comments(6)

Babbar Divino says...
2:16am Fri 10 Feb 12

“We are pleased that the council has at last accepted its responsibility to treat its women workers fairly. Most of the women’s claims were first lodged in 2007 and for nearly five years the council has been wasting precious public money trying to defend the indefensible.”

Exactly. As was said months ago the council should seriously look at the quality of legal advise it is getting.

Room4More says...
1:18pm Sat 11 Feb 12

There needs to be sufficient transparency to show that the tax payer will not be left with the bill caused due to a few sexist pig councillors and lawyers. If two people are doing the same job then they get the same pay regardless of sex, colour, height, postcode etc. It is not a legal issue, it is a simple moral issue and Bury council should be ashamed. I will not pay the legal fees.

R'Marcus says...
3:48pm Sat 11 Feb 12

And the winners are....the solicitors and the like.
The Bury people have lost millions. Bury council does simple NOT care.
Yet again, the council officers are useless. But there again, it is not their money.
The legal costs of this action should be borne by the council officers.

Unsworth Tax Payer says...
9:55pm Sat 11 Feb 12

The present Labour administration at Bury Town Hall are to be congratulated for doing the right thing morally and legally !

Babbar Divino says...
10:56pm Sat 11 Feb 12

Unsworth Tax Payer wrote:
The present Labour administration at Bury Town Hall are to be congratulated for doing the right thing morally and legally !
No doubt you'll next be accusing the Conservatives of irregularities in regards to Planning permission next :)

ladymanchester54 says...
7:50pm Mon 13 Feb 12

R'Marcus wrote:
And the winners are....the solicitors and the like.
The Bury people have lost millions. Bury council does simple NOT care.
Yet again, the council officers are useless. But there again, it is not their money.
The legal costs of this action should be borne by the council officers.
I totally agree and it should be down to conversitive council members as they were the ones who blocked it!!! and it none other than councillor bibby who made the biggest fuss!!! ironic isn't it!!!! poetic justice comes to mind?

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree