Three people killed in motorway horror smash were going to Bolton wedding attended by Amir Khan
8:37am Thursday 27th December 2012 in News
TWO children and woman killed in a horror crash on Christmas day were travelling to a wedding attended by Amir Khan.
The two brothers named as Adnan Habib, 10, and Mohammed Arsalaan Habib, four, and a 32-year-old woman, named as Bushra Tazarib died following a crash in the northbound land of the M6 in Staffordshire between junctions 14, near Stafford, and 15, near Stoke-on-Trent, at about 11:25am.
All three were from High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, and were travelling to a family wedding in the Greater Manchester area, police said.
The mother of the boys, who was driving, survived the crash along with a relative, who was a passenger. Both were treated in hospital and have since been discharged.
The wedding took place at the Excellency Centre.
Comments(42)
Hough64
says...
1:42pm Thu 27 Dec 12
brian jones
says...
2:44pm Thu 27 Dec 12
zoomzam
says...
3:12pm Thu 27 Dec 12
Brit moaner
says...
5:16pm Thu 27 Dec 12
SHUT IT !!!
honkytonk1
says...
5:29pm Thu 27 Dec 12
it must be the most horrendous feeling losing a family so sudden when they were on their way to a celebration.
may l express my condolence to all.
Hough64
says...
6:12pm Thu 27 Dec 12
mustafa-moan wrote:And you know this fact how exactly?
I believe she was wearing a niqab when the accident occurred, if this is the case then they should be banned whilst driving! I think the media are once again omiting very relevant details to hide the full truth!
Hough64
says...
6:16pm Thu 27 Dec 12
mustafa-moan wrote:Please tell us how you know this fact before asking opinions.
My point is that maybe if she wasn't wearing the niqab then nobody would have died! I'm debating whether or not the niqab is a practical garment to wear whilst driving? Any opinions anyone?
Hough64
says...
6:17pm Thu 27 Dec 12
mustafa-moan wrote:So basically you read it in some trashy tabloid so it must be true? That makes you a sheep my dear.
Hough64 wrote:I said "I believe" in my earlier post, so not a fact, however I have read a couple of articles relating to this story and they would tend to imply she was.
mustafa-moan wrote:And you know this fact how exactly?
I believe she was wearing a niqab when the accident occurred, if this is the case then they should be banned whilst driving! I think the media are once again omiting very relevant details to hide the full truth!
Hough64
says...
6:21pm Thu 27 Dec 12
mustafa-moan wrote:So if her tyre blew, or she skidded on oil, or any other reason that cause other fatal crashes, are only happening because of wearing such a garment? So all the thousands of deaths on our roads are caused by wearing one? Silly man...go and get some facts before trying to spread heresay and gossip.
My point is that maybe if she wasn't wearing the niqab then nobody would have died! I'm debating whether or not the niqab is a practical garment to wear whilst driving? Any opinions anyone?
Hough64
says...
7:58pm Thu 27 Dec 12
mustafa-moan wrote:So tell us where you read it or put a link on here please. And why would I get into a discussion about the garment impairing vision if it has no relevance to the story? Until it has been proven this is the case you should not be speculating. The lady has lost her two children. Show some respect.
None of the above probable explanations could be helped hough if that is in fact how the accident did happen, however (not yet fact) if and I repeat "if" she was wearing the niqab and as long as there were no other anomalies as you stated, then the impaired vision caused by the niqab could be a contributory factor, do you agree or not? Oh and I don't read tabloids, the WWW is a font of endless knowledge providing one knows where to look!
Rememberscarborough
says...
8:35pm Thu 27 Dec 12
mr.mark.c
says...
9:36pm Thu 27 Dec 12
Please try and have some sympathy before spouting blame, I think the Mother who was driving does not need any help in feeling guilty, she will feel that it his her fault no matter how it happened.
The BBC has better information http://www.bbc.co.uk
/news/uk-20853405
Citizen Cane
says...
9:48pm Thu 27 Dec 12
Lets be clear that millions of otherwise innocent drivers are penalised each year through speed camera fines on the pretext (lie) of road safety improvement. An accident such as this, with three needless fatalities, needs to be thoroughly investigated and appropriate action taken depending upon the cause identified.
davroduk1
says...
5:04pm Fri 28 Dec 12
But this time the **** is out of order.
Innocent lives have been lost, and any comments should reflect that fact.
If this woman was wearing a garment that impaired her driving then that will have to be investigated at a later date, and then post your comments about that fact on that stories thread.
It does not matter what ethnic minority or majority these people came from, we should remember that a family has lost three members in terrible circumstances.
Leave the **** for another thread.
davoovad
says...
6:46pm Fri 28 Dec 12
mustafa-moan wrote:I agree, there is talk on the web that she was wearing a niqab at the time of the accident, they should be banned and to all those who are saying this is not the time or the place just be thankful none of your nearest and dearest where not involved..
None of the above probable explanations could be helped hough if that is in fact how the accident did happen, however (not yet fact) if and I repeat "if" she was wearing the niqab and as long as there were no other anomalies as you stated, then the impaired vision caused by the niqab could be a contributory factor, do you agree or not? Oh and I don't read tabloids, the WWW is a font of endless knowledge providing one knows where to look!
pjgarside
says...
7:23pm Fri 28 Dec 12
mr.mark.c
says...
8:47pm Fri 28 Dec 12
mustafa-moan wrote:Much the same as bike helmets then ??????????
davoovad wrote:They certainly should be banned in many places, but behind the wheel of a 1 tonne 70 mph bullet it is an absolute necessity!
mustafa-moan wrote:I agree, there is talk on the web that she was wearing a niqab at the time of the accident, they should be banned and to all those who are saying this is not the time or the place just be thankful none of your nearest and dearest where not involved..
None of the above probable explanations could be helped hough if that is in fact how the accident did happen, however (not yet fact) if and I repeat "if" she was wearing the niqab and as long as there were no other anomalies as you stated, then the impaired vision caused by the niqab could be a contributory factor, do you agree or not? Oh and I don't read tabloids, the WWW is a font of endless knowledge providing one knows where to look!
Maybe F1 should ban the helmet???
Get a life
JustBecause
says...
4:51pm Sat 29 Dec 12
judyben
says...
8:45pm Sat 29 Dec 12
pjgarside wrote:Seeing their photographs in the newspaper was heartbreaking. Condolences to the families.
God bless three stars that will shine so bright in so many hearts
Don Kiddick
says...
11:13am Sun 30 Dec 12
pjgarside wrote:Yeh, like your god never killed anybody. Idiot.
God bless three stars that will shine so bright in so many hearts
WanderersIdiot
says...
2:56pm Sun 30 Dec 12
Don Kiddick
says...
4:43pm Sun 30 Dec 12
WanderersIdiot wrote:thank you for re-iterating a comment made just a few lines up the page. Your incisive plagarism has made an immeasurable contribution to the discussion. Well done.
Irrelevant if she was wearing a hijab... Motorcyclists wear helmets...
Don Kiddick
says...
8:43pm Sun 30 Dec 12
JustBecause wrote:Shouldn't you be out on the streets with the other no-mark, pathetic thugs who think they can solve a problem with their fists? I can imagine the type of parents that dragged you up. What a pathetic waste of blood and guts.
Mustafa, have you got nothing better to do than bring your racist crap in here you ****, its about time you got a good kicking you arsehole.
Zain-Bolton
says...
10:22pm Sun 30 Dec 12
If I throw a stick, will you leave?
Zain-Bolton
says...
9:41am Mon 31 Dec 12
davoovad wrote:I agree, there is talk on the web that she was wearing a niqab
mustafa-moan wrote:I agree, there is talk on the web that she was wearing a niqab at the time of the accident, they should be banned and to all those who are saying this is not the time or the place just be thankful none of your nearest and dearest where not involved..
None of the above probable explanations could be helped hough if that is in fact how the accident did happen, however (not yet fact) if and I repeat "if" she was wearing the niqab and as long as there were no other anomalies as you stated, then the impaired vision caused by the niqab could be a contributory factor, do you agree or not? Oh and I don't read tabloids, the WWW is a font of endless knowledge providing one knows where to look!
Really, talk on the web?
Is it BBC, Reuters, Sky News or is it that both you davoovad and mustafa-moan are making up inane drivel?
I am waiting for a link from any credible news source.
Nice to see both you trolls have used the death of children so you can sprout your putrid agenda.
Zain-Bolton
says...
9:48am Mon 31 Dec 12
Don Kiddick
says...
12:09pm Mon 31 Dec 12
Zain-Bolton wrote:Well, shall we start with The Nile takeaway?
Why is it davoovad and mustafa-moan that the majority of your comments are to do with people of ethnic background?
Zain-Bolton
says...
1:02pm Mon 31 Dec 12
Don Kiddick wrote:What exactly does a take away have to do with the tragic death of a woman and these two little boys?
Zain-Bolton wrote:Well, shall we start with The Nile takeaway?
Why is it davoovad and mustafa-moan that the majority of your comments are to do with people of ethnic background?
Oh right, you are generalising all people of ethnicity.
Now you are really showing your level of simplicity.
I think you would be more suited on the BNP forum. You know the one the Black National Party.
saj70n
says...
3:28pm Mon 31 Dec 12
you are one low life
Don Kiddick
says...
3:58pm Mon 31 Dec 12
saj70n wrote:not killed anyone though has he.
mustafa moron
you are one low life
Zain-Bolton
says...
7:35pm Mon 31 Dec 12
Don Kiddick wrote:No he hasn’t killed anybody.
saj70n wrote:not killed anyone though has he.
mustafa moron
you are one low life
What he has done is accuse a mother of killing her children by wearing a piece of clothing, and therefore insinuate she is directly responsible for what happened. These are totally baseless accusations. We are all entitled to free speech, but these are not comments these are accusations. What he has done is vile and revolting and you are a parasite for defending his actions.
Don Kiddick
says...
10:28am Tue 1 Jan 13
Zain-Bolton wrote:Well actually a parasite takes from its host rather than adds to it - English not a strong point? Whatever, Mustafa-Moan made a perfectly reasonable point and your dismissal of it shows you to be the racist, not him. Anything that impairs vision increases risk including motorcycle helmets - however a helmet is a necessary item of safety equipement unlike a niqab which serves no useful purpose whatsoever.
Don Kiddick wrote:No he hasn’t killed anybody.
saj70n wrote:not killed anyone though has he.
mustafa moron
you are one low life
What he has done is accuse a mother of killing her children by wearing a piece of clothing, and therefore insinuate she is directly responsible for what happened. These are totally baseless accusations. We are all entitled to free speech, but these are not comments these are accusations. What he has done is vile and revolting and you are a parasite for defending his actions.
Zain-Bolton
says...
11:52am Tue 1 Jan 13
Don Kiddick wrote:You are fuelling this posts because of what he wrote.
Zain-Bolton wrote:Well actually a parasite takes from its host rather than adds to it - English not a strong point? Whatever, Mustafa-Moan made a perfectly reasonable point and your dismissal of it shows you to be the racist, not him. Anything that impairs vision increases risk including motorcycle helmets - however a helmet is a necessary item of safety equipement unlike a niqab which serves no useful purpose whatsoever.
Don Kiddick wrote:No he hasn’t killed anybody.
saj70n wrote:not killed anyone though has he.
mustafa moron
you are one low life
What he has done is accuse a mother of killing her children by wearing a piece of clothing, and therefore insinuate she is directly responsible for what happened. These are totally baseless accusations. We are all entitled to free speech, but these are not comments these are accusations. What he has done is vile and revolting and you are a parasite for defending his actions.
That is Parasitism.
Mustafa-Moan made a perfectly reasonable point.
Really?
I believe she was wearing a niqab.
That’s not a point it is an accusation.
Mustafa-Moan made a perfectly reasonable point and your dismissal of it shows you to be the racist
Really?
He makes an unfounded accusation I asked him to prove it. He does not, so I totally disregard what he says and dismiss it as fodder.
And this makes me a racist?
Common sense not your strong point is it?
In an earlier post I asked the question.
Why is it davoovad and mustafa-moan that the majority of your comments are to do with people of ethnic background?
And you replied.
Well, shall we start with The Nile takeaway?”
Please enlighten us all as to the relationship between the accident and the take away.
Don Kiddick
says...
2:11pm Tue 1 Jan 13
boltonnut
says...
2:14pm Tue 1 Jan 13
roadkillking
says...
2:33pm Tue 1 Jan 13
i simulated the niqab or whatever its called, just out of curiosity. and i can say it does severely restrict vision.
also a motorcycle helmet has approximately 10-15 times more free area.
ps i am not racist. not that i care what you think.
Zain-Bolton
says...
4:21am Wed 2 Jan 13
Don Kiddick wrote:“A parasite latches on to a healthy host and gradually erodes it until it dies.”
you really do not have a clue do you? a parasite latches on to a healthy host and gradually erodes it until it dies, much like scroungers leaching from a benefit system. So you're actually agreeing with Mustafa-Moan. Next we move to the term "fodder" which means only one thing and that's food - which is what we all rely on to sustain our lives, so again you're adding weight to the the opposing argument. Finally "I believe she was wearing a niqab" isn't the accusative case - but you've chosen to distort the phrase because you're a pathetic and arrogant racist.
Really?
Not all parasites kill the hosts they are attached to. A parasite by definition is something that feeds off a person (or a so-called 'host'). You can look it up here http://www.urbandict
ionary.com/define.ph
p?term=parasite. As I stated earlier you are fuelling these posts because of what Mustafa-Moan wrote. That is Parasitism.
“Much like scroungers leaching from a benefit system.”
Ok I don’t know how scroungers and benefits came in the post, but I guess that is your modus operandi.
“So you're actually agreeing with Mustafa-Moan.”
Agreeing about what? In fact what are you drivelling on about?
“Next we move to the term "fodder" which means only one thing and that's food - which is what we all rely on to sustain our lives, so again you're adding weight to the the opposing argument.”
Really?
Are you actually stating that we all eat fodder?
Speak for yourself.
Fodder or animal feed is any agricultural foodstuff used specifically to feed domesticated livestock, such as cattle, goats, sheep, horses, chickens and pigs (source Wikipedia)
If you are eating this stuff that really explains a lot.
"I believe she was wearing a niqab isn't the accusative case - but you've chosen to distort the phrase."
Ok let’s try and go with this point, but please be aware I am doing this to accommodate you in regards to your non accusative point of view. So if I said to you these non-accusative words. I believe you are a cretin, I believe you are a moronic, I believe you are an imbecile, I believe you are a racist who hides behind the façade of debate but actually hate people of ethnic minority. I believe my sofa has more seats than the BNP. I believe you are a person who eats cattle food.
Are these “accusative case” comments I have mentioned above?
Well according to your logic no.
What you need to do is put what mustafa moan wrote in to context.
A family travelling along the motorway, an accident happens, 2 young children and a woman die in the accident. The mother of the 2 children was the driver of the car, as of yet the public do not know the cause of the accident. Mustafa moan who constantly post comments when ethnic minorities are involved writes “I believe she was wearing a niqab when the accident occurred.” He writes this without providing not a shred of evidence from any credible news source, despite being asked time and time again to provide it.
What mustafa moan has done is accused the mother of causing an accident because wearing a piece of clothing (niquab), and therefore insinuate she is directly responsible for what happened. The death of 2 beautiful little boys and their auntie.
According to you because I have stated this I am a pathetic racist.
Have I ever mentioned or have any knowledge of your or anybody else’s skin colour or religion?
No.
Do I know of your or mustafa moan’s ethnicity?
No.
So how you came to this conclusion I do not know.
I think the horse feed you are eating might have distorted what little thought process you originally had.
I truly and sincerely worry about you and your unusual desire for eating cattle food. I suggest you see medical advice for your condition.
Zain-Bolton
says...
12:49pm Wed 2 Jan 13
Don Kiddick wrote:In an earlier post I asked the question.
Zain-Bolton wrote:Well, shall we start with The Nile takeaway?
Why is it davoovad and mustafa-moan that the majority of your comments are to do with people of ethnic background?
What exactly does a take away have to do with the tragic death of a woman and these two little boys?
You choose to ignore this question.
Yet keep posting comments that I am a racist.
I can assure you it is a sincerely innocent question.
Please enlighten us all as to the relationship between the accident and the take away.
Crazy 38
says...
1:50pm Wed 2 Jan 13
grimtown
says...
5:30pm Wed 2 Jan 13
But bank holidays are notorious for fatal travel accidents,
Why are the BEN covering this story
grimtown
says...
5:30pm Wed 2 Jan 13
But bank holidays are notorious for fatal travel accidents,
Why are the BEN covering this story
bolton-born-n-bred says...
10:21am Thu 27 Dec 12