Third attempt for Darwen farm turbine plan
2:00pm Thursday 17th January 2013 in News
By Dan Clough, Reporter
PLANS for a controversial wind turbine have been submitted a third time by the owner of a farm near Bull Hill.
Elizabeth Gott, of Pleasant View Farm, has applied to erect a turbine measuring 64.2metres from its base to the tip of the blade on land at the farm.
A previous application was thrown out by planners in October due to its adverse impact on residents and insufficient information about the noise.
That application had been submitted after plans for an 88.5-metre turbine were withdrawn by the applicant.
The initial application sparked a furious response from residents who set up protest group ACT (Against Cranberry Turbine), fronted by Cranberry Fold Court resident Martin Vizzard, whose home would have been closest to the development.
Mrs Gott has now applied for a re-sited turbine that would be 482metres from Mr Vizzard’s home.
Mr Vizzard said the campaign group would be seeking a public consultation on the turbine.
He said: “We are yet to be convinced at the validity of noise information supplied by the applicant.
“They have moved the turbine but closer to other people’s homes. We are seeking a minimum separation distance of 500metres from homes for a turbine of that size. We will hold a public meeting in the future and will certainly be lobbying councillors.”
Fellow ACT member Wayne Silver said: “It is the same height as before but higher up the slope so it will actually be more prominent on the landscape.”
Coun Jean Rigby opposed the previous applications and said her position remained the same.
She said: “I am concerned about the flicker effect to residents and the noise element. I don’t understand why they keep trying.
“It will be visible for a huge distance. Why does it need to be so big if it is just to power a farm?”
No-one was available to comment on behalf of the applicants.
Comments(5)
2 for 5p
says...
3:24am Fri 18 Jan 13
eastlancslad wrote:i bet you still want electric . were should it come from NIMBY
'No-one was available to comment on behalf of the applicants.' Head buried too deep in the trough, no doubt. Elizabeth Gott, don't you get it? Nobody wants your chuffin' great useless eyesore. Just give it a rest, will you.
warymarty
says...
9:36am Fri 18 Jan 13
She said: “I am concerned about the flicker effect to residents and the noise element. I don’t understand why they keep trying."
Jean, it's all about the thi edge of the wedge and money.
louderfasterlonger
says...
6:04pm Sat 19 Jan 13
The residents in the area are stuck between a rock and a hard place.
Mart8
says...
11:55pm Sat 19 Jan 13
Just a little more information as well, we already have a wind turbine in 'our back yard'! Actually 600 metres away to be exact which makes plenty of noise. If we listen to people like you and back down when someone says complaining is being a NIMBY wind turbine developers will take full advantage. Just like they have the right to apply, we have the right to question them.
May i respectfully suggest the next time you call someone a NIMBY you do a little research on what we are trying to achieve. You clearly have not done that on this occasion.
Kind Regards
Martin Vizzard
www.againstcranberry
turbine.com

eastlancslad says...
3:41pm Thu 17 Jan 13
Head buried too deep in the trough, no doubt.
Elizabeth Gott, don't you get it? Nobody wants your chuffin' great useless eyesore. Just give it a rest, will you.