40 households in Bury have benefits capped

This Is Lancashire: Bury Town Hall Bury Town Hall

NEW figures have revealed that 40 households in Bury were among 2,292 in the North West who have had their benefits capped.

The government’s decision to cap benefits is aimed at stopping households receiving more in benefits than the average family earns. The cap is £26,000, including housing benefit.

Ministers say it is a key part of a long-term economic plan to make sure it “delivers for hardworking people and fix the broken welfare system.”

A total of 363 households in Manchester, 176 in Liverpool, and 139 in Bolton, have had their benefits capped by November last year, and those authorities are the three most affected in the region.

Latest statistics also show that in November:

  • Almost 150 households were capped by at least £350 a week
  • More than 1,000 single people without children were capped
  • The top 10 areas had capped more than 500 households each and more than 9,000 house-holds in total since April, 2013
  • In November, 2013, more than 27,000 households had their benefits capped and since April, 2013, almost 33,000 households have been capped overall.

Minister for welfare reform, Lord Freud, said: “It is not right that some families on benefits were receiving amounts of money that hardworking taxpayers could only dream of and our welfare reforms are working to fix the system.

“By exempting people who are receiving Working Tax Credit, the benefit cap is increasing incentives to move into work and we already know that about 19,000 claimants potentially affected by the benefit cap have found jobs.”

The benefit cap applies to combined income from the main out-of-work benefits, Jobseeker’s Allowance, Income Support, Employment and Support Allowance, Universal Credit and other benefits such as housing benefit, child benefit and child tax credit and carer’s allowance.

Comments (3)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

11:45am Wed 22 Jan 14

buckfeed17 says...

It's a start and i hope more households will be capped. 40 isn't much at all.
It's a start and i hope more households will be capped. 40 isn't much at all. buckfeed17
  • Score: 0

11:04am Thu 23 Jan 14

Buryite1 says...

buckfeed17 wrote:
It's a start and i hope more households will be capped. 40 isn't much at all.
Charming. What's your stance re. people who claim benefits because they're in work but are too poorly paid in order to pay their bills? Do you 'lump' everyone together?
[quote][p][bold]buckfeed17[/bold] wrote: It's a start and i hope more households will be capped. 40 isn't much at all.[/p][/quote]Charming. What's your stance re. people who claim benefits because they're in work but are too poorly paid in order to pay their bills? Do you 'lump' everyone together? Buryite1
  • Score: 0

12:19pm Tue 28 Jan 14

buckfeed17 says...

Maybe they should find a better paid job/career. Claiming benefits shouldn't be necessary, live within your means and no one should have to claim them. Only have kids if you can afford to, if not, don't have any.Only get a house you can afford and put away for a rainy day. Job done
Maybe they should find a better paid job/career. Claiming benefits shouldn't be necessary, live within your means and no one should have to claim them. Only have kids if you can afford to, if not, don't have any.Only get a house you can afford and put away for a rainy day. Job done buckfeed17
  • Score: 1

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree