Council tax freeze despite £9.6 million cuts

This Is Lancashire: Bury council tax. What will you pay? Bury council tax. What will you pay?

THERE is pain as well as gain as Bury Council’s budget package for the next financial year was formally approved.

Despite having to make council cuts of £9.6 million, residents face only a fractional rise in their council tax bill, a below-inflation increase in council house rents, and investment in housing and highways.

Bury Council chiefs froze their element of the council tax, and with no rise from Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Service, only the police precept has risen, by 1.99 per cent.

As revealed in last week’s Bury Times, this means the overall council tax bill will increase by 0.2 per cent — equivalent to £2.97 per year for residents in Band D houses.

Council house rents will go up by 2.5 per cent, but is tempered by news that the local authority is to spend £34 million over three years upgrading its 8,000 homes with new heating, kitchens and bathrooms, roof repairs and environmental improvements.

Additionally, £500,000 is to be spent on a project to upgrade the A56 Bury New Road through Prestwich Village.

The renewed round of cuts will comprise £7.4 million in line with the budget agreed last year, plus a further £2.2 million of mostly internal efficiencies.

The measures were agreed at a special budget meeting of Bury Council last Wednesday.

Amendments put forward by the opposition Conservative and Lib Dem groups, each seeking a significant £2 million spend on essential road repairs, were defeated.

As part of their £3.576 million spending priorities programme, the Tories also unsuccessfully sought to create 52 new apprenticeships for young people and to reinstate free parking in all council pay and display sites in Bury.

In his budget speech, cabinet member for finance and corporate affairs, Cllr John Smith, told the meeting: “Once again we have seen vital grants such as the Early Intervention Grant slashed and once again we have been given a worse-than-average funding settlement with our funding allocation being cut by 9.9 per cent in 2014-15.

“This means that since the coalition came to power, we have lost £37 million a year of Government funding, which equates to a whopping £462 a year for every household in the borough.

“We already know that Bury’s Government support will be slashed once again in 2015-16, this time by an unbelievable 14.1 per cent, a percentage that is once again higher than the average. This leaves us facing budget cuts of £15.8 million in 2015-16, on top of the cuts that we have already been forced to make.

“We have continued to reduce our senior management structure, we have continued to make savings in the way that we procure goods and services and, with regret and reluctance, we have continued to restructure services and reduce overall staffing levels.”

Council leader Cllr Mike Connolly said: “Once again, we have before us a budget that demonstrates this Labour administration’s commitment to widespread consultation and it is a budget that continues our commitment to protect frontline services and services for the vulnerable.

“I am particularly pleased that we have found money to fund improvements to the A56 corridor in Prestwich, giving lie to the nonsense being touted around that Prestwich is being ignored.”

Conservative group leader Cllr Iain Gartside said: “We have consistently said council tax should be frozen. We welcome the decision. This is the right decision to make.”

Lib Dem leader Cllr Tim Pickstone added that the decision not to increase the local authority element of the council tax was possible thanks to a £772,000 grant from the coalition Government — equivalent to a 1.2 per cent increase in council tax for 2014-2015.

He said: “It is only a shame that Bury's Labour council didn’t take this free money last year.”

Comments (9)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

9:17am Fri 28 Feb 14

sense2 says...

The whole issue of how much council tax people pay needs seriously looking at. Considering how little a single person uses compared to a family or even a couple to only get a 25% discount is not fair. A single person should pay no more than 50% of the charge at the most.
The whole issue of how much council tax people pay needs seriously looking at. Considering how little a single person uses compared to a family or even a couple to only get a 25% discount is not fair. A single person should pay no more than 50% of the charge at the most. sense2
  • Score: 1

11:12am Fri 28 Feb 14

shakencity says...

sense2 wrote:
The whole issue of how much council tax people pay needs seriously looking at. Considering how little a single person uses compared to a family or even a couple to only get a 25% discount is not fair. A single person should pay no more than 50% of the charge at the most.
Really....and what exactly does a single person use any less than a family to constitute such a discount?

Do they not use the swimming baths, parks, carparks, roads, pavements, libraries and other public facilities, just like families and couples do?
[quote][p][bold]sense2[/bold] wrote: The whole issue of how much council tax people pay needs seriously looking at. Considering how little a single person uses compared to a family or even a couple to only get a 25% discount is not fair. A single person should pay no more than 50% of the charge at the most.[/p][/quote]Really....and what exactly does a single person use any less than a family to constitute such a discount? Do they not use the swimming baths, parks, carparks, roads, pavements, libraries and other public facilities, just like families and couples do? shakencity
  • Score: 1

7:58pm Fri 28 Feb 14

Babbar Divino says...

shakencity wrote:
sense2 wrote:
The whole issue of how much council tax people pay needs seriously looking at. Considering how little a single person uses compared to a family or even a couple to only get a 25% discount is not fair. A single person should pay no more than 50% of the charge at the most.
Really....and what exactly does a single person use any less than a family to constitute such a discount?

Do they not use the swimming baths, parks, carparks, roads, pavements, libraries and other public facilities, just like families and couples do?
They use 1/4 of an average family of 4. Less use less cost. Do we need explain in more detail?
[quote][p][bold]shakencity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]sense2[/bold] wrote: The whole issue of how much council tax people pay needs seriously looking at. Considering how little a single person uses compared to a family or even a couple to only get a 25% discount is not fair. A single person should pay no more than 50% of the charge at the most.[/p][/quote]Really....and what exactly does a single person use any less than a family to constitute such a discount? Do they not use the swimming baths, parks, carparks, roads, pavements, libraries and other public facilities, just like families and couples do?[/p][/quote]They use 1/4 of an average family of 4. Less use less cost. Do we need explain in more detail? Babbar Divino
  • Score: 3

7:58pm Fri 28 Feb 14

Babbar Divino says...

shakencity wrote:
sense2 wrote:
The whole issue of how much council tax people pay needs seriously looking at. Considering how little a single person uses compared to a family or even a couple to only get a 25% discount is not fair. A single person should pay no more than 50% of the charge at the most.
Really....and what exactly does a single person use any less than a family to constitute such a discount?

Do they not use the swimming baths, parks, carparks, roads, pavements, libraries and other public facilities, just like families and couples do?
They use 1/4 of an average family of 4. Less use less cost. Do we need explain in more detail?
[quote][p][bold]shakencity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]sense2[/bold] wrote: The whole issue of how much council tax people pay needs seriously looking at. Considering how little a single person uses compared to a family or even a couple to only get a 25% discount is not fair. A single person should pay no more than 50% of the charge at the most.[/p][/quote]Really....and what exactly does a single person use any less than a family to constitute such a discount? Do they not use the swimming baths, parks, carparks, roads, pavements, libraries and other public facilities, just like families and couples do?[/p][/quote]They use 1/4 of an average family of 4. Less use less cost. Do we need explain in more detail? Babbar Divino
  • Score: 0

7:54am Mon 3 Mar 14

shakencity says...

No need to post twice, but yes please....i'd love to know what they use 1/4 of that you think costs less and entiltles them to a discount.
No need to post twice, but yes please....i'd love to know what they use 1/4 of that you think costs less and entiltles them to a discount. shakencity
  • Score: 0

9:52am Mon 3 Mar 14

sense2 says...

Shakencity obviously not very bright. One person cannot use the same amount of services as a family so that is why the charge paid by them should be much less. Perhaps we need to go to a system based on use when couples and families will quite rightly pay a much higher rate.
Shakencity obviously not very bright. One person cannot use the same amount of services as a family so that is why the charge paid by them should be much less. Perhaps we need to go to a system based on use when couples and families will quite rightly pay a much higher rate. sense2
  • Score: 1

10:36am Mon 3 Mar 14

bevjoy1979 says...

Is that not going back to poll tax if we are charged per person? Should we pay the same rate for children?
Is that not going back to poll tax if we are charged per person? Should we pay the same rate for children? bevjoy1979
  • Score: 0

10:42am Mon 3 Mar 14

shakencity says...

So, what you're saying is that less Utility services are used when only one person (as opposed to 4) go to used public services......really
?

I wouldn't say i'm Einstien or something sense2, but i'm certainly not stupid....i really don't get what would cost less "to the Council" by one person using their services as opposed to 4.
**Please explain in more detail, as promised**

Sense2,
"One person cannot use the same amount of services as a family so that is why the charge paid by them should be much less".

Absolute rubbish.

It is all done on house "Bands" anyway. If a single person chooses to live in the same kind of house as a family of 4, then they should pay the same....end of, as that's their choice. They get discounted Council tax, but they still use ALL the same other Council services. As far as i know all admittance to public places, eg swimming baths/leisure centers, etc, etc are charged individually.
So, what you're saying is that less Utility services are used when only one person (as opposed to 4) go to used public services......really ? I wouldn't say i'm Einstien or something sense2, but i'm certainly not stupid....i really don't get what would cost less "to the Council" by one person using their services as opposed to 4. **Please explain in more detail, as promised** Sense2, "One person cannot use the same amount of services as a family so that is why the charge paid by them should be much less". Absolute rubbish. It is all done on house "Bands" anyway. If a single person chooses to live in the same kind of house as a family of 4, then they should pay the same....end of, as that's their choice. They get discounted Council tax, but they still use ALL the same other Council services. As far as i know all admittance to public places, eg swimming baths/leisure centers, etc, etc are charged individually. shakencity
  • Score: -1

6:51pm Mon 3 Mar 14

Babbar Divino says...

shakencity. Whilst admittedly a service for example waste collection, has to be there and is a fixed cost, there are such things as variable costs. In this example the variable is the cost of disposing of the waste. A single person will probably produce 1/4 of the waste of the average family of 4 therefore the cost to dispose of the waste is less.
shakencity. Whilst admittedly a service for example waste collection, has to be there and is a fixed cost, there are such things as variable costs. In this example the variable is the cost of disposing of the waste. A single person will probably produce 1/4 of the waste of the average family of 4 therefore the cost to dispose of the waste is less. Babbar Divino
  • Score: 1

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree