Oswaldtwistle cleaner who stole form 93-year-old woman in spared jail

Jacqueline Leishman Jacqueline Leishman

A CLEANER who emptied a 93-year-old woman’s bank account of more than £4,100 has been spared immediate jail.

Jacqueline Leishman had also been a long-time friend of vuln-erable victim Irene Neild, as well as a trusted worker.

Her mother, who has come up with the cash to pay the pens-ioner back, helped save her from prison. Mother-of-two Leishm-an’s lawyer produced a £4,170.55 cheque, the full amount the def-endant stole from the victim’s current acc-ount, when she app-eared for sentence at Burnley Crown Court.

Leishman was said to have succumbed to temptation when she had debts at home, but didn’t have the courage to ask her family for help over her financial pressures. She stole the money over several months from Mrs Neild, a great grandmother-of-seven, after the pensioner gave her her bank card and PIN number to do her food shopping, and get her cash.

Leishman 50, of Rhyddings Street, Oswaldtwistle, now said to be a full-time carer for her disabled husband, had admitted theft. She was sentenced to eight months in jail, suspended for two years, with 150 hours unpaid work.

Michael Wallbank, prosecut-ing, told the court Mrs Neild, who lived in sheltered accomm-odation, was deaf, had limited mobility, and was unable to leave her home without help.

The defendant had known Mrs Neild for some years and had cleaned for her regularly for 11 years. In, or around, last December, Mrs Neild got a letter from her bank, informing her her account was overdrawn.

In March, her daughter was aware she had received a further letter saying she was still overdrawn. They went through bank statements and found, between August 2011 and March 2012, there had been 30 unauthorised cash withdrawals. Darren Lee-Smith, for Leishman, said the cheque to pay back Mrs Neild had come from the defendant’s mother as a loan.

Sentencing, Judge Andrew Woolman said Leishman was of previous good character and came from a respectable family.

He told her: “It’s surprising to see you in the dock. I have read letters from other people for whom you have worked and they seem to trust you implicitly, despite the fact they obviously know you have pleaded guilty.”

Comments(12)

big bird says...
8:28pm Fri 2 Nov 12

Two mistakes in the headline this time. Going from bad to worse! Do you not have a human proof reader?

Good call says...
8:43pm Fri 2 Nov 12

Yet if you commit the evil crime of offending someone on twitter,Facebook or any other communication network, you will get sent to prison.

MrMungus says...
9:59pm Fri 2 Nov 12

Was this typed by one of the infinite number of chimps? Get a grip.

woolywords says...
7:01am Sat 3 Nov 12

what message does this send to the perpetrators of crime by her walking free from Courts?

what a complete abrogation our justice system.
jail her, for at least 6 months, you spineless bench of justice!
She was willing and able to steal the money in the first place, betraying a position of trust...

She now and suddenly has to care, full time , for her partner, how tragic, how sad..get to jail, you thieving scoundrel..

These Magistrates are supposed to represent the people...just which part of Lah-Lah land are they from?

And LT, if my comment offend some peoples, they should look to their own before throwing stones at me, for I am the son of two magistrates and am assured that this act would warrant a prison term. I asked my Mum before commenting and she said, 6 months.
read and weep..
My Mum knows best.

.

Info-warrior says...
8:13am Sat 3 Nov 12

woolywords says...what message does this send to the perpetrators of crime by her walking free from Courts?

Should that not be FORM COURTS..?

woolywords says...
8:33am Sat 3 Nov 12

Trust is a quantity that cannot be measured on a scale but when it goes wrong, we expect that justice tilts the scales towards punishment for the offender. The least we expect is that betrayal of trust incurs a very stiff penalty of imprisonment.
For when someone were to walk free from Court, it flies in the face of what we call, the very values of crime and punishment.
You have to question what is going on in our justice system for this to happen. Can I be arrested for speaking out in moral outrage when these sentences are gifted?
I sincerely hope so, because as it stands, our justice system is failing both me and you. Currently, you can shoplift at 10, be bailed by 12, then re-arrested by 2 and that cannot be a message that promotes law and order.

Just as you are fingerprinted and DNA swabbed when arrested, why not give a test for drugs. It's no big thing, is it?
We breath test alleged drunk drivers and many of them go home. Do a drugs test at the same time.. Far better that than the current farcical situation.

Oh dear, how sad, you have an habit to feed... let's get our nurse to attend you.
Here's some Probation and Counselling to go on with, before your next epic failure in your sad life.
Surely, if we are going to run some sort of kindly society, can we not jail these drugs abusers for a month or two, just to wean them off it.

To just bail them and then do the assinine thing of letting them go scot free at next appearance is, to say the least, just plain stupid. Why not insist they are chemically implanted with the drug, Naltrexone?
None of this going on Methodone, where they leave bottles for children to sup the last dregs of .This is an implant, studies show it works better than the current withdrawal systems. Better yet, you can't trade it for cash to get another hit, as it's stuck under your skin.

I volunteer to jag these people, since I used to give it to little porkers with iron injections. Their incessant squealing and wriggling won't bother me in the least, Mr Mannering,Sir.
As my Uncle Joe said, get a firm grip of that hind leg, stick it in, press the plunger, job's a good 'un, lad.
Don't worry if you drop a piglet on this side of the wicket gate, I jag the wriggley beggar in the other leg, you cack handed idiot.

mavrick says...
9:06am Sat 3 Nov 12

I think she was harshly treated, If she was an MP who deliberately falsified expense claims, she would only have got suspended from parliament. On a serious note the judicial system in this country is as out of touch as the politicians.

woolywords says...
9:18am Sat 3 Nov 12

have this story viral..
best comment so far...
'Do not pass go, do not collect £200, go straight to jail, it's not Monopoly money, you sad piece of work, it's someone's Mom!'

woolywords says...
9:22am Sat 3 Nov 12

'Send her to where I live, in South Manhatten Island, the street lights are off, she can work it off here.What a damned lousy trick to turn. May your God forgive you, mine won't.'

woolywords says...
9:27am Sat 3 Nov 12

'Jeez ****, I thought you still had hanging, flogging and whipping going on there..flay the hide off her and hang on the shed.'

wotever says...
10:03am Sat 3 Nov 12

Omg how many errors in one news story, standards are certainly slipping, I would never let a story go out in that state, employ some proof readers LET you are so embarassing

Fire Fly says...
11:13am Sat 3 Nov 12

@ woolywords...I think we've got the message, you're unhappy lol !

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree