News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Police criticised over North West terror raids


MUSLIMS in Clitheroe say questions remain unanswered after a report into anti-terror raids in the town was published.

Farooq Hussain, a co-ordinator at Clitheroe’s Masjid Mosque, reacted to today’s report by Lord Carlile, which was critical of Greater Manchester Police’s lack of consultation with prosecutors ahead of the April operation.

GMP made 12 arrests across the northwest on April 8 this year under the Terrorism Act, including two security guards working at Clitheroe Homebase store, who are Pakistani nationals.

However, no criminal charges resulted from the operation and Lord Carlile, the government’s independent reviewer of terror legislation, said police should have discussed their plans with prosecutors earlier.

Mr Hussain said: “Had there been any convictions, or even charges, the operation would have been far more palatable.

“They have been deported, so there are obviously concerns about the presence of these individuals, so why were charges not made? There are lots of questions not answered.

“As someone who lives in the town, it is reassuring the police acted swiftly.

"But equally, how serious a threat was it?” And he raised concerns about community relations.

The two guards had been staying at the Brooklyn Guest House, Pimlico Road, Clitheroe.

The men were suspected of having links to al Qaida amid claims of an Easter bomb plot.

In the report, Lord Carlile said it was possible fewer men would have been arrested if discussions had taken place earlier.

He said: “It was unwise of the police in this case not to actively seek legal advice from the CPS during the process of planning the arrests.”

Lord Carlile said while the arrests ‘lacked visual subtlety’, the GMP were ‘probably right’ to take no chances.

GMP Assistant Chief Constable Dave Thompson said the report supported its ‘compelling case’ for the arrests, adding that the investigation was still live.

Comments(20)

RK says...
1:45pm Tue 24 Nov 09

The thing that concerns me about this case was that the photographer didn't take his photos direct to the police when he knew what they were. But, for the sake of arguments, the police did not do what they did at the time that they did it and some terrorist activity had occured a lot of people would have been calling for their heads.
I think that if the raids had been against eastern europeans instead of Asians then there wouldn't have been this much bother. And as for the CPS, well they're a complete waste of time.

etrib says...
1:51pm Tue 24 Nov 09

RK wrote:
The thing that concerns me about this case was that the photographer didn't take his photos direct to the police when he knew what they were. But, for the sake of arguments, the police did not do what they did at the time that they did it and some terrorist activity had occured a lot of people would have been calling for their heads. I think that if the raids had been against eastern europeans instead of Asians then there wouldn't have been this much bother. And as for the CPS, well they're a complete waste of time.
Would you care to qualify your final sentence?

RK says...
2:01pm Tue 24 Nov 09

Yes, the police have to go to the CPS regarding going ahead with convictions, am I right on this or not? It is up to the CPS whether police can take a criminal to court. Although this particular case is different, I believe as do many of my associates that the CPS don't do a particularly good job. Now this may be wrong but it is only my opinion which will probably differ from yours.

Jimmy Paterson says...
2:36pm Tue 24 Nov 09

If the overpaid waste of time in London hadn't blown the operation then it wouldn't have been rushed.
At least some of the illegals were deported so some good did come of it.

akon says...
2:41pm Tue 24 Nov 09

To the police,

Keep up the good work !! (whilst being dictated to by your limp-wristed ,politically motivated, bosses)
Your job is hard enough without the politic's!!



justicejoan says...
3:20pm Tue 24 Nov 09

The police have to be held to account on any action they take.
I remember many people questioning at the time the "quality" of the intelligence as many raids had been conducted with very few charges being brought.
AS for the police they have my admiration. However in view of the many undesirable individuals posting on here one has to ask whether the police are monitoring those who espouse racial and religious hatred with respect to the Discrimination Act 2007 and whether charges need to be brought against them.
Time to put these people up before the judges and magistrates.

akon says...
3:42pm Tue 24 Nov 09

justicejoan, nelson

Do you mean Liebour's "thought police" ?
Also are you going to report yourself for your anti-british ,anti-white comment's?

justicejoan says...
4:02pm Tue 24 Nov 09

We are not politically controlled. WE are all independent and proud to be so.
As for your last comment it is a clear indication of your hidden agenda against minorities. You really need to find something productive to exert your energies on as this tirade will eventually lead you to come before us on the bench.

Press Photographer says...
5:17pm Tue 24 Nov 09

I am at a loss as to why you think that the photographer should have gone to the Police with the pictures he / she had taken..
The photographer captured a photo that turned out to be very ,very news worthy and no doubt made said photographer a wage for the day,(no wages in going to the Police)

As a result ministers now arriving for meeting,have been told to avoid photograpers..easier to carry top secret documents in a carry case,i say.....

ExForces says...
5:44pm Tue 24 Nov 09

I fully support the police on these matters.
Its very easy to judge when somebody gets something ''wrong'' but I'm glad they acted in the swift manner they did.
Britain needs to be shown as not being the 'soft touch' people think it is.
Unfortunately we have alot of armchair critics that love to slate people trying to make a difference.

RK says...
5:44pm Tue 24 Nov 09

Never mind that people's lives may be at risk, take the money! Pathetic.

Akki says...
6:05pm Tue 24 Nov 09

With the advent of TV reality shows, more and more Police Forces are carrying out unneccassary raids on people's homes in the name of 'terrorism' to get their 5 minutes of fame on Skynews before releasing the innocent people without charge.
It would be all good and well if they targetted real criminals like young louts who create the real terror by causing anti-social behaviour.
Familiar story up and down the Country.
Good to see the follow up article from LET.

Press Photographer says...
6:04am Wed 25 Nov 09

RK wrote:
Never mind that people's lives may be at risk, take the money! Pathetic.

What about the lives of inocent people that are lost/put at risk,through acts of terrorism,

I can't recall the last time a press photographer armed with a camera blew a bus, a tube train,ohh and two tall buildings in the U.S into so many bits...

"Take the money!" its called a wage,bringing home the bacon,bread on the table,providing for a family,and you tag this as PATHETIC...

RK says...
7:50am Wed 25 Nov 09

Yes, actually I do. Answer me this, what if somebody had died because of that idiot? And before you answer I class the person who had the documents for all to see as criminally stupid too. I honestly can't see your point, in the first sentence you go on about people being killed by terrorists and then you ramble on about it being a job to feed people's mouths. If you really want to do some decent photography why don't you go to one of the war zones or are you one of those pathetic creeps who follows 'celebs' around?

akon says...
8:01am Wed 25 Nov 09

Lancs lass
Go & read your "english" version of the koran.
It's not bullying silly girl ,it's simply replying to scum & quisling's like yourself.

akon says...
8:08am Wed 25 Nov 09

Lancs lass
Go & read your "english" version of the koran.
It's not bullying silly girl ,it's quite simply replying to scum & quisling's like yourself.

Press Photographer says...
2:43pm Wed 25 Nov 09

RK wrote:
Yes, actually I do. Answer me this, what if somebody had died because of that idiot? And before you answer I class the person who had the documents for all to see as criminally stupid too. I honestly can't see your point, in the first sentence you go on about people being killed by terrorists and then you ramble on about it being a job to feed people's mouths. If you really want to do some decent photography why don't you go to one of the war zones or are you one of those pathetic creeps who follows 'celebs' around?
I have been known to chase the rich and famous around,and before you tag,this sentance,i'll point out most of that work was within the North West,and most of the celebs i got to know,they would call me and let me know where they were and with whom..cos they wanted to keep their profile alive in the papers . so i worked with them... unlike the London Paps...who are animals

I have done war photography,and that is pure Reportage,and i loved it,not to impressed by the carnage i witnessed,but that was the nature of the work. at that time..(being around for my family stops me from trotting off to anymore war zones)

Hey,RK tell me when you see a story in your chosen paper about a celeb,upto no good,images splashed over the page,along with a juicy story,do you turn the page and refuse to read it ,,then write to the editor,telling him what a creep he and his staff are.. ..i guess not

RK says...
3:07pm Wed 25 Nov 09

No, I don't read boring rubbish like that. If that's what you do and like it then fair enough but answer me this question - if you had taken that photo and you knew that it involved national security and that somebody MAY have got hurt because of it would you have sold it to the papers or gone to the police? Remember that this is just my opinion which counts the same as yours and if we differ (obviously do) then fair enough. Where did you do your war reporting as a matter of interest?

Press Photographer says...
5:40pm Wed 25 Nov 09


Different points of view makes for an intresting world,if we all sang from the same music sheet boy it would be a boring world..the art is to listen to differing views....

Before i answer your question,id like to point out,--most press photographers,Editor
s and reporters are members of unions,(like the N.U.J to mention one) and their are guide lines for members to follow, ,and in short most do follow....

As an on the ground photographer it's my job to capture the news,how ever it unfolds before me..i click away,as a work freelance ,i send then images to a news agency,and they forward on my behalf to the paper(s) picture editor,...it's the pic editors decision weather to put a picture into print,taking into account all the pros and cons of doing so..it's not the photographers decision..sounds like a cop out thats how it works...had i been the photographer,i would have forwarded out the image...

Number 10 would have been informed /tipped about the image that was going to be in print the next day..give them time to prepare a statement,,,you scratch my back.

if i had an image and i knew 100%
that as a result of publication it would lead to the death of a person,the image would be embargoed...

I can not say as to which war area i was in..due to the red tape still..but i did take away many memories,some fond,and not so fond,,i saw things most people wouldn't see in a life time,and i wouldn't want them to see in a life time....other things ,opened my eyes into what another human being would do for another...

RK says...
6:19pm Wed 25 Nov 09

Thanks for that, see you.


RAID: Police at the store on Wednesday RAID: Police at the Homebase store in Clitheroe

Most popular


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses