Future of historic Burnley hall to be discussed

This Is Lancashire: Future of historic Burnley hall to be discussed Future of historic Burnley hall to be discussed

COUNCIL chiefs in Burnley have pledged to disuss the future of the run-down Extwistle Hall with the site’s new owners.

Concerns have been raised about the disused 16th century gentry hall for almost 40 years, but several proposed developments have failed to materialise.

The council’s new deputy leader, Coun John Harbour, said he would approach the hall’s recent buyers, but ruled out any chance of the authority investing in the site.

Resident John Rowe, who spoke on the matter at the council’s annual meeting, said: “What I’d like to know is how this state of affairs came about?

“In 1975, it was habitable. It wouldn’t have taken a great fortune to bring it under repair. It is not like Towneley Hall or Gawthorpe Hall - it is unique in itself.

“This is a scandalous state of affairs. What is being done to prevent it happening to other buildings of similar historical value?”

Coun Harbour said the ownership of the hall had changed ‘recently’ but it is not known if it is still in the hands of the Isle of Man-based company Extwistle Properties Ltd.

He said: “The current position is that the council will enter discussions with the new owners of the hall to stop future deterioration.

“It is likely that the discussions will take some time to conclude. It’s something that has gone on for 30 years now.

“As with other heritage properties, the council does not have the resources to intervene. To do so would place the council’s finances at risk.”

The hall, off Todmorden Road in Roggerham, on the outskirts of Briercliffe, was built in 1585 by the Parker family.

The site, near Lee Green reservoir, was previously home to a monastry, but has been unoccupied since the 1970s.

Coun Roger Frost, a Burnley historian, said: “I’m pleased to hear what Coun Harbour has said. For 30 years or more it’s been a problem.

“The main reason nothing has happened is that although there have been private owners involved and interested in development, when they had to do the sums and looked at the potential sale value, the two figures didn’t add up.”

Comments (5)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

6:01pm Sun 8 Jun 14

onsidecobra says...

It looks as though the new "owners" as usual will let the building fall into further disrepair and then demolish it to make way for profitable flats. They get away with it time after time so it will not be much of a surprise to anyone when it happens.
It looks as though the new "owners" as usual will let the building fall into further disrepair and then demolish it to make way for profitable flats. They get away with it time after time so it will not be much of a surprise to anyone when it happens. onsidecobra
  • Score: 10

8:23pm Sun 8 Jun 14

Truth will out says...

Monastery
Monastery Truth will out
  • Score: 2

7:29am Mon 9 Jun 14

DaveBurnley says...

onsidecobra wrote:
It looks as though the new "owners" as usual will let the building fall into further disrepair and then demolish it to make way for profitable flats. They get away with it time after time so it will not be much of a surprise to anyone when it happens.
I'd agree with that in part, except I can't see it becoming flats. I think it might end up being restored to something of it's former glory, but realistically, how many people would want to live there?
[quote][p][bold]onsidecobra[/bold] wrote: It looks as though the new "owners" as usual will let the building fall into further disrepair and then demolish it to make way for profitable flats. They get away with it time after time so it will not be much of a surprise to anyone when it happens.[/p][/quote]I'd agree with that in part, except I can't see it becoming flats. I think it might end up being restored to something of it's former glory, but realistically, how many people would want to live there? DaveBurnley
  • Score: 0

11:37am Mon 9 Jun 14

slants says...

does anyone give a tooss i doubt it
does anyone give a tooss i doubt it slants
  • Score: -5

5:01pm Mon 9 Jun 14

Angusam says...

The council just isn't competent at preserving its listed buildings even when they fall under the control or ownership of the Council.

Just look at Griffin Lodge in Blackburn, this was council owned, fell into disprepair as they didn't maintain it and it was burnt to the ground by arsonists as they failed to keep it safe. Just look at this link.

http://www.lancashir
etelegraph.co.uk/new
s/10948657.Blackburn
_s_historic_Griffin_
Lodge_up_in_flames_a
gain/?ref=rss
The council just isn't competent at preserving its listed buildings even when they fall under the control or ownership of the Council. Just look at Griffin Lodge in Blackburn, this was council owned, fell into disprepair as they didn't maintain it and it was burnt to the ground by arsonists as they failed to keep it safe. Just look at this link. http://www.lancashir etelegraph.co.uk/new s/10948657.Blackburn _s_historic_Griffin_ Lodge_up_in_flames_a gain/?ref=rss Angusam
  • Score: 4

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree