News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Burnley urgent care centre to be upgraded

SERVICES RETURN: Burnley’s old A&E is being upgraded SERVICES RETURN: Burnley’s old A&E is being upgraded

BURNLEY Urgent Care Centre is to be upgraded to treat more emergency patients following an independent review – but the most serious cases will still go to Blackburn.

The review found that closing Burnley General Hospital’s A&E department in November 2007 and moving emergency services to Blackburn was justified.

But it said that the Urgent Care Centre (UCC) set up to deal with less serious cases was under used and not taking enough ambulance cases.

Campaigners hailed the findings as a ‘victory for common sense’ and called for the centre to be renamed as an A&E department.

The review was led by Professor Matthew Cooke, the national director for emergency and urgent care, and Dr Irving Cobden, medical director at Cumbria Primary Care Trust.

It suggested the name could be changed because other A&E departments provide similar or less services than Burnley.

The pair interviewed patient representatives, councillors, MPs, staff, managers and union members across the hospital trust, primary care trusts and ambulance service and studied performance data as part of the review.

The report said there was no evidence that the present system was unsafe and in fact some areas were more clinically effective.

But it added: “It was apparent that the Burnley UCC has the potential to see many cases that are currently going to Blackburn and other more specialised units.

“We were concerned that some people may not have recognised the full potential of the Burnley UCC to provide a local service for dealing with a variety of emergencies not requiring more specialised care.”

It said there was inconsistency in the services available at the centre, which could reduce safety and lead to poor levels of care, and that the centre was only staffed by junior doctors out of office hours.

And the pair discovered that there were very few cases, only five or six a day, taken to the centre by ambulance, despite plans put in place to allow more cases.

The report said: “There is a system of telephoning the duty A&E consultant for discussion regarding appropriate location but we understand this is rarely used.

“On occasions the crews were vigorously challenged on why they had come to Burnley, this tended to mean crews choose Blackburn where all cases are accepted.”

Their review made 23 recommendations, which East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust and the strategic health authority NHS North West have accepted.

Jane Cummings, director of performance, quality and nursing at NHS North West, said an action plan would now be drawn up over the coming weeks to detail how the recommendations would be implemented.

She said Burnley would not become a full A&E as before, but some minor trauma and orthopaedic work could be treated in Burnley, along with some elderly patients and some ambulance patients.

Burnley MP Gordon Birtwistle said the review was a “major coup” but that he would continue to fight for a full A&E in Burnley.

He said: “Two years’ hard graft by myself and Lib Dem colleagues, a 27,000 name petition plus pressure put on the trust via the council and now in parliament has paid off. I think it’s a victory for the people of Burnley.

“The trust never accepted there was a problem at all, but now they have and they will have to act.”

Former hospitals trust chairman Ian Woolley, who contributed to the review alongside ex-Burnley MP Peter Pike, described the report as a “victory for common sense”.

He said its recommendations were “the best we could have hoped for” as “high tech facilities cannot be afforded at both ends of the patch”.

Former Pendle MP Gordon Prentice, who asked Gordon Brown for the review, said: "We're better off now than we were before but the ball is very firmly in the court of the secretary of state Andrew Lansley and the two new MPs for Burnley and Pendle.”

East Lancashire Hospitals released a joint statement with the primary care trust NHS East Lancashire.

A spokesman said: “We fully accept their recommendations and will work enthusiastically to implement them.”

North West Ambulance Service deputy chief executive, Bob Williams, said it would look at the recommendations and work closely with NHS East Lancashire and East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust to progress.

Recommendations

Among the 23 recommendations the report made were:

l Publicity campaigns and creating a directory of services so the public and staff know what services are on offer at the Urgent Care Centre.

l Establishing a formal emergency care network of clinicians and managers to oversee developments.

l Reviewing acute provision for the elderly and considering establishing a community-run assessment service linked to an intermediate care unit.

l That the ambulance service and hospital trust develop systems to increase the number of cases taken to Burnley.

l 24-hour primary care provision at Burnley is fully integrated with the Urgent Care Centre.

l Patients needing an orthopaedic opinion on fractures are given X-Rays at Burnley rather than being sent to Blackburn.

l That consultant cover is always available at the centre when needed and overnight staffing is reviewed.

l That the plans for a children’s assessment unit during the daytime at Burnley but overnight children’s wards in Blackburn are publicly clarified as soon as possible.

l That quicker mental health support is provided.

Full report

Click on the link below to read the full 12-page report (PDF format).

Review of Burnley Urgent Care Centre 2010.pdf

Comments(8)

DaveBurnley says...
9:50am Thu 8 Jul 10

They can't rename it A&E because that would be admitting that they were wrong in the first place.
Hopefully this will ease the pressure on Blackburn and make it easier for people in this area to get emergency treatment fast.

wackyracer says...
10:39am Thu 8 Jul 10

i think that the main reason ambulance crew will not go to Burnly would be because if they got it wron they would be hung out to dry by their management. It's good news all the same and a step down by the idiotic management of the hospitals. If only all that money was not wasted on the PFI......

Inter-Rossiter says...
11:48am Thu 8 Jul 10

Sounds like the LibDems are trying to use a bit of Orwellian doublespeak here.

.

The urgent care centre is NOT an A&E Dept and renaming it as such is trying to take us all for utter fools.

At the end of the day this is nothing more than a Pyrrhic victory for the people of Burnley & Pendle.

Pennine Lad says...
12:56pm Thu 8 Jul 10

These recommendations may well be "a victory for common sense", but only because they mainly re-confirm what should have been happening since A&E in Burnley was transferred to Blackburn (along with Intensive Care and many other services).

This is far from the "major coup" that Gordon Birtwistle claims. In fact, it's a major failure of the LibDem campaign, particularly bearing in mind that their friends in the Coalition Government are in a position to do something about it.

A full A&E unit will never return to Burnley General Hospital, which will continue its sad decline of recent years.

Anthony A Cooper says...
2:02pm Thu 8 Jul 10

It makes eminent sense for major medical services to be centralised. Unfortunately the Blackburn Royal Hospital is not at the centre of the area it serves, i.e. Pendle, Burnley, Rossendale, Blackburn with Darwen and Ribble Valley. I understand that there was a proposal to build the new hospital near to the junction of the M65 and A56 where it could have been reached quickly from all the areas mentioned. Did I hear a whisper that a certain cabinet minister (at the time) insisted that it be built in his constituency?

sonsdad says...
5:31pm Thu 8 Jul 10

The problem with this constant campaigning by Birtwistle and others is that they don't know what they are talking about. There is a suggestion that very little happens at Burnley since A&E closed. The reality is that the Burnley site is very busy with theatres working to capacity. Burnley could be near to becoming a Centre of Excellence due to the excellent work carried out by consultant led teams and nursing staff staff. Burnley employs for instance three consultants who concentrate on foot surgery, the site is capable of completing ten joint replacements each day. Burnley consultants are undertaking radical breast reconstruction surgery. The orthopeadic surgeons undertake complex athroscopic surgery and hand surgery previously not done on the Burnley site
The only way should be allowed back on the Burnley site is if it ran alongside the present service, The cost of this would be enormous and would never be accepted.
The politicians would be far better employed ensuring that both site are given the resources to carry out their work in an effective manner

Burnley girl says...
6:09pm Thu 8 Jul 10

The report of the review into A & E provision at Burnley General is quite clear there will be no return of A & E to Burnley nor will it be renamed to pretend that it has returned. Professor Cooke says "We believe that the centralisation of some services to Blackburn was appropriate and has improved the quality of care for many patients." (i.e.the change was a good thing)
The report does have a number of recommendations for improvement mainly centring around communication. There is a strong recommendation that the general public and the NHS staff are made fully aware of the facts so that they know which conditions can be treated at Burnley and which necessitate a trip to Blackburn.

But let's be quite clear this is not a return of A & E but a mere tidying up of the arrangements that were made as a result of the changes in 2007. The Lib Dems will no doubt say different but then it wouldn't be the first time they have conned local people.

sonsdad says...
6:20pm Thu 8 Jul 10

In my penultimate paragraph I should have said 'the only way A&E should be allowed back to Burnley is if it ran alongside the present service.'

In the opening paragraph I repeated 'staff'

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree