Blackburn couple in plane blaze terror

This Is Lancashire: Etihad Airway jet Etihad Airway jet

A COUPLE have told of their terror after their plane home from Australia was nearly brought down by a passenger repeatedly lighting fires in the toilets.

Paul and Gillian Mason said their Etihad Airway jet was forced to make an emergency landing in Indonesia, where crew members attempted to find the culprit.

After a security search of passengers, the Boeing 777-300ER was allowed to take off again, but more fires broke out.

The couple said a member of the air crew said the whole plane would have gone up in flames if the fire had been spotted 90 seconds later.

The airline has been criticised for letting the flight continue.

The couple from Crosshill Road, Blackburn, who had just finished a month-long visit to Tasmania, said the overnight journey was the ‘scariest thing that’s ever happened to us’.

Mr Mason is a former chairman of Thwaites Empire Theatre in Blackburn and his wife was a teacher at Pendle Community High School in Colne for 25 years.

 

OTHER TOP STORIES

Police still searching for missing Burnley woman

Faeces found on wall at failing East Lancashire care home

Blackburn bomb fanatic kept two cannons

Bowyer praises defensive pair as Rhodes left out of Scotland squad

 

He said: “It’s hard to come to terms with the fact we were literally seconds from plunging into the ocean.

“It was extremely frightening and we just feel very grateful to be here.

“It’s the most scary thing that’s ever happened to us and easily the worst journey of our lives.”

Mrs Mason said: “The first thing that happened was a slightly worrying announcement from the captain reminding people they couldn’t smoke in the toilet.

“Then a while later I was aware of the smell of smoke, and all the cabin crew were running down to the toilet behind us. It didn’t smell like cigarettes and the fire alarm was going off.

“A couple behind us said they saw flames and suddenly one of the crew was using fire extinguishers to put it out.

“One of the crew said later that the whole plane would have gone up if the fire had been left another 90 seconds without being noticed.

“The pilot then said there had been a serious breach of security and we’d have to land in Jakarta.”

“It’s hard to come to terms with the fact we were literally seconds from plunging into the ocean. It was extremely frightening and we just feel very grateful to be here.”

Mrs Mason, 60, said everyone in economy class was then forced to exit the plane after landing, along with their luggage, before being searched in the airport.

Nothing was found and the passengers were allowed back on board.

She said: “We were all making the point that the person who was lighting the fires would still be on the plane. They let everyone back on and everyone in business and first class had stayed on.

“I definitely didn’t want to get back on because we knew there was likely to be another problem, but apparently we had to because the Indonesian authorities wouldn’t let us stay in Jakarta.”

The flight then took off again with crew members monitoring the toilets, and there were no problems for about five hours.

But Mrs Mason said: “Everyone was really hungry, as we hadn’t eaten anything for hours and hours, and then there was another fire when the crew started serving food.

This time there was nowhere to land so they just had to put it out and carry on.”

Passengers said there were three fires en-route from Jakarta to Abu Dhabi.

Mr Mason, 61, said: “There was just some idiot on board who had no concern for their own safety or anyone else’s.

“We didn’t think it was terrorism or anything like that, but we knew it was an extremely dangerous situation and we felt very vulnerable.”

The ordeal lasted more than 40 hours as the couple missed their connecting flight from Abu Dhabi to Manchester. It meant they arrived home at 8am yesterday, about 17 hours behind schedule.

They have praised the cabin crew for the way they handled the fires, but questioned the decision to take off from Jakarta with the arsonist still on board.

On arrival in Abu Dhabi police questioned passengers in small groups in the hope of finding the suspect.

According to reports yesterday, there had been no arrests but police were investigating a female passenger.

A spokesperson for Etihad Airways said: “A comprehensive investigation into the incidents onboard EY 461 from Melbourne to Abu Dhabi on 17 February is still underway.

“The aircraft was searched and released shortly after arrival at Abu Dhabi when it was confirmed it was safe to do so. Etihad Airways is co-operating fully in this investigation.

“This follows a precautionary diversion to Jakarta where a security assessment of the situation was conducted with local authorities after smoke was detected in two of the toilets.

“The decision was made to resume the flight after a security search of the aircraft, passengers and their carry-on luggage.

“To further ensure the safety of passengers and crew, the captain implemented strict controls over passenger movement in the cabin, particularly passenger access to the toilets. The normal service was suspended to allow cabin crew to monitor and ensure the security of the cabin.”

Comments (12)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

8:40am Thu 20 Feb 14

apple10 says...

What a horrifying experience for the couple.
What a horrifying experience for the couple. apple10
  • Score: 6

9:24am Thu 20 Feb 14

useyourhead says...

Why didn't they lock all but one and check it after each use? Might have tied up a crew member but I'm sure the passengers would rather be safe than have prompt service or a tidy plane!
Why didn't they lock all but one and check it after each use? Might have tied up a crew member but I'm sure the passengers would rather be safe than have prompt service or a tidy plane! useyourhead
  • Score: 13

11:44am Thu 20 Feb 14

Davelyn says...

Surely they have CCTV on board.
Surely they have CCTV on board. Davelyn
  • Score: 14

1:05pm Thu 20 Feb 14

woolywords says...

What with fires being started in the toilets of pubs, supermarkets, trains and now, planes, it's becoming a little bit scary out there, to near the point of parcopresis (phobia of toilets) but thankfully, everyone is safe.

Does anyone know how much, man-sized Pampers cost, in a pound shop?
What with fires being started in the toilets of pubs, supermarkets, trains and now, planes, it's becoming a little bit scary out there, to near the point of parcopresis (phobia of toilets) but thankfully, everyone is safe. Does anyone know how much, man-sized Pampers cost, in a pound shop? woolywords
  • Score: 0

1:16pm Thu 20 Feb 14

HecticBigBoy says...

woolywords wrote:
What with fires being started in the toilets of pubs, supermarkets, trains and now, planes, it's becoming a little bit scary out there, to near the point of parcopresis (phobia of toilets) but thankfully, everyone is safe. Does anyone know how much, man-sized Pampers cost, in a pound shop?
errrr a pound??
[quote][p][bold]woolywords[/bold] wrote: What with fires being started in the toilets of pubs, supermarkets, trains and now, planes, it's becoming a little bit scary out there, to near the point of parcopresis (phobia of toilets) but thankfully, everyone is safe. Does anyone know how much, man-sized Pampers cost, in a pound shop?[/p][/quote]errrr a pound?? HecticBigBoy
  • Score: 11

3:15pm Thu 20 Feb 14

Lurid67 says...

HecticBigBoy wrote:
woolywords wrote:
What with fires being started in the toilets of pubs, supermarkets, trains and now, planes, it's becoming a little bit scary out there, to near the point of parcopresis (phobia of toilets) but thankfully, everyone is safe. Does anyone know how much, man-sized Pampers cost, in a pound shop?
errrr a pound??
Not if there is a bogof deal
[quote][p][bold]HecticBigBoy[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]woolywords[/bold] wrote: What with fires being started in the toilets of pubs, supermarkets, trains and now, planes, it's becoming a little bit scary out there, to near the point of parcopresis (phobia of toilets) but thankfully, everyone is safe. Does anyone know how much, man-sized Pampers cost, in a pound shop?[/p][/quote]errrr a pound??[/p][/quote]Not if there is a bogof deal Lurid67
  • Score: 1

5:05pm Thu 20 Feb 14

Stone Island: says...

Lurid67 wrote:
HecticBigBoy wrote:
woolywords wrote:
What with fires being started in the toilets of pubs, supermarkets, trains and now, planes, it's becoming a little bit scary out there, to near the point of parcopresis (phobia of toilets) but thankfully, everyone is safe. Does anyone know how much, man-sized Pampers cost, in a pound shop?
errrr a pound??
Not if there is a bogof deal
Pun intended?
[quote][p][bold]Lurid67[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]HecticBigBoy[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]woolywords[/bold] wrote: What with fires being started in the toilets of pubs, supermarkets, trains and now, planes, it's becoming a little bit scary out there, to near the point of parcopresis (phobia of toilets) but thankfully, everyone is safe. Does anyone know how much, man-sized Pampers cost, in a pound shop?[/p][/quote]errrr a pound??[/p][/quote]Not if there is a bogof deal[/p][/quote]Pun intended? Stone Island:
  • Score: 1

5:32pm Thu 20 Feb 14

Stone Island: says...

Lurid67 wrote:
HecticBigBoy wrote:
woolywords wrote:
What with fires being started in the toilets of pubs, supermarkets, trains and now, planes, it's becoming a little bit scary out there, to near the point of parcopresis (phobia of toilets) but thankfully, everyone is safe. Does anyone know how much, man-sized Pampers cost, in a pound shop?
errrr a pound??
Not if there is a bogof deal
Pun intended?
[quote][p][bold]Lurid67[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]HecticBigBoy[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]woolywords[/bold] wrote: What with fires being started in the toilets of pubs, supermarkets, trains and now, planes, it's becoming a little bit scary out there, to near the point of parcopresis (phobia of toilets) but thankfully, everyone is safe. Does anyone know how much, man-sized Pampers cost, in a pound shop?[/p][/quote]errrr a pound??[/p][/quote]Not if there is a bogof deal[/p][/quote]Pun intended? Stone Island:
  • Score: 0

5:57pm Thu 20 Feb 14

Legal Beagle says...

"They ... questioned the decision to take off from Jakarta with the arsonist still on board. "

Well what on earth were the airline supposed to do? Make all the passengers stand on the naughty step until someone owned up?

Would he rather they had simply stayed in Jakarta?

“One of the crew said later that the whole plane would have gone up if the fire had been left another 90 seconds without being noticed."

If this is true the crew member should be sacked, as it's utter nonsense. It takes a hell of a lot more than a small fire like this to destroy a modern airliner.
"They ... questioned the decision to take off from Jakarta with the arsonist still on board. " Well what on earth were the airline supposed to do? Make all the passengers stand on the naughty step until someone owned up? Would he rather they had simply stayed in Jakarta? “One of the crew said later that the whole plane would have gone up if the fire had been left another 90 seconds without being noticed." If this is true the crew member should be sacked, as it's utter nonsense. It takes a hell of a lot more than a small fire like this to destroy a modern airliner. Legal Beagle
  • Score: 2

7:27pm Thu 20 Feb 14

adamdesk says...

apple10 wrote:
What a horrifying experience for the couple.
excuse me a horrifying experience for all on board except the fire lighters all have valuable lives
[quote][p][bold]apple10[/bold] wrote: What a horrifying experience for the couple.[/p][/quote]excuse me a horrifying experience for all on board except the fire lighters all have valuable lives adamdesk
  • Score: 5

7:34pm Thu 20 Feb 14

lcjfm03 says...

Legal Beagle wrote:
"They ... questioned the decision to take off from Jakarta with the arsonist still on board. "

Well what on earth were the airline supposed to do? Make all the passengers stand on the naughty step until someone owned up?

Would he rather they had simply stayed in Jakarta?

“One of the crew said later that the whole plane would have gone up if the fire had been left another 90 seconds without being noticed."

If this is true the crew member should be sacked, as it's utter nonsense. It takes a hell of a lot more than a small fire like this to destroy a modern airliner.
I agree a wild exaggeration. I was involved in real passenger cabin electrical fire with a full emergency landing and evacuation in Basle. The fire couldn't be accessed to extinguish. The plane flew from height to the airport and all evacuated with no injuries. Swiss fire brigade dealt with the fire on the ground.

Agree not pleasant for those involved in this story but highly unlikely it would bring down a 777.
[quote][p][bold]Legal Beagle[/bold] wrote: "They ... questioned the decision to take off from Jakarta with the arsonist still on board. " Well what on earth were the airline supposed to do? Make all the passengers stand on the naughty step until someone owned up? Would he rather they had simply stayed in Jakarta? “One of the crew said later that the whole plane would have gone up if the fire had been left another 90 seconds without being noticed." If this is true the crew member should be sacked, as it's utter nonsense. It takes a hell of a lot more than a small fire like this to destroy a modern airliner.[/p][/quote]I agree a wild exaggeration. I was involved in real passenger cabin electrical fire with a full emergency landing and evacuation in Basle. The fire couldn't be accessed to extinguish. The plane flew from height to the airport and all evacuated with no injuries. Swiss fire brigade dealt with the fire on the ground. Agree not pleasant for those involved in this story but highly unlikely it would bring down a 777. lcjfm03
  • Score: 5

7:54pm Thu 20 Feb 14

icannotrace says...

Legal Beagle wrote:
"They ... questioned the decision to take off from Jakarta with the arsonist still on board. "

Well what on earth were the airline supposed to do? Make all the passengers stand on the naughty step until someone owned up?

Would he rather they had simply stayed in Jakarta?

“One of the crew said later that the whole plane would have gone up if the fire had been left another 90 seconds without being noticed."

If this is true the crew member should be sacked, as it's utter nonsense. It takes a hell of a lot more than a small fire like this to destroy a modern airliner.
Don't believe a "crew member" said that I suspect either the LET adding it in to try and spice the story up or the Masons for the same reason
[quote][p][bold]Legal Beagle[/bold] wrote: "They ... questioned the decision to take off from Jakarta with the arsonist still on board. " Well what on earth were the airline supposed to do? Make all the passengers stand on the naughty step until someone owned up? Would he rather they had simply stayed in Jakarta? “One of the crew said later that the whole plane would have gone up if the fire had been left another 90 seconds without being noticed." If this is true the crew member should be sacked, as it's utter nonsense. It takes a hell of a lot more than a small fire like this to destroy a modern airliner.[/p][/quote]Don't believe a "crew member" said that I suspect either the LET adding it in to try and spice the story up or the Masons for the same reason icannotrace
  • Score: 3

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree