Firework yobs target Burnley disabled man's house

ARSONISTS with fireworks have targeted the house of a disabled man.

Police said three lit fireworks were pushed through the letter box of the terrace house in Ford Street, Burnley, at 10pm on Saturday, which started a ‘slow burning fire’.

The blaze caused significant damage to a front room, which was being used as a bedroom.

Firefighters spent an hour at the blaze and have now launched an investigation with police.

A spokesman for Lancashire Fire and Rescue Service said: “The house was occupied, but the owner had moved out for a few days.

“In the meantime, someone has put a window through and thrown some quite big fireworks into the front room, which was being used as a bedroom, because the man isn’t so good on his feet.

“It was quite a serious fire — it’s wrecked the room and has smoke damaged the rest of the property.

“If the man had been in, then the consequences could have been very serious.

“People don’t realise what damage fireworks can do if they are set off in a confined space.”

DS Charlie Haynes of Burnley CID said: “Three fireworks were ignited and pushed through the letterbox, and firefighters had to force entry to get in.

“The house has since been boarded up and we are in the process of examining CCTV footage of the area, and the fireworks which were recovered from the scene.

“This had the potential to be a very serious fire as it is a terraced property.”

Anyone who saw anything suspicious in the area at the time is asked to call Burnley CID on 01282 472240.

Comments(9)

frank says...
11:47am Mon 29 Oct 12

i could suggest where these arsonist thugs put lit fireworks, but whats the point of getting a post deleted.
sad.

DaveBurnley says...
12:09pm Mon 29 Oct 12

If they get caught and taken to court they will be "full of remorse" and "had been drinking". They will then get a strong telling off and sent on their way.

AnthonyUK says...
1:59pm Mon 29 Oct 12

teens and kids who do things like this should be named and shamed with photographs of them sent to all firework retailers and they should be blacklisted so they never get to buy fireworks ever again and that should also apply to all firework offenders regardless of age. If they are too young to be prosecuted jail their parents and/or shove the kids into care. That'll punish them.

Major Tom says...
3:34pm Mon 29 Oct 12

No doubt their parents were off their heads on booze and drugs while breeding another one.
They should catch them and force them into hard labour camps. Little *@$t@rd$.

mavrick says...
5:24pm Mon 29 Oct 12

There is no reason to have fireworks on sale to the general public.

AnthonyUK says...
5:42pm Mon 29 Oct 12

And I hate killjoys and spoilsports and nampypamby dogooders like you mavrick trying to curtail them from sensible home use! I used some sensibly on saturday at a halloween party and nobody got injured and I will be displaying again privately saturday sunday and monday as well. That sort of sensible use should not be curtailed or frowned on because of the actions of a stupid imbecile youth mentality. Its the retail trade responsible for underage sales you should be attacking you idiot. A ban will only result in an illegal blackmarket of dangerous imported fireworks being sold to the public but ignorant people like you refuse point blank to see that.

Fire Fly says...
8:03pm Mon 29 Oct 12

AnthonyUK wrote:
And I hate killjoys and spoilsports and nampypamby dogooders like you mavrick trying to curtail them from sensible home use! I used some sensibly on saturday at a halloween party and nobody got injured and I will be displaying again privately saturday sunday and monday as well. That sort of sensible use should not be curtailed or frowned on because of the actions of a stupid imbecile youth mentality. Its the retail trade responsible for underage sales you should be attacking you idiot. A ban will only result in an illegal blackmarket of dangerous imported fireworks being sold to the public but ignorant people like you refuse point blank to see that.
Whilst making some valid points, its a shame you lower yourself to insulting others on here with name calling.

I think maverick's made a valid point also. At the end of the day, fireworks are dangerous & year after year, they fall into the hands of the wrong people who do stupid things like this. We dont allow youths to drive until they're 17 because a cars a dangerous thing in the wrong hand, drink age limits for the same reason.

If fireworks are to be sold to the public, it should be to over 21's in my opinion. Not a cure all but it would help.

AnthonyUK says...
9:46pm Mon 29 Oct 12

Why should sensible home use of fireworks be banned? I put on a safe display at a halloween party saturday using commercially available category 3 retail display fireworks:-everybody was 25 metres away as recommended by the safety warning on them, I wore fire retardant overalls hard hat goggles and suitable footwear firing them and I took great care to set them up securely and properly (where that is necessary) so they didnt fall over while going off. Nobody got hurt and everybody enjoyed the display immensely. I will be doing the same on saturday and monday using full ppe as stated with just basic eye protection for a box of small garden fireworks for a friends kids on sunday(for which eye protection is quite sensible).

I think mavrick that you unfairly and unrealistically tar all firework use with the same brush lumping in responsible use with irresponsible use in calling for a retail sale/use ban. The sensible majority, on the whole, don't thankfully do what these yobs did and enjoy fireworks sensibly every year and largely don't get injured with them.

HairyBowls says...
12:53am Tue 30 Oct 12

Mmmm. They should be charged with at least arson with intent to endanger life, but the reality, if caught, will be well short of that.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree